Multiple Myeloma
Conditions
Keywords
Multiple Myeloma, bortezomib, Cancer, Hematology, bone marrow, immunoglobulin, relapse, refractory, plasma cell, Velcade, adriamycin, dexamethasone, vincristine
Brief summary
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and effectiveness of replacing vincristine with a drug called bortezomib (also known as Velcadeor PS341) in the standard therapy vincristine, doxorubicin (not limited to, but formerly referred to under the tradename Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (VAD) in patients with multiple myeloma. Multiple Myeloma is the second most common cancer of the blood. Bortezomib is the first approved cancer treatment in a new class of medicines called proteasome inhibitors. It disrupts the cell cycle of the cell, affecting numerous biologic pathways, including those related to growth and survival of cancer cells. The treatment will be used as second line treatment, which means either the disease has returned after a period of improvement (relapse) or the disease did not respond to the initial treatment (refractory). Patients will receive either bortezomib (PS341), doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and dexamethasone (PAD) or the VAD standard therapy.
Detailed description
Bortezomib, has been approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma, who have already received at least one prior treatment and whose disease is worsening on their last treatment and who have already undergone or are unsuitable for bone marrow transplantation. Bortezomib has significant activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, its efficacy is increased with the addition of dexamethasone and it demonstrates synergy with doxorubicin. The VAD combination has been widely used in multiple myeloma and has demonstrated to be effective in relapsed patients. Based on previous trial results, it is hoped that bortezomib, in replacing vincristine in the VAD standard therapy, can improve the response to treatment of patients with multiple myeloma, with manageable side effects. This is an international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. About 212 patients will take part in the study. Patients will be treated with either bortezomib (PS-341), Adriamycin and Dexamethasone (PAD) or Vincristine, Adriamycin and Dexamethasone (VAD). There will be an initial 14 day screening period to evaluate if the patient is suitable for the study. After screening, eligible patients will be randomised to receive either PAD or VAD. Patients will receive therapy for up to 8 treatment cycles of 28 days each. After the treatment period, there will be a long-term follow-up period with monthly visits until disease progression or relapse. Thereafter follow-up will be continued by at least a phone call every other month. This long-term follow-up period will be performed for all patients until the last patient was treated and followed up for 1 year. Response to treatment will be assessed according to the European group for blood and marrow transplant criteria (EBMT). Disease burden will be monitored by measuring M-protein concentration in serum and in urine every 4 weeks until disease progression or relapse. Thereafter follow-up for survival will be continued every other month by at least a phone call. Safety will be assessed by monitoring of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examination and clinical laboratory tests. Treatment with PAD or VAD will be for up to 8 cycles of 28 days each. Treatment beyond 6 cycles will be discussed on individual basis. Proposed dosages are: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11; vincristine 0.4mg IV push on Days 1 to 4; doxorubicin 9mg/m² IV push on Days 1 to 4; dexamethasone in 1st cycle 40 mg daily on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12 and 17 to 20, orally (or equivalent parenteral dose) and on subsequent cycles as 40 mg daily on Days 1 to 4 and 17 to 20 only.
Interventions
adriamycin: 9mg/m² intravenous (IV) push on days 1 to 4
bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1, 4, 8, and 11
dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle
vincristine: 0.4mg IV push on days 1 to 4
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma following 1 previous line of therapy and, is scheduled by the investigator to be treated with vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone standard therapy * measurable secretory multiple myeloma based on defined criteria * Karnofsky performance status of \>or = 60% * fulfils defined laboratory requirements within 14 days before baseline * if female, the patient is either postmenopausal or surgically sterilised or willing to use an acceptable method of birth control for defined period of time * if male, the patient agrees to use an acceptable barrier method for contraception for a defined period of time.
