Skip to content

Sutent and Radiation as Treatment for Limited Extent Metastatic Cancer

Phase I/II Study of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy and Concurrent and Adjuvant Sutent (SU11248) as Treatment for Oligometastatic Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00463060
Enrollment
47
Registered
2007-04-19
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2018-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

erlotinib, celecoxib, radiation, progression-free survival

Brief summary

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, with approximately 90% of deaths resulting from patients with metastatic spread. Save for notable exceptions such as testicular cancer, chemotherapy alone cannot cure patients with metastases. Some patients with limited metastatic deposits (most commonly colon cancer spread to the liver) can be cured with surgery followed by chemotherapy. Therefore, some patients with metastases should be considered for aggressive local therapy (surgery and/or radiation). Even though chemotherapy has improved significantly, patients treated with conventional chemotherapy and/or biologically targeted therapy are not cured of their disease. For the most common types of cancer, chemotherapy alone can shrink or stabilize tumors for an average of 6 months before the tumors regrow. Both chemotherapy and biologically targeted therapy have major limitations preventing cure of these patients. Radiation therapy is an effective modality of treating cancer. Until recently, radiation for metastases was used only to relieve symptoms resulting from local tumor growth. Technological advances, including stereotactic radiotherapy, allow for radiation to be more precisely delivered to the tumor while sparing nearby normal organs. Stereotactic radiotherapy can completely eradicate local tumors with minimal side effects. Stereotactic radiotherapy has never been combined with drug therapy. Sutent is a new F.D.A. approved cancer therapy that targets tumor blood vessels. It is effective against two types of cancer that rarely respond to chemotherapy (GI stromal tumors and kidney cancer). We propose combining biologically targeted drug therapy with physically targeted stereotactic radiotherapy. Our goal is to determine if this is a safe regimen and the best method of combining these treatments. Ultimately, our goal is to cure some patients with previously incurable metastatic cancer with this combination.

Interventions

Sutent administered PO QD from days 1 to 28 Two weeks after completion of any chemotherapy, maintenance Sutent in 6 week cycles (consisting of Sutent 50 mg PO QD weeks 1-4 followed by no treatment weeks 5-6) until progression or death If no chemotherapy is planned, maintenance Sutent (as described above) will start on day 43.

PROCEDUREradiotherapy

Radiation is to be delivered to each site over 10 fractions separated by at least 16 hours. Up to 5 sites may be treated

Sponsors

Pfizer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Zubrod Performance Scale 0-1 * Metastatic disease confirmed by biopsy or imaging * 5 or fewer sites of metastatic disease on tumor staging (either CT chest/abdomen/pelvis plus bone scan or whole body FDG-PET) * All tumors measure \< 6 cm * Age \> 18 * Chemotherapy must be completed at least 2 weeks prior to radiation * Signed informed consent * Adequate bone marrow function, defined as follows; 1. Platelets \> 100,000 cells/mm3 based upon CBC/differential obtained within 2 weeks prior to registration on study 2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \> 1,800 cells/mm3 based on CBC/differential obtained within 2 weeks prior to registration on study 3. Hemoglobin \> 8.0 g/dl based upon CBC/differential obtained within 2 weeks prior to registration on study (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb \> 8.0 g/dt is acceptable.)

Exclusion criteria

* Other coexisting malignancies or malignancies diagnosed within the previous 3 years with the exception of basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ, and other treated malignancies with no evidence of disease for at least 3 years * Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF), unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with the study requirements * Patients with clinically significant pulmonary dysfunction, cardiomyopathy, or any history of clinically significant CHF are excluded. The exclusion of patients with active coronary heart disease will be at the discretion of the attending physician. * Patients with exudative, bloody, or cytologically malignant effusions are not eligible. * Pregnancy or breast feeding (Women of child-bearing potential are eligible, but must consent to using effective contraception during therapy and for at least 3 months after completing therapy) * Patients must have no uncontrolled active infection other than that not curable without treatment of their cancer. * Prior radiation to target area * Patient may not be receiving any other investigational agents during radiotherapy. * Prior history of non-inducible bleeding (12/16/09). * Requirement for continuation of anticoagulation (defined as Coumadin, lovenox, heparin, plavix, aspirin, NSAIDs or similar drugs) during treatment (12/16/09) * Under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)2 yearsSunitinib (SU) and radiation (IGRT) doses were sequentially escalated using a ping-pong strategy according to a 3 + 3 design phase 1 study. The starting dose was sunitinib 25 mg and IGRT 40 Gy. MTD reflects the highest dose that did not cause a dose limiting toxicity. Toxicity was in assessed in patients at regular intervals by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria (version 3.0). Dose limiting events were defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity and unexpected grade 3 toxicity. Expected grade 3 toxicities from radiation include mucositis or esophagitis lasting ≤7 days. Grade 3 metabolic and hematologic toxicities are considered expected events with sunitinib and therefore were not considered DLTs
Number of Participants With Particular Disease Status5 yearsNumber of participants who have no evidence of disease and number of participants with distant metastases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Distant Control4 weeksDistant control defined as distant metastasis contained outside of the radiation field within months of treatment.
Percentage of Patients With Toxicity Grade 3 or Higher5 years% of patients experienced one or more grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Toxicity is graded as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), or life-threatening (Grade 4),and death (Grade 5).
Number of Participants According Failure and Survival4 years
Quality of Life4-6 weeks after radiation therapy
Percentage of Patients With Local Control4 yearsLocal control was defined as a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment period began January 2007 and was open for recruitment through July 2014 with 47 patients enrolled in the study between February 2007 and September 2010.

