Skip to content

A Study of Encapsulated Cell Technology (ECT) Implant for Participants With Early Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa

A Phase II/III Study of Encapsulated Human NTC-201 Cell Implants Releasing Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) for Participants With Retinitis Pigmentosa Using Visual Field Sensitivity as the Primary Outcome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00447980
Enrollment
73
Registered
2007-03-15
Start date
2007-01-22
Completion date
2010-04-19
Last updated
2025-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinitis Pigmentosa

Keywords

Retinitis Pigmentosa, eye disease, retinal disorder, CNTF

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the safety and effectiveness of CNTF implants on vision in persons with retinitis pigmentosa, Usher type II & III, and Choroideremia. This research is being done because there are no effective therapies for people with these retinal degenerations. They are genetic disorders that affect one's ability to see at night, and later cause tunnel vision and loss of central vision. Retinal degenerations affect the retina, a light sensitive layer of cells in the back of the eye. Slowly over time, these cells die and cause permanent loss of vision. The implant is a small capsule that contains human retinal pigment epithelium cells. These cells have been given the ability to make CNTF and release it through the capsule membrane into the surrounding fluid. In this study, two different CNTF dose levels will be used: a high dose and a low dose in one eye, as well as a sham (or placebo) surgery in the other eye.

Detailed description

This study will involve about 18 visits over 2½ years for specific tests of the participant's vision and health. These visits may include visual exams, blood draw for laboratory testing, brief medical history and exam, and occasionally a questionnaire (survey), in addition to the visit for the surgical procedures. The primary effectiveness outcome for this study will be a visual field score one year after the implant surgery. There will be about 12 centers participating in this study, and up to 60 people enrolled, across the US. Each participant joining the study who has completed initial screening will then be scheduled to have a brief surgical procedure performed on each eye, one of which will include a very small cell-filled implant. Follow-up visits for repeat assessments will be required regularly to determine if the implant being tested is safe and effective for use to treat retinitis pigmentosa (RP).

Interventions

DRUGNT-501

Low Dose

Sponsors

Neurotech Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Study inclusion /

Exclusion criteria

Criteria for patients to qualify for the study include, but are not limited to: * Over 18 years of age, and less than 65 years of age * Diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa, Usher Syndrome Type 2 or 3 or Choroideremia * Visual acuity no worse than 20/63 * Experience with at least two full threshold Humphrey Visual Field 30-2 tests, one completed within the year prior to enrolling in this study The following criteria will exclude patients from the study: * Pregnant or lactating females, or females planning to become pregnant during the study or not using an acceptable method of contraception. * Retinitis pigmentosa caused by a classic syndrome, including Usher Type I * Other eye diseases including advanced cataract. * Chronic systemic disease requiring continuous treatment with systemic steroids, immunosuppressive medications or insulin.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity12 monthsThe primary efficacy endpoint was the change in Humphrey VFS from baseline to month 12 (Visit 10) as determined by the HVF 30-2 test, comprised of 76 points. The measure was the sum of actual thresholds for all 76 locations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months
Mean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 monthsChange in Humphrey Visual Field Sensitivity over time

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 90 participants were screened and 73 were randomized to dose groups. 17 of 90 patients were screen failures and not associated (randomized) to either arm. Of the 73 randomized participants, 5 participants, 2 in the high dose and 3 in the low dose arms were randomized but did not receive surgery and did not take part in the study. 68 participants had surgery. For participants randomized to treatment dose, one eye was randomized to surgery and the fellow eye was randomized to sham.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Dose - Implant
NT-501 Low Dose Implant: encapsulated cell therapy that delivers ciliary neurotrophic factor to the retina
23
Low Dose - Implant
NT-501 Low Dose Implant: encapsulated cell therapy that delivers ciliary neurotrophic factor to the retina
23
Low Dose - Sham
Sham Implant in Fellow Eye (Low Dose Arm)
23
Low Dose - Sham
Sham Implant in Fellow Eye (Low Dose Arm)
23
High Dose - Implant
NT-501 High Dose Implant: encapsulated cell therapy that delivers ciliary neurotrophic factor to the retina
50
High Dose - Implant
NT-501 High Dose Implant: encapsulated cell therapy that delivers ciliary neurotrophic factor to the retina
50
High Dose - Sham
Sham Implant in Fellow Eye (High Dose Arm)
50
High Dose - Sham
Sham Implant in Fellow Eye (High Dose Arm)
50
Total292

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyDid not proceed with surgery3322
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1144

