Skip to content

Open Label Study of Subcutaneous Homoharringtonine (Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate) in Patients With Advanced CML

A Phase II Open-Label Study of the Subcutaneous Administration of Homoharringtonine. (Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate; OMA) in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Myeloid. Leukemia (CML) Who Have Failed or Are Intolerant to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00462943
Enrollment
100
Registered
2007-04-19
Start date
2007-03-07
Completion date
2013-06-27
Last updated
2021-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

CML, HHT, Homoharringtonine, Omacetaxine

Brief summary

A Phase II open-label trial of subcutaneous HHT (omacetaxine mepesuccinate) in the treatment of patients who are resistant to or intolerant to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Detailed description

This will be an open label, multicenter study of subcutaneous HHT (omacetaxine mepesuccinate) therapy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic, accelerated, or blast phase who have failed or are intolerant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Patients will be treated with induction course cycles consisting of subcutaneous (SC) HHT 1.25 mg/m² twice daily for 14 consecutive days every 28 days. Patients will be evaluated every 7 days with complete blood and platelet counts while undergoing induction therapy; the number of consecutive doses of HHT or intervals between subsequent cycles may be adjusted, as clinically indicated, according to guidelines provided in the treatment plan.

Interventions

Induction: 1.25mg/m\^2 subcutaneously twice daily for 14 consecutive days, every 28 days. Maintenance: 1.25mg/m\^2 subcutaneously twice daily for 7 consecutive days, every 28 days. Response targets during induction vary by chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) subclass (chronic, accelerated, or blast phase). Participants will complete at least one cycle (14 days treatment of a 28 day cycle) of induction therapy before changing to maintenance therapy. Participants not demonstrating evidence of clinical response after 6 induction cycles will be considered for removal from the study.

Sponsors

Cephalon
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients, age 18 years or older * Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in either chronic, accelerated, or blast phase * Patients will have either failed, demonstrated intolerance, or a combination of prior failure and intolerance, to prior treatments with at least two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI's). Failure of TKI treatment may either be primary (never achieved a response) or secondary resistance (loss of response). * Acceptable Renal and Liver Function * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. * Sexually active patients and their partners must use an effective double barrier method of contraception

