Skip to content

Study of GSK1358820 In Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity

A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK1358820 Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00460655
Enrollment
120
Registered
2007-04-16
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2010-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-Stroke Spasticity, Cerebrovascular Accident

Keywords

Post-Stroke, Lower Limb, botulinum toxin type A, Spasticity

Brief summary

This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.

Detailed description

This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.

Interventions

botulinum toxin type A

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria: * Patients with lower limb spasticity who are at least 6 months post-stroke and present with equinus deformity (plantar flexion of the ankle) at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2). * Patients with MAS ankle score of ≥3 at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2). * Male or female between 20 and 80 years of age at the time of informed consent. For males, only those who can practice contraception during the study period are eligible. * ≥50kg in weight at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2). * Inpatient or outpatient; however, the hospitalization status must remain unchanged during the double-blind phase. NOTE: Subjects may be hospitalized for ≤10 days after injection during the treatment period. * Written informed consent from the subject him/herself. If the subject's signature is not legible, the attendance of a witness is required.

Exclusion criteria

* A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: * Bilateral hemiplegia or quadriplegia. * Presence of fixed contractures of the ankle (absence of range of motion). * Profound atrophy of the muscles to be injected. * Previous surgical intervention, phenol block, ethanol block, or Muscle Afferent Block (MAB) for ankle spasticity. * Casting of the study lower limb within 3 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2). * Current treatment with intrathecal baclofen. * Use of peripheral muscle relaxants (dantrolene sodium, suxamethonium chloride, pancuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide, rocuronium bromide). * Concurrent use of antibiotics that interfere with neuromuscular transmission, such as aminoglycoside antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin sulfate, kanamycin sulfate, gentamicin sulfate, neomycin sulphate, spectinomycin hydrochloride), polypeptide antibiotics (e.g., polymixin B sulfate), lincomycin antibiotics (e.g., lincomycin hydrochloride, clindamycin), and enviomycin sulfate. * Previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype. * Diagnosis of systemic neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). * Females who are pregnant, nursing, may be pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during the study period. * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of study medication (e.g., human serum albumin). * Presence of psychiatric disorder or impairment of intellectual function that may interfere with the subject's ability to give informed consent or the conduct of the study. * Bedridden patients. * Presence of clinically unstable severe cardiovascular disease. * Presence of clinically significant severe renal or hepatic disease. * Infection or dermatological condition at the proposed injection sites. * Previous or planned participation in another clinical study (including the upper limb spasticity study of GSK1358820) within 6 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2). * Others whom the investigator or sub investigator considers not eligible for the study. * Clinically significant severe reduction of muscle strength. * Angle closure glaucoma or its preposition (narrow angle).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)Baseline, Week 12Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The +1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseBaseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. The +1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseBaseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BTX 300U
BTX (GSK1358820) 300U (24 mL) was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
58
Placebo
Placebo 24 mL was injected into the lower limb muscles in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0)
62
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)Adverse Event3000
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)Protocol Violation0100
Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject3000
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)Adverse Event0016
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)Meeting the Exclusion Criteria0001
Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject0062

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBTX 300UPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.32
62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.97
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian-Japanese
58 participants62 participants120 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants16 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants46 Participants96 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 5816 / 6223 / 5016 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 581 / 623 / 508 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)

Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ \[regarded as 1.5\], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)-8.513 Score*weekStandard Deviation 6.6904
PlaceboArea Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)-5.085 Score*weekStandard Deviation 6.6496
p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-5.841, -1.016]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.14 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.708
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.40 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.814
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.28 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.919
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.49 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.882
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.42 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.57 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.965
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.38 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.59 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.438
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.30 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.918
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.76 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.888
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.54 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.878
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.86 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.155
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.54 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.768
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.83 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.992
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.46 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.702
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.50 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.219
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL2.00 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.798
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.62 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.145
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.40 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.393
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.55 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.611
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.93 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.639
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL2.07 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.387
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.11 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.387
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL2.04 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.224
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.70 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL2.00 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.177
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.443
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.68 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.416
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.463
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.54 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.513
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.21 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.589
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL2.02 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.89 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.676
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.52 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.683
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.59 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.476
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.82 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.389
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL0.98 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.08
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.19 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.222
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.26 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.205
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.62 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.305
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL0.66 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.536
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.56 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.532
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.37 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.226
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.33 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.557
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL0.92 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.891
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.86 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.013
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.00 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.149
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.04 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.215
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.19 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.349
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.75 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.973
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.67 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.119
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.57 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.029
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.66 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.396
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.86 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.715
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. The +1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL-1.29 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.682
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL-1.19 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.732
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL-1.55 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.706
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL-1.48 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL-1.03 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.646
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL-1.41 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.694
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL-1.36 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.675
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL-1.44 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.751
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL-1.37 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL-1.34 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.578
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL-1.27 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.653
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL-1.33 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL-1.04 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.654
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL-1.51 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL-1.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.554
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL-1.21 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL-1.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.764
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL-1.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.556
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.17 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.494
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.40 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.449
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.30 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.389
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.28 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.461
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL0.91 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.501
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.33 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.494
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.33 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.569
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL1.22 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.121
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.10 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.433
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL0.96 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.344
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL1.35 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.601
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL1.46 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.668
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL1.15 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.638
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL1.48 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.722
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL1.47 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL1.29 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.842
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL1.04 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.551
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL1.15 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.433
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase

The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL-11.14 secondsStandard Deviation 27.453
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL-16.31 secondsStandard Deviation 32.613
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL-13.49 secondsStandard Deviation 29.674
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL-20.09 secondsStandard Deviation 42.452
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL-10.50 secondsStandard Deviation 27.726
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL-15.91 secondsStandard Deviation 43.589
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL-8.05 secondsStandard Deviation 45.061
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL-16.37 secondsStandard Deviation 51.482
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL-11.21 secondsStandard Deviation 25.67
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after third injection in OL-13.84 secondsStandard Deviation 29.241
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after first injection in OL-12.09 secondsStandard Deviation 27.148
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after first injection in OL-8.05 secondsStandard Deviation 22.735
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after first injection in OL-9.29 secondsStandard Deviation 21.851
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after second injection in OL-13.05 secondsStandard Deviation 31.241
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after second injection in OL-7.65 secondsStandard Deviation 22.715
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 12 after second injection in OL-13.40 secondsStandard Deviation 29.508
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 4 after third injection in OL-13.42 secondsStandard Deviation 33.205
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label PhaseWeek 8 after third injection in OL-12.10 secondsStandard Deviation 28.24
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 41.09 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.254
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 81.13 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.318
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 61.21 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.558
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.81 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.302
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.82 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.283
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.52 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.273
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.45 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.082
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.64 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.065
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.66 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.182
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 80.59 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.75 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.575
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 81.00 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.028
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.82 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.49 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.527
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.49 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.477
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.49 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.34 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.44 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.756
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.72 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.976
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 80.70 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.978
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.64 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.271
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 81.04 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.78
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.82 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 121.02 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.337
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.63 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.97 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.505
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.48 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.004
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 41.07 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.377
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 61.03 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.906
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 81.00 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.643
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part\[s\] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The +1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder \[less than half\] of ROM \[range of motion\]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 4-0.88 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.687
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 8-0.82 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 6-0.91 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 12-0.56 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.685
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 1-0.61 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.675
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 12-0.40 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.583
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 1-0.52 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.765
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 4-0.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.718
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 6-0.47 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.712
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 8-0.43 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.676
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters. Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.54 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.224
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 80.61 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.188
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.46 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.55 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.264
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.40 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.178
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 120.58 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.565
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 10.66 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.401
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 40.63 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.449
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 60.72 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.474
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 80.78 Points on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.811
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase

The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.

Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS ankle score

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 4-6.10 secondsStandard Deviation 22.852
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 8-3.14 secondsStandard Deviation 35.78
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 6-7.80 secondsStandard Deviation 20.568
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 12-10.14 secondsStandard Deviation 26.93
BTX 300UMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 12.14 secondsStandard Deviation 34.828
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 12-8.53 secondsStandard Deviation 24.71
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 1-5.02 secondsStandard Deviation 11.436
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 4-7.37 secondsStandard Deviation 20.782
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 6-8.48 secondsStandard Deviation 18.075
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind PhaseWeek 8-8.19 secondsStandard Deviation 18.633

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026