Exclusion criteria
* More than one previous line of therapy for multiple myeloma * use of bortezomib in the previous line of therapy and/or received bortezomib in a previous trial * known allergy or hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron or mannitol * peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain of grade 2 or higher * myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrollment or had New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Best Confirmed Disease Response | every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles | The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease \[PD\], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD. |
| Best Reported Disease Response | every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles | The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response (DOR) | every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles | DOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study. DOR = (\[Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response\]+1)/30.44. |
Countries
Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Russia, Turkey (Türkiye)
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited from 05 December 2006 to 04 July 2007 at 2 sites in Germany, 1 site in Hungary, 3 sites in Lithuania, 3 sites in Poland and 3 sites in Russia
Pre-assignment details
Subjects who qualified were screened. Subjects were considered for eligibility when the investigator would treat the subject with a combination therapy of vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD) standard therapy. One subject was not randomised because the subject was a screening failure.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| VAD Treatment vincristine: 0.4mg IV push on days 1 to 4; adriamycin: 9mg/m² IV push on days 1 to 4; dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle | 16 |
| PAD Treatment bortezomib: 1.3 mg/m² intravenous (IV) bolus on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; adriamycin: 9mg/m² IV push on days 1 to 4; dexamethasone: 40 mg daily days 1- 4/9-12/17-20 - cycle 1 / days 1-4/17-20 - subsequent cycle | 13 |
| Total | 29 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up Period | Death | 3 | 0 |
| Follow-up Period | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 6 |
| Follow-up Period | Other | 1 | 3 |
| Follow-up Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 |
| Treatment Period | Adverse Event | 1 | 2 |
| Treatment Period | Death | 3 | 0 |
| Treatment Period | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period | Progressive Disease | 0 | 2 |
| Treatment Period | Protocol Violation | 0 | 1 |
| Treatment Period | qualified for stem-cell transplantation | 3 | 0 |
| Treatment Period | refractory disease | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | PAD Treatment | VAD Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 | 61.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 | 64.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 |
| Body Surface Area | 1.886 m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.226 | 1.924 m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.219 | 1.855 m2 STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.233 |
| Height | 169.3 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 | 169.8 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 | 168.8 cm STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 |
| Karnofsky Performance Status 100 | 3 participants | 3 participants | 0 participants |
| Karnofsky Performance Status ≤50 | 0 participants | 0 participants | 0 participants |
| Karnofsky Performance Status 60 | 2 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Karnofsky Performance Status 70 | 4 participants | 3 participants | 1 participants |
| Karnofsky Performance Status 80 | 12 participants | 3 participants | 9 participants |
| Karnofsky Performance Status 90 | 8 participants | 3 participants | 5 participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 29 Participants | 13 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 8 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 21 Participants | 10 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Weight | 77.0 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 | 78.3 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 | 75.9 kg STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 16 | 8 / 13 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 16 | 5 / 13 |
Outcome results
Best Confirmed Disease Response
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria as assessed by the investigator. The best confirmed response was defined as 2 separate and consecutive evaluations of response, at least 6 weeks apart (for progressive disease \[PD\], 1 to 3 weeks apart). The ordering of the responses was: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), no change (NC) and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | CR | 0 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | PR | 5 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Response Rate (CR + PR) | 5 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | MR | 2 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Overall Response (CR + PR + MR) | 7 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | NC | 3 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | PD | 1 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Unknown/Unable to Assess | 4 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Unknown/Unable to Assess | 4 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | CR | 1 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Overall Response (CR + PR + MR) | 7 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | PR | 6 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | PD | 1 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | Response Rate (CR + PR) | 7 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | NC | 1 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Confirmed Disease Response | MR | 0 participants |
Best Reported Disease Response
The primary efficacy analysis was based on the best response obtained during the treatment period according to the EBMT criteria as assessed by the investigator. The ordering of the responses was: CR, PR, MR, NC and PD. CR was the best response and the poorest response was PD.
Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Overall Response (CR + PR + MR) | 9 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Response Rate (CR + PR) | 7 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | NC | 5 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | CR | 1 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | PD | 0 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | MR | 2 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Unknown/Unable to Assess | 1 participants |
| VAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | PR | 6 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Unknown/Unable to Assess | 0 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | CR | 3 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Response Rate (CR + PR) | 7 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | MR | 3 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | Overall Response (CR + PR + MR) | 10 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | NC | 3 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | PD | 0 participants |
| PAD Treatment | Best Reported Disease Response | PR | 4 participants |
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the duration from the date of the best confirmed response for subjects who achieved CR or PR to the date of first documented evidence of PD (or relapse for subjects who experienced CR) over the duration of the study. DOR = (\[Date of PD or date of censoring - Date of best response\]+1)/30.44.
Time frame: every 28 days during treatment period for up to 6 to 8 cycles
Population: Subjects in the ITT population (all subjects who received at least one dose of study drug and who had at least one post baseline efficacy parameter) were included.There was insufficient data to perform Kaplan Meier analysis (data available for 5 subjects in the VAD group and 6 subjects in the PAD group).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 1 | 1.68 months |
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 2 | 6.18 months |
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 3 | 3.71 months |
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 4 | 5.42 months |
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 5 | 4.73 months |
| VAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 6 | NA months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 5 | 4.96 months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 1 | 2.83 months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 4 | 6.57 months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 2 | 7.69 months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 6 | 7.42 months |
| PAD Treatment | Duration of Response (DOR) | patient 3 | 5.52 months |