Exclusion criteria

* New York Heart Association classification (NYHA) class III or IV heart disease, active ischemia or any other uncontrolled cardiac condition * Myocardial infarction in the previous 12 weeks. * Other concurrent illness which would preclude study conduct and assessment * uncontrolled and active infection, and positive HIV or positive HTLV I/II status, whether on treatment or not. * Pregnant or lactating. * Any medical or psychiatric condition, which may compromise the ability to give written informed consent or to comply with the study protocol. * Lymphoid Ph+ blast crisis * Patient is enrolled in another clinical investigation within 30 days of enrollment or is receiving another investigational agent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total PopulationDay 1 up to 6 monthsSubpopulations reflect chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) phases at the time of enrollment: chronic, accelerated, and blast phase. Primary endpoints as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee were used for the primary analyses. Overall hematologic response for chronic phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall hematologic response for accelerated or blast phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL), or return to chronic phase (RCP). Hematologic response must last \>= 8 weeks to be considered meaningful. Response rates by disease phase were examined relative to an a priori value of 2.5% using a one-sided lower 95% exact binomial confidence limit. If the lower limit from the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit exceeds 2.5%, the observed response rate will have exceeded the minimum threshold required to demonstrate efficacy.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total PopulationDay 1 up to 9 monthsSubpopulations reflect chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) phases at the time of enrollment: chronic, accelerated, and blast phase. Primary endpoints as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee were used for the primary analyses. Major cytogenetic response includes complete or partial response. Both confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response is considered meaningful. Unconfirmed response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation for participants where a confirmatory evaluation is not available. Complete response shows 0% Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells. A partial response shows \>0% - 35% Ph+ cells. Response rates by disease phase were examined relative to an a priori value of 2.5% using a one-sided lower 95% exact binomial confidence limit. If the lower limit from the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit exceeds 2.5%, the observed response rate will have exceeded the minimum threshold required to demonstrate efficacy.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Totalup to 4 yearsTEAE are any untoward events that were newly occurring or worsening from Baseline. Treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be unrelated, possibly, probably or unknown related to study drug. Severity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A participant is only counted once in each category (at worst severity or strongest relationship).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryDay 1 up to Month 6Complete Response (CHR) * Chronic phase must last at least 8 weeks: WBC \<10\*10\^9/liter, platelets \<450\*10\^9/liter, myelocytes + metamyelocytes \<5% in blood, no blasts or promyelocytes in blood, \<20% basophils in peripheral blood, no extramedullary involvement. * Accelerated and Blast phase must last at least 4 weeks: absolute neutrophil count 1.5\*10\^9/liter, platelets 100\*10\^9/liter, no blood blasts, bone marrow blasts \<5%, no extramedullary disease. Partial Response - CHR plus one or more of the following: * Persistence of splenomegaly with a reduction of ≥50% from pre-treatment * Platelets \> 450\*10\^9/L * Presence of immature cells in the peripheral blood * 5% to 25% blasts in the bone marrow * If extra-medullary disease pre-treatment, reduction by ≥50% Hematologic Improvement - CHR, except allowing persistent thrombocytopenia (\<100\*10\^9/L), and a few immature cells No evidence of leukemia: Morphologic leukemia-free state, defined as \<5% bone marrow blasts.
Percentage of Participants With Extramedullary Disease (EMD) at Baseline Achieving a Clinical ResponseDay 1 up to Month 9Clinical response was defined by disease phase and based on evaluations by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). Chronic Phase subgroup: achieving a complete hematologic response and/or major cytogenetic response (complete cytogenetic response or partial cytogenetic response, confirmed or unconfirmed). Accelerated Phase and Blast Phase subgroups: achieving complete hematologic response, no evidence of leukemia, return to chronic phase, and/or major cytogenetic response (complete cytogenetic response or partial cytogenetic response, confirmed or unconfirmed).
Percentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABLDay 1 up to Month 9Summarization is based on the best of the individual response assessments. Not assessable indicates that the participant either had no baseline assessment or the % mutation could not be determined in the post-baseline assessment(s).
Number of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic ResponseDay 1 up to Month 6Induction therapy was administered for 14 consecutive days for each 28 days cycle, for up to 6 cycles. All treatment arms were given omacetaxine mepesuccinate via subcutaneous (SC) administration at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID) for the 14 consecutive days.
Number of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic ResponseDay 1 up to Month 9
Percentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Day 1 up to Month 9Cytogenetic response categories: * Complete: 0% Ph+ cells * Partial: \>0%-35% Ph+ cells * Minor: \>35%-65% Ph+ cells * Minimal: \>65%-95% Ph+ cells * No Response: \>95% Ph+ cells * Unevaluable: \<20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Cytogenetic ResponseDay 1 up to Month 9Time to onset was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Participants who did not achieve a response are censored at their last visit day. Major cytogenetic response includes complete or partial response. Both confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response is considered meaningful. Unconfirmed response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation for participants where a confirmatory evaluation is not available. Complete response shows 0% Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells. A partial response shows \>0% - 35% Ph+ cells.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Hematologic Responseup to four yearsDuration of response is defined as the time from first reported date of hematologic response until the earliest date of objective evidence of disease progression, relapse or death. Data was censored at the last examination date for participants with ongoing response or participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than adverse event, disease progression or death.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Cytogenetic Responseup to four yearsDuration of response is defined as the time from first reported date of cytogenetic response until the earliest date of objective evidence of disease progression, relapse or death. Data was censored at the last examination date for participants with ongoing response or participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than adverse event, disease progression or death.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progressionup to 4 yearsTime to disease progression is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment until the onset date of death, the development of CML accelerated phase or blast phase, or the loss of complete hematologic response or major cytogenetic response, whichever came first. Participants were censored only if they did not have progression or if they discontinued treatment for reasons other than AE, progression or death.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survivalup to 4 yearsOverall survival is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment until death from any cause or the last day of participant contact or evaluation for participants that were lost to follow-up. Participants were censored t the last recorded contract or evaluation when a participant was alive at time of analysis. A quarterly phone survey was conducted to collect survival data for participants who discontinued from the study.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic ResponseDay 1 up to Month 6Time to onset was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Participants who did not achieve a response are censored at their last visit day. Overall hematologic response for chronic phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall hematologic response for accelerated or blast phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL), or return to chronic phase (RCP). Hematologic response must last \>= 8 weeks to be considered meaningful.
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUSDay 1 up to Month 6MMR is defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/standard gene of less than 0.1% according to the international scale. BCR-ABL is a fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region \[BCR\] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene \[ABL\] genes). This analysis used the standard gene GUS. Analysis was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of peripheral blood.
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABLDay 1 up to Month 6MMR is defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/standard gene of less than 0.1% according to the international scale. BCR-ABL is a fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region \[BCR\] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene \[ABL\] genes). This analysis used the standard gene ABL. Analysis was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of peripheral blood.

