Skip to content

Budesonide Capsules vs. Mesalazine Granules vs. Placebo in Collagenous Colitis

Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Phase III Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Tolerability of Budesonide Capsules vs. Mesalazine Granules vs. Placebo for Patients With Collagenous Colitis.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00450086
Enrollment
92
Registered
2007-03-21
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2014-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Collagenous Colitis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether budesonide or mesalazine is more active in the treatment of collagenous colitis.

Detailed description

This study will check the reproducibility of the results reported in trials with budesonide in patients with collagenous colitis. Efficacy of mesalazine was never tested in collagenous colitis by placebo-controlled trials. This trial will check the superiority of mesalazine over placebo using the common clinical symptom of collagenous colitis, which is chronic or recurrent non-bloody, watery diarrhea.

Interventions

DRUGBudesonide

9 mg per day

DRUGMesalazine

3 g per day

DRUGPlacebo

0 g per day

Sponsors

Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(main): * \> 4 watery/soft stools on at least 4 days in the week prior to baseline * \> 3 stools per day on average within the last 7 days prior to baseline * Symptoms (chronic watery diarrhea) for at least 3 months before baseline * Complete colonoscopy within the last 12 weeks before baseline * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of collagenous colitis

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of infectious diarrhea * Celiac disease * Endoscopic-histologic findings, which may have caused diarrhea * History of partial colonic resection * Diarrhea as a result of the presence of other symptomatic organic disease of the gastrointestinal tract * Active colorectal cancer or a history of colorectal cancer * Severe co-morbidity substantially reducing life expectancy * Abnormal hepatic function or liver cirrhosis (ALT, AST or AP \>= 2 x ULN) * Abnormal renal function (Cystatin C \> ULN) * Active peptic ulcer disease, local intestinal infection * Asthma, diabetes mellitus, infection, osteoporosis, glaucoma, cataract, or cardiovascular disease if careful medical monitoring is not ensured * Hemorrhagic diathesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of clinical remission (<= 3 stools per day) after 8 weeks8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time to remission
Impact on stool consistency (watery/soft/solid)8 weeks
Impact on abdominal pain8 weeks
Impact on patient's general well-being8 weeks
Rate of clinical remission (<= 3 stools per day) after 2 weeks2 weeks
Severity of diarrhea8 weeks
QoL8 weeks
PGA8 weeks
Effect on histopathology8 weeks

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026