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalLow Dose - ImplantLow Dose - ShamHigh Dose - ImplantHigh Dose - Sham
Age, Continuous37.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
34.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
34.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
40.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
40.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
136 Participants22 Participants22 Participants46 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity (MITT Population)1052.5 dB
STANDARD_DEVIATION 424.31
1142.4 dB
STANDARD_DEVIATION 446.33
1135.9 dB
STANDARD_DEVIATION 423.5
969.8 dB
STANDARD_DEVIATION 391.74
961.7 dB
STANDARD_DEVIATION 435.68
Ocular History - Years Since RP Diagnosis10.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
8.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
8.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
10.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
10.49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
140 Participants21 Participants21 Participants49 Participants49 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
74 Participants11 Participants11 Participants26 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
72 Participants12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants24 Participants
Type of Ocular History
Ocular disease
146 Eyes23 Eyes23 Eyes50 Eyes50 Eyes
Type of Ocular History
Ocular surgery
27 Eyes3 Eyes3 Eyes10 Eyes11 Eyes
Type of Ocular History
Ocular treatment
6 Eyes0 Eyes0 Eyes2 Eyes4 Eyes

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
20 / 2048 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 204 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in Humphrey VFS from baseline to month 12 (Visit 10) as determined by the HVF 30-2 test, comprised of 76 points. The measure was the sum of actual thresholds for all 76 locations.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: MITT Population excluding 1 participant from the high dose arm who did not complete any visits subsequent to surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity1.4 dBStandard Deviation 174.58
Low Dose - ShamChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity16.8 dBStandard Deviation 165.41
High Dose - ImplantChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity-164.8 dBStandard Deviation 115.02
High Dose - ShamChange in Humphrey Visual Fields - Total Sensitivity-66.7 dBStandard Deviation 103.23
Secondary

Change in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity

Time frame: Baseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months

Population: MITT Population excluding 1 participant from the high dose arm who did not complete any visits subsequent to surgery.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months - Change from BL-1.21 dBStandard Deviation 140.09
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months - Change from BL1.35 dBStandard Deviation 174.58
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months - Change from BL-62.65 dBStandard Deviation 208.64
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months - Change from BL-104.15 dBStandard Deviation 194.5
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (retained implant) - Change from BL-46.977 dBStandard Deviation 345.78
Low Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant) - Change from BL-82.67 dBStandard Deviation 185.6
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant) - Change from BL-58.50 dBStandard Deviation 148.57
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months - Change from BL-72.15 dBStandard Deviation 162.72
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months - Change from BL25.80 dBStandard Deviation 128.34
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months - Change from BL-37.33 dBStandard Deviation 173.46
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months - Change from BL16.75 dBStandard Deviation 165.41
Low Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (retained implant) - Change from BL-58.64 dBStandard Deviation 275.09
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months - Change from BL-164.79 dBStandard Deviation 115.02
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months - Change from BL-202.31 dBStandard Deviation 137.13
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months - Change from BL-227.89 dBStandard Deviation 149.73
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant) - Change from BL-188.64 dBStandard Deviation 122.33
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (retained implant) - Change from BL-321.72 dBStandard Deviation 196.81
High Dose - ImplantChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months - Change from BL-135.23 dBStandard Deviation 107.86
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (retained implant) - Change from BL-211.82 dBStandard Deviation 145.25
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant) - Change from BL-144.60 dBStandard Deviation 134.31
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months - Change from BL-66.65 dBStandard Deviation 103.23
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months - Change from BL-136.96 dBStandard Deviation 126.73
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months - Change from BL-42.99 dBStandard Deviation 82.85
High Dose - ShamChange in Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months - Change from BL-98.73 dBStandard Deviation 127.09
Secondary

Mean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity

Change in Humphrey Visual Field Sensitivity over time

Time frame: Baseline compared to 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 months

Population: MITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months1141.21 dBStandard Deviation 438.07
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months1038.28 dBStandard Deviation 430.12
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline1142.43 dBStandard Deviation 446.33
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months with retained implant1176.22 dBStandard Deviation 384.29
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months1143.78 dBStandard Deviation 409.76
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant)1090.92 dBStandard Deviation 382.1
Low Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months1079.78 dBStandard Deviation 440.81
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline1135.94 dBStandard Deviation 423.5
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months1152.69 dBStandard Deviation 388.3
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months1063.79 dBStandard Deviation 398.68
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant)1056.08 dBStandard Deviation 406.65
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months1161.74 dBStandard Deviation 399.67
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months1098.61 dBStandard Deviation 427.23
Low Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months with retained implant1173.32 dBStandard Deviation 340.09
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline969.83 dBStandard Deviation 391.74
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months834.60 dBStandard Deviation 354.98
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant)752.78 dBStandard Deviation 345.78
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months805.03 dBStandard Deviation 357.86
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months with retained implant695.97 dBStandard Deviation 251.57
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months757.80 dBStandard Deviation 363.86
High Dose - ImplantMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months745.62 dBStandard Deviation 344.58
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields SensitivityBaseline961.70 dBStandard Deviation 435.68
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity6 Months918.72 dBStandard Deviation 422.6
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity12 Months895.05 dBStandard Deviation 427.12
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity18 Months850.92 dBStandard Deviation 404.91
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity24 Months825.06 dBStandard Deviation 396.47
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months with retained implant787.30 dBStandard Deviation 322.72
High Dose - ShamMean Humphrey Visual Fields Sensitivity30 Months (6 Months Post-Explant)782.60 dBStandard Deviation 382.68

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026