Skip to content

Safety of and Immune Response to a Meningitis Vaccine in HIV-Infected Children and Youth

Phase I/II Study of Safety and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine (MCV4) in HIV-Infected Children and Youth And Open Label Immunogenicity Study of a Booster Dose of MCV4 in Previously Immunized HIV-Infected Children and Youth

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00459316
Enrollment
384
Registered
2007-04-11
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2021-11-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections, Meningitis

Brief summary

Bacterial meningitis infection is common in youth 2 to 24 years of age in the United States. This disease can be treated by antibiotics, but mortality rates associated with meningitis of up to 53% have been estimated. Vaccination against meningitis may be effective in preventing this disease, especially for HIV-infected youth who have weakened immune systems. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of and immune response to a preventive meningitis vaccine in HIV-infected youth.

Detailed description

In the United States, youth 2 to 24 years of age are at high risk for bacterial meningitis infection. Despite antibiotic treatment, the mortality rate for meningitis and sepsis can reach as high as 53% caused by Neisseria meningitidis. This rate could be higher in immunocompromised individuals, such as those infected with HIV. To prevent infection, vaccination against meningitis is recommended by the CDC at ages 11, 15, and 18. The quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV4) is a vaccine that has been observed to elicit an appropriate immune response to N. meningitidis and was approved by the FDA in January 2005. However, to date, no studies have been done to determine the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in HIV-infected individuals. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and immunogenicity of MCV4 in HIV-infected youth 2 to 24 years of age. The study was originally designed for participants to be followed for 72 weeks. Participants were enrolled in three groups by age and CD4% as follows: Group 1: Age 11 to 24 years, CD4% of 15% or higher. Enrollment was further stratified by CD4%: 15% to \<25%, and \>= 25%. Group 2: Age 11 to 24 years, CD4% \< 15%. Group 3: Age 2 to 10 years, CD4% of 25% or higher. At study entry, all study participants received one injection of MCV4 (Step 1). Participants were observed for 30 minutes post-injection to monitor for adverse events. A clinic visit was required 24 hours post-injection if the participant reported adverse events. At Week 24, participants in Group 1 who did not experience any disqualifying adverse events after the first injection were randomly assigned to receive a second injection of MCV4 or no further injections. Group 2, and Group 3 participants who had no disqualifying adverse events after the first injection received a second injection of MCV4 at Week 24 (Step 2). There were five study visits in Steps 1 and 2; they occurred at study entry and at Weeks 4, 24, 28, and 72. At these visits, a physical exam, assessment of HIV-related symptoms, and blood collection occurred. In addition, study participants were contacted by telephone at Days 3 and 7 and Weeks 1, 6, and 25 after the first vaccination. Participants in Groups 1B and 2 who received a second injection were contacted by telephone at Weeks 30 and 48. As of November 2010, due to data from this study (P1065) and recommendations from the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Center for Disease Control (CDC), eligible participants in Groups 1 (1A and 1B) and 3 of P1065 received a booster dose of MCV4 at approximately 3.5 years (+/- 6 months) after the initial MCV4 vaccination. Participants were then observed for 30 minutes post-injection to monitor for adverse events. Participants were also observed at Week 1 for vaccine adverse reactions. This portion of the study (Step 3) lasted an additional 24 weeks. There were 4 study visits; they occurred at entry, at Days 7-8, and at Weeks 4 and 24. At these visits, a physical exam, assessment of HIV-related symptoms, and blood collection occurred. The purpose of this follow-up study was to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a MCV4 booster dose in HIV-infected participants who have previously received one or two MCV4 vaccinations on this study.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALQuadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine

MCV4 vaccine (4 µg each of meningococcal A, C, Y, and W-135 polysaccharides conjugated to approximately 48 µg of diphtheria toxoid protein carrier ) was given by injection intramuscularly at least once and no more than three times for each participant, depending on adverse reactions.

