Skip to content

Efficacy of Preoperative Education and Mini-invasive Surgery for Total Hip Replacement

Evaluation of Preoperative Education and Mini-invasive Total Hip Replacement in Regard to the Attainment of Functional Independency and Reduction of Hospital Stay

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00449228
Acronym
ANRACT
Enrollment
215
Registered
2007-03-20
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2012-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Keywords

Osteoarthritis,, hip replacement,, education,, randomized controlled trial,, mini-invasive surgery

Brief summary

We propose to evaluate a preoperative education of the patient and a new surgical technique (the mini-invasive THR) that could reduce the time to achieve functional independence. The primary objective of the trial is to assess the time to reach functional independence after total hip replacement depending on the treatment groups: preoperative education versus no preoperative education and mini-invasive procedure versus standard procedure. The study hypothesis is that education and mini-invasive procedure will reduce the time to reach functional independence. This is a prospective trial with a double randomization.

Detailed description

We propose to evaluate a preoperative education of the patient and a new surgical technique (the mini-invasive THR) that could reduce the time to achieve functional independence. Preoperative education is compared to no education and the mini-invasive surgery is compared to the standard group. The education is based on explaining to the patient what will the postoperative rehabilitation be like. The mini-invasive THR is based on the minimisation of soft tissue trauma. It requires a specific instrumentation to allow dissection and implantation of the prosthesis. Only few studies have evaluated such a technique. However, these studies were retrospective or non-randomised and results are contradictory. Therefore, a randomised controlled clinical trial is necessary to evaluate the possible benefits and feasibility of this technique. The primary outcome is the time to reach functional independence. Secondary outcomes evaluate the duration of hospital stay, the quality of implantation of the prosthesis, the postoperative morbidity, the functional benefits and the quality of life. Methods: this monocentric randomised controlled clinical trial compares the preoperative education versus no preoperative education (first randomization) and the conventional THR to the mini-invasive THR (second randomization). One hundred and forty patients will be included in each group. Expected results: preoperative education and the mini-invasive THR are prone to decrease time to functional independence, postoperative morbidity and duration of hospital stay.

Interventions

PROCEDURE-preoperative education and total hip replacement

-preoperative education and total hip replacement

Sponsors

Cochin Hospital
CollaboratorAMBIG
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* osteoarthritis of the hip * avascular necrosis of the hip * patient between 40 and 90 years old (included)

Exclusion criteria

* history of previous hip operation (bone) * patient \>90 or \< 40 * inflammatory arthritis * important proximal femur or acetabular deformity * complete functional independence not possible * BMI \> 30

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to reach functional independence at hospital dischargeduring de studyTime to reach functional independence at hospital discharge

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
estimated blood lossduring the studyestimated blood loss
duration of operationduring the studyduration of operation
implant positionduring the studyimplant position
implant fixationduring th studyimplant fixation
perioperative technical errorsduring the studyperioperative technical errors
Postoperative during hospital stay:during the studyPostoperative during hospital stay:
number of patients and number of units transfused before hospital dischargeduring the studynumber of patients and number of units transfused before hospital discharge
total estimated blood lossduring the studytotal estimated blood loss
Perioperative criteria :during the studyPerioperative criteria :
skin problemsduring the studyskin problems
duration of hospital stayduring the studyduration of hospital stay
Postoperative (3, 6 and 12 months):during the studyPostoperative (3, 6 and 12 months):
Harris hip score, SF-36, evaluation of satisfaction and expectationduring the studyHarris hip score, SF-36, evaluation of satisfaction and expectation
Abduction strength, balance and gateduring the studyAbduction strength, balance and gate
Scar assessmentduring the studyScar assessment
complicationsduring the studycomplications
postoperative painduring the studypostoperative pain

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactPhilippe ANRACT, PU-PH
philippe.anract@cch.ap-hop-paris.fr+33(0)1 58 41 30 98

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026