Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan in Combination With Amlodipine Compared to Losartan Plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Patients With Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

An Open-label, Randomized, Parallel Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Amlodipine in Combination With Valsartan Compared to Losartan in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide Given for 52 Weeks on the Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00446563
Enrollment
90
Registered
2007-03-13
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2011-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular

Keywords

Left ventricular hypertrophy, hypertension, valsartan, amlodipine

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of amlodipine plus valsartan in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy

Interventions

DRUGAmlodipine

5 mg or 10 mg tablets taken orally once daily in the morning.

DRUGHydrochlorothiazide

12.5 mg or 25 mg tablets taken orally once daily in the morning.

DRUGValsartan

160 mg film coated tablets taken orally once daily in the morning.

DRUGLosartan

100 mg tablets taken orally once daily in the morning.

Sponsors

Novartis
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Caucasian; male or female outpatients and age between 18-80 years of age, inclusive. * Patients with a history of essential hypertension and who are actually treated either with an antihypertensive monotherapy and with a diastolic blood pressure \>=90 and \<= 105mmHg or with a combination therapy (limited to two active compounds) and with a diastolic blood pressure of \>=90 and \<= 100mmHg. * Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Exclusion criteria

* Severe hypertension * Symptomatic heart failure * History of stroke, heart attack, coronary bypass surgery etc. * Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Measured Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline to week 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Interventricular Septum Thickness (IVS) Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Posterior Wall Thickness Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood that is pumped out of a filled ventricle with each heartbeat.
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Atrial (LA) Area Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in the Ascending Aortic Diameter Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)Baseline to week 52
Change From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)Baseline to week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 52Week 52Target blood pressure defined as having a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) \< 140 mm Hg and a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) \< 90 mm Hg.
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline to week 52An adverse event was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after obtaining informed consent even if the event was not considered to be related to study drug. Medical conditions/diseases present before obtaining informed consent were only considered adverse events if they worsened after study start. Abnormal laboratory values or test results constituted adverse events only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, required study drug discontinuation or required therapy.
Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRIBaseline to week 52

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Valsartan and Amlodipine
Participants received 160 mg Valsartan and 5 mg amlodipine orally once a day for 52 weeks. If blood pressure was not normalized at week 4, treatment was uptitrated to valsartan/amlodipine 160/10 mg. Participants with still uncontrolled hypertension could receive add-on antihypertensive medication.
43
Losartan and HCTZ
Participants received 100 mg losartan and 12.5 mg Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) orally once a day for 52 weeks. If blood pressure was not normalized at week 4, treatment was uptitrated to losartan/HCT 100/25 mg, respectively, until end of study. Participants with still uncontrolled hypertension could receive add-on antihypertensive medication.
47
Total90

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAbnormal laboratory value(s)01
Overall StudyAbnormal test procedure result(s)10
Overall StudyAdministrative problems01
Overall StudyAdverse Event43
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect03
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicValsartan and AmlodipineLosartan and HCTZTotal
Age Continuous58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
57.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants13 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants34 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 4316 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 436 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Measured Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Measured Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-7.1 g/m˄2Standard Deviation 16.5
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Measured Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-9.1 g/m˄2Standard Deviation 18.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The safety population consisted of the sample of all randomized patients who applied study medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)0.8 mg/lStandard Deviation 6.09
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)-2.1 mg/lStandard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The safety population consisted of the sample of all randomized patients who applied study medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-4.5 pg/mlStandard Deviation 56.41
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to End of Study in Levels of N-terminal Pro-B Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-40.1 pg/mlStandard Deviation 74.09
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Interventricular Septum Thickness (IVS) Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Interventricular Septum Thickness (IVS) Assessed by MRI-1.1 mmStandard Deviation 1.5
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Interventricular Septum Thickness (IVS) Assessed by MRI-0.6 mmStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Atrial (LA) Area Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Atrial (LA) Area Assessed by MRI-0.6 cm˄2Standard Deviation 3.2
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Atrial (LA) Area Assessed by MRI-1.0 cm˄2Standard Deviation 4.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessed by MRI

Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood that is pumped out of a filled ventricle with each heartbeat.

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessed by MRI-0.8 PercentageStandard Deviation 6.7
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Assessed by MRI-0.4 PercentageStandard Deviation 5.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Assessed by MRI0.1 mlStandard Deviation 19.9
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Assessed by MRI-6.4 mlStandard Deviation 22.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI0.0 mlStandard Deviation 9.6
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-diastolic Volume (LVEDV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI-3.0 mlStandard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Assessed by MRI0.4 mlStandard Deviation 10.3
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Assessed by MRI-1.5 mlStandard Deviation 10.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI0.2 mlStandard Deviation 5.1
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular End-Systolic Volume (LVESV) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI-0.8 mlStandard Deviation 5.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI-3.5 g/m˄2Standard Deviation 7.4
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMI) Normalized to Body Surface Area Assessed by MRI-4.4 g/m˄2Standard Deviation 9.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in Posterior Wall Thickness Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Posterior Wall Thickness Assessed by MRI-0.4 mmStandard Deviation 1.1
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in Posterior Wall Thickness Assessed by MRI-0.3 mmStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of Study in the Ascending Aortic Diameter Assessed by MRI

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Valsartan and AmlodipineChange From Baseline to the End of Study in the Ascending Aortic Diameter Assessed by MRI0.1 mmStandard Deviation 1.9
Losartan and HCTZChange From Baseline to the End of Study in the Ascending Aortic Diameter Assessed by MRI-0.8 mmStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 52

Target blood pressure defined as having a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) \< 140 mm Hg and a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) \< 90 mm Hg.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all patients from the safety population who had a baseline MRI assessment. If patients dropped out prior to the scheduled observation period, every effort should have been taken to get a final MRI scan which could then be used for the ITT analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Valsartan and AmlodipinePercentage of Participants Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 5253.5 Percentage of participants
Losartan and HCTZPercentage of Participants Achieving Target Blood Pressure at Week 5214.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs)

An adverse event was the appearance or worsening of any undesirable sign, symptom, or medical condition occurring after obtaining informed consent even if the event was not considered to be related to study drug. Medical conditions/diseases present before obtaining informed consent were only considered adverse events if they worsened after study start. Abnormal laboratory values or test results constituted adverse events only if they induced clinical signs or symptoms, required study drug discontinuation or required therapy.

Time frame: Baseline to week 52

Population: The safety population consisted of the sample of all randomized patients who applied study medication at least once.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Valsartan and AmlodipinePercentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs)69.8 Percentage of participants
Losartan and HCTZPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs)68.1 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026