Skip to content

Effect of Omalizumab on Expression of IgE Receptors in Adults With Severe, Inadequately Controlled Allergic Asthma

Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Expression of IgE on Basophils and Dendritic Cells During Omalizumab Treatment.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00454051
Enrollment
31
Registered
2007-03-29
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2011-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, anti-immunoglobulin E, omalizumab, IgE receptors

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the expression of IgE high affinity receptors (the part of the cell associated with allergic response) in patients suffering from uncontrolled severe asthma despite long term treatment with high dose of inhaled corticosteroid and long acting Beta-2 agonist.

Detailed description

Double blind placebo controlled study to assess the expression of IgE on blood basophils and dendritic cells in patients with uncontrolled, severe, persistent allergic asthma after a 16-week Omalizumab treatment.

Interventions

DRUGOmalizumab

Omalizumab was supplied as a sterile, freeze dried preparation, to be reconstituted to deliver 150mg of omalizumab. Each vial was reconstituted with 1.4ml of sterile water for injection. The appropriate dose and dosing frequency of omalizumab were determined by baseline total IgE and body weight. A dosing table was used following the European Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of omalizumab.

DRUGplacebo

Placebo was a physiological salt solution, administered according to the same administration scheme to respect the same dosing frequency and injected volume.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged \>= 18 years. * Patients with severe persistent allergic asthma with the following characteristics: * FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second) \<80% of predicted. * Frequent daily symptoms (\>=4 days/week on average) or nocturnal awakening (\>=1/week on average). * Multiple severe asthma exacerbations: either \>=2 severe asthma exacerbations having required an unscheduled medical intervention with systemic corticosteroid in the past year, or hospitalization (including emergency room treatment) for an asthma exacerbation in the past year. * Despite a high dose inhaled corticosteroid \>1000 mg beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent and a inhaled long-acting B2-agonist. * With an allergy to a perennial allergen demonstrated with convincing criteria, i.e. positive prick skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen (RAST). * Total serum IgE level \>= 30 to \<=700 IU/ml and suitable serum total IgE level and weight according to Xolair dosing tablets.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Smoking history \> 20 pack years. * Patients who have had an asthma exacerbation during the 4 weeks prior to randomization * History of food or drug related severe anaphylactoid or anaphylactic reaction * Elevated serum IgE levels for reasons other than allergy (e.g. parasite infections, hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis). * Patients with active cancer, suspicion of cancer or any history of cancer. * Pregnant women. * Known hypersensitivity to omalizumab or to one of its components. * Patients already treated with omalizumab (indeed a previous treatment with omalizumab could have modified the FceRI expression). * Patients who had participated in a clinical trial in the past 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With PlaceboBaseline and Week 16Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at Week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With PlaceboBaseline and Week 16Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per WeekBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with daytime asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of days per week with asthma symptoms during the 4-week screening period prior to randomization with the mean number of days per wek with asthma symptoms in the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 -16).
Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per WeekBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the daytime number of puffs of rescue Short-acting B2 agonist (SABA) used to treat asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of puffs of rescue medication per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization to the mean number of puffs per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per WeekBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma symptoms per week. For this analysis, the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per WeekBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Impairment was defined as days with physical activity considered as limited (or not normal) according to patient's assessment and was recorded in a patient daily diary. For this analysis, the mean number of days with impairment per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of days with impairment per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With HospitalizationsBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with hospitalizations during the study. For this analysis, the number of days with hospitalizations during the screening period (4 weeks prior to randomization) was compared with the number of days with hospitalizations during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic VisitsBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the number of unscheduled clinic visits during the study. For this analysis, the number of unscheduled visits during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization is compared with the number of unscheduled visits during the last 4 weeks on treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was measured every morning using a peak flow meter, and was recorded in the patient diary. For this analysis, the mean morning PEF during the 4-week screening period prior to randomizaton is compared with the mean morning PEF during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessAfter 16 weeks of treatmentThe Physician's overall assessment of treatment effectiveness was graded 1-5 as 1 = Excellent asthma control (complete control) 2 = Good asthma control (marked improvement) 3 = Moderate asthma control (discernible, but limited improvement) 4 = Poor asthma control (no appreciable change) 5 = Very poor asthma control (worsening)
Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma SymptomsBaseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with absence from school or work due to asthma symptoms. For this analysis, the number of days with absence from school or work in the four weeks prior to randomization (screening period) were compared with the number of absence days during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).
Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of TreatmentBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Omalizumab
Omalizumab was injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Dose and dosing interval were determined based on patient body weight and pre-treatment serum IgE level.
20
Placebo
Placebo was injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks for 16 weeks.
11
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOmalizumabPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.31
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.37
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants5 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 207 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 201 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Change (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo

Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at Week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population analyzable for FcεRI expression was a subset of the ITT population and included the 27 participants with accurate measurements before and after 16 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Basophils expressing FcεRI-0.1 percent change in FcεRI expressionStandard Deviation 8.39
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI-5.9 percent change in FcεRI expressionStandard Deviation 27.14
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Basophils expressing FcεRI3.9 percent change in FcεRI expressionStandard Deviation 7
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in FcεRI (High-affinity IgE Receptor) Expression on Blood Basophils and Dendritic Cells After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI14.8 percent change in FcεRI expressionStandard Deviation 22.8
Primary

Change (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo

Blood was drawn from participants at baseline and at week 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The greater the fluorescence intensity the greater FcεRI expression. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the end of study, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population analyzable for FcεRI expression was a subset of the ITT population and included the 27 participants with accurate measurements before and after 16 weeks of treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Basophil fluorescence intensity-77.5 percent change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 20.83
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Dendritic cell fluorescence intensity-41.4 percent change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 36.9
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Basophil fluorescence intensity20.0 percent change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 76.7
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 16 Weeks of Treatment With Omalizumab as Compared With Placebo% Change in Dendritic cell fluorescence intensity36.7 percent change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 101.66
Secondary

Change (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment

Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16

Population: A subset of the ITT population analyzable for FcεRI expression at select sites had repeat measurements of FcεRI expression at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 41.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 7.89
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 82.5 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 8.6
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 123.7 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 23.49
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 164.6 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 9.4
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 4-16.1 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 33.54
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 8-1.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 14.66
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 12-10.3 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 19.62
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 16-9.8 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 11.07
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 1623.0 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 24.7
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 4-5.2 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 8.46
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 4-4.7 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 17.73
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 80.9 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 1.49
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 12-2.8 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 27.98
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 12-6.4 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 11.92
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Dendritic cells expressing FcεRI Week 86.2 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 7.03
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in Percent of Basophils and Dendritic Cells Expressing FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change Basophils expressing FcεRI at Week 16-1.4 percent change in cells expressing FcεRIStandard Deviation 3.29
Secondary

Change (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment

Blood was drawn from a sub-group of participants at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Basophils and dendritic cells expressing FcεRI were counted and the percentage was calculated. Fluorescence was used to label FcεRI so that they could be visualized. The change from baseline is described by the difference (%) between the baseline value, before the first study drug administration, and the value observed at the specified time point, expressed as a percent of the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: A subset of the ITT population analyzable for FcεRI expression at select sites had repeat measurements of FcεRI expression at all time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 4-85.1 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 6.09
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 8-81.0 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 9.08
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 12-86.8 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 6.36
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 16-88.6 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 4.39
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 4-38.6 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 42.76
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 8-27.1 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 40.13
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 12-31.2 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 60.61
OmalizumabChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 16-49.2 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 30.21
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 1647.1 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 92.44
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 4-45.8 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 41.14
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 4-36.6 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 27.95
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 8-11.5 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 40.83
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 12-14.1 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 55.42
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 12-24.2 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 60.18
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on dendritic cells at Week 8-12.2 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 42.56
PlaceboChange (%) From Baseline in the Mean Fluorescence Intensity of FcεRI After 4, 8, 12 and 16 Weeks of Treatment% change on basophils at Week 1654.2 % change in fluorescence intensityStandard Deviation 11.71
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)

Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) was measured every morning using a peak flow meter, and was recorded in the patient diary. For this analysis, the mean morning PEF during the 4-week screening period prior to randomizaton is compared with the mean morning PEF during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Baseline303.5 liters per minuteStandard Deviation 122.07
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Change from Baseline9.9 liters per minuteStandard Deviation 54.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Baseline317.8 liters per minuteStandard Deviation 77.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Morning Daily Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)Change from Baseline10.5 liters per minuteStandard Deviation 28.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma Symptoms

Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with absence from school or work due to asthma symptoms. For this analysis, the number of days with absence from school or work in the four weeks prior to randomization (screening period) were compared with the number of absence days during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma SymptomsBaseline2.7 daysStandard Deviation 7.38
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma SymptomsChange from Baseline-0.9 daysStandard Deviation 2.54
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma SymptomsBaseline2.5 daysStandard Deviation 8.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Absence From School or Work Due to Asthma SymptomsChange from Baseline0.1 daysStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per Week

Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with daytime asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of days per week with asthma symptoms during the 4-week screening period prior to randomization with the mean number of days per wek with asthma symptoms in the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 -16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per WeekBaseline5.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.71
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per WeekChange from Baseline-2.3 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.77
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per WeekBaseline4.5 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Asthma Symptoms Per WeekChange from Baseline-0.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 1.79
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Hospitalizations

Participants maintained a diary to record the number of days with hospitalizations during the study. For this analysis, the number of days with hospitalizations during the screening period (4 weeks prior to randomization) was compared with the number of days with hospitalizations during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With HospitalizationsBaseline0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With HospitalizationsChange from Baseline0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With HospitalizationsBaseline0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With HospitalizationsChange from Baseline0.0 daysStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per Week

Impairment was defined as days with physical activity considered as limited (or not normal) according to patient's assessment and was recorded in a patient daily diary. For this analysis, the mean number of days with impairment per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of days with impairment per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per WeekBaseline4.9 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.35
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per WeekChange from Baseline-1.6 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per WeekBaseline4.5 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Days With Impairment in Daily Activities Per WeekChange from Baseline-1.0 days per weekStandard Deviation 2.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per Week

Participants maintained a diary to record the number of nights with awakenings due to asthma symptoms per week. For this analysis, the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization was compared with the mean number of nights with awakenings per week during the last 4 weeks of study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per WeekBaseline2.5 nights with awakenings per weekStandard Deviation 2.55
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per WeekChange from Baseline-1.2 nights with awakenings per weekStandard Deviation 2.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per WeekBaseline1.7 nights with awakenings per weekStandard Deviation 2.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Nights With Awakenings Per WeekChange from Baseline-0.4 nights with awakenings per weekStandard Deviation 1.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Week

Participants maintained a diary to record the daytime number of puffs of rescue Short-acting B2 agonist (SABA) used to treat asthma symptoms per week. This analysis compares the mean number of puffs of rescue medication per week during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization to the mean number of puffs per week during the last 4 weeks on study treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per WeekBaseline19.7 puffs per weekStandard Deviation 24.68
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per WeekChange from Baseline-2.0 puffs per weekStandard Deviation 16.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per WeekBaseline10.5 puffs per weekStandard Deviation 13.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per WeekChange from Baseline-2.7 puffs per weekStandard Deviation 7.75
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic Visits

Participants maintained a diary to record the number of unscheduled clinic visits during the study. For this analysis, the number of unscheduled visits during the 4 week screening period prior to randomization is compared with the number of unscheduled visits during the last 4 weeks on treatment (Weeks 12 - 16).

Time frame: Baseline (the 4 week screening period prior to randomization) and End of Study (Weeks 12 - 16)

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic VisitsBaseline0.2 unscheduled visitsStandard Deviation 0.62
OmalizumabChange From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic VisitsChange from Baseline-0.1 unscheduled visitsStandard Deviation 0.55
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic VisitsBaseline0.1 unscheduled visitsStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Number of Unscheduled Clinic VisitsChange from Baseline0.1 unscheduled visitsStandard Deviation 0.54
Secondary

Physician's Overall Assessment of Treatment Effectiveness

The Physician's overall assessment of treatment effectiveness was graded 1-5 as 1 = Excellent asthma control (complete control) 2 = Good asthma control (marked improvement) 3 = Moderate asthma control (discernible, but limited improvement) 4 = Poor asthma control (no appreciable change) 5 = Very poor asthma control (worsening)

Time frame: After 16 weeks of treatment

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and from whom at least one efficacy measurement was obtained. Complete data for 26 of the total 30 participants was recorded.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
OmalizumabPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessWorsening0 participants
OmalizumabPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessModerate6 participants
OmalizumabPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessGood5 participants
OmalizumabPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessPoor3 participants
OmalizumabPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessExcellent3 participants
PlaceboPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessGood2 participants
PlaceboPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessWorsening1 participants
PlaceboPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessExcellent1 participants
PlaceboPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessPoor1 participants
PlaceboPhysician's Overall Assessment of Treatment EffectivenessModerate4 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026