Countries

Canada, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CML: Chronic Phase
Study participants with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase at the time of enrollment. Treatment was the same for all cohorts: induction therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 14 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 6 cycles. Maintenance therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 7 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 24 months.
46
CML: Accelerated Phase
Study participants with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the accelerated phase at the time of enrollment. Treatment was the same for all cohorts: induction therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 14 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 6 cycles. Maintenance therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 7 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 24 months.
31
CML: Blast Phase
Study participants with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the blast phase at the time of enrollment. Treatment was the same for all cohorts: induction therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 14 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 6 cycles. Maintenance therapy was subcutaneous (SC) administration of omacetaxine at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID), administered for 7 consecutive days every 28 (±3) days for up to 24 months.
23
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event641
Overall StudyBone Marrow Transplant100
Overall StudyDeath527
Overall StudyDisease Progression15159
Overall StudyFailure to achieve a response551
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyRequest of Patient, PI, Sponsor or RA824
Overall StudyRequired Lymphocyte Infusion100
Overall StudyStem Cell Transplant110
Overall StudyTransplant - not specified101
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCML: Chronic PhaseCML: Accelerated PhaseCML: Blast PhaseTotal
Age, Continuous58 years56 years57 years57 years
Body Surface Area (BSA)1.9 meters^21.7 meters^21.9 meters^21.9 meters^2
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
Grade 0
27 participants7 participants6 participants40 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
Grade 1
17 participants19 participants11 participants47 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
Grade 2
2 participants5 participants5 participants12 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
Grade 3
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Height167.7 centimeter167.5 centimeter171.0 centimeter167.6 centimeter
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Class I
44 participants29 participants23 participants96 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Class II
2 participants0 participants0 participants2 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Class III
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Class IV
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
Not available
0 participants2 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 participants7 participants4 participants18 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
2 participants4 participants5 participants11 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
31 participants17 participants12 participants60 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 participants2 participants1 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants1 participants1 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants12 Participants9 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants19 Participants14 Participants59 Participants
Time from Initial Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Diagnosis74.4 months83.5 months68.7 months74.0 months
Weight79.5 kilograms67.4 kilograms74.0 kilograms74.2 kilograms

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
99 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
63 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total

TEAE are any untoward events that were newly occurring or worsening from Baseline. Treatment related toxicity was considered by the investigator to be unrelated, possibly, probably or unknown related to study drug. Severity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0 on the following scale: Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening, Grade 5 = death. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that is fatal or life-threatening; results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity; requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient; and conditions not included in the above that may jeopardize the patient or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. A participant is only counted once in each category (at worst severity or strongest relationship).

