Skip to content

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR and Placebo in Overweight and Obese Subjects Participating in an Intensive Behavior Modification Program

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Naltrexone Sustained Release (SR)/Bupropion SR and Placebo in Subjects With Obesity Participating in a Behavior Modification Program

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00456521
Enrollment
793
Registered
2007-04-05
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2014-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity, Overweight

Keywords

Obesity, Behavior Modification

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a combination of naltrexone SR and bupropion SR is safe and effective in treating obesity and leads to greater weight loss when given with a group lifestyle modification program than with group lifestyle modification alone.

Detailed description

The combination of group lifestyle modification counseling and pharmacotherapy has recently been shown to result in nearly twice the average weight loss at one year (12.1 kg) as pharmacotherapy alone (sibutramine, 5.0 kg) or lifestyle modification counseling alone (6.7 kg). Combining pharmacotherapy with a comprehensive program of diet, exercise and group lifestyle modification counseling may provide the best weight loss regimen. This study evaluated weight loss in subjects participating in such a comprehensive program who received a combination of naltrexone SR and bupropion SR, or placebo.

Interventions

DRUGNaltrexone SR 32 mg/ bupropion SR 360 mg/ day
DRUGPlacebo
BEHAVIORALIntensive group lifestyle modification counseling

Sponsors

Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female or male subjects aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive) * Body mass index (weight \[kg\]/height \[m²\]) ≥30 and ≤45 kg/m² for subjects with uncomplicated obesity, and BMI of ≥27 and ≤45 kg/m² for subjects with controlled hypertension and/or dyslipidemia * Non-smoker and had not used tobacco or nicotine products for at least 6 months before screening * Normotensive (systolic ≤140 mm Hg and diastolic ≤90 mm Hg). Anti-hypertensive medications were allowed with the exception of alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-blockers, and clonidine. Medical regimen was to be stable for at least 8 weeks. * Low-density lipoprotein level \<190 mg/dL and triglycerides level \<400 mg/dL. Medications for the treatment of dyslipidemia were allowed as long as the medical regimen had been stable for at least 8 weeks. * No clinically significant abnormality of serum albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, bilirubin, calcium and phosphorus * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) within 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) * No clinically significant abnormality of hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential, or platelets * Fasting glucose ≤126 mg/dL and not receiving hypoglycemic agents * No clinically significant abnormality on urinalysis * Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) within 1.5 times ULN or normal triiodothyronine (T3), if TSH was below normal limits * Female subjects of childbearing potential had a negative serum pregnancy test * An IDS-SR score \<2 on individual items: 5 (sadness), 6 (irritability), 7 (anxiety/tension), and 18 (suicidality) and an IDS-SR total score \<30 * Female subjects of childbearing potential were non-lactating and agreed to continue to use effective contraception throughout the study and 30 days after discontinuation of study drug * Completed a food diary for 6 of 7 consecutive days during screening * Able to comply with all required study procedures and schedule * Able to speak and read English * Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Obesity of known endocrine origin (e.g., untreated hypothyroidism, Cushing's syndrome, established polycystic ovary syndrome) * Serious medical condition (including but not limited to renal or hepatic insufficiency; congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, stroke, claudication, or acute limb ischemia; history of malignancy with exception of non-melanoma skin cancer or surgically cured cervical cancer) * Serious psychiatric illness (e.g., lifetime history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychosis, bulimia, and anorexia nervosa; current serious personality disorder, e.g., borderline; severe major depressive disorder, recent \[previous 6 months\] suicide attempt or current active suicidal ideation, recent hospitalization due to psychiatric illness) * Response to the bipolar disorder questions that indicated the presence of bipolar disorder. * Required medications for the treatment of a psychiatric disorder (with the exception of short-term insomnia) within the previous 6 months * History of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 1 year * Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus * Baseline ECG with a corrected QT (QTc) interval (using Bazett's formula \>450 millisecond (msec) \[males\] and \>470 msec \[females\]) or the presence of any clinically significant cardiac abnormalities, including but not limited to patterns consistent with myocardial ischemia, electrolyte abnormalities, or atrial or ventricular dysrhythmia or significant conduction abnormalities * Received excluded concomitant medications: any psychotropic agents (including antipsychotic, antidepressant, anxiolytic, mood stabilizer or anticonvulsant agents) with the exception of low-dose benzodiazepine or hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia; any anorectic or weight loss agents; any over-the-counter dietary supplements with psychoactive, appetite or weight effects; alpha-adrenergic blockers; beta-blockers; clonidine; coumadin; theophylline; cimetidine; oral corticosteroids; topiramate, Depo-Provera®; smoking cessation