Skip to content

A Study to Determine the Number of Patients Who Reach Optimal Cholesterol Levels on Each of Three Different Treatments (0653A-121)

A MC, DB, Rand, Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Eze/Simva 10/40 mg, Atorva 40 mg, Rosuva 10 mg in Achieving LDL-C <2 mmol/l in Pts With CVD...on Simva 40 mg With LDL-C ³2 mmol/l

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00462748
Enrollment
786
Registered
2007-04-19
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2008-06-30
Last updated
2024-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

To evaluate the percentage of patients with either established cardiovascular disease (CVD), at high risk of developing CVD or with diabetes who are on simvastatin 40mg, with fasting LDL-C \> 2mmol/l, who are able to attain the recommended LDL-C target of \< 2mmol/l following 6 weeks treatment with either ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40mg, atorvastatin 40mg or rosuvastatin 10mg.

Interventions

ezetimibe (+) simvastatin 10/40mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally, cholesterol lowering medication.

atorvastatin 40mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally

rosuvastatin 10 mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally.

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient Is Male Or Female And Aged Over 18 * Patient Provides Written Informed Consent * Patient Has A Fasting Ldl-C Level \>2mmol/L At Both Visit 1 And Again At Visit 2 * Patient Has Established Cvd, Diabetes Or At High Risk Of Cvd (\>20 % Risk Over 10 Years, Framingham Scale) * Patient Has Taken Simvastatin 40mg Continuously For The Past 6 Weeks * Patient Has A Fasting Triglyceride Level Of \<3.7mmol/L * Patient Has Hba1c \<9% At Visit 1 * Patient Is 75% Compliant With Medication Between Visit 1 And Visit 2

Exclusion criteria

* Patient Is Hypersensitive To Any Of The Study Medications Or Their Components * Patient Has A History Of, Or Active Liver Disease (Persistent Elevation Of Alt / Ast (\>3xuln) * Patient Is Pregnant, Lactating, Or A Female Patient Of Childbearing Potential Not Using Adequate Contraception * Patient Has Severe Renal Impairment: Creatinine Clearance \<30ml/Min (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) (In Patients With Moderate Renal Impairment: \<60ml/Min, The Dose Of Rosuvastatin Will Be 5mg In Line With The Spc) * Patient Has Uncontrolled Endocrine Or Metabolic Disease Known To Influence Serum Lipids Or Lipoproteins (I.E. Secondary Causes Of Hyperlipidaemia Such As Hypothyroidism Or Hyperthyroidism) * Patient Has A Recent History Of, Or Current, Alcohol Abuse * Patient Has Ck \>10 X Uln At Visit 1 Or Visit 2 * Patient Has Fasting Ldl-C \>4.2mmol/L * Patient Has Any Acute Or Serious Condition, Or History Suggestive Of Myopathy Or Predisposing To The Development Of Renal Failure Secondary To Rhabdomyolysis (E.G. Sepsis, Hypotension, Major Surgery, Trauma, Severe Metabolic, Severe Endocrine And Electrolyte Disorders Or Uncontrolled Seizures)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End6 WeeksFasting LDL-C was the primary efficacy variable. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the proportion of patients achieving a target of \<2mmol/l in fasting LDL-C at study end.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients with diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD) or a high risk of developing CVD and a fasting LDL-C level of ≥2mmol/l, having been on simvastatin 40mg for 6 weeks were assigned to 10/40 mg ezetimibe/simvastatin; 40 mg atorvastatin; 10 mg rosuvastatin (5 mg in elderly/Asian patients (in line with UK SPC)) between 27/03/2007 and 31/03/2008

Pre-assignment details

All patients were subjected to a 6 week run-in period on open label 40 mg simvastatin to stabilise their LDL-C levels. Patients whose LDL-C at the end of this period was below 2.0 mmol/l or who were \<75% compliant with run-in medication, were excluded from the study

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ezetimibe/Simvastatin
ezetimibe (+) simvastatin 10/40mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally
261
Atorvostatin
atorvastatin 40mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally
263
Rosuvastatin
rosuvastatin 10 mg. once daily tablet formulation, all tablet form, taken orally
262
Total786

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event759
Overall StudyDiscontinued after 41 days Rx100
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up111
Overall StudyProtocol Violation021
Overall StudyWithdrew consent330

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEzetimibe/SimvastatinAtorvostatinRosuvastatinTotal
Age, Continuous64.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.65
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.44
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.61
64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.56
Age, Customized
< 70 years
185 participants187 participants195 participants567 participants
Age, Customized
>=70 years
76 participants76 participants67 participants219 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
4 Participants0 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
254 Participants261 Participants257 Participants772 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants78 Participants84 Participants263 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
160 Participants185 Participants178 Participants523 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / —1 / —8 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / —2 / —4 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End

Fasting LDL-C was the primary efficacy variable. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the proportion of patients achieving a target of \<2mmol/l in fasting LDL-C at study end.

Time frame: 6 Weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) all patients who were:~* Randomised~* Took at least one dose of double-blind medication~* Had a baseline measurement of efficacy~* Had a post-baseline measurement of efficacy~Patients were analysed according to the treatment group they were randomised, regardless of the treatment they received

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Ezetimibe/SimvastatinPercentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End67.4 Percent
AtorvostatinPercentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End36.3 Percent
RosuvastatinPercentage of Patients Achieving a Target of Fasting LDL-C of <2mmol/l at Study End17.4 Percent
Comparison: Ho is no difference in proportion achieving the target of LDL-C \< 2mmol/l.. 240 patients per group give a power of at least 85% to detect a 15% difference in this proportion, assuming the percentage decrease from baseline in LDL-C was 25% in the E/S group and 15% in the two comparator groups. A two-sided 0.025 test to allow for multiple comparisons was used.p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Ho is no difference in proportion achieving the target of LDL-C \< 2mmol/l.. 240 patients per group give a power of at least 85% to detect a 15% difference in this proportion, assuming the percentage decrease from baseline in LDL-C was 25% in the E/S group and 15% in the two comparator groups. A two-sided 0.025 test to allow for multiple comparisons was used.p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026