Skip to content

Phase III Study (Tarceva®) vs Chemotherapy to Treat Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients With Mutations in the TK Domain of EGFR

Phase III, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Trial of Tarceva® vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced NSCLC With Mutations in the TK Domain of the EGFR

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00446225
Acronym
EURTAC
Enrollment
174
Registered
2007-03-12
Start date
2007-02-15
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Lung, cancer, EGFR, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, tyrosine kinase, Tarceva®, Erlotinib

Brief summary

A Phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial of Erlotinib (Tarceva®) versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase (TK) domain of the EGFR.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, phase III, randomized, open-label clinical trial. 146 patients with a diagnosis of advanced (stage IIIB and stage IV), non-squamous-cell, non-small-cell pulmonary carcinoma not treated previously for their disease with chemotherapy who present mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR will be recluted. The primary objective is to compare the progression-free survival in both treatment arms of the study (conventional chemotherapy vs. erlotinib) in patients with non-squamous-cell, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in advanced stage (stages IIIB and stage IV) who have not received previous chemotherapy for their disease and who present mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

Interventions

DRUGErlotinib

150 mg/day Patients will receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For all practical effects a treatment cycle will be defined as three weeks of continuous treatment with erlotinib

DRUGCarboplatin

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and Carboplatin AUC = 5 day 1, every 21 days. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) /carboplatin (AUC=6); Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2; day 1 and 8) / Carboplatin (AUC=5) Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive the treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or until a maximum of 4 treatment cycles are given.

Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) / Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2; day 1 and 8) Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive the treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or until a maximum of 4 treatment cycles are given.

DRUGDocetaxel

Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) / Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive the treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or until a maximum of 4 treatment cycles are given.

DRUGCisplatin

Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) / Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive the treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or until a maximum of 4 treatment cycles are given.

Sponsors

Spanish Lung Cancer Group
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed consent * Histologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC, non epidermoid, stage IV or IIIB with pleural effusion, or N3 tumours not candidate for thoracic radiotherapy, harbouring deletions in the exon 19 or mutation in the exon 21 in the TK of the EGFR. * Either measurable or evaluable disease. * Age \> 18 years. * ECOG performance status \< 2. * Adequate bone marrow function * Adequate renal function * Adequate hepatic function * Patients must be accessible for treatment and follow-up. * Patients capable of following an adequate therapeutic compliance * Women of child bearing potential: negative pregnancy test. * Patients of both genders at a fertile age, including those women having their last menstruation within the two previous years, must follow effective contraceptive measures. * Ability to swallow. * Patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis and stable with medical treatment will be eligible for the study. Patients having received radiotherapy for their brain metastasis prior to the systemic treatment for the NSCLC will be also eligible. * Absence of gastrointestinal tract problems

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women. * Women of child bearing potential having a positive pregnancy test in the basal visit or not accomplishing the test. * Patients of both genders sexually active (at a fertile age) not following contraceptive measures during the study. * Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Both prior neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy allowed provided that completed ≥ 6 months before entering the study. * Prior treatment with EGFR targeted therapies. * Patients may have received radiotherapy, provided that the irradiated lesion is not the only evaluable lesion for response and completed before entering the study. * Prior experimental pharmacological agent within the 3 weeks prior to the inclusion of the study. * Any significant ophthalmologic impairment of the eye surface. Use of contact lenses is not recommended. * Pre-existing motor or sensorial neurotoxicity grade \> 2, according to the NCI-CTC criteria. * Evidence of spinal cord compression. * Inability to take oral medication and surgical procedures affecting the absorption or implying intravenous or parenteral feeding. * Any other severe disease or clinical conditions, as, but not only: * Unstable cardiopathy despite treatment, myocardial infarction within the 6 months before entering the study * History of significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, including dementia and epileptic seizures. * Uncontrolled active infection. * Uncontrolled peptic ulcer. * Unstable diabetes mellitus or any other contraindication for treatment with corticosteroids. * AST and/or ALT \> 1.5 x UNL associated to alkaline phosphatase \> 2.5 x UNL. * Any other underlying severe process affecting the ability to take part in the study. * Absolute contraindication for steroids. * Dementia or significant mental disorder interfering the understanding and giving the informed consent. * History of other malignancy except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, radically treated prostatic carcinoma with good prognostic (Gleason = 6). History of other curatively treated malignancy and no evidence of disease within the past 5 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free-survivalFrom the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 monthsThe time from enrollment in the study to tumor progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective ResponseFrom the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 monthsThe objective response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who attain complete response (CR) or partial response (PR); response will be evaluated following RECIST criteria version 1.0. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study.
Overall SurvivalFrom the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 monthsOverall Survival (OS) is defined as the time, in months, from the inclusion date to the death date. A patient is censored at the last contact date if he/she does not die.Overall survival will be assessed from the date of enrollment in the study until the date of death from any cause. Patients lost to follow-up will be censured on the date of the last follow-up visit.
Molecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyAt baselineThe study of mutations in serum (serum DNA). This exploratory analysis was performed to determine whether EGFR mutations can reliably be detected in serum thereby reducing the requirement for invasive techniques as well as to enable detection of mutations in patients where no tumor biopsy samples are available.

Countries

France, Italy, Spain

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
A: Erlotinib Group
Erlotinib (Tarceva)150 mg /day Patients will receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For all practical effects a treatment cycle will be defined as three weeks of continuous treatment with erlotinib Erlotinib: 150 mg/day Patients will receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For all practical effects a treatment cycle will be defined as three weeks of continuous treatment with erlotinib
86
B: Standard Chemotherapy Group
4 cycles of Chemotherapy: Cisplatin / Gemcitabine; Cisplatin /Docetaxel; Carboplatin / Gemcitabine; Carboplatin / Docetaxel. 3 week cycles of standard intravenous chemotherapy * 75 mg/m² cisplatin plus 75 mg/m² docetaxel on day 1 or * 75 mg/m² cisplatin on day 1 plus 1250 mg/m² gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 Patients who were ineligible for cisplatin treatment received intra venous carboplatin chemotherapy instead: * 3 week cycles of carboplatin AUC 6 on day 1 with 75 mg/m² docetaxel on day 1 or * 3 week cycles carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 with 1000 mg/m² gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 Patients in the chemotherapy arm will receive the treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs, or until a maximum of 4 treatment cycles are given.
87
Total173

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicA: Erlotinib GroupB: Standard Chemotherapy GroupTotal
Age, Continuous65 years65 years65 years
Bone metastasis
No
58 Participants58 Participants116 Participants
Bone metastasis
Yes
28 Participants29 Participants57 Participants
Brain metastasis
No
77 Participants76 Participants153 Participants
Brain metastasis
Yes
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants
Clinical stage
Stage II C
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Clinical stage
Stage IIIA
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Clinical stage
Stage IIIB (malignant pleural effusion)
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Clinical stage
Stage IV
78 Participants82 Participants160 Participants
ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG 0
27 Participants30 Participants57 Participants
ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG 1
47 Participants45 Participants92 Participants
ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG 2
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG 3
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
ECOG Performance Status Scale
ECOG 4
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma
82 Participants78 Participants160 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Adenosquamous carcinoma
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Bronchoalveolar adenocarcinoma
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Large-cell carcinoma
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Pleomorphic carcinoma
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Squamous-cell carcinoma
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Histological diagnosis
Undifferentiated carcinomas
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
86 Participants85 Participants171 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
21 participants18 participants39 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
11 participants8 participants19 participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
54 participants61 participants115 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants68 Participants126 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants19 Participants47 Participants
Smoking status
Current smoker
7 Participants12 Participants19 Participants
Smoking status
Never smoked
57 Participants63 Participants120 Participants
Smoking status
Previous smoker
22 Participants12 Participants34 Participants
Type of EGFR mutation
Deletion of exon 19
57 Participants58 Participants115 Participants
Type of EGFR mutation
L858R mutation in exon 21
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Type of EGFR mutation
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
55 / 8654 / 87
other
Total, other adverse events
70 / 8665 / 87
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 8625 / 87

Outcome results

Primary

Progression Free-survival

The time from enrollment in the study to tumor progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first)

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
A: Erlotinib GroupProgression Free-survival9.4 months
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupProgression Free-survival5.2 months
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.27, 0.64]Log Rank
Secondary

Molecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study Pathology

The study of mutations in serum (serum DNA). This exploratory analysis was performed to determine whether EGFR mutations can reliably be detected in serum thereby reducing the requirement for invasive techniques as well as to enable detection of mutations in patients where no tumor biopsy samples are available.

Time frame: At baseline

Population: Intention to treat. Serum sample taken at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
A: Erlotinib GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyMutated30 Sample of serum
A: Erlotinib GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyWild type24 Sample of serum
A: Erlotinib GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyNot enough sample32 Sample of serum
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyMutated29 Sample of serum
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyWild type23 Sample of serum
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupMolecular Markers Related to EGFR and Study PathologyNot enough sample35 Sample of serum
Secondary

Objective Response

The objective response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who attain complete response (CR) or partial response (PR); response will be evaluated following RECIST criteria version 1.0. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
A: Erlotinib GroupObjective ResponseComplete Response (CR)2.3 percentage of participants
A: Erlotinib GroupObjective ResponseStable Disease (SD)18.6 percentage of participants
A: Erlotinib GroupObjective ResponsePartial Response (PR)62.8 percentage of participants
A: Erlotinib GroupObjective ResponseMissing (No Response Assessment)9.3 percentage of participants
A: Erlotinib GroupObjective ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)7 percentage of participants
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupObjective ResponseMissing (No Response Assessment)21.8 percentage of participants
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupObjective ResponseStable Disease (SD)49.4 percentage of participants
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupObjective ResponseComplete Response (CR)0 percentage of participants
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupObjective ResponsePartial Response (PR)16.1 percentage of participants
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupObjective ResponseProgressive Disease (PD)12.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time, in months, from the inclusion date to the death date. A patient is censored at the last contact date if he/she does not die.Overall survival will be assessed from the date of enrollment in the study until the date of death from any cause. Patients lost to follow-up will be censured on the date of the last follow-up visit.

Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of last follow up, assessed up to 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
A: Erlotinib GroupOverall Survival33.4 months
B: Standard Chemotherapy GroupOverall Survival29.9 months
p-value: 0.04395% CI: [0.36, 0.99]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026