agents; regular use of opioid or opioid-like analgesics * History of surgical or device (e.g., lap band) intervention for obesity * History of seizures of any etiology, or of predisposition to seizures (e.g., history of cerebrovascular accident, head trauma with \>5 minutes loss of consciousness, concussion symptoms lasting \>15 minutes, brain surgery, skull fracture, subdural hematoma, or febrile seizures) * History of treatment with bupropion or naltrexone within the preceding 12 months * History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to bupropion or naltrexone * Used drugs, herbs, or dietary supplements believed to significantly affect body weight or participated in a weight loss management program within one month prior to baseline * Loss or gained \>4.0 kilograms within the previous 3 months * Females who were pregnant or breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant during the study period or within 30 days of discontinuing study drug * Planned surgical procedure that could impact the conduct of the study * Received any investigational drug or used an experimental device or procedure within the previous 30 days * Participated in any previous clinical trial conducted by Orexigen * Had any condition that in the opinion of the investigator made the subject unsuitable for inclusion into the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent ChangeBaseline, 56 weeks
Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% DecreaseBaseline, 56 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol LevelsBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in IWQOL-Lite Total ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksIWQOL-Lite= Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire Total score is based on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the poorest and 100 the best quality of life and where a score of 71-79 indicates moderate impairment
Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeksHOMA-IR= Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance
Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose LevelsBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting LDL CholesterolBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Systolic Blood PressureBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks
Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% DecreaseBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Waist CircumferenceBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in IDS-SR Total ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksIDS-SR= Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Subject Rated IDS-SR total score is based on 30 items. The total score can range from 0-84, with 0 being no depressive symptoms and 84 being very severe depressive symptoms. A total score ≤ 13 indicates no depression.
Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksThe Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The sweets subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).
Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale ScoresBaseline, 56 weeksThe Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The carbohydrates subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).
Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) QuestionnaireBaseline, 56 weeksQuestion 19: Generally, how difficult has it been to control your eating? Scoring: 0=not at all difficult; 100=extremely difficult
Change in Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline, 56 weeks
Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed DataBaseline, 56 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NB32
Naltrexone SR 32 mg/ bupropion SR 360 mg/ day
591
Placebo
Placebo
202
Total793

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event15025
Overall StudyDrug non-compliance, moved, other2611
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy36
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2217
Overall StudyPregnancy11
Overall StudyProtocol Violation40
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject4324

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNB32PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous45.89 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.42
45.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.35
45.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
BMI36.34 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16
36.96 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.18
36.50 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.17
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
7 participants1 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
6 participants2 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
145 participants44 participants189 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
27 participants6 participants33 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
405 participants149 participants554 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
528 Participants185 Participants713 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants17 Participants80 Participants
Weight100.16 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.42
101.88 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.96
100.60 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.31

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
465 / 584132 / 200
serious
Total, serious adverse events
22 / 5841 / 200

Outcome results

Primary

Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT (Full Analysis Set): Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Co-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change-9.29 percentage of body weightStandard Error 0.4
PlaceboCo-primary: Body Weight- Mean Percent Change-5.08 percentage of body weightStandard Error 0.6
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.56, -2.86]ANCOVA
Primary

Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NB32Co-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease66.39 percentage of participants
PlaceboCo-primary: Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥5% Decrease42.49 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.02, 4.13]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NB32Body Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease41.49 percentage of participants
PlaceboBody Weight- Proportion of Subjects With ≥10% Decrease20.21 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.95, 4.37]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure-1.41 mmHgStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboChange in Diastolic Blood Pressure-2.78 mmHgStandard Error 0.5
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.25, 2.49]
Secondary

Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels-2.36 mg/dLStandard Error 0.62
PlaceboChange in Fasting Blood Glucose Levels-1.08 mg/dLStandard Error 0.96
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-3.34, 0.79]
Secondary

Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels4.10 mg/dLStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboChange in Fasting HDL Cholesterol Levels0.87 mg/dLStandard Error 0.8
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.52, 4.95]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB32Change in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-27.98 percent change
PlaceboChange in Fasting Insulin Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-15.45 percent change
p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol5.43 mg/dLStandard Error 1.36
PlaceboChange in Fasting LDL Cholesterol8.13 mg/dLStandard Error 2.13
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-7.26, 1.86]
Secondary

Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB32Change in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-16.62 percent change
PlaceboChange in Fasting Triglycerides Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-8.51 percent change
p-value: 0.004ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Scores

The Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The carbohydrates subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Scores-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange in Food Craving Inventory Carbohydrates Subscale Scores-1.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.78, 0.6]
Secondary

Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Scores

The Food Craving Inventory is a 33-item self-report measure designed to assess specific food cravings and is organized into 4 subscales (high fats, sweets, carbohydrates/starches, and fast-food fats). A craving was defined as an intense desire to consume a particular food (or food type) that was difficult to resist over the past month. Subjects rated their frequency of cravings for each of the 33 items using a 5-point scale, where 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, and 5=always. The sweets subscale consisted of 8 items and the score ranges from 8 (better outcome) to 40 (worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Scores-2.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
PlaceboChange in Food Craving Inventory Sweets Subscale Scores-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.85, 0.63]
Secondary

Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB32Change in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-25.87 percent change
PlaceboChange in High-sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-16.89 percent change
p-value: 0.165ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data

HOMA-IR= Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
NB32Change in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-29.93 percent change
PlaceboChange in HOMA-IR Levels, Using Log-transformed Data-16.56 percent change
p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in IDS-SR Total Scores

IDS-SR= Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Subject Rated IDS-SR total score is based on 30 items. The total score can range from 0-84, with 0 being no depressive symptoms and 84 being very severe depressive symptoms. A total score ≤ 13 indicates no depression.

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in IDS-SR Total Scores0.09 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
PlaceboChange in IDS-SR Total Scores-0.00 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-0.7, 0.87]
Secondary

Change in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores

IWQOL-Lite= Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire Total score is based on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the poorest and 100 the best quality of life and where a score of 71-79 indicates moderate impairment

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores13.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
PlaceboChange in IWQOL-Lite Total Scores10.29 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.86
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.23, 5.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire

Question 19: Generally, how difficult has it been to control your eating? Scoring: 0=not at all difficult; 100=extremely difficult

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire-13.75 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.17
PlaceboChange in Question 19 From 21-Item COE (Control of Eating) Questionnaire-8.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [-9.16, -1.42]
Secondary

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Systolic Blood Pressure-1.32 mmHgStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange in Systolic Blood Pressure-3.87 mmHgStandard Error 0.71
Comparison: Due to pre-specified hypothesis testing design, no formal statistical inference testing was performed.95% CI: [0.97, 4.14]
Secondary

Change in Waist Circumference

Time frame: Baseline, 56 weeks

Population: Modified ITT: Included all subjects who were randomized, had a baseline weight measurement, and had at least one post-baseline weight measurement while on study drug. Missing data were imputed with the LOCF method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
NB32Change in Waist Circumference-9.98 cmStandard Error 0.48
PlaceboChange in Waist Circumference-6.77 cmStandard Error 0.75
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-4.82, -1.6]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026