Skip to content

Patient-Centered Heart Failure Trial

Patient-Centered Disease Management for Heart Failure Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00461513
Acronym
PCDM
Enrollment
384
Registered
2007-04-18
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2018-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Congestive

Keywords

Heart Failure, Congestive, Disease Management, Health Status, Quality of Life, Telemedicine, Depression

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a patient-centered disease management intervention for VA patients with heart failure.

Detailed description

Background/Rationale: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the VA. Disease management is a promising strategy to improve care and outcomes, but evidence supporting CHF disease management is inconsistent and open questions remain. Prior studies have not evaluated a multi-modal intervention combining multidisciplinary collaborative care, telemonitoring, promotion of patient self-care, and an explicit intervention for comorbid depression, which is a barrier to optimal CHF care and outcomes. Moreover, the effectiveness of CHF disease management has not been evaluated in the VA. Objective(s): We propose to evaluate a Patient-Centered Disease Management (PCDM) intervention that includes case finding, collaborative care management for both CHF and comorbid depression, and home telemonitoring. The primary aim will be to ascertain whether the PCDM intervention results in better patient health status (i.e. symptom burden, functional status, and quality of life) than usual care. Secondary aims will include assessment of whether the intervention will reduce hospitalizations or mortality, result in more guideline-concordant care, and reduce depression while increasing patient medication adherence, self-efficacy and satisfaction with treatment. Methods: We propose a 3-year, multi-site randomized study. VA patients with CHF from 4 VA Medical Centers (Denver, Palo Alto, Richmond, and Seattle) and their affiliated clinics who have diminished CHF-specific health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores\<50) will be eligible. We will randomize enrolled patients to a 12-month PCDM intervention versus usual care (target 300 patients in each arm). The PCDM intervention will include collaborative care management for CHF and comorbid depression and daily telemonitoring. Patient self-care will be promoted through the telemonitoring intervention and the depression intervention. The primary analysis will be a comparison of change in health status (KCCQ scores) between enrollment and 12 months for the intervention versus usual care groups. Secondary analyses will include comparison of rates of hospitalization and death, depressive symptoms, the proportion of patients with guideline concordant CHF care, medication adherence, 6-minute walk test, self-efficacy, and patient satisfaction. In addition, cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. All analyses will be intention to treat. Impact: If successful, the proposed intervention will improve the quality of care and outcomes of veterans with CHF and be cost effective. The intervention has the potential to serve as model for other disease management interventions in the VA, and is designed as an 'effectiveness' trial to enhance implementation. This study will be a joint effort of the CHF and IHD QUERI groups, Patient Care Services, and Office of Care Coordination. The study directly addresses several aims of the recently published 'QUERI: A New Direction' position statement, including: a) partnership between QUERI groups; b) explicit collaborative ties between QUERI and 'operational' components of the VA (i.e. Patient Care Services and Office of Care Coordination); c) focus beyond a single disease entity (i.e. CHF and depression); and d) clinical studies of interventions that might be candidates for national VA implementation. Moreover, this study specifically engages patients in their care and emphasizes quality of life outcomes, both of central import to the VA health care mission.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALIntervention

Disease management has emerged as a promising strategy to improve the outcomes of patients with CHF. Disease management in this study will use a multidisciplinary collaborative care, leveraging health information technology, and focusing on patient self-care.Collaborative care is the use of multidisciplinary teams to deliver evidence-based treatment to a defined population of patients with chronic illness.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure; * low health status.

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive/psychiatric impairment (inability to complete questionnaires); * nursing home resident; * irreversible non-cardiac medical condition likely to affect 6-month survival or ability to execute study protocol; * prior heart transplantation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Chronic Heart Failure Health Status Between Baseline and 12 Months.12 monthsThe primary outcome was average change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score. This is reported for each group (Intervention and Usual Care). The average for each group and standard deviation are reported. A positive score change represents an improvement in overall patient health status for the group of patients with congestive heart failure. A negative score change represents a worsening in overall patient health status for the group of patients with congestive heart failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality at 1 Year12 monthsMortality at 1 year
Hospitalization at 1 Year12 monthsHospitalization at 1 year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intervention Group
Baseline characteristics of patients who enrolled and were randomized to the Intervention Group, and who had at least one follow-up Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (at 3, 6, or 12 months). Therefore the total number completed in the Intervention Arm was 165, but we had at least one follow-up Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire result on 187 patients.
187
Usual Care Group
Baseline characteristics of patients who enrolled and were randomized to the Usual Care Group, and who had at least one follow-up Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (at 3, 6, or 12 months).Therefore the total number completed in the Usual Care Arm was 172, but we had at least one follow-up Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire result on 197 patients.
197
Total384

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntervention GroupUsual Care GroupTotal
Age, Continuous67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Overall Score37.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
36.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
37.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white race
38 participants32 participants70 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White race
149 participants165 participants314 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
178 Participants193 Participants371 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1870 / 197
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1870 / 197

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Chronic Heart Failure Health Status Between Baseline and 12 Months.

The primary outcome was average change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score. This is reported for each group (Intervention and Usual Care). The average for each group and standard deviation are reported. A positive score change represents an improvement in overall patient health status for the group of patients with congestive heart failure. A negative score change represents a worsening in overall patient health status for the group of patients with congestive heart failure.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Chronic Heart Failure Health Status Between Baseline and 12 Months.13.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Usual CareChange in Chronic Heart Failure Health Status Between Baseline and 12 Months.13.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.6
Secondary

Hospitalization at 1 Year

Hospitalization at 1 year

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionHospitalization at 1 Year55 Participants
Usual CareHospitalization at 1 Year59 Participants
Secondary

Mortality at 1 Year

Mortality at 1 year

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
InterventionMortality at 1 Year8 Participants
Usual CareMortality at 1 Year19 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026