Time frame: up to 4 years

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study or follow-up35 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 417 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 318 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 24 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDiscontinued treatment due to AE10 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWith hematologic toxicity36 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>=1 TEAE46 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unknown1 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Probably36 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Possibly5 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>= 1 SAE26 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study (outcome of SAE)6 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unrelated4 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 56 participants
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 11 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>=1 TEAE31 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study (outcome of SAE)6 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>= 1 SAE19 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 10 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 24 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 36 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 415 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 56 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unrelated4 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Possibly11 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Probably14 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unknown2 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWith hematologic toxicity22 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDiscontinued treatment due to AE11 participants
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study or follow-up25 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWith hematologic toxicity13 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study or follow-up21 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDiscontinued treatment due to AE6 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unknown1 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>= 1 SAE18 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 22 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study (outcome of SAE)11 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Possibly7 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 511 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 34 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>=1 TEAE23 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 10 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unrelated7 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 46 participants
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Probably8 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 438 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 523 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWith hematologic toxicity71 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unrelated15 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>=1 TEAE100 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Possibly23 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study or follow-up71 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Probably58 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalRelation to drug: Unknown4 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 210 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 11 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDeaths during study (outcome of SAE)23 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalWorst severity: Grade 328 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and TotalDiscontinued treatment due to AE27 participants
Total ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Subpopulation and Total>= 1 SAE63 participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population

Subpopulations reflect chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) phases at the time of enrollment: chronic, accelerated, and blast phase. Primary endpoints as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee were used for the primary analyses. Major cytogenetic response includes complete or partial response. Both confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response is considered meaningful. Unconfirmed response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation for participants where a confirmatory evaluation is not available. Complete response shows 0% Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells. A partial response shows \>0% - 35% Ph+ cells. Response rates by disease phase were examined relative to an a priori value of 2.5% using a one-sided lower 95% exact binomial confidence limit. If the lower limit from the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit exceeds 2.5%, the observed response rate will have exceeded the minimum threshold required to demonstrate efficacy.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 9 months

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population21.7 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population3.2 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Major Cytogenetic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population11 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population

Subpopulations reflect chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) phases at the time of enrollment: chronic, accelerated, and blast phase. Primary endpoints as adjudicated by the Data Monitoring Committee were used for the primary analyses. Overall hematologic response for chronic phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall hematologic response for accelerated or blast phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL), or return to chronic phase (RCP). Hematologic response must last \>= 8 weeks to be considered meaningful. Response rates by disease phase were examined relative to an a priori value of 2.5% using a one-sided lower 95% exact binomial confidence limit. If the lower limit from the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit exceeds 2.5%, the observed response rate will have exceeded the minimum threshold required to demonstrate efficacy.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 6 months

Population: Intent to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population67.4 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population25.8 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population8.7 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving an Overall Hematologic Response by Subpopulation and Total Population41.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Cytogenetic Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from first reported date of cytogenetic response until the earliest date of objective evidence of disease progression, relapse or death. Data was censored at the last examination date for participants with ongoing response or participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than adverse event, disease progression or death.

Time frame: up to four years

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had a response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Cytogenetic Response6.01 months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Cytogenetic Response0.07 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Hematologic Response

Duration of response is defined as the time from first reported date of hematologic response until the earliest date of objective evidence of disease progression, relapse or death. Data was censored at the last examination date for participants with ongoing response or participants who discontinued treatment for reasons other than adverse event, disease progression or death.

Time frame: up to four years

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had a response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Hematologic Response7.01 months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Hematologic Response5.47 months
CML: Blast PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Best Hematologic Response2.67 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment until death from any cause or the last day of participant contact or evaluation for participants that were lost to follow-up. Participants were censored t the last recorded contract or evaluation when a participant was alive at time of analysis. A quarterly phone survey was conducted to collect survival data for participants who discontinued from the study.

Time frame: up to 4 years

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival33.91 months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival17.27 months
CML: Blast PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival3.52 months
Total ParticipantsKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival17.27 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression

Time to disease progression is defined as the time from the initiation of treatment until the onset date of death, the development of CML accelerated phase or blast phase, or the loss of complete hematologic response or major cytogenetic response, whichever came first. Participants were censored only if they did not have progression or if they discontinued treatment for reasons other than AE, progression or death.

