Skip to content

Fludarabine Phosphate, Cyclophosphamide, and Total-Body Irradiation Followed by Donor Bone Marrow Transplant, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Cyclosporine in Treating Patients With Fanconi Anemia

Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients With Fanconi Anemia Using Alternative Marrow Donors: A Phase II Dose-Finding Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00453388
Enrollment
6
Registered
2007-03-28
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2020-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission, de Novo Myelodysplastic Syndrome, Fanconi Anemia, Previously Treated Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Brief summary

This phase II trial studies how well total-body irradiation (TBI) works when given together with fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide followed by donor bone marrow transplant, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclosporine in treating patients with Fanconi anemia (FA). Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate and cyclophosphamide, and TBI before or after a donor bone marrow transplant helps stop the growth of abnormal cells. It may also stop the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine after the transplant may stop this from happening.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Identify doses of total-body irradiation (TBI) that lead to sufficient probability of donor engraftment (\> 5% donor cluster of differentiation \[CD\]3 chimerism) by day +200. II. Evaluate the probability of severe acute graft-versus-host disease. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the probabilities of overall survival, regimen-related toxicity (RRT), and recurrent hematopoietic malignancy in those patients with a prior underlying history of such. II. Examine the degree to which mixed chimerism provides for amelioration of symptoms (i.e., infections due to neutropenia, hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia) associated with bone marrow failure. III. Determine if the FA complementation group and % initial mosaicism predict engraftment and RRT outcomes. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 4 treatment arms. NOTE: Patients no longer receive pre-transplant cyclophosphamide as of February 2009. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 months and then annually thereafter.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAllogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Given IV

DRUGCyclosporine

Given IV or PO

DRUGFludarabine Phosphate

Given IV

OTHERLaboratory Biomarker Analysis

Correlative studies

DRUGMycophenolate Mofetil

Given PO

PROCEDURENonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant

RADIATIONTotal-Body Irradiation

Undergo TBI

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient with FA and bone marrow (BM) failure involving 2 of the following 3 lineages: granulocyte count \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L, platelet count \< 20 x 10\^9/L, or hemoglobin \< 8 g/dL * Any patient with FA who requires red blood cell or platelet transfusions because of marrow failure * Any patient with FA who has a life-threatening BM failure involving a single hematopoietic lineage * Any patient with FA and pre-existing cytogenetic abnormality including hematopoietic malignancy (acute myeloid leukemia \[AML\] or myelodysplastic syndrome \[MDS\]) in morphological remission (defined as absence of circulating blasts and bone marrow blasts \< 5% as assessed by morphology); Note that hematopoietic recovery is not required for remission status * Patients must have a negative cytotoxic cross match with donor * DONOR: Related, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical donors must be identical for one HLA haplotype and mismatched for any number of HLA-A, -B, -C, DRB1 or DQB1 loci of the unshared haplotype * DONOR: Unrelated, HLA-matched donors must be matched at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1 by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) typing at the highest resolution routinely available at the time of donor selection; a single allele mismatch at HLA-A, B, or C is allowed OR a single DQB1 mismatch is allowed * DONOR: Bone marrow will be the only allowed hematopoietic stem cell source * DONOR: Haploidentical donor selection will be based on standard institutional criteria, otherwise no specific prioritization will be made amongst the suitable available donors

Exclusion criteria

* Patients having available HLA-matched related donors * Significant organ dysfunction that would prevent compliance with conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, or would severely limit the probability of survival, such as liver disease/failure (active hepatitis, moderate to severe portal fibrosis/cirrhosis confirmed by biopsy or uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction), lung disease, or cardiac disease (ejection fraction \< 35%, or if unable to obtain ejection fraction, shortening fraction of \< 26%; if shortening is \< 26% a cardiology consult is required with principal investigator \[PI\] having final approval of eligibility) * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositive patients * Fertile females who are unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for the twelve months following treatment, as well as females who are pregnant or actively breast feeding * Fertile males who are unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for the twelve months following treatment * AML/MDS in morphological relapse, defined as having circulating blasts or bone marrow blasts \>= 5% as assessed by morphology * Active infectious disease concerns * Karnofsky performance score \< 50 or Lansky performance score \< 40 * DONOR: Donors found to have Fanconi anemia based on chromosomal breakage analysis * DONOR: Donors who are not expected to meet the minimum target dose of marrow cells (1 x 10\^8 nucleated cells/kg recipient ideal body weight \[IBW\]) or who are unwilling to be bone marrow donors * DONOR: HIV-positive donors * DONOR: Donors who are cross-match positive with recipient * DONOR: Recipient homozygous at mismatched locus; if the recipient is homozygous at HLA-A, B, or C and the donor is mismatched at that locus, the donor should be avoided; exceptions must be discussed with the PI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Engraft at Each Dose of TBI UsedUp to Day 200Number of subjects who engrafted. Engraftment defined as greater than 95% donor chimerism.
Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHDUp to Day 100Number of subjects who developed maximum grade acute graft-vs-host disease aGVHD Stages Skin: 1. \- a maculopapular eruption involving \< 25% BSA 2. \- a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA 3. \- generalized erythroderma 4. \- generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and often with desquamation Liver: 1. \- bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL 2. \- bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL 3. \- bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL 4. \- bilirubin \> 15 mg/100 mL Gut: Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall. aGVHD Grades Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gastrointestinal involvement and/or +2 to +4 liver involvement, with or without a rash Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Transplant-related MortalityUp to Day 200Number of subjects who expired due to transplant-related mortality
Incidence of Adverse EventsUp to Day 100Number of subjects who developed reportable AEs, assessed using adapted version of the Common Toxicity Criteria

