Skip to content

An Efficacy and Safety Study of CNTO 1275 Compared to Etanercept in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study Comparing CNTO 1275 and Etanercept for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00454584
Enrollment
903
Registered
2007-03-30
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2009-01-31
Last updated
2012-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Keywords

Psoriasis, CNTO 1275, Etanercept, Immune diorder, Skin disorder

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of CNTO 1275 to etanercept in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized (study medication assigned by chance), active-controlled, parallel, 3-arm study. Patients will be randomly (allocation to treatments available by chance) assigned in 3:5:5 ratio to receive one of three treatments groups. The three treatment groups are: Group 1 - CNTO 1275 45 mg dosing at weeks 0 and 4, Group 2 - CNTO 1275 90 mg dosing at weeks 0 and 4, Group 3 - Etanercept 50 mg two times per week through week 12. The total duration for each participant will be up to 64 weeks (approximately 16 months). The active-controlled portion of the study is from Week 0 to Week 12 during which the efficacy and safety of etanercept and 2 dose levels of CNTO 1275 will be evaluated. Treatment after Week 12 is dependent on Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response at Week 12 and initial treatment assignment. Patients will receive 2 subcutaneous injections of CNTO 1275 (either 45 or 90 mg doses) or twice weekly injections of etanercept during the first twelve weeks of the study. Patients may receive two additional doses of CNTO 1275 (either 45 or 90 mg doses) up to week 44.

Interventions

DRUGCNTO 1275 45 mg

Type=exact number, number=45, unit=mg, form=injection, route=subcutaneous

DRUGCNTO 1275 90 mg

Type=exact number, number=90, unit=mg, form=injection, route=subcutaneous

Type=exact number, number=50, unit=mg, form=injection, route=subcutaneous

Sponsors

Centocor, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have had a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis at least 6 months prior to the study * Have plaque-type psoriasis covering at least 10 percentage of total body surface area * Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 12 or greater and a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score of 3 or greater at the time of the first administration of study drug * Must be suitable for phototherapy or systemic treatment for psoriasis * Have failed to respond to or have condition which prevents use of cyclosporine, methotrexate (MTX) or psoralen plus ultraviolet light A (PUVA)

Exclusion criteria

* Currently have nonplaque forms of psoriasis * Have current drug-induced psoriasis * Have used any therapeutic agent targeted at reducing interleukin-12 (IL-12) or IL-23 (Interleukins are the substance produced by body in immunological disease like psoriasis) * Have received phototherapy or any systemic medications/treatments that could affect psoriasis or PASI evaluation (including, but not limited to, oral or injectable corticosteroids, retinoids, 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 and analogues, psoralens, sulfasalazine, hydroxyurea, or fumaric acid derivatives) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study agent * Have used a biologic within the previous 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 75 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Number of participants achieving greater than or equal to 75 percentage improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 12. PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst). Baseline visit refers to Week 0.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Cleared or Minimal at Week 12Week 12Number of participants achieving a physician global assessment (PGA) (0-5) of cleared or minimal at Week 12. The PGA is 7-point scale used in clinical trial of various diseases. In this the physician checks the state of the disease and gives them score from 0 (clear) to 5 (severe).
Number of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 90 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Number of participants achieving greater than or equal to 90 percentage improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 12. PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst).
Difference in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Between Week 12 and That Achieved 12 Weeks After Retreatment (Week R12)Up to Week 52. Retreatment may occur anytime between Week 16 and Week 40 depending on time of losing PGA response. Hence end of 12 weeks of retreatment would be between Week 28 and Week 52, inclusive.The difference between the PASI score at Week 12 and that achieved after 12 weeks of retreatment. The PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

903 partcipants received either ustekinumab (CNTO 1275) or etanercept at 67 sites in North America and Europe.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I: Etanercept
Participants received Etanercept 50 mg twice weekly through Week 12. Participants with PGA greater than or equal to 3 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 16 and 20. Participants with PGA leeser than or equal to 2 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 90 mg upon losing PGA response (PGA greater than or equal to 3) and 4 weeks after.
347
Group II: Ustekinumab 45 mg
Participants received ustekinumab 45 mg at Weeks 0, 4 . Participants with PGA greater than or equal to 3 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 45 mg at Week 16. Participants with PGA lesser than or equal to 2 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 45 mg upon losing PGA response (PGA greater than or equal to 3) and 4 weeks after.
209
Group III: Ustekinumab 90 mg
Participants received ustekinumab 90 mg at Weeks 0, 4 . Participants with PGA greater than or equal to 3 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 16. Participants with PGA lesser than or equal to 2 at Week 12 received ustekinumab 90 mg upon losing PGA response (PGA greater than or equal to 3) and 4 weeks after.
347
Total903

