Skip to content

Velcade (Bortezomib), Adriamycin Dexamethasone (PAD) or Vincristine Adriamycin Dexamethasone in Second Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma

A Phase 2, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Velcade When Added to Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Treatment Versus Vincristine-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone Standard Treatment in Subjects With Multiple Myeloma Who Are Refractory to or Have Relapsed After Primary Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00441168
Enrollment
30
Registered
2007-02-28
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-01-31
Last updated
2014-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Keywords

Multiple Myeloma, bortezomib, Cancer, Hematology, bone marrow, immunoglobulin, relapse, refractory, plasma cell, Velcade, adriamycin, dexamethasone, vincristine

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and effectiveness of replacing vincristine with a drug called bortezomib (also known as Velcadeor PS341) in the standard therapy vincristine, doxorubicin (not limited to, but formerly referred to under the tradename Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (VAD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Multiple Myeloma is the second most common cancer of the blood. Bortezomib is the first approved cancer treatment in a new class of medicines called proteasome inhibitors. It disrupts the cell cycle of the cell, affecting numerous biologic pathways, including those related to growth and survival of cancer cells. The treatment will be used as second line treatment, which means either the disease has returned after a period of improvement (relapse) or the disease did not respond to the initial treatment (refractory). Patients will receive either bortezomib (PS341), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (PAD) or the VAD standard therapy.

Detailed description

Bortezomib, has been approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma, who have already received at least one prior treatment and whose disease is worsening on their last treatment and who have already undergone or are unsuitable for bone marrow transplantation. Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, its efficacy is increased with the addition of dexamethasone and it demonstrates synergy with doxorubicin. The VAD combination has been widely used in multiple myeloma and has demonstrated to be effective in relapsed patients. Based on previous trial results, it is hoped that bortezomib, in replacing vincristine in the VAD standard therapy, can improve the response to treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, with manageable side effects. This is an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. About 212 patients will take part in the study. Patients will be treated with either bortezomib (PS-341), Adriamycin and Dexamethasone (PAD) or Vincristine, Adriamycin and Dexamethasone (VAD). There will be an initial 14 day screening period to evaluate if the patient is suitable for the study. After screening, eligible patients will be randomised to receive either PAD or VAD. Patients will receive therapy for up to 8 treatment cycles of 28 days each. After the treatment period, there will be a long-term follow-up period with monthly visits until disease progression or relapse. Thereafter follow-up will be continued by at least a phone call every other month. This long-term follow-up period will be performed for all patients until the last patient was treated and followed up for 1 year. Response to treatment will be assessed according to the European group for blood and marrow transplant criteria (EBMT). Disease burden will be monitored by measuring M-protein concentration in serum and in urine every 4 weeks until disease progression or relapse. Thereafter follow-up for survival will be continued every other month by at least a phone call. Safety will be assessed by monitoring of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examination and clinical laboratory tests. Treatment with PAD or VAD will be for up to 8 cycles of 28 days each. Treatment beyond 6 cycles will be discussed on individual basis. Proposed dosages are: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11; vincristine 0.4mg IV push on Days 1 to 4; doxorubicin 9mg/m² IV push on Days 1 to 4; dexamethasone in 1st cycle 40 mg daily on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12 and 17 to 20, orally (or equivalent parenteral dose) and on subsequent cycles as 40 mg daily on Days 1 to 4 and 17 to 20 only.

Interventions

DRUGadriamycin

adriamycin: 9mg/m² intravenous (IV) push on days 1 to 4

DRUGbortezomib

bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1, 4, 8, and 11

DRUGdexamethasone

dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle

DRUGvincristine

vincristine: 0.4mg IV push on days 1 to 4

Sponsors

Janssen-Cilag International NV
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma following 1 previous line of therapy and, is scheduled by the investigator to be treated with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone standard therapy * measurable secretory multiple myeloma based on defined criteria * Karnofsky performance status of \>or = 60% * fulfils defined laboratory requirements within 14 days before baseline * if female, the patient is either postmenopausal or surgically sterilised or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for defined period of time * if male, the patient agrees to use an acceptable barrier method for contraception for a defined period of time.