Time frame: up to 4 years

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression7.50 months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression4.84 months
CML: Blast PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression2.04 months
Total ParticipantsKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Disease Progression4.38 months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Cytogenetic Response

Time to onset was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Participants who did not achieve a response are censored at their last visit day. Major cytogenetic response includes complete or partial response. Both confirmed and unconfirmed major cytogenetic response is considered meaningful. Unconfirmed response is based on a single bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation for participants where a confirmatory evaluation is not available. Complete response shows 0% Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) cells. A partial response shows \>0% - 35% Ph+ cells.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 9

Population: Intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Cytogenetic ResponseNA months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Cytogenetic ResponseNA months
CML: Blast PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Cytogenetic ResponseNA months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic Response

Time to onset was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Participants who did not achieve a response are censored at their last visit day. Overall hematologic response for chronic phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR). Overall hematologic response for accelerated or blast phase participants includes confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR), no evidence of leukemia (NEL), or return to chronic phase (RCP). Hematologic response must last \>= 8 weeks to be considered meaningful.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 6

Population: Intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic Response1.38 months
CML: Accelerated PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic ResponseNA months
CML: Blast PhaseKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic ResponseNA months
Total ParticipantsKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Onset of Best Hematologic Response5.03 months
Secondary

Number of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic Response

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 9

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had a cytogenetic response

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic Response2.0 treatment cycles
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic Response1.5 treatment cycles
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic Response1.0 treatment cycles
Total ParticipantsNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Cytogenetic Response2.0 treatment cycles
Secondary

Number of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic Response

Induction therapy was administered for 14 consecutive days for each 28 days cycle, for up to 6 cycles. All treatment arms were given omacetaxine mepesuccinate via subcutaneous (SC) administration at 1.25 mg/m\^2 twice a day (BID) for the 14 consecutive days.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 6

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had a response to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CML: Chronic PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic Response1.0 treatment cycles
CML: Accelerated PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic Response2.0 treatment cycles
CML: Blast PhaseNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic Response2.0 treatment cycles
Total ParticipantsNumber of Treatment Cycles Needed to Achieve Best Hematologic Response1.0 treatment cycles
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)

Cytogenetic response categories: * Complete: 0% Ph+ cells * Partial: \>0%-35% Ph+ cells * Minor: \>35%-65% Ph+ cells * Minimal: \>65%-95% Ph+ cells * No Response: \>95% Ph+ cells * Unevaluable: \<20 metaphases were examined and/or response could not be assigned

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 9

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Complete4.3 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Partial17.4 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minor8.7 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minimal6.5 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)No Response39.1 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Unevaluable23.9 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Partial3.2 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minor9.7 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minimal6.5 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)No Response61.3 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Complete0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Unevaluable19.4 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minimal4.3 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)No Response30.4 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Unevaluable65.2 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Partial0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minor0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Complete0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minor7.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Minimal6.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Complete2.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)No Response44.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Partial9.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Cytogenetic Response Category Representing the Degree of Suppression of the Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph+)Unevaluable32.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response Category

Complete Response (CHR) * Chronic phase must last at least 8 weeks: WBC \<10\*10\^9/liter, platelets \<450\*10\^9/liter, myelocytes + metamyelocytes \<5% in blood, no blasts or promyelocytes in blood, \<20% basophils in peripheral blood, no extramedullary involvement. * Accelerated and Blast phase must last at least 4 weeks: absolute neutrophil count 1.5\*10\^9/liter, platelets 100\*10\^9/liter, no blood blasts, bone marrow blasts \<5%, no extramedullary disease. Partial Response - CHR plus one or more of the following: * Persistence of splenomegaly with a reduction of ≥50% from pre-treatment * Platelets \> 450\*10\^9/L * Presence of immature cells in the peripheral blood * 5% to 25% blasts in the bone marrow * If extra-medullary disease pre-treatment, reduction by ≥50% Hematologic Improvement - CHR, except allowing persistent thrombocytopenia (\<100\*10\^9/L), and a few immature cells No evidence of leukemia: Morphologic leukemia-free state, defined as \<5% bone marrow blasts.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 6

