Ototoxicity, Unspecified Childhood Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Conditions
Keywords
ototoxicity, unspecified childhood solid tumor, protocol specific
Brief summary
RATIONALE: New ways to find out about hearing loss after treatment with chemotherapy may improve the ability to plan cancer treatment and may help patients live more comfortably. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is assessing ear damage in young cancer patients treated with cisplatin.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: * Determine the optimal criteria for determination of ototoxicity in younger cancer patients treated with cisplatin. * Determine the feasibility of including ultrahigh frequency and evoked otoacoustic emission testing as adjunctive measures of ototoxicity. * Determine the feasibility and necessity of central review of audiometry data. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Patients undergo hearing tests (conventional, otoscopy, ultrahigh frequency, and otoacoustic emission testing) before the first course of planned cisplatin, before each subsequent course of cisplatin, and 4 weeks after the last dose of cisplatin. Patients who are scheduled to receive hematopoietic progenitor stem cell transplantation undergo hearing tests before the transplantation and 4 weeks after transplantation. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 282 patients will be accrued for this study.
Interventions
Undergo hearing tests
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Planning to undergo treatment with any cisplatin-containing therapeutic regimen for cancer * Treatment does not need to be on a COG therapeutic study * Planning to enroll on clinical trial ACCL0431 PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Not specified PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * See Disease Characteristics * No prior cisplatin
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Incidence of patients with ototoxicity according to Common Toxicity Criteria, American-Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Brock's criteria | Length of study |
| Proportion of patients who undergo assessments using ultrahigh frequency (UHF) and evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing | Length of study |
| Proportion of patients with complete standard audiometry data (excluding UHF and OAE evaluations) | Length of Study |
Countries
Australia, Canada, United States