Exclusion criteria

* More than one previous line of therapy for multiple myeloma * use of bortezomib in the previous line of therapy and/or received bortezomib in a previous trial * known allergy or hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol * peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of grade 2 or higher * myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment or had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Confirmed Disease Responseevery 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cyclesThe primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease \[PD\], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
Best Reported Disease Responseevery 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cyclesThe primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Response (DOR)every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cyclesDOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study. DOR = (\[Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response\]+1)/30.44.

Countries

Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Turkey (Türkiye)

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 05 December 2006 to 04 July 2007 at 2 sites in Germany, 1 site in Hungary, 3 sites in Lithuania, 3 sites in Poland and 3 sites in Russia

Pre-assignment details

Subjects who qualified were screened. Subjects were considered for eligibility when the investigator would treat the subject with a combination therapy of vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) standard therapy. One subject was not randomised because the subject was a screening failure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VAD Treatment
vincristine: 0.4mg IV push on days 1 to 4; adriamycin: 9mg/m² IV push on days 1 to 4; dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
16
PAD Treatment
bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; adriamycin: 9mg/m² IV push on days 1 to 4; dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
13
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up PeriodDeath30
Follow-up PeriodLost to Follow-up56
Follow-up PeriodOther13
Follow-up PeriodWithdrawal by Subject30
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event12
Treatment PeriodDeath30
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up01
Treatment PeriodProgressive Disease02
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation01
Treatment Periodqualified for stem-cell transplantation30
Treatment Periodrefractory disease10
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPAD TreatmentVAD Treatment
Age, Continuous62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
64.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
Body Surface Area1.886 m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.226
1.924 m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.219
1.855 m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.233
Height169.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
169.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
168.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Karnofsky Performance Status
100
3 participants3 participants0 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
≤50
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
60
2 participants1 participants1 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
70
4 participants3 participants1 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
80
12 participants3 participants9 participants
Karnofsky Performance Status
90
8 participants3 participants5 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
29 Participants13 Participants16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants10 Participants11 Participants
Weight77.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
78.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
75.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 168 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 165 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Best Confirmed Disease Response

The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease \[PD\], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.

Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseCR0 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponsePR5 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseResponse Rate (CR + PR)5 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseMR2 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseOverall Response (CR + PR + MR)7 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseNC3 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponsePD1 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseUnknown/Unable to Assess4 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseUnknown/Unable to Assess4 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseCR1 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseOverall Response (CR + PR + MR)7 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponsePR6 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponsePD1 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseResponse Rate (CR + PR)7 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseNC1 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Confirmed Disease ResponseMR0 participants
Primary

Best Reported Disease Response

The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.

Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseOverall Response (CR + PR + MR)9 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseResponse Rate (CR + PR)7 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseNC5 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseCR1 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponsePD0 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseMR2 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseUnknown/Unable to Assess1 participants
VAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponsePR6 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseUnknown/Unable to Assess0 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseCR3 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseResponse Rate (CR + PR)7 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseMR3 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseOverall Response (CR + PR + MR)10 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponseNC3 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponsePD0 participants
PAD TreatmentBest Reported Disease ResponsePR4 participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study. DOR = (\[Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response\]+1)/30.44.

Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles

Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.There was insufficient data to perform Kaplan Meier analysis (data available for 5 subjects in the VAD group and 6 subjects in the PAD group).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 11.68 months
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 26.18 months
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 33.71 months
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 45.42 months
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 54.73 months
VAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 6NA months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 54.96 months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 12.83 months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 46.57 months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 27.69 months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 67.42 months
PAD TreatmentDuration of Response (DOR)patient 35.52 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026