Skip to content

Educational CD-ROM Compared With Standard Informed Consent for Patients With Colorectal Cancer or a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

Facilitating Informed Decisions for MSI Testing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00450424
Enrollment
239
Registered
2007-03-22
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2014-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Hereditary Non-polyposis Colon Cancer

Keywords

colon cancer, rectal cancer, hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer, recurrent colon cancer, stage I colon cancer, stage IIA colon cancer, stage IIB colon cancer, stage IIIA colon cancer, stage IIIB colon cancer, stage IIIC colon cancer, stage IVA colon cancer, stage IVB colon cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, stage I rectal cancer, stage IIA rectal cancer, stage IIB rectal cancer, stage IIC rectal cancer, stage IIIA rectal cancer, stage IIIB rectal cancer, stage IIIC rectal cancer, stage IVA rectal cancer, stage IVB rectal cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: The use of a CD-ROM may help patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer make informed decisions about undergoing microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying an educational CD-ROM to see how well it works compared with standard informed consent to assist decision-making about MSI testing in patients with colorectal cancer or a family history of colorectal cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * Compare the impact of standard informed consent vs a CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or a family history of CRC. * Determine the impact of these interventions on patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision. Secondary * Determine whether the CD-ROM educational intervention has a differential impact on satisfaction with the MSI test decision, difficulty making the MSI test decision, and decisional conflict, as well as on patients' attitudes about MSI testing and CRC (e.g., perceived benefits and barriers to having the MSI test, perceived risk for colorectal and related cancers, self-efficacy), on general and cancer-related distress, and on discussions with family members about the MSI test and familial CRC risk. * Assess whether demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support for testing, and cancer-related distress moderate the impact of the intervention on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot, study (part I) followed by a randomized study (part II). * Part I: The educational CD-ROM is developed over 9 months. Patients receive a pilot version of the CD-ROM and provide feedback regarding usability and content. * Part II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. * Arm I: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. * Arm II: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for MSI testing and the educational CD-ROM developed in phase I. All patients in part II (even those that did not consent to the MSI test) complete a follow-up survey at 2 weeks. Tissue samples from patients are analyzed by immunohistochemistry and MSI assay (polymerase chain reaction) for MLH1 and MSH2. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 184 patients will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

OTHERcounseling intervention

Participants in the Counseling intervention will meet with the study health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI informed consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. The patients will either sign (or not sign, if they do not consent to have the test, or wish to think further about the decision) after this discussion. Participants who have further questions will be referred to either the attending physician or the genetics counselor at each hospital site.

OTHERCD-ROM intervention

Participants who are randomized to the CD-ROM condition will complete the baseline interview and then meet with the health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. Next, the participant will be provided with the CD-ROM to view on a laptop computer in the clinic. Participants will also be given a copy of the CD-ROM to take home and keep for future reference. The CD-ROM patients will sign (or not sign, if they do not consent or wish to think further about the decision) the consent form after this discussion.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient or family member meeting 1 of the following revised Bethesda colorectal cancer (CRC) criteria: * Diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer at \< 50 years of age * Diagnosis of \> 1 CRC at one time in the past * Diagnosis of ≥ 1 CRC at different times * Diagnosis of CRC and any other hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related cancers * Diagnosis of CRC in ≥ 2 first-degree or second-degree relatives with HNPCC-related tumor and ≥ 1 cancer diagnosed at \< 50 years of age * Diagnosis of CRC in ≥ 2 first- or second-degree relatives with HNPCC-related tumors, regardless of age * Diagnosis of CRC with pathologic features suggestive of microsatellite instability (MSI) and \< 60 years of age * Patients with CRC meeting the Amsterdam criteria defined below are ineligible: * Three relatives with CRC with 1 being a first-degree relative of the other 2 * Cases that span ≥ 2 generations * At least 1 CRC case diagnosed before 50 years of age PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Not specified PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * Not specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Standard Informed Consent vs CD-ROM Educational Intervention on Knowledge About Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Testing2 weeks after enrollment10-item true/false MSI knowledge survey developed by the oncologists on trial. (e.g., Microsatellite Instability is found in every person that has had cancer.; Microsatellite Instability may be caused by a permanent change in a gene that is inherited from a person's mother or father.). Participants can score anywhere from 0 (no questions answered correctly) to 10 (all questions answered correctly).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differential Impact of CD-ROM on Satisfaction With MSI Test Decision, Difficulty Making Decision & Decisional Conflict; Attitude; General & Cancer-related Distress; Discussions With Family About MSI Test & Familial Colorectal Cancer Riskat enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollmentParticipants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU). Differential impact of CD-ROM on satisfaction with MSI test decision, difficulty making decision & decisional conflict; attitude; general & cancer-related distress; discussions with family about MSI test & familial colorectal cancer risk were measured.
Impact of Demographic Factors, Disease/Family History Characteristics, Family Support, and Cancer-related Distress on Satisfaction With and Completeness of the Informed Consent Processat enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollmentParticipants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU). Impact of demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support, and cancer-related distress on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process was measured
Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation to Make a Decisionat enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollmentParticipants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Consent Condition
Participants in the Standard consent condition will complete the baseline interview and then meet with the study health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI informed consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. The patients will either sign (or not sign, if they do not consent to have the test, or wish to think further about the decision) after this discussion. Participants who have further questions will be referred to either the attending physician or the genetics counselor at each hospital site.
117
CD-ROM Condition
Participants who are randomized to the CD-ROM condition will complete the baseline interview and then meet with the health educator who will provide the participant with the standard MSI consent form and provide a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test. At that time, the participant can ask any questions s/he wishes to ask. Next, the participant will be provided with the CD-ROM to view on a laptop computer in the clinic. Participants will also be given a copy of the CD-ROM to take home and keep for future reference. The CD-ROM patients will sign (or not sign, if they do not consent or wish to think further about the decision) the consent form after this discussion.
122
Total239

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard Consent ConditionCD-ROM ConditionTotal
Age, Continuous45.69 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.38
47.33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.58
46.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.04
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
114 Participants120 Participants234 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
102 Participants112 Participants214 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants52 Participants109 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
60 Participants70 Participants130 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1170 / 122
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1170 / 122

Outcome results

Primary

Impact of Standard Informed Consent vs CD-ROM Educational Intervention on Knowledge About Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Testing

10-item true/false MSI knowledge survey developed by the oncologists on trial. (e.g., Microsatellite Instability is found in every person that has had cancer.; Microsatellite Instability may be caused by a permanent change in a gene that is inherited from a person's mother or father.). Participants can score anywhere from 0 (no questions answered correctly) to 10 (all questions answered correctly).

Time frame: 2 weeks after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard Consent ConditionImpact of Standard Informed Consent vs CD-ROM Educational Intervention on Knowledge About Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Testing4.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
CD-ROM ConditionImpact of Standard Informed Consent vs CD-ROM Educational Intervention on Knowledge About Microsatellite Instability (MSI) Testing4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.94
Secondary

Differential Impact of CD-ROM on Satisfaction With MSI Test Decision, Difficulty Making Decision & Decisional Conflict; Attitude; General & Cancer-related Distress; Discussions With Family About MSI Test & Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk

Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU). Differential impact of CD-ROM on satisfaction with MSI test decision, difficulty making decision & decisional conflict; attitude; general & cancer-related distress; discussions with family about MSI test & familial colorectal cancer risk were measured.

Time frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment

Secondary

Impact of Demographic Factors, Disease/Family History Characteristics, Family Support, and Cancer-related Distress on Satisfaction With and Completeness of the Informed Consent Process

Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU). Impact of demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support, and cancer-related distress on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process was measured

Time frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment

Secondary

Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation to Make a Decision

Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).

Time frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026