Skip to content

In-exsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis

A Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Inexsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00452114
Enrollment
28
Registered
2007-03-26
Start date
2004-04-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2018-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis

Keywords

Bronchiectasis

Brief summary

This study is a randomized, controlled trial examining the effectiveness of the mechanical cough-assist device (in-exsufflator) in promoting the clearance of retained airway secretions in patients with symptomatic bronchiectasis. We hypothesize that this enhanced clearance of airway secretions will lead to a decline in the number of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis experienced by these patients during the study period, improve health-related quality of life, decrease overall health-care costs and improve pulmonary function.

Detailed description

Bronchiectasis is characterized by airway dilatation with the potential to cause devastating illness, including repeated respiratory infections requiring antibiotics, disabling productive, mucopurulent cough, shortness of breath and occasional hemoptysis. The damaged and dilated airways lead to persisting bacterial infection of the bronchi and bronchioles, causing inflammation and retained secretions, which in turn may further damage the airways. Patients typically suffer from frequent, severe and refractory episodes of bacterial bronchitis, often requiring hospitalization and prolonged courses of antibiotics. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis involves the retention of viscid, tenacious inflammatory secretions and microbes leading to a vicious cycle of airway obstruction, destruction and recurrent infection with further compromise of the mucociliary clearance host defense apparatus. It has been widely proposed and recommended that methods of enhancing clearance of airway secretions should be an integral component of the care of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite these recommendations and a sound pathophysiologic plausibility given the central role retention of secretions plays in the disease, the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward enhancing bronchopulmonary hygiene has not been systematically studied. It is also not known whether the ability to generate an adequate cough would predict which patient will benefit from these interventions. The mechanical in-exsufflator device assists patients in clearing retained secretions by augmenting the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure. An effective cough mechanism is actually an important and beneficial host defense which aids in mucus clearance along with the mucociliary apparatus. We hypothesize that daily, regular use of the in-exsufflator device will lead to a reduction in acute bronchiectasis exacerbations- a clinically meaningful endpoint- with other possible beneficial outcomes including improved pulmonary function, improved health-related quality of life and decreased health care costs. Despite the lack of rigorous, well-designed studies supporting the role and most effective mode of bronchial hygiene physiotherapy in patients with bronchiectasis, many Pulmonologists recommend the flutter valve device as the generally accepted standard of care at this time due to its relative non-invasiveness, ease of use and high level of patient acceptability. The flutter valve is a simple, hand-held, pipe-like device which helps loosen secretions by providing an expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used. This study will provide a comparison of the clinical efficacy of these mechanical chest physiotherapy devices in the setting of bronchiectasis.

Interventions

DEVICEIn-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
DEVICEActive Comparator: Flutter Valve Device

Active Comparator

Sponsors

University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chest CT scan confirmation of bronchiectasis * At least two exacerbations in the preceding 12 months requiring antibiotics

Exclusion criteria

* Cystic fibrosis * Bullous emphysema * History of spontaneous pneumothorax * History of massive hemoptysis: greater than 200 cc in a 24 hour period * Lung resection surgery in the past 6 months * Use of the mechanical cough in-exsufflator in the prior 3 months * Inability to speak and read English * Inability to demonstrate proper use of the cough-assist or flutter device * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year12 monthsThe impact of the intervention is measured by the total number of suppurative exacerbations per patient within a 12 month period.
Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits12 monthsThe impact of the intervention is measured by the number of hospitalizations and urgent/unscheduled outpatient visits the participants experienced within a 12 month period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)12 monthsQuality of life is measured using St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, a 50 item disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. The instrument consists of 2 parts, and 3 components. Part 1 measures symptom frequency and severity with a 1,3 or 12 month recall. Part 1 is evaluated using several scales. Part 2 measures impact of breathlessness on activities including social functioning and psychological disturbances. Part 2 is evaluated by dichotomous (true false) evaluation except the final question which is a 4 point likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitation and lower quality of life.
Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)12 monthsQuality of life is measured using the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) to measure the effect of interventions on cough-specific quality of life. The Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire consist of 28 questions about cough and its effects using Likert-like 4-point scales, with lower scores indicating less effect of cough on health related quality of life. CQLQ scale ranges from 28 to 112 with higher scores indicating worse outcome or status.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device augments the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure when used daily
15
Flutter Valve Device
flutter valve device delivers expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used daily
13
Total28

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIn-Exsufflator Cough Assist DeviceFlutter Valve DeviceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants6 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants13 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits

The impact of the intervention is measured by the number of hospitalizations and urgent/unscheduled outpatient visits the participants experienced within a 12 month period.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants in the Intervention Group (Cough In-exsufflator)Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits.78 Number of Hospitalizations/VisitsStandard Deviation 0.8
Particpants in the Control Group (Flutter Device)Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits.87 Number of Hospitalizations/VisitsStandard Deviation 1.2
Primary

Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year

The impact of the intervention is measured by the total number of suppurative exacerbations per patient within a 12 month period.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants in the Intervention Group (Cough In-exsufflator)Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year2.5 Number of events per patientStandard Deviation 1.7
Particpants in the Control Group (Flutter Device)Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year2.3 Number of events per patientStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)

Quality of life is measured using the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) to measure the effect of interventions on cough-specific quality of life. The Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire consist of 28 questions about cough and its effects using Likert-like 4-point scales, with lower scores indicating less effect of cough on health related quality of life. CQLQ scale ranges from 28 to 112 with higher scores indicating worse outcome or status.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants in the Intervention Group (Cough In-exsufflator)Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)48 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Particpants in the Control Group (Flutter Device)Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)43 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)

Quality of life is measured using St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, a 50 item disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. The instrument consists of 2 parts, and 3 components. Part 1 measures symptom frequency and severity with a 1,3 or 12 month recall. Part 1 is evaluated using several scales. Part 2 measures impact of breathlessness on activities including social functioning and psychological disturbances. Part 2 is evaluated by dichotomous (true false) evaluation except the final question which is a 4 point likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitation and lower quality of life.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Outcomes not analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants in the Intervention Group (Cough In-exsufflator)Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)30 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Particpants in the Control Group (Flutter Device)Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026