Sponsors

International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
CollaboratorNETWORK
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for Steps 1, 2, and 3: * HIV-infected * Age greater than or equal to 2 and less than 25 years (Steps 1 and 2 only) * CD4% documented within 120 days of study entry * Participants on antiretroviral therapy (ART) must have been on stable ART regimen for at least 90 days prior to study entry * Able and willing to complete all study immunizations and evaluations * Parent or guardian willing to provide informed consent, if applicable * Participants and/or their partners who are sexually active had to agree to use at least one of the following methods of contraception as long as they are on the study: hormonal birth control drugs (oral, injectable or transdermal); male or female condoms with or without a spermicide; diaphragm/cervical cap with spermicide; intrauterine device (IUD) Inclusion Criteria specific to Step 3: * Participants must have been enrolled in Groups 1 or 3 of previous versions of P1065 * Participants did not have to be less than 25 years of age * Participants must have had serology data from Weeks 0, 4, and 28 from their previous participation in P1065 * Participants must have been within 3.5 years +/- 6 months from the first MCV4 dose received in a previous version of P1065

Exclusion criteria

for Step 1: * Any nonstudy vaccine on study entry day * Any inactive vaccine within 2 weeks prior to study entry * Plans to receive any vaccine 2 weeks after the first injection * Receipt of any live nonstudy vaccine within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Meningococcal conjugate vaccine at any time prior to study entry * Meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine within 2 years prior to study entry * Known hypersensitivity to any component of the MCV4 vaccine, including diphtheria toxoid * Known hypersensitivity to dry natural rubber latex * Life-threatening reaction after previous administration of a vaccine containing similar components * Family history or personal history of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) * Clinically significant diseases that, in the investigator's opinion, would interfere with the study * Current immunomodulatory therapy, including IL-2, any interferon product, GM-CSF, or thalidomide. Participants taking G-CSF or erythropoietin were not excluded. * Current immunosuppressive therapy, including equivalent of 1 mg/kg/per day or more of prednisone 2 weeks prior to study entry OR planned corticosteroid therapy lasting 2 weeks or longer. Participants using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and inhaled corticosteroids are not excluded. * Cancer within 12 weeks of study entry * Cancer treatment currently or within 12 weeks of study entry * Loss of strength in lower extremity within 24 weeks prior to study entry * Bleeding disorder or anticoagulant therapy prior to study entry * Absence of ankle and patellar deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) (all four) * Recent receipt of IGIV or any blood or immunoglobulin product (except washed blood cells). More information about this criterion can be found in the protocol. * Other acute or chronic medical or surgical conditions or contraindications that, in the opinion of the investigator, might have interfered with the study * Any new and unresolved Grade 3 or higher laboratory toxicity within 120 days prior to study entry * Any new and unresolved Grade 3 or higher clinical toxicity within 120 days prior to study entry * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Step 3 entry and Week 4 post-booster vaccinePrimary response was defined for each serogroup as a four-fold rise in Ab concentration between day 0 and day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7; OR a change from seronegative on day 0 to seropositive on day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7. Note: a primary response can only occur in the absence of any memory response.
Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.From administration of Dose 1 at week 0 to 42 days post-vaccinationAdverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.From administration of Dose 2 at week 24 to 6 weeks post-vaccinationAdverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryAt 3.5 years (Step 3 entry)Immunogenicity was assessed for each serogroup by the number of participants with protective antibody levels (titers greater than or equal to 1:128)
Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 3Step 3 entry and Week 1 post-booster vaccineDefined for each serogroup as a four-fold rise in antibody titers between booster dose (week 0) and week 1.
Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Step 3 entry and Week 1 post-booster vaccineSeropositive memory response was defined for each serogroup by having protective antibody levels (titer \>= 1:128) on Day 0 or change from seronegative to seropositive between booster dose (Day 0) and Day 7.
Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24At Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24 post-booster vaccineImmunogenicity was assessed by the number of participants with protective levels of antibody (titers greater than or equal to 1:128)
Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Study entry and Week 28Serum bactericidal antibody titers were measured at study entry and Week 28 for each of the four serogroups in the MCV-4 vaccine. Response was defined as a 4-fold or greater increase from entry at Week 28.
Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)At Study entry, Week 4Serum bactericidal antibody titers were measured at study entry and Week 4 for each of the four serogroups in the MCV-4 vaccine. Response (seroconversion) was defined as a 4-fold or greater increase from entry at Week 4.
Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72Protective levels of antibody are titers ≥1:128.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immunologic Memory for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm (1 vs. 2 Doses)At Week 1 post-booster vaccinationEvidence of immunologic memory according to each of the following definitions: 1. Secondary (anamnestic) response defined as a four-fold rise in Ab titers between day 0 (booster dose) and day 7; or 2. Seroprotection on day 0 or change from titer \<1:128 to titer ≥1:128 (seroprotection) between day 0 and day 7.
Immunogenic Response to Serogroup C in Group 2At Weeks 4, 28, and 72Immunogenic response as assessed by number of participants with protective antibody titers (\>= 1:128) to serogroup C in Group 2 (entry CD4%\<15)
Immunologic Memory or Primary Response for Serogroup C by Treatment ArmAt Week 4 post-booster vaccinationImmunologic Memory defined as: 1. Secondary (anamnestic) response defined as a four-fold rise in Ab titers between day 0 (booster dose) and day 7; or 2. Seroprotection on day 0 or change from titer \<1:128 to titer ≥1:128 (seroprotection) between day 0 and day 7. Primary Response defined as: 1. A four-fold rise in Ab concentration between day 0 and day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7; or 2. A change from titer \<1:128 on day 0 to titer ≥1:128on day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7.
Safety, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Step 3 Dose of the Vaccine.From administration of vaccination at Step 3 entry through 6 weeks post-vaccinationAdverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.
Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 EntryAt 3.5 yearsNumber of participants with protective antibody titers (rSBA\>=1:128) for serogroup C by treatment arm (1 vs. 2 doses) of Group 1 (entry CD4% \>= 15) at Step 3 entry

