Skip to content

An Exploratory Study of Rebamipide in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

An Exploratory Study of Rebamipide in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00463151
Enrollment
124
Registered
2007-04-20
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2008-08-31
Last updated
2021-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colitis, Ulcerative

Keywords

Rebamipide, Enema, Ulcerative Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of rebamipide by once daily intracolonial administration at 0 (placebo), 60, 150, or 300 mg for 6 weeks in patients with active ulcerative colitis, who are being treated with oral aminosalicylic acid (ASA).

Interventions

DRUGrebamipide

0, 60, 150, 300mg of rebamipide per day for 6 weeks into colon

Sponsors

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with active ulcerative colitis 2. Patients having an insufficient response to ASA oral formulation: (1) Patients whose ongoing use of ASA oral formulation from ≥2 weeks prior to the day before registration is fixed at mesalazine ≥2 g/day or salazosulfapyridine 3-6 g/day, (2) Patients with continuous bloody stools from ≥2 weeks prior to the day before registration, (3) Patients whose DAI subscores are ≥2 points for bloody stools and ≥2 points for endoscopic findings 3. Patients shown via colonoscopy to have major lesions between the sigmoid colon and rectum (with lesions not extending beyond the splenic flexure) 4. Outpatients

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have a history of intestinal resection (other than appendiceal resection) 2. Patients who have a complication of malignant tumor 3. Female patients who are pregnant, lactating, or possibly pregnant, or who hope to become pregnant during the study period 4. Patients who have complications of serious cardiac, hepatic or renal impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)Week 6Definition of clinical improvement: a decrease of Disease Activity Index \[DAI\] score for rectal bleeding to either 0 or 1 point and a decrease of ≥1 point in the DAI score for findings on endoscopy from the baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)Week 6Definition of remission: a decrease of the total DAI scores for rectal bleeding and findings on endoscopy to 0 points
Mean Change From Baseline in Total DAI ScoreBaseline and Week 6DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.
Percentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreBaseline and week 6DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) ScoreBaseline and Week 6The index consisted of 4 subscales: granulation scattering reflected light, vascular pattern, vulnerability of mucosa, and mucosal damage. Each subscale was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 and the total score (the sum of all 4 subscores) ranges from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rebamipide 60 mg
Once daily intracolonial administration at a dose of 60 mg for 6 weeks
35
Rebamipide 150 mg
Once daily intracolonial administration at a dose of 150 mg for 6 weeks
29
Rebamipide 300 mg
Once daily intracolonial administration at a dose of 300 mg for 6 weeks
27
Placebo
Once daily intracolonial administration of placebo for 6 weeks
30
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0010
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2525
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRebamipide 60 mgRebamipide 150 mgRebamipide 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
34 Participants26 Participants25 Participants28 Participants113 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
35 Participants29 Participants27 Participants30 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants16 Participants8 Participants14 Participants52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants13 Participants19 Participants16 Participants69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 290 / 290 / 31
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 3520 / 2918 / 2922 / 31
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 352 / 290 / 291 / 31

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)

Definition of clinical improvement: a decrease of Disease Activity Index \[DAI\] score for rectal bleeding to either 0 or 1 point and a decrease of ≥1 point in the DAI score for findings on endoscopy from the baseline

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set: subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom postdose efficacy data were obtained

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rebamipide 60 mgClinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)31.4 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgClinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)24.1 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgClinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)44.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Improvement Rate (Number of Subjects Showing Clinical Improvement/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)30.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)

Definition of remission: a decrease of the total DAI scores for rectal bleeding and findings on endoscopy to 0 points

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set: subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom postdose efficacy data were obtained

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rebamipide 60 mgClinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)2.9 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgClinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)0.0 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgClinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)18.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboClinical Remission (Number of Subjects Showing Remission/Number of Subjects Evaluated x 100)3.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score

DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3; the total score ranges from 0 to 12 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change in mean score indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set: subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom postdose efficacy data were obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebamipide 60 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score-2.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Rebamipide 150 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Rebamipide 300 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score-3.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total DAI Score-2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score

The index consisted of 4 subscales: granulation scattering reflected light, vascular pattern, vulnerability of mucosa, and mucosal damage. Each subscale was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 and the total score (the sum of all 4 subscores) ranges from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set: subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom postdose efficacy data were obtained

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rebamipide 60 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score-1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Rebamipide 150 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score-1.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Rebamipide 300 mgMean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score-2.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Total Endoscopic Index (EI) Score-1.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Secondary

Percentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI Subscore

DAI measures disease activity through assessment of 4 items/subscales: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, findings on endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Each item of the score is assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with a higher score representing greater severity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and week 6

Population: Full Analysis Set: subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and for whom postdose efficacy data were obtained

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rebamipide 60 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreStool frequency48.6 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 60 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreRectal bleeding65.7 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 60 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscorePhysician's global assessment48.6 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 60 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreFindings on endoscopy39.4 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreStool frequency31.0 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscorePhysician's global assessment31.0 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreRectal bleeding51.7 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 150 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreFindings on endoscopy26.9 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreFindings on endoscopy53.8 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreStool frequency59.3 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscorePhysician's global assessment51.9 percentage of participants
Rebamipide 300 mgPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreRectal bleeding66.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscorePhysician's global assessment36.70 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreStool frequency10.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreRectal bleeding63.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Subjects Showing Improvement in Each DAI SubscoreFindings on endoscopy48.1 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026