Asthma
Conditions
Keywords
Asthma, anti-immunoglobulin E, omalizumab, IgE receptors
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of IgE high affinity receptors (the part of the cell associated with allergic response) in patients suffering from uncontrolled severe asthma despite long term treatment with high dose of inhaled corticosteroid and long acting Beta-2 agonist.
Detailed description
Double blind placebo controlled study to assess the expression of IgE on blood basophils and dendritic cells in patients with uncontrolled, severe, persistent allergic asthma after a 16-week Omalizumab treatment.
Interventions
Omalizumab was supplied as a sterile, freeze dried preparation, to be reconstituted to deliver 150mg of omalizumab. Each vial was reconstituted with 1.4ml of sterile water for injection. The appropriate dose and dosing frequency of omalizumab were determined by baseline total IgE and body weight. A dosing table was used following the European Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of omalizumab.
Placebo was a physiological salt solution, administered according to the same administration scheme to respect the same dosing frequency and injected volume.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults aged \>= 18 years. * Patients with severe persistent allergic asthma with the following characteristics: * FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second) \<80% of predicted. * Frequent daily symptoms (\>=4 days/week on average) or nocturnal awakening (\>=1/week on average). * Multiple severe asthma exacerbations: either \>=2 severe asthma exacerbations having required an unscheduled medical intervention with systemic corticosteroid in the past year, or hospitalization (including emergency room treatment) for an asthma exacerbation in the past year. * Despite a high dose inhaled corticosteroid \>1000 mg beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent and a inhaled long-acting B2-agonist. * With an allergy to a perennial allergen demonstrated with convincing criteria, i.e. positive prick skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen (RAST). * Total serum IgE level \>= 30 to \<=700 IU/ml and suitable serum total IgE level and weight according to Xolair dosing tablets.
Exclusion criteria
* Age \< 18 years. * Smoking history \> 20 pack years. * Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation during the 4 weeks prior to randomization * History of food or drug related severe anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction * Elevated serum IgE levels for reasons other than allergy (e.g. parasite infections, hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis). * Patients with active cancer, suspicion of cancer or any history of cancer. * Pregnant women. * Known hypersensitivity to omalizumab or to one of its components. * Patients already treated with omalizumab (indeed a previous treatment with omalizumab could have modified the FceRI expression). * Patients who had participated in a clinical trial in the past 3 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | Baseline and Week 16 | Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at Week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value. |
| Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | Baseline and Week 16 | Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with daytime asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of days per week with asthma symptoms during the 4-week screening period prior to randomization with the mean number of days per wek with asthma symptoms in the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 -16). |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the daytime number of puffs of rescue Short-acting B2 agonist (SABA) used to treat asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of puffs of rescue medication per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization to the mean number of puffs per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma symptoms per week. For this analysis, the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Impairment was defined as days with physical activity considered as limited (or not normal) according to patient's assessment and was recorded in a patient daily diary. For this analysis, the mean number of days with impairment per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of days with impairment per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 | Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with hospitalizations during the study. For this analysis, the number of days with hospitalizations during the screening period (4 weeks prior to randomization) was compared with the number of days with hospitalizations during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the number of unscheduled clinic visits during the study. For this analysis, the number of unscheduled visits during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization is compared with the number of unscheduled visits during the last 4 weeks on treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was measured every morning using a peak flow meter, and was recorded in the patient diary. For this analysis, the mean morning PEF during the 4-week screening period prior to randomizaton is compared with the mean morning PEF during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | After 16 weeks of treatment | The Physician's overall assessment of treatment effectiveness was graded 1-5 as 1 = Excellent asthma control (complete control) 2 = Good asthma control (marked improvement) 3 = Moderate asthma control (discernible, but limited improvement) 4 = Poor asthma control (no appreciable change) 5 = Very poor asthma control (worsening) |
| Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms | Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16) | Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with absence from school or work due to asthma symptoms. For this analysis, the number of days with absence from school or work in the four weeks prior to randomization (screening period) were compared with the number of absence days during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16). |
| Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 | Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value. |
Countries
France
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Omalizumab Omalizumab was injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Dose and dosing interval were determined based on patient body weight and pre-treatment serum IgE level. | 20 |
| Placebo Placebo was injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. | 11 |
| Total | 31 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Omalizumab | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 45.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 | 50.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.31 | 47.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.37 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 5 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 12 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 20 | 7 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 1 / 11 |
Outcome results
Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo
Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at Week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population analyzable for FcεRI expression was a subset of the ITT population and included the 27 participants with accurate measurements before and after 16 weeks of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Basophils expressing FcεRI | -0.1 percent change in FcεRI expression | Standard Deviation 8.39 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI | -5.9 percent change in FcεRI expression | Standard Deviation 27.14 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Basophils expressing FcεRI | 3.9 percent change in FcεRI expression | Standard Deviation 7 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI | 14.8 percent change in FcεRI expression | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo
Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population analyzable for FcεRI expression was a subset of the ITT population and included the 27 participants with accurate measurements before and after 16 weeks of treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Basophil fluorescence intensity | -77.5 percent change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 20.83 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Dendritic cell fluorescence intensity | -41.4 percent change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 36.9 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Basophil fluorescence intensity | 20.0 percent change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 76.7 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo | % Change in Dendritic cell fluorescence intensity | 36.7 percent change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 101.66 |
Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment
Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Population: A subset of the ITT population analyzable for FcεRI expression at select sites had repeat measurements of FcεRI expression at all time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 4 | 1.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 7.89 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 8 | 2.5 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 8.6 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 12 | 3.7 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 23.49 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 16 | 4.6 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 9.4 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 4 | -16.1 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 33.54 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 8 | -1.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 14.66 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 12 | -10.3 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 19.62 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 16 | -9.8 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 11.07 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 16 | 23.0 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 4 | -5.2 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 8.46 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 4 | -4.7 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 17.73 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 8 | 0.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 1.49 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 12 | -2.8 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 27.98 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 12 | -6.4 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 11.92 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 8 | 6.2 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 7.03 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 16 | -1.4 percent change in cells expressing FcεRI | Standard Deviation 3.29 |
Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment
Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16
Population: A subset of the ITT population analyzable for FcεRI expression at select sites had repeat measurements of FcεRI expression at all time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 4 | -85.1 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 6.09 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 8 | -81.0 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 9.08 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 12 | -86.8 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 6.36 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 16 | -88.6 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 4.39 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 4 | -38.6 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 42.76 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 8 | -27.1 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 40.13 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 12 | -31.2 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 60.61 |
| Omalizumab | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 16 | -49.2 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 30.21 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 16 | 47.1 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 92.44 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 4 | -45.8 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 41.14 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 4 | -36.6 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 27.95 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 8 | -11.5 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 40.83 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 12 | -14.1 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 55.42 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 12 | -24.2 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 60.18 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on dendritic cells at Week 8 | -12.2 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 42.56 |
| Placebo | Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment | % change on basophils at Week 16 | 54.2 % change in fluorescence intensity | Standard Deviation 11.71 |
Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was measured every morning using a peak flow meter, and was recorded in the patient diary. For this analysis, the mean morning PEF during the 4-week screening period prior to randomizaton is compared with the mean morning PEF during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Baseline | 303.5 liters per minute | Standard Deviation 122.07 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Change from Baseline | 9.9 liters per minute | Standard Deviation 54.06 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Baseline | 317.8 liters per minute | Standard Deviation 77.37 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) | Change from Baseline | 10.5 liters per minute | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms
Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with absence from school or work due to asthma symptoms. For this analysis, the number of days with absence from school or work in the four weeks prior to randomization (screening period) were compared with the number of absence days during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms | Baseline | 2.7 days | Standard Deviation 7.38 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms | Change from Baseline | -0.9 days | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms | Baseline | 2.5 days | Standard Deviation 8.44 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms | Change from Baseline | 0.1 days | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week
Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with daytime asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of days per week with asthma symptoms during the 4-week screening period prior to randomization with the mean number of days per wek with asthma symptoms in the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 -16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week | Baseline | 5.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week | Change from Baseline | -2.3 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.77 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week | Baseline | 4.5 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.26 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week | Change from Baseline | -0.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 1.79 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations
Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with hospitalizations during the study. For this analysis, the number of days with hospitalizations during the screening period (4 weeks prior to randomization) was compared with the number of days with hospitalizations during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations | Baseline | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations | Change from Baseline | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations | Baseline | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations | Change from Baseline | 0.0 days | Standard Deviation 0 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week
Impairment was defined as days with physical activity considered as limited (or not normal) according to patient's assessment and was recorded in a patient daily diary. For this analysis, the mean number of days with impairment per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of days with impairment per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week | Baseline | 4.9 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.35 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week | Change from Baseline | -1.6 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week | Baseline | 4.5 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week | Change from Baseline | -1.0 days per week | Standard Deviation 2.53 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week
Participants maintained a diary to record the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma symptoms per week. For this analysis, the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week | Baseline | 2.5 nights with awakenings per week | Standard Deviation 2.55 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week | Change from Baseline | -1.2 nights with awakenings per week | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week | Baseline | 1.7 nights with awakenings per week | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week | Change from Baseline | -0.4 nights with awakenings per week | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week
Participants maintained a diary to record the daytime number of puffs of rescue Short-acting B2 agonist (SABA) used to treat asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of puffs of rescue medication per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization to the mean number of puffs per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week | Baseline | 19.7 puffs per week | Standard Deviation 24.68 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week | Change from Baseline | -2.0 puffs per week | Standard Deviation 16.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week | Baseline | 10.5 puffs per week | Standard Deviation 13.43 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week | Change from Baseline | -2.7 puffs per week | Standard Deviation 7.75 |
Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits
Participants maintained a diary to record the number of unscheduled clinic visits during the study. For this analysis, the number of unscheduled visits during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization is compared with the number of unscheduled visits during the last 4 weeks on treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)
Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits | Baseline | 0.2 unscheduled visits | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Omalizumab | Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits | Change from Baseline | -0.1 unscheduled visits | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits | Baseline | 0.1 unscheduled visits | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits | Change from Baseline | 0.1 unscheduled visits | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness
The Physician's overall assessment of treatment effectiveness was graded 1-5 as 1 = Excellent asthma control (complete control) 2 = Good asthma control (marked improvement) 3 = Moderate asthma control (discernible, but limited improvement) 4 = Poor asthma control (no appreciable change) 5 = Very poor asthma control (worsening)
Time frame: After 16 weeks of treatment
Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained. Complete data for 26 of the total 30 participants was recorded.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Omalizumab | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Worsening | 0 participants |
| Omalizumab | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Moderate | 6 participants |
| Omalizumab | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Good | 5 participants |
| Omalizumab | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Poor | 3 participants |
| Omalizumab | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Excellent | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Good | 2 participants |
| Placebo | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Worsening | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Excellent | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Poor | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness | Moderate | 4 participants |