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)
Participants ≥11 to \<25 years with 15\<CD4%\<25
127
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)
Participants ≥11 to \<25 years with CD4%≥25
153
Group 2
Participants ≥11 to \<25 years with CD4%\<15
39
Group 3
Participants ≥ 2 to \<11 years with CD4% ≥25
59
Total378

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Step 3Withdrawal by Subject301
Steps 1 & 2Death110
Steps 1 & 2Lost to Follow-up502
Steps 1 & 2Not able to get to clinic740
Steps 1 & 2Not willing to adhere to regulations100
Steps 1 & 2Other eligibility failure110
Steps 1 & 2Withdrawal by Subject610

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 (CD4%≥25)Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Group 2Group 3Total
Age, Continuous16 years18 years20 years6 years16 years
Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment at Entry
HAART with NNRTI (no PI)
34 participants14 participants3 participants14 participants65 participants
Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment at Entry
HAART with PI
81 participants70 participants22 participants38 participants211 participants
Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment at Entry
No ARV
30 participants37 participants13 participants6 participants86 participants
Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment at Entry
Other ARV
8 participants6 participants1 participants1 participants16 participants
CDC Classification at Study Entry
C
37 participants28 participants11 participants8 participants84 participants
CDC Classification at Study Entry
Not C
116 participants99 participants28 participants51 participants294 participants
Entry plasma HIV RNA viral load, copies/mL
<400 copies/mL
83 participants35 participants3 participants43 participants164 participants
Entry plasma HIV RNA viral load, copies/mL
≥ 400 copies/mL
70 participants92 participants36 participants16 participants214 participants
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
61 participants44 participants16 participants18 participants139 participants
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
89 participants83 participants23 participants40 participants235 participants
Ethnicity
Unknown
3 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants4 participants
Race
American Indian
3 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants5 participants
Race
Asian
1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants4 participants
Race
Black or African American
69 participants72 participants22 participants34 participants197 participants
Race
More than One race
3 participants0 participants2 participants0 participants5 participants
Race
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific islander
0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants2 participants
Race
Unknown
2 participants4 participants1 participants1 participants8 participants
Race
White
75 participants47 participants14 participants21 participants157 participants
Screening CD4%33.0 percent20.0 percent8.5 percent36.0 percent27.9 percent
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants44 Participants16 Participants31 Participants161 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants83 Participants23 Participants28 Participants217 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
94 / 127113 / 15333 / 3947 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1275 / 1535 / 392 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72

Protective levels of antibody are titers ≥1:128.

Time frame: Week 72

Population: Participants with antibody data at Week 72. The number of Participants analyzed for Group 1 (15\<CD4%\<25), Group 1 (CD4%≥25), Group 2, Group 3 respectively are:~serogroup A are 82, 108, 18, 44 serogroup C are 78, 110, 16, 44 serogroup W-135 are 80, 110, 17, 44 serogroup Y are 82, 110, 18, 44

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup A39 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup C17 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup W-13536 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup Y49 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup C36 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup W-13583 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup Y80 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup A82 participants
Group 2Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup W-1356 participants
Group 2Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup C1 participants
Group 2Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup Y5 participants
Group 2Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup A4 participants
Group 3Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup Y40 participants
Group 3Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup C20 participants
Group 3Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup A35 participants
Group 3Long-term Immunogenicity, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Protective Levels of Antibody at Week 72Week 72 Responders, serogroup W-13542 participants
Primary

Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.