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryComplete response67.4 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo response21.7 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo evidence of leukemiaNA percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryPartial response0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryUnevaluable10.9 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryHematologic improvement0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryReturn to chronic phaseNA percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo response58.1 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryReturn to chronic phase6.5 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryHematologic improvement9.7 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo evidence of leukemia0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryUnevaluable3.2 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryPartial response3.2 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryComplete response19.4 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryReturn to chronic phase0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryComplete response8.7 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryPartial response0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryHematologic improvement4.3 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo evidence of leukemia0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo response78.3 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryUnevaluable8.7 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryHematologic improvement4.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryUnevaluable8.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo response46.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryPartial response1.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryComplete response39.0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryNo evidence of leukemia0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants in Each Hematologic Response CategoryReturn to chronic phase2.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Extramedullary Disease (EMD) at Baseline Achieving a Clinical Response

Clinical response was defined by disease phase and based on evaluations by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). Chronic Phase subgroup: achieving a complete hematologic response and/or major cytogenetic response (complete cytogenetic response or partial cytogenetic response, confirmed or unconfirmed). Accelerated Phase and Blast Phase subgroups: achieving complete hematologic response, no evidence of leukemia, return to chronic phase, and/or major cytogenetic response (complete cytogenetic response or partial cytogenetic response, confirmed or unconfirmed).

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 9

Population: Intent to treat population of study participants who had extramedullary disease at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With Extramedullary Disease (EMD) at Baseline Achieving a Clinical ResponseClinical response0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With Extramedullary Disease (EMD) at Baseline Achieving a Clinical ResponseUnevaluable50 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABL

MMR is defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/standard gene of less than 0.1% according to the international scale. BCR-ABL is a fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region \[BCR\] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene \[ABL\] genes). This analysis used the standard gene ABL. Analysis was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of peripheral blood.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 6

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had evaluable samples. Participants with no data for these analyses either had degraded samples or the samples were missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABL10.5 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABL4.3 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABL0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene ABL6.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUS

MMR is defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/standard gene of less than 0.1% according to the international scale. BCR-ABL is a fusion gene of the breakpoint cluster region \[BCR\] gene and Abelson proto-oncogene \[ABL\] genes). This analysis used the standard gene GUS. Analysis was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of peripheral blood.

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 6

Population: Intent to treat population of participants who had evaluable samples. Participants with no data for these analyses either had degraded samples or the samples were missing.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUS13.6 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUS0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUS0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Representing the Degree of Suppression of BCR-ABL Transcript Levels Using the Housekeeping Gene GUS6.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL

Summarization is based on the best of the individual response assessments. Not assessable indicates that the participant either had no baseline assessment or the % mutation could not be determined in the post-baseline assessment(s).

Time frame: Day 1 up to Month 9

Population: Intent to treat population of participants with post-baseline assessment of T315I mutated BCR ABL

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL100% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL0% reduction78.9 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL1-24% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL75-99% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABLNot assessable21.1 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL50-74% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Chronic PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL25-49% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL0% reduction91.3 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL25-49% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL50-74% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL1-24% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABLNot assessable8.7 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL75-99% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Accelerated PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL100% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL25-49% reduction9.1 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL100% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL75-99% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL50-74% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL1-24% reduction0 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL0% reduction63.3 percentage of participants
CML: Blast PhasePercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABLNot assessable27.3 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL50-74% reduction0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABLNot assessable18.1 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL0% reduction80.6 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL75-99% reduction0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL100% reduction0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL1-24% reduction0 percentage of participants
Total ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With the Largest Percentage Reduction From Baseline of T315I Mutated BCR-ABL25-49% reduction1.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026