Skip to content

Extension Study to Assess Long Term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Valsartan and Enalapril Combined and Alone in Children With Hypertension

An Extension to Study Protocol CVAL489K2302 to Evaluate the Long Term Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Valsartan in Children 6 to 17 Years of Age With Hypertension, Versus Enalapril Treatment for 14 Weeks, or Combined With Enalapril Versus Enalapril for 66 Weeks in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00446511
Enrollment
250
Registered
2007-03-13
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2011-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

children, pediatrics, high blood pressure, hypertension, valsartan, enalapril

Brief summary

The purpose of this extension study is to compare the long-term safety of valsartan versus enalapril, and the effectiveness of the combination of valsartan and enalapril versus enalapril alone in children with hypertension.

Interventions

DRUGValsartan

Valsartan (80, 160, and 320 mg, weight stratified). All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.

DRUGEnalapril

Enalapril (10, 20, and 40 mg, weight stratified). All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.

DRUGplacebo matched to enalapril

Placebo matched to enalapril. All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.

DRUGplacebo matched to valsartan

placebo matched to valsartan. All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Successful completion of 12 weeks of double-blind treatment in core protocol CVAL489K2302. * Patients participating in study CVAL489K2302 who may have discontinued prematurely due to uncontrolled hypertension defined as MSSBP \> 20%, but \< 25% above the 95th percentile for age, gender, and height after visit 5, qualifies a patient for entry into this extension study.

Exclusion criteria

* Renal artery stenosis. * Current diagnosis of heart failure (NYHA Class II-IV). * Second or third degree heart block without a pacemaker. * Concurrent potentially life threatening arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia. * Clinically significant valvular heart disease. * Patient that demonstrates clinically significant ECG abnormalities other than those associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and AV block controlled with a pacemaker. * Previous solid organ transplantation except renal, liver or heart transplantation. Renal, liver or heart transplant must have occurred at least 6 months prior to enrollment. Patient must be on stable doses of immunosuppressive therapy for 3 months and deemed clinically stable by the investigator. * Patients who experienced any adverse events considered serious and drug related in protocol CVAL489K2302. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Patients With Adverse EventsStart of extension (week 13) to end of study (Week 26 in non-CKD patients and Week 50 in CKD patients)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit. A negative number indicates lowered blood pressure.
Percentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26Week 26Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) control was defined as msSBP and msDBP \< 95th percentile for gender, age, and height. After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit.
Change From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 2024-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was conducted once during the extension in a subset of patients at selected centers. For all patients who completed a qualifying ABPM at baseline, an ABPM was to be performed at Week 20. The ABPM monitor was placed on the non-dominant arm.
Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit. A negative number indicates lowered blood pressure.

Countries

Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Poland, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CKD Patients: Valsartan+Enalapril
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients assigned to valsartan in the core study received combination therapy of valsartan and enalapril in the extension: Valsartan+enalapril (80/10, 160/20, 320/40 mg, weight stratified). All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.
21
CKD Patients: Enalapril
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients assigned to enalapril in the core study received enalapril and valsartan placebo in the extension: Enalapril (10, 20, 40, weight stratified) and matching placebo to valsartan (80, 160, 320 mg). All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.
17
Non-CKD Patients: Valsartan
Non-chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients assigned to valsartan in the core study continued their valsartan monotherapy treatment in the extension: Valsartan (80, 160, 320 mg, weight stratified)+enalapril placebo. All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.
103
Non-CKD Patients: Enalapril
Non-chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients assigned to enalapril in the core study continued their enalapril monotherapy treatment in the extension: Enalapril (10, 20, 40, weight stratified)+valsartan placebo. All study medications were taken orally once daily, at approximately the same time each day, with or without food.
109
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdministrative Problems3041
Overall StudyAdverse Event7231
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0003

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilCKD Patients: EnalaprilNon-CKD Patients: ValsartanNon-CKD Patients: EnalaprilTotal
Age Continuous11.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4
12.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.07
13.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.75
13.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.81
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants5 Participants41 Participants27 Participants81 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants12 Participants62 Participants82 Participants169 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / 2125 / 10311 / 1742 / 109
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 211 / 1030 / 172 / 109

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients With Adverse Events

Time frame: Start of extension (week 13) to end of study (Week 26 in non-CKD patients and Week 50 in CKD patients)

Population: Extension safety population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilNumber of Patients With Adverse Events16 Participants
CKD Patients: EnalaprilNumber of Patients With Adverse Events11 Participants
Non-CKD Patients: ValsartanNumber of Patients With Adverse Events51 Participants
Non-CKD Patients: EnalaprilNumber of Patients With Adverse Events53 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20

24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was conducted once during the extension in a subset of patients at selected centers. For all patients who completed a qualifying ABPM at baseline, an ABPM was to be performed at Week 20. The ABPM monitor was placed on the non-dominant arm.

Time frame: Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 20

Population: ABPM population: All ITT patients who received the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) measurements at both baseline and Week 20. Patients were excluded if their baseline ABPM was measured after active treatment dose (considered invalid baseline).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Systolic BP-23.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.6
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Diastolic BP-17.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.2
CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Systolic BP-0.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.42
CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Diastolic BP2.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.81
Non-CKD Patients: ValsartanChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Systolic BP-11.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.81
Non-CKD Patients: ValsartanChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Diastolic BP-12.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.6
Non-CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Diastolic BP-4.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 7.59
Non-CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange From Baseline in Post-dosing 24-hour Mean Systolic and Diastolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure at Week 20Systolic BP-4.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.49
Secondary

Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26

After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit. A negative number indicates lowered blood pressure.

Time frame: Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26

Population: Extension ITT population: All patients that had both baseline and at least 1 post-Week 12 assessment of any efficacy variable (sitting systolic/diastolic BP) during the extension. Baseline is the Week 0 value. Extension endpoint is the Week 26 or last observation after the core endpoint but before Week 26 carried forward value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26-20.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.48
CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26-11.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.55
Non-CKD Patients: ValsartanChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26-7.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.47
Non-CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP) From Baseline to Week 26-7.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.99
Secondary

Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26

After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit. A negative number indicates lowered blood pressure.

Time frame: Core Baseline (Week 0) to Week 26

Population: Extension ITT population: All patients that had both baseline and at least 1 post-Week 12 assessment of any efficacy variable (sitting systolic/diastolic BP) during the extension. Baseline is the Week 0 value. Extension endpoint is the Week 26 or last observation after the core endpoint but before Week 26 carried forward value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26-23.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.79
CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26-18.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.51
Non-CKD Patients: ValsartanChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26-11.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.74
Non-CKD Patients: EnalaprilChange in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) From Baseline to Week 26-10.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.7
Secondary

Percentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) control was defined as msSBP and msDBP \< 95th percentile for gender, age, and height. After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: The extension ITT population consisted of all extension patients that had both baseline and at least one post-Week 12 assessment of any efficacy variable (sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure) during the extension. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment they were assigned to at the beginning of their extension.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilPercentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26Systolic BP control66.0 Percentage of patients
CKD Patients: Valsartan+EnalaprilPercentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26Diastolic BP control95.1 Percentage of patients
CKD Patients: EnalaprilPercentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26Systolic BP control63.0 Percentage of patients
CKD Patients: EnalaprilPercentage of Non-CKD Patients Achieving Systolic and Diastolic BP Control at Week 26Diastolic BP control91.7 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026