Pre-assignment details

One patient withdrew prior to starting treatment and was excluded from analysis. Phase 1: 21 patients in Phase 1 in dose-escalating study to find maximum-tolerated dose Phase 2: 25 patients on the recommended phase II dose, 37.5mg

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase I
N=21 participants Patients enrolled between Feb 2007 and May 2008
21
Phase II Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancy
Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytological documented advanced solid tumor malignancy with radiographic evidence of 1 to 5 sites of active metastatic disease. N=26 participants Patients enrolled between February 2008 and September 2010
25
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Phase 1-Radiation 50Gy +Sunitinib 50mgacute toxicity5
Phase 2-Radiation 50Gy +Sunitinib 37.5mgWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase II Advanced Solid Tumor MalignancyTotalPhase I
Age, Continuous63 years64 years65 years
ECOG Performance status
0
4 participants11 participants7 participants
ECOG Performance status
1
13 participants22 participants9 participants
ECOG Performance status
2
8 participants13 participants5 participants
Largest Tumor size
<=3cm
15 participants26 participants11 participants
Largest Tumor size
>=3cm
10 participants20 participants10 participants
Number of involved organs
1
14 participants31 participants17 participants
Number of involved organs
>=2
11 participants15 participants4 participants
Number of metastases
1
13 participants26 participants13 participants
Number of metastases
2
5 participants8 participants3 participants
Number of metastases
>=3
7 participants12 participants5 participants
Prior radiation therapy
No
15 participants25 participants10 participants
Prior radiation therapy
Yes
10 participants21 participants11 participants
Prior systemic chemotherapy
No
14 participants22 participants8 participants
Prior systemic chemotherapy
Yes
11 participants24 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants14 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants32 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 2118 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 2126 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 2113 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)

Sunitinib (SU) and radiation (IGRT) doses were sequentially escalated using a ping-pong strategy according to a 3 + 3 design phase 1 study. The starting dose was sunitinib 25 mg and IGRT 40 Gy. MTD reflects the highest dose that did not cause a dose limiting toxicity. Toxicity was in assessed in patients at regular intervals by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria (version 3.0). Dose limiting events were defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity and unexpected grade 3 toxicity. Expected grade 3 toxicities from radiation include mucositis or esophagitis lasting ≤7 days. Grade 3 metabolic and hematologic toxicities are considered expected events with sunitinib and therefore were not considered DLTs

Time frame: 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Suniitnib 37.5 mgNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)0 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 50Gy + Sunitinib 37.5mgNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)1 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 50Gy + Sunitinib 50mgNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Particular Disease Status

Number of participants who have no evidence of disease and number of participants with distant metastases.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Phase 2 only

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants With Particular Disease StatusNo evidence of disease12 participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants With Particular Disease Statusdistant metastases3 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants According Failure and Survival

Time frame: 4 years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivalalive without evidence of disease12 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivalalive with distant metastases3 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivaldead from distant metasteses22 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivaldead from local progression1 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivaldead from comorbid illness6 Participants
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgNumber of Participants According Failure and Survivaldead from treatment-related toxicities2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Distant Control

Distant control defined as distant metastasis contained outside of the radiation field within months of treatment.

Time frame: 4 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgPercentage of Patients With Distant Control40 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Local Control

Local control was defined as a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: the 4-year estimates for local control

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgPercentage of Patients With Local Control75 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Toxicity Grade 3 or Higher

% of patients experienced one or more grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Toxicity is graded as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), or life-threatening (Grade 4),and death (Grade 5).

Time frame: 5 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Sunitinib 25 mgPercentage of Patients With Toxicity Grade 3 or Higher15 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life

Time frame: 4-6 weeks after radiation therapy

Population: data not collected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026