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
After Controlled PeriodAdverse Event000939
After Controlled PeriodLack of Efficacy000100
After Controlled PeriodLost to Follow-up000246
After Controlled PeriodOther000100
Controlled PeriodAdverse Event521000
Controlled PeriodLost to Follow-up122000
Controlled PeriodOther542000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I: EtanerceptGroup II: Ustekinumab 45 mgGroup III: Ustekinumab 90 mgTotal
Age Continuous45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.56
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.78
Sex: Female, Male
Female
101 Participants76 Participants113 Participants290 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
246 Participants133 Participants234 Participants613 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
154 / 34785 / 209126 / 34760 / 337102 / 29585 / 204164 / 343
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 3474 / 2094 / 3478 / 33710 / 29513 / 20422 / 343

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 75 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) Score at Week 12

Number of participants achieving greater than or equal to 75 percentage improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 12. PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst). Baseline visit refers to Week 0.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent to treat. All participants randomized were included in the analysis according to the assigned treatment groups. Participants is considered a non- responder if the participant has used any pre-specified prohibited medications or discontinued due to lack of efficacy or has missing data at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: EtanerceptNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 75 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) Score at Week 12197 Participants
Group II: Ustekinumab 45 mgNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 75 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) Score at Week 12141 Participants
Group III: Ustekinumab 90 mgNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 75 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) Score at Week 12256 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: No difference between ustekinumab 90 mg or 45 mg and etanercept at an overall significant level of 0.05. Sample Size: Assuming the PASI 75 response rates of ustekinumab 90 mg, 45 mg, etanercept are 65%, 64%, and 50% , respectively, with 325 participants each in the ustekinumab 90 mg and etanercept groups, the power to detect a treatment difference is 97%. With 200 participants in the ustekinumab 45 mg group, the complete power to further detect a treatment difference was 87%.p-value: 0.012Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square
Secondary

Difference in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Between Week 12 and That Achieved 12 Weeks After Retreatment (Week R12)

The difference between the PASI score at Week 12 and that achieved after 12 weeks of retreatment. The PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst).

Time frame: Up to Week 52. Retreatment may occur anytime between Week 16 and Week 40 depending on time of losing PGA response. Hence end of 12 weeks of retreatment would be between Week 28 and Week 52, inclusive.

Population: Participants who were randomized to ustekinumab, had a PGA score less than or equal to 2 at Week 12, and were retreated upon losing PGA response (PGA greater than or equal to 3).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I: EtanerceptDifference in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Between Week 12 and That Achieved 12 Weeks After Retreatment (Week R12)-0.99 Score on a scaleStandard Error 3.799
Group II: Ustekinumab 45 mgDifference in Psoriasis Area Severity Index Between Week 12 and That Achieved 12 Weeks After Retreatment (Week R12)-0.30 Score on a scaleStandard Error 4.124
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 90 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) Score at Week 12

Number of participants achieving greater than or equal to 90 percentage improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 12. PASI is the widely used tool for the measurement of severity of psoriasis. This is a test of how bad a person's psoriasis is. The combination of redness, scaling, and thickness, as well as overall body involvement determine the PASI score. The scale ranges from 0 (best) -72 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent to treat. All randomly assigned participants were included in the analysis according to the assigned treatment groups. A participant is considered a non-responder if the participant has used any pre-specified prohibited medications, discontinued due to lack of efficacy, or had a missing Week 12 PASI score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: EtanerceptNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 90 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) Score at Week 1280 Participants
Group II: Ustekinumab 45 mgNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 90 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) Score at Week 1276 Participants
Group III: Ustekinumab 90 mgNumber of Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 90 Percentage Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) Score at Week 12155 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: No difference between ustekinumab 90 mg or 45 mg and etanercept at an overall significant level of 0.05.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square
Secondary

Number of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Cleared or Minimal at Week 12

Number of participants achieving a physician global assessment (PGA) (0-5) of cleared or minimal at Week 12. The PGA is 7-point scale used in clinical trial of various diseases. In this the physician checks the state of the disease and gives them score from 0 (clear) to 5 (severe).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Intent to treat. All randomly assigned participants were included in the analysis according to the assigned treatment groups. Participant is considered a non- responder if the participant has used any pre-specified prohibited medications or discontinued due to lack of efficacy or had a missing PGA score.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: EtanerceptNumber of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Cleared or Minimal at Week 12170 Participants
Group II: Ustekinumab 45 mgNumber of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Cleared or Minimal at Week 12136 Participants
Group III: Ustekinumab 90 mgNumber of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Cleared or Minimal at Week 12245 Participants
p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square
Comparison: Null Hypothesis: No difference between ustekinumab 90 mg or 45 mg and etanercept at an overall significant level of 0.05.p-value: <0.001Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi square

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026