Skip to content

Efficacy in Reducing Fractures and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Men With Osteoporosis

A Two Year Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Fracture Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg Annually for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00439647
Enrollment
1199
Registered
2007-02-23
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2017-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Male Osteoporosis

Keywords

Osteoporosis, males, vertebral fractures, clinical fractures, bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, zoledronic acid

Brief summary

This study will investigate if the drug zoledronic acid given once yearly is safe and has beneficial effects in treating osteoporosis by reducing bone loss and fractures in men with osteoporosis.

Interventions

DRUGZoledronic acid 5 mg iv

Zoledronic acid 5 mg iv given once a year.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo intravenous (i.v.) once a year

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Osteoporosis as defined by very low bone mineral density in the hip and spine or low bone mineral density in the hip combined with presence of 1-3 mild or moderate fractures of the vertebrae

Exclusion criteria

* Low Vitamin D * Renal insufficiency * Previous treatment with certain anti-osteoporotic therapies (except after certain washout periods): calcitonin, bisphosphonates, parathyroid hormone (PTH), sodium fluoride, strontium ranelate, * Previous treatment with testosterone, anabolic steroids or growth hormone * Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids (oral or i.v.) within the last year * History of any cancer or metastases within the last 5 years * History of brittle bone disease, multiple myeloma, or Paget's disease, or any other metabolic bone disease, except osteoporosis * Bilateral hip replacements Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 MonthsVertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 monthsModerate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months24 MonthsModerate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 MonthsBaseline, 12 monthsWorsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 MonthsBaseline, Month 24Worsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)
Mean Change in Height From Baselinefrom Baseline to 12 months and 24 monthsHeight was measured using a stadiometer. Two measurements were taken in millimeters (mm), and repeated if the two measurements differed by greater than 4 mm. The average of the two (or four) height measurements was used for analysis
Number of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture24 monthsClinical vertebral fracture is a painful vertebral fracture which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased back pain, impairment of mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months12 MonthsVertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height
Number of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture24 monthsNon-vertebral fracture is any fracture which was not of the vertebrae. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in BMD at lumbar spine at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in total hip BMD at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6, Month 12, Month 24Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in total femoral neck BMD at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)
Serum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 15, month 18, Month 24
Number of Participants With First Clinical Fracture24 monthsClinical fracture is painful fracture in any site which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased pain, impaired mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience fracture were censored at end of study. End of study was defined as the earlier of last visit or date of death.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Zoledronic Acid
5 mg/100 ml administered via a peripheral intravenous site as a slow infusion over 15 minutes. The intravenous (i.v.) infusion was delivered via vented infusion line (to allow constant flow) and 20-22 gauge angiocatheter, and preceded and followed by a 10 ml normal saline flush of the intravenous line for a total volume infused of 120 ml once a year.
588
Placebo
100 ml Placebo administered via a peripheral intravenous site as a slow infusion over 15 minutes. The intravenous (i.v.) infusion was delivered via vented infusion line (to allow constant flow) and 20-22 gauge angiocatheter, and preceded and followed by a 10 ml normal saline flush of the intravenous line for a total volume infused of 120 ml once a year.
611
Total1,199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event1111
Overall StudyDeath1518
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy04
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up412
Overall StudyProtocol Violation34
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2522

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZoledronic AcidPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
588 Participants611 Participants1199 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
399 / 588256 / 611
serious
Total, serious adverse events
149 / 588154 / 611

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months

Vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. In this analysis, missing Month 24 fractures were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months1.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months4.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Mean Change in Height From Baseline

Height was measured using a stadiometer. Two measurements were taken in millimeters (mm), and repeated if the two measurements differed by greater than 4 mm. The average of the two (or four) height measurements was used for analysis

Time frame: from Baseline to 12 months and 24 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidMean Change in Height From Baseline12 months-0.86 mmStandard Error 0.333
Zoledronic AcidMean Change in Height From Baseline24 months-2.33 mmStandard Error 0.389
PlaceboMean Change in Height From Baseline12 months-2.50 mmStandard Error 0.522
PlaceboMean Change in Height From Baseline24 months-4.61 mmStandard Error 0.61
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Clinical Fracture

Clinical fracture is painful fracture in any site which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased pain, impaired mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience fracture were censored at end of study. End of study was defined as the earlier of last visit or date of death.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: The ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidNumber of Participants With First Clinical Fracture6 Participants 1.95
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Clinical Fracture11 Participants 3.09
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture

Clinical vertebral fracture is a painful vertebral fracture which came to clinical attention, e.g., with increased back pain, impairment of mobility or functional limitations. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: The ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidNumber of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Clinical Vertebral Fracture3 Participants 1.63
Secondary

Number of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture

Non-vertebral fracture is any fracture which was not of the vertebrae. Subjects who did not experience a fracture event were censored at the end of study. End of study was defined as the last visit or date of death, whichever was earlier.

