Advanced Hodgkin Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the toxicities of the COPPEBVCAD vs BEACOPP vs ABVD regimens.
Interventions
DRUGCOPPEBVCAD vs BEACOPP vs ABVD
Sponsors
Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed diagnosis of Hodgkin disease * Clinical stage IIB, III, IV * No prior treatment for Hodgkin disease or other malignancy * Age 18-65 year * Good cardiac, pulmunar, renal and hepatic function * Performance status 0-3 (Karnofsky 100- 40) * Written Informed Consent
Exclusion criteria
* HIV positivity * Large cell, anaplastic, CD30+ lymphoma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the toxicity of the COPPEBVCAD vs BEACOPP vs ABVD regimens | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the results in terms of response, failure free survival and relapse free survival of the three regimens | — |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed