Skip to content

Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Detection in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography

A Prospective Evaluation of Computer Aided Detection (CAD) in the NHS Breast Screening Programme [CADET II]

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00450359
Enrollment
30000
Registered
2007-03-22
Start date
2006-09-30
Completion date
2008-10-31
Last updated
2013-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: A computer-aided detection program may help doctors find breast cancer sooner, when it may be easier to treat, in women undergoing screening mammography. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well computer-aided breast cancer detection works in women undergoing screening mammography.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Compare, prospectively, the breast cancer detection rate and recall rate of single reading using computer-aided detection vs standard double reading in women undergoing screening mammography. OUTLINE: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 screening arms. * Arm I (double reading): Screening mammograms are independently reviewed by two readers (i.e., radiologist or radiographer), each of whom reports on any abnormalities and decides whether a participant is recalled for further assessment or returned home to routine screening. In the event there is disagreement between the readers' findings, a third reader acts as an arbitrator by rendering an interpretation of the mammogram and making the final decision to recall the participant or return to routine screening. * Arm II (single reading with computer-aided detection \[CAD\]): Screening mammograms are reviewed initially by a single reader who reports on any abnormalities. The reader then re-examines the mammogram with the aid of CAD, a system that uses computer prompts to recall suspicious features or abnormalities that may have been overlooked or previously dismissed as being normal. Based on these evaluations, a recommendation is made by the reader to either recall the participant for further assessment or return home to routine screening. If there is a discrepancy between the reader's interpretation and the CAD findings, another reader may be consulted to review the mammogram. * Arm III (double reading followed by single reading with CAD): Screening mammograms are reviewed by double reading as in arm I followed by single reading with CAD as in arm II. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 30,000 participants will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

Sponsors

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
SCREENING

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Currently undergoing 2-view mammography for routine breast cancer screening at any of the following participating National Health Services Breast Cancer Screening Program centers: * Manchester * Coventry * Nottingham * Hormone receptor status not specified PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Female * Menopausal status not specified PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * Not specified

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Breast cancer detection rate
Recall rate

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Film reader performance using computer-aided detection

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026