Skip to content

Comparing Rehabilitation Programs for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Comparison of Early Hip Strengthening to Early Quadriceps Strengthening in the Treatment of Females With Patellofemoral Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00445224
Enrollment
33
Registered
2007-03-08
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Keywords

Knee pain, Rehabilitation

Brief summary

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee disorder affecting physically active people. Despite the growing base of support for the early introduction of hip strengthening exercises into the rehabilitation of PFPS, there have been few randomized clinical trials comparing isolated hip to isolated quadriceps strengthening. The purpose of this study is to determine how different exercises affect pain, strength, muscle activity, and function in female subjects with patellofemoral pain. The researchers hypothesize that females diagnosed with PFPS who initially participate in a hip strengthening program will report a greater perceived level of function, greater strength, less pain, and improved neuromuscular activity than those who participate in a progressive quadriceps strengthening intervention.

Detailed description

Methods: Thirty-three females with PFPS will perform either initial hip strengthening (hip group) or initial quadriceps strengthening (quad group) for 4 weeks, prior to 4 weeks of a similar program of functional weight-bearing exercises. Self-reported pain, function, and functional strength were measured. Isometric strength was assessed for hip abductors, external rotators, and knee extensors. A mixed-model analysis of variance will be used to determine group differences over time.

Interventions

OTHERHip Progressive Resistive Exercise

Hip Progressive Resistance Exercise program will be carried out by subjects under supervision once a week and then performed at home 2 additional times at home without supervision. Exercises focus on strengthening hip abduction ad external rotation musculature.

OTHERQuad Progressive Resistive Exercises

Quad Progressive Resistive Exercise program will be carried out by subjects under supervision once a week and then performed at home 2 additional times at home without supervision. Exercises focus on strengthening quadriceps musculature with straight leg raises and quadriceps isometrics.

Sponsors

Timothy Uhl
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
15 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* anterior or retropatellar knee pain reported during at least 2 of the following activities: ascending and descending stairs, hopping and running, squatting, kneeling, and prolonged sitting * insidious onset of symptoms not related to trauma * pain with compression of the patella * pain on palpation of the patellar facets

Exclusion criteria

* symptoms present for less than one month * clinical evidence of other knee pathology * history of recent knee surgery within past one year * history of patellar dislocations or subluxations * current significant injury affecting other lower extremity joints

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analog Pain Scale8 weekVisual analog pain scale at end of intervention. 0 to 10 cm line with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing severe pain
Visual Analog Pain Scale (Describing Worst Pain Felt During the Past Week)weekly0 to 10 cm line with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing severe pain
Subjective Function by Lower Extremity Functional Scale Report FormBaseline, Mid-Intervention, and Post-Intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Strength by Isometric DynamometerBaseline, Mid, and Post-Intervention
Hip Abduction Strength8 weekSide lying Hip Abduction maximal muscular contraction with a hand held dynamometer
Neuromuscular Activity by Surface Electromyographical Amplitude During Stair DescentBaseline, Mid and Post-Intervention
Objective Function by Step-down Task for 30 SecondsBaseline, Mid, and Post-Intervention

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

33 females with anterior knee pain (PFPS) volunteered to participate in this study. Enrollment began August 2007 and last subject was enrolled in August 2009.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects were evaluated for PFPS using the following:(1)anterior knee pain reported during at least 2 activities: stair climbing, running, squatting, kneeling, and prolonged sitting;(2)insidious onset of symptoms ;(3)pain with compression of the patella; and(4)pain on palpation of patellar facets. Only three patients were excluded during study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hip Strengthening Then Combined Exercises
Performed hip strengthening exercises for 4 weeks prior to crossing over to a combined hip and quadricep rehabilitation program
17
Quadricep Group Then Combined Exercises
Performed quadricep strengthening exercises for 4 weeks prior to crossing over to a combined hip and quadricep rehabilitation program
16
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Specific ExercisesWithdrawal by Subject33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQuadricep Group Then Combined ExercisesHip Strengthening Then Combined ExercisesTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Age, Continuous25.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
24.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3
25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants17 participants33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants17 Participants33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 170 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 170 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Subjective Function by Lower Extremity Functional Scale Report Form

Time frame: Baseline, Mid-Intervention, and Post-Intervention

Primary

Visual Analog Pain Scale

Visual analog pain scale at end of intervention. 0 to 10 cm line with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing severe pain

Time frame: 8 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hip Strengthening Then Combined ExercisesVisual Analog Pain Scale2.4 centimetersStandard Deviation 2.8
Quadricep Group Then Combined ExercisesVisual Analog Pain Scale2.6 centimetersStandard Deviation 2
Comparison: Repeated measures ANOVA for group and timep-value: 0.049ANOVA
Primary

Visual Analog Pain Scale (Describing Worst Pain Felt During the Past Week)

0 to 10 cm line with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing severe pain

Time frame: weekly

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hip Strengthening Then Combined ExercisesVisual Analog Pain Scale (Describing Worst Pain Felt During the Past Week)4.5 centimeterStandard Deviation 2.5
Quadricep Group Then Combined ExercisesVisual Analog Pain Scale (Describing Worst Pain Felt During the Past Week)4.2 centimeterStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Hip Abduction Strength

Side lying Hip Abduction maximal muscular contraction with a hand held dynamometer

Time frame: 8 week

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hip Strengthening Then Combined ExercisesHip Abduction Strength6.6 (Newton*meters)/(Weight*Height)Standard Deviation 0.9
Quadricep Group Then Combined ExercisesHip Abduction Strength6.2 (Newton*meters)/(Weight*Height)Standard Deviation 1.8
p-value: 0.041ANOVA
Secondary

Neuromuscular Activity by Surface Electromyographical Amplitude During Stair Descent

Time frame: Baseline, Mid and Post-Intervention

Secondary

Objective Function by Step-down Task for 30 Seconds

Time frame: Baseline, Mid, and Post-Intervention

Secondary

Strength by Isometric Dynamometer

Time frame: Baseline, Mid, and Post-Intervention

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026