Serum bactericidal antibody titers were measured at study entry and Week 28 for each of the four serogroups in the MCV-4 vaccine. Response was defined as a 4-fold or greater increase from entry at Week 28.

Time frame: Study entry and Week 28

Population: This outcome only includes participants who received 2 doses and had antibody data from both entry and Week 28.The number of participants analyzed for Group 1 (15\<CD4%\<25), Group 1 (CD4%≥25), Group 2, Group 3 are respectively:~serogroup A: 49, 63, 20, 49 serogroup C: 47, 65, 18, 49 serogroup W-135: 47, 66, 19, 49 serogroup Y: 49, 66, 19, 49

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup W-13536 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup Y32 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup C28 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup A27 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup C49 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup W-13561 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup A60 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup Y54 participants
Group 2Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup C1 participants
Group 2Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup A8 participants
Group 2Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup Y1 participants
Group 2Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup W-1350 participants
Group 3Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup Y41 participants
Group 3Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup W-13549 participants
Group 3Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup A43 participants
Group 3Number of Immunogenic Responders, With Response Defined as a 4-fold or Greater Increase in Serum Bactericidal Antibody Titers From Study Entry to Week 28 After 2 Doses of MCV-4.Week 28 reponders, serogroup C39 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 3

Defined for each serogroup as a four-fold rise in antibody titers between booster dose (week 0) and week 1.

Time frame: Step 3 entry and Week 1 post-booster vaccine

Population: Because response is a combination of memory and primary response, only participants with data for weeks 0, 1 and 4 are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup A54 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup C56 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup W-13563 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup Y54 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup C50 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup Y51 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup A49 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup W-13555 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup W-13533 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup C34 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup A33 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With 4-fold Memory Response in Step 34-fold memory responders, serogroup Y33 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.

Adverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From administration of Dose 1 at week 0 to 42 days post-vaccination

Population: All participants who received Dose 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.3 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.1 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.3 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 1 of the Vaccine.0 participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference between CD4% strata.p-value: 0.03Fisher Exact
Primary

Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Entry

Immunogenicity was assessed for each serogroup by the number of participants with protective antibody levels (titers greater than or equal to 1:128)

Time frame: At 3.5 years (Step 3 entry)

Population: All participants who had antibody data for Step 3 Week 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup W-13530 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup A47 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup Y39 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup C19 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup W-13535 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup C20 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup A48 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup Y33 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup C9 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup A34 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup Y24 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 EntryImmunogenicity, Serogroup W-13523 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24

Immunogenicity was assessed by the number of participants with protective levels of antibody (titers greater than or equal to 1:128)

Time frame: At Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24 post-booster vaccine

Population: Participants with data for Step 3 weeks 4 and 24. The numbers for Group 1 (1-dose), Group 1 (2-dose), and Group 3 respectively are:~Week 4: 73, 71, 37 Week 24: 73, 70, 33

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup Y67 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13557 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup A66 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup C41 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup Y58 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13567 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup A58 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup C61 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup A67 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup C60 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup A59 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup C46 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13553 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13564 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup Y62 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup Y52 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup C35 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13537 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup A30 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup A37 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 4 immunogenicity, serogroup Y35 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup W-13532 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup Y31 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Immunogenicity at Step 3 Weeks 4 and 24Week 24 immunogenicity, serogroup C24 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)

Primary response was defined for each serogroup as a four-fold rise in Ab concentration between day 0 and day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7; OR a change from seronegative on day 0 to seropositive on day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7. Note: a primary response can only occur in the absence of any memory response.

Time frame: Step 3 entry and Week 4 post-booster vaccine

Population: Because response is a combination of memory and primary response, only participants with data for weeks 0, 1 and 4 are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup A2 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup C1 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup W-1351 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup Y1 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup Y2 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup A2 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup W-1350 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup C1 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup Y2 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup C1 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup W-1352 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Primary Response (in Step 3)Primary responder, serogroup A0 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.

Adverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From administration of Dose 2 at week 24 to 6 weeks post-vaccination

Population: All participants who entered Step 2

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.0 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.0 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.2 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Dose 2 of the Vaccine.0 participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that there were no differences between CD4% strata.p-value: 0.01Fisher Exact
Primary

Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)

Seropositive memory response was defined for each serogroup by having protective antibody levels (titer \>= 1:128) on Day 0 or change from seronegative to seropositive between booster dose (Day 0) and Day 7.