Countries

Brazil, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm I (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)
Patients with a history of hematologic malignancy and HLA-haploidentical donor receive fludarabine phosphate (FLU) intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days -6 to -2, and undergo TBI on day -1 and allogeneic bone marrow transplant on day 0. Patients then receive CY IV over 1 hour on days 3 and 4, MMF orally (PO) thrice daily (TID) on days 5-35, and CSP IV or PO on days 5-84, with taper until day 180, in the absence of GVHD. Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant Cyclophosphamide: Given IV Cyclosporine: Given IV or PO Fludarabine Phosphate: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Mycophenolate Mofetil: Given PO Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant Total-Body Irradiation: Undergo TBI
0
Arm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)
Patients with no history of hematological malignancy and HLA-haploidentical donors receive FLU IV over 1 hour on days -6 to -2, and undergo TBI on day -1 and allogeneic bone marrow transplant on day 0. Patients then receive CY IV over 1 hour on days 3 and 4, MMF PO TID on days 5-35, and CSP IV or PO on days 5-84, with taper until day 180, in the absence of GVHD. Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant Cyclophosphamide: Given IV Cyclosporine: Given IV or PO Fludarabine Phosphate: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Mycophenolate Mofetil: Given PO Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant Total-Body Irradiation: Undergo TBI
5
Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)
Patients with history of hematologic malignancy and HLA-matched unrelated donors receive FLU IV over 1 hour on days -6 to -2, and undergo TBI on day -1 and allogeneic bone marrow transplant on day 0. Patients then receive CY IV over 1 hour on days 3 and 4, MMF PO TID on days 5-35, and CSP IV or PO on days 5-84, with taper until day 180, in the absence of GVHD. Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant Cyclophosphamide: Given IV Cyclosporine: Given IV or PO Fludarabine Phosphate: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Mycophenolate Mofetil: Given PO Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant Total-Body Irradiation: Undergo TBI
1
Arm IV (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)
Patients with no history of hematological malignancy and HLA-matched unrelated donors receive FLU IV over 1 hour on days -6 to -2, and undergo TBI on day -1 and allogeneic bone marrow transplant on day 0. Patients then receive CY IV over 1 hour on days 3 and 4, MMF PO TID on days 5-35, and CSP IV or PO on days 5-84, with taper until day 180, in the absence of GVHD. Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic bone marrow transplant Cyclophosphamide: Given IV Cyclosporine: Given IV or PO Fludarabine Phosphate: Given IV Laboratory Biomarker Analysis: Correlative studies Mycophenolate Mofetil: Given PO Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Undergo allogeneic stem cell transplant Total-Body Irradiation: Undergo TBI
0
Total6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
5 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous11.1 years11.9 years11.1 years
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 02 / 50 / 10 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 03 / 50 / 10 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 02 / 50 / 10 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD

Number of subjects who developed maximum grade acute graft-vs-host disease aGVHD Stages Skin: 1. \- a maculopapular eruption involving \< 25% BSA 2. \- a maculopapular eruption involving 25 - 50% BSA 3. \- generalized erythroderma 4. \- generalized erythroderma with bullous formation and often with desquamation Liver: 1. \- bilirubin 2.0 - 3.0 mg/100 mL 2. \- bilirubin 3 - 5.9 mg/100 mL 3. \- bilirubin 6 - 14.9 mg/100 mL 4. \- bilirubin \> 15 mg/100 mL Gut: Diarrhea is graded 1 - 4 in severity. Nausea and vomiting and/or anorexia caused by GVHD is assigned as 1 in severity. The severity of gut involvement is assigned to the most severe involvement noted. Patients with visible bloody diarrhea are at least stage 2 gut and grade 3 overall. aGVHD Grades Grade III: Stage 2 - 4 gastrointestinal involvement and/or +2 to +4 liver involvement, with or without a rash Grade IV: Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or death

Time frame: Up to Day 100

Population: No subjects meeting the criteria for Arms I or IV were enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD1 Participants
Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)Incidence of Grades III-IV Acute GVHD0 Participants
Primary

Number of Patients Who Engraft at Each Dose of TBI Used

Number of subjects who engrafted. Engraftment defined as greater than 95% donor chimerism.

Time frame: Up to Day 200

Population: No subjects meeting the criteria for Arms I or IV were enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)Number of Patients Who Engraft at Each Dose of TBI Used5 Participants
Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)Number of Patients Who Engraft at Each Dose of TBI Used1 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events

Number of subjects who developed reportable AEs, assessed using adapted version of the Common Toxicity Criteria

Time frame: Up to Day 100

Population: No subjects meeting the criteria for Arms I or IV were enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)Incidence of Adverse Events3 Participants
Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)Incidence of Adverse Events0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Transplant-related Mortality

Number of subjects who expired due to transplant-related mortality

Time frame: Up to Day 200

Population: No subjects meeting the criteria for Arms I or IV were enrolled.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm II (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 vs 1 vs 0 Gy TBI De-escalation)Incidence of Transplant-related Mortality1 Participants
Arm III (2 vs 2.5 vs 3 Gy TBI Dose-escalation)Incidence of Transplant-related Mortality0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026