Skip to content

Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir 800/100 mg Once a Day Versus a Triple Combination Therapy With Darunavir/Ritonavir

A Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Treatment Simplification by Darunavir/Ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg O.D. vs a Triple Combination Therapy With DRV/r in HIV-1 Infected Patients With Undetectable Plasma HIV-RNA on Their Current Treatments.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00458302
Acronym
MONET
Enrollment
256
Registered
2007-04-10
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2011-01-31
Last updated
2012-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Virus, AIDS Virus, HIV Infections, Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Keywords

HIV, Monotherapy, Darunavir, Protease inhibitor, Early pre-treated, Undetectable, Treatment Experienced

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and darunavir/ritonavir in 250 HIV-1 infected patients who have been on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) and have plasma viral load below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks.

Detailed description

This study is randomised (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once a day (O.D.) as a monotherapy versus a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r in 250 HIV-1 infected patients. Patients will be considered eligible if they have not changed any antiretroviral drugs for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and have documented evidence of plasma viral load (or plasma HIV-1 RNA) \< 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to being screened. The trial will consist of a screening period up to 4 weeks, a 48-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week follow-up (FU) period. The primary objective is to demonstrate non-inferiority in efficacy of DRV/r versus the triple combination therapy containing DRV/r, with respect to confirmed virologic response, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at 48 weeks.Patients will be assigned a study medication based on a 1:1 ratio to either switch to a triple combination therapy containing 2 nucleosides and DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D, or initiate monotherapy with DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. Patients in the triple combination arm who are already on 2 nucleosides prior to randomisation may remain on these or switch them at baseline. Patients randomised to the monotherapy arm will discontinue Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) at baseline and commence DRV/r 800/100 mg O.D. A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has been commissioned for this study. The role of the DSMB is to review the progress of the trial and the accumulating data to detect evidence of early safety issues for the patients while the trial is ongoing. An interim analysis will be performed after 24 weeks of treatment. The results of the Week 24 analysis will be used to determine whether long-term follow-up to 72 and 96 weeks will be done. The protease inhibitor (PI) component of the regimen cannot be changed until the end of the treatment period and the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) cannot be modified until the end of the treatment period with the following exception: single antiretroviral (ARV) substitutions will be allowed for tolerability/toxicity reasons, as long as this can be linked to an adverse event (AE) or an serious adverse event (SAE). After withdrawal of the patient from the trial, changes in the ARV regimen are allowed after the assessments of the withdrawal visit have been performed. Temporary interruption of all ARVs will be allowed in the event of suspected toxicity, as long as the temporary interruption is associated with and can be linked to an AE or a SAE. For the control arm, the nucleoside analogues could be re-optimized at baseline or on study, and all approved ARVs allowed. However, PIs other than DRV/r are not allowed during the treatment period. Patients who cannot resume study medication will have to be withdrawn. A physical examination will be done at protocol-scheduled visits and vital signs will be monitored at each study visit. In addition, at each study visit, every patient will be asked about the occurrence of or change to AEs since they were last seen by the investigator. Laboratory samples for haematology and serum chemistry will be drawn and the results determined and transmitted to the investigator. Urinalysis will be performed. Pregnancy test will be done at each visit for female participants of child-bearing potential. The primary endpoint will be the proportion with virologic response, defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL at Week 48.The study hypothesis is that DRV/r monotherapy will be as effective as a triple combination regimen and will be well tolerated in this early pre-treated HIV-1 patients. Two 400mg tablets of darunavir once daily orally within 30 minutes after completion of a meal for 48 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGdarunavir (DRV, TMC114)

800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks

Sponsors

Janssen-Cilag International NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with documented HIV-1 infection * Patients currently receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks * Plasma viral load \< 50 copies/mL for at least 24 weeks prior to screening (two results must be documented) * Patients taking the same antiretroviral combination for at least 8 weeks before screening * Patients and physician's preference to change the current HAART regimen for reasons of simplification and/or toxicity * CD4 \> 100/mm3 at the start of HAART and \> 200/mm3 at screening.