Time frame: Step 3 entry and Week 1 post-booster vaccine

Population: Because response is a combination of memory and primary response, only participants with data for weeks 0, 1 and 4 are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup C62 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup W-13565 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup A65 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup Y67 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup Y57 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup A61 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup W-13560 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup C55 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup W-13534 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup Y33 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup A35 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Seropositive Memory Response (in Step 3)Seropositive memory responder, serogroup C34 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)

Serum bactericidal antibody titers were measured at study entry and Week 4 for each of the four serogroups in the MCV-4 vaccine. Response (seroconversion) was defined as a 4-fold or greater increase from entry at Week 4.

Time frame: At Study entry, Week 4

Population: This outcome only includes participants who had antibody data from both entry and Week 4.The number of participants analyzed for Group 1 (15\<CD4%\<25), Group 1 (CD4%≥25), Group 2, Group 3 respectively are:~serogroup A are 93, 129, 20, 49 serogroup C are 90, 130, 18, 49 serogroup W-135 are 91, 131, 19, 49 serogroup Y are 93, 131, 20, 49

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup C44 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup W-13566 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup A61 participants
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup Y49 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup C89 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup W-135118 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup Y100 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup A107 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup A5 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup Y8 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup W-1356 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup C3 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup Y37 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup A45 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup W-13548 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Short-term Immunogenicity, Defined as Number of Seroconverters at Week 4 (Those With at Least a 4-fold Rise in Meningococcal Serum Bactericidal Titers From Baseline)Week 4 Seroconverters, serogroup C21 participants
Secondary

Immunogenic Response to Serogroup C in Group 2

Immunogenic response as assessed by number of participants with protective antibody titers (\>= 1:128) to serogroup C in Group 2 (entry CD4%\<15)

Time frame: At Weeks 4, 28, and 72

Population: Group 2 participants with response data for weeks 4, 28 and 72

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Immunogenic Response to Serogroup C in Group 24 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Immunogenic Response to Serogroup C in Group 24 participants
Group 2Immunogenic Response to Serogroup C in Group 21 participants
Secondary

Immunologic Memory for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm (1 vs. 2 Doses)

Evidence of immunologic memory according to each of the following definitions: 1. Secondary (anamnestic) response defined as a four-fold rise in Ab titers between day 0 (booster dose) and day 7; or 2. Seroprotection on day 0 or change from titer \<1:128 to titer ≥1:128 (seroprotection) between day 0 and day 7.

Time frame: At Week 1 post-booster vaccination

Population: Participants in Group 1 who entered Step 3

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Immunologic Memory for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm (1 vs. 2 Doses)65 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Immunologic Memory for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm (1 vs. 2 Doses)61 participants
Secondary

Immunologic Memory or Primary Response for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm

Immunologic Memory defined as: 1. Secondary (anamnestic) response defined as a four-fold rise in Ab titers between day 0 (booster dose) and day 7; or 2. Seroprotection on day 0 or change from titer \<1:128 to titer ≥1:128 (seroprotection) between day 0 and day 7. Primary Response defined as: 1. A four-fold rise in Ab concentration between day 0 and day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7; or 2. A change from titer \<1:128 on day 0 to titer ≥1:128on day 28, but not between day 0 and day 7.

Time frame: At Week 4 post-booster vaccination

Population: Group 1 participants who entered Step 3

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Immunologic Memory or Primary Response for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm64 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Immunologic Memory or Primary Response for Serogroup C by Treatment Arm57 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 Entry

Number of participants with protective antibody titers (rSBA\>=1:128) for serogroup C by treatment arm (1 vs. 2 doses) of Group 1 (entry CD4% \>= 15) at Step 3 entry

Time frame: At 3.5 years

Population: Group 1 and 3 participants at entry to Step 3

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 Entry19 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 Entry17 participants
Group 2Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 Entry3 participants
Group 3Number of Participants With Protective Antibody Titers for Serogroup C at Step 3 Entry6 participants
Secondary

Safety, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Step 3 Dose of the Vaccine.

Adverse events were graded by the Division of AIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, dated December, 2004, Clarification August 2009, which is available on the RSC web site (http://rsc.tech-res.com/safetyandpharmacovigilance/). Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = potentially life-threatening, Grade 5 = death.

Time frame: From administration of vaccination at Step 3 entry through 6 weeks post-vaccination

Population: All participants who were vaccinated at Step 3 entry

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (15<CD4%<25)Safety, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Step 3 Dose of the Vaccine.2 participants
Group 1 (CD4%≥25)Safety, as Assessed by Number of Participants With Reactions and Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events Within 42 Days Following Step 3 Dose of the Vaccine.0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026