Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Subjects With Non-Infectious Uveitis Affecting the Posterior Segment of the Eye

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00456482
Enrollment
239
Registered
2007-04-05
Start date
2002-05-31
Completion date
2006-04-30
Last updated
2011-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-infectious Uveitis

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-masked, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implants for the management of subjects with non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye. An additional objective is to compare the safety and efficacy of two doses of fluocinolone acetonide.

Interventions

DRUGFluocinolone Acetonide 0.59mg

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant 0.59 mg

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant 2.1 mg

Sponsors

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or non-pregnant females at least 6 years of age who had been diagnosed and treated for recurrent, * Non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of one or both eyes for at least 1 year prior to the start of the study, * Had clinically 'quiet' eyes at surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Coexistent medical or ocular conditions that would interfere with obtaining or interpreting data for this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence of uveitis before and after implantation. Postimplantation recurrences were evaluated using protocol-defined criteria based upon changes in VA, vitreous haze, and the presence of cells in the anterior chamber of the eye.1 year pre-implantation; 3 years post-implantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Between-dose group and within-subject comparisons (Study to Fellow eye) for uveitis recurrence; time to first recurrence; need for adjunctive uveitis treatment; reduction in the area of cystoid macular edema; results of quality of life surveys.1 year pre-implantation; 3 years post-implantation

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026