Exclusion criteria

* No history of virological failure defined as two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA \> 500 copies/mL while on previous or current antiretroviral therapy * No history of any primary PI mutations as defined by the IAS-USA guidelines 2006 * No patients co-infected with hepatitis B * No pregnant or breastfeeding women * No active clinically significant disease or life threatening disease or findings during screening of medical history or physical examination that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise the patient's safety or outcome of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]Week 48Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]Week 144Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]Week 144Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). All switches included means that all data even after any changes of treatment were kept. \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 144 window.
Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]week 144Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 200 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144
Resistance Determinationsat each visit from baseline to week 144Number of patients with resistance mutations at any time point when a patient had a viral load \> 50 copies/mL after randomization.
Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countat week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 112, 128, 144The mean change in CD4+ cell count from baseline was calculated with a last observation carried forward method; i.e. the last observed value was carried forward, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.
Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]Week 48Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 48 window
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI cognitive function subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on cognitive function on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI emotional well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on emotional well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI functional and global well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on functional and global well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI physical well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI social well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).
Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreat baseline, week 48, 96 and 144The FAHI is a validated health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire consist of 44 items and includes 5 functional scales (physical, social, emotional, functional and global well-being and cognitive function). Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

xxxxx

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DRV/r+2NRTIs
800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) + 2 NRTI for 144 weeks
129
DRV/r
800 mg qd (2 x 400 mg tablet) monotherapy for 144 weeks
127
Total256

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event414
Overall StudyInc/Exc Criteria Not Met11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up20
Overall StudyOther42
Overall StudyPregnancy21
Overall StudyProtocol Violation02
Overall StudyStudy Termination By Sponsor10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject64

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDRV/rDRV/r+2NRTIsTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
125 Participants128 Participants253 Participants
Age Continuous43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
43.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.43
CD4+ cell count (absolute count)571.0 cells/µl579.0 cells/µl573.5 cells/µl
plasma viral load
> 1000
2 participants0 participants2 participants
plasma viral load
400-1000
0 participants0 participants0 participants
plasma viral load
< 50
118 participants125 participants243 participants
plasma viral load
50-400
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRIA
7 participants9 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Region of Enrollment
DENMARK
14 participants14 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
14 participants14 participants28 participants
Region of Enrollment
HUNGARY
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
ISRAEL
7 participants1 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
5 participants11 participants16 participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
20 participants9 participants29 participants
Region of Enrollment
PORTUGAL
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
2 participants9 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
24 participants24 participants48 participants
Region of Enrollment
SWITZERLAND
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
9 participants12 participants21 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants22 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
99 Participants107 Participants206 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
98 / 129103 / 127201 / 256
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 12914 / 12728 / 256

Outcome results

Primary

Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]

Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 48

Time frame: Week 48

Population: PP population: all randomised patients who took study drug, and who did not deviate from the protocol.This excludes 10 patients with major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]108 participants
DRV/rVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP) - Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR), < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]106 participants
Comparison: Assuming a virologic response rate of 90% at 48 weeks for both treatment arms, 111 patients were required per treatment arm to establish non-inferiority of DRV/r versus triple regimen with a maximum allowable difference of 12%, with a one-sided significance level of p=0.025 and 80% power. To account for a maximum of 10% major protocol violations that would be excluded from the on-protocol analysis, 125 patients were recruited in each treatment arm, so 250 patients in total.95% CI: [-10.1, 6.8]
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscale

The FAHI cognitive function subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on cognitive function on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 480.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 96-0.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 1440.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 48-0.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 96-0.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Cognitive Function Subscaleweek 144-0.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale

The FAHI emotional well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on emotional well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 480.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 961.0 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 1441.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 481.8 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 961.3 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscaleweek 1441.7 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscale

The FAHI functional and global well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on functional and global well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 480.3 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 96-0.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 144-0.6 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 48-0.8 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 960.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Functional and Global Well-Being Subscaleweek 1440.0 points on a scaleStandard Error 1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale

The FAHI physical well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 480.6 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 960.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 1440.0 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 1441.0 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 481.0 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscaleweek 961.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale

The FAHI social well-being subscale. Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on physical well-being on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 480.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 96-0.6 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 144-0.3 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 48-0.2 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 960.8 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscaleweek 1440.6 points on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Score

The FAHI is a validated health-related quality of life questionnaire. The questionnaire consist of 44 items and includes 5 functional scales (physical, social, emotional, functional and global well-being and cognitive function). Each item is assessing the impact of HIV on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much).

Time frame: at baseline, week 48, 96 and 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of protocol adherence. A LOCF method was used for calculation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 481.7 points on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 960.4 points on a scaleStandard Error 1.6
DRV/r+2NRTIsChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 1440.7 points on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 481.7 points on a scaleStandard Error 2
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 963.5 points on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
DRV/rChange From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life - FAHI Questionnaire Total Scoreweek 1443.1 points on a scaleStandard Error 2.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Count

The mean change in CD4+ cell count from baseline was calculated with a last observation carried forward method; i.e. the last observed value was carried forward, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.

