Skip to content

Presentation of Lumbar Disc and Reduction of Symptoms

Reduction in Leg and Back Pain Following Lumbar Microdiscetomy in Those Shown the Removed Disc Fragments After the Operation: a Double Blind Randomized Control Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00440856
Acronym
POLDAROS
Enrollment
100
Registered
2007-02-27
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2015-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Radiculopathy

Keywords

Intervertebral disc, Lumbar discectomy, Outcome, Radiculopathy due to prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Brief summary

The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of the disc material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their leg and back symptoms.

Detailed description

Objective. The trial aims to assess the hypothesis that presentation of removed material to the patient following a lumbar microdiscectomy would positively influence the improvement in their radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms. Design. Data will be collected prospectively. Patient allocation to treatment groups will be by simple randomization using a computer generated sequence of random numbers. Trial participants will be blinded as to the trial hypothesis and investigators blinded to patient allocation. Setting. Patients will all be treated in a single secondary care unit. Participants. All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc over a six month period will be considered for entry into the trial. Exclusion criteria: inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms. Intervention. Patients allocated to the experimental arm will be given the removed disc fragments to keep once they have recovered from anaesthesia. Those in the control arm will not be shown disc fragments (best available treatment). Main outcome measure. The degree of improvement in radiculopathic and degenerative symptoms reported by the patient at 2-3 months after surgery.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPresentation of excised intervertebral disc fragments

Sponsors

St George's, University of London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients undergoing a planned lumbar microdiscectomy for radiculopathy due to a prolapsed intervertebral disc

Exclusion criteria

* inability to give verbal consent, age less than 18, previous spinal surgery, emergency discectomies, patients having spinal fusions and those with no radiculopathic symptoms.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective experience of radiculopathic pain by the patient following surgery2-4 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Subjective experience of lower limb motor weakness by the patient following surgery2-4 months
Subjective experience of paraesthesia by the patient following surgery2-4 months
Subjective experience of low back pain by the patient following surgery2-4 months
Altered pattern of use of analgesia2-4 months
Subjective experience of numbness by the patient following surgery2-4 months
Maximum walking distance2-4 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026