Time frame: at week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 112, 128, 144

Population: ITT: all randomized patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of their adherence to the protocol

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 4-16.9 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 12-23.6 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 24-5.4 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.6
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 36-1.2 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15.8
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 48-19.0 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 60-4.0 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.9
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 7224.1 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 16.1
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 8434.6 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 17.2
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 9649.1 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15.9
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 128117.3 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 18.3
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 112106.0 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 16.7
DRV/r+2NRTIsMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 14499.3 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15.7
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 14494.9 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 4-32.9 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.6
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 72-12.3 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.3
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 12-20.7 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15.2
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 12890.4 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.9
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 24-35.8 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.2
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 84-3.7 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 15
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 36-21.1 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.3
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 9654.8 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 16.2
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 48-15.1 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 16
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 11287.5 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 16.2
DRV/rMean Change From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Countweek 60-2.3 number of cells/L (x10^6)Standard Error 14.4
Secondary

Resistance Determinations

Number of patients with resistance mutations at any time point when a patient had a viral load \> 50 copies/mL after randomization.

Time frame: at each visit from baseline to week 144

Population: ITT: all randomised patients who had at least 1 dose of study medication, regardless of their adherence to the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance Determinations>= 1 HIV-1 RNA > 50 copies/mL42 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance Determinations>= 1 successful genotype after baseline23 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance Determinations>= 1 IAS-USA primary PI mutations1 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance Determinations>= 1 DRV RAMs0 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance DeterminationsNRTI RAMs1 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance DeterminationsM184V mutation1 number of participants
DRV/r+2NRTIsResistance Determinationsno primary PI, DRV, NRTI or M184 V mutations22 number of participants
DRV/rResistance DeterminationsNRTI RAMs0 number of participants
DRV/rResistance Determinationsno primary PI, DRV, NRTI or M184 V mutations30 number of participants
DRV/rResistance Determinations>= 1 HIV-1 RNA > 50 copies/mL48 number of participants
DRV/rResistance Determinations>= 1 DRV RAMs1 number of participants
DRV/rResistance Determinations>= 1 successful genotype after baseline31 number of participants
DRV/rResistance DeterminationsM184V mutation0 number of participants
DRV/rResistance Determinations>= 1 IAS-USA primary PI mutations1 number of participants
Secondary

Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]

Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 48. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 48 window

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who took study drug, regardless of their compliance with the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsVirological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]110 participants
DRV/rVirological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT) - TLOVR, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 48]107 participants
Comparison: Assuming a virologic response rate of 90% at 48 weeks for both treatment arms, 111 patients were required per treatment arm to establish non-inferiority of DRV/r versus triple regimen with a maximum allowable difference of 12%, with a one-sided significance level of p=0.025 and 80% power. To account for a maximum of 10% major protocol violations that would be excluded from the on-protocol analysis, 125 patients were recruited in each treatment are, so 250 patients in total.95% CI: [-9.9, 7.8]
Secondary

Virological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]

Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the ITT population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). All switches included means that all data even after any changes of treatment were kept. \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until start of Week 144 window.

Time frame: Week 144

Population: ITT population: all randomised patients who took study drug, regardless of their compliance with the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsVirological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]106 participants
DRV/rVirological Response [Intent To Treat (ITT), TLOVR - All Switches Included, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]106 participants
95% CI: [-7.99, 10.58]
Secondary

Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]

Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 200 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144

Time frame: week 144

Population: PP population: all randomised patients who took study drug, and who did not deviate from the protocol. This excludes 13 patients with major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]102 Participants
DRV/rVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, <200 Copies/ml, Week 144]95 Participants
Secondary

Virological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]

Virological response is defined as the number of patients in the PP population with a plasma viral load \< 50 HIV RNA copies/ml at Week 144. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive HIV RNA levels ≥ 50 copies/mL, or discontinuation of randomised treatment (known as TLOVR). In addition, any switch in background nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) equaled failure\* (referred to as a Switch Equals Failure analysis). \*Discontinuations and rechallenge with NRTIs are taken into account until Week 144

Time frame: Week 144

Population: PP population: all randomised subjects who took study drug, and who did not deviate from the protocol.This excludes 13 subjects with major protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
DRV/r+2NRTIsVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]94 participants
DRV/rVirological Response [Per Protocol (PP), TLOVR - Switch Equals Failure, < 50 Copies/ml, Week 144]88 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026