Time frame: 24 months

Population: The ITT (intent to treat) population consisted of all subjects as randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidNumber of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture5 Participants 1.88
PlaceboNumber of Participants With First Non-vertebral Fracture8 Participants 2.83
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in total femoral neck BMD at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)

Time frame: Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6 (n=60, n=63)2.21 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.448
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 12 (n=58, n=64)2.06 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.465
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 24 (n=56, n=63)3.39 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.544
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6 (n=60, n=63)0.58 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.437
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 12 (n=58, n=64)0.59 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.443
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Femoral Neck BMD (g/CM^2)Month 24 (n=56, n=63)0.09 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.513
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in BMD at lumbar spine at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)

Time frame: Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 6 (n=61, n=61)4.87 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.412
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 12 (n=60, n=62)5.51 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.437
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 24 (n=58, n=61)7.73 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.459
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 6 (n=61, n=61)0.10 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.412
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 12 (n=60, n=62)0.84 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.43
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Lumbar Spine Bone Mass Density (BMD)Month 24 (n=58, n=61)1.61 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.448
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Least Square Means (LSM) were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with treatment and baseline value as explanatory variables. Percent change in total hip BMD at Months 6, 12, and 24 relative to baseline as measured by DXA in a subset of at least 100 evaluable subjects at selected sites. Percentage change from baseline = 100\*(endpoint - baseline)

Time frame: Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6 (n=60, n=63)1.38 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.294
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 12 (n=58, n=64)1.66 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.283
Zoledronic AcidPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 24 (n=56, n=63)2.31 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.346
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 6 (n=60, n=63)-0.44 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.287
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 12 (n=58, n=64)0.26 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.269
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Total Hip BMD (g/CM^2)Month 24 (n=56, n=63)0.16 Percent change in BMDStandard Error 0.326
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months

Moderate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months0.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months1.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months

Moderate or severe vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. Grade 2 moderate VF was defined as a 25-40% reduction in any vertebral height.Grade 3 Severe: VF was defined as more than 40% reduction in any vertebral height.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months1.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Moderate or Severe Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months3.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months

Vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM(quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) is defined by at least 20% decrease in vertebral height of at least 4mm. If participant had QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative method for VF assessment: Grade1 Mild VF is defined as 20-24% decrease in anterior, middle, and/or posterior vertebral height. Grade2 moderate VF is defined as 25-40% decrease in vertebral height. Grade3 Severe VF is defined as more than 40% decrease in vertebral height

Time frame: 12 Months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months0.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months2.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months

Worsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit, x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)

Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Patients with a baseline x-ray and a 12M x-ray are included.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months1.3 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 12 Months2.8 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months

Worsening vertebral fracture (VF) was assessed based on morphometry. A QM (quantitative morphometry) incident VF(QM positive) was defined by at least a 20% decrease in any vertebral height (at least 4 mm). If a participant had a QM positive at any vertebrae at any visit,x-rays from all visits for participants were evaluated using Genant semi-quantitative (SQ) method for VF assessment. A worsening fracture was defined as an SQ reading that was greater than the baseline SQ reading, which was at least 1 (prevalent fracture)

Time frame: Baseline, Month 24

Population: Modified Intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized subjects who had a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. In this analysis, missing Month 24 fractures were imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zoledronic AcidPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months2.0 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With at Least One New or Worsening Morphometric Vertebral Fracture Over 24 Months4.9 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Serum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by Visits

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 15, month 18, Month 24

Population: The ITT, Intent to Treat population, includes all participants who received a single a dose of treatment and had data available for analysis. n = the number of subjects with evaluable measurements at visit, as determined by the efficacy window.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 6 (n=62) (n=64)0.1384 ng/mLStandard Error 0.00914
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 15 (n=55) (n=58)0.0996 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0059
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 3 (n=63) (n=65)0.0990 ng/mLStandard Error 0.008
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 18 (n=55) (n=60)0.1320 ng/mLStandard Error 0.00661
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 12 (n=63) (n=64)0.1669 ng/mLStandard Error 0.00925
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 24 (n=55) (n=62)0.1760 ng/mLStandard Error 0.01248
Zoledronic AcidSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsBaseline (n-64) (n=66)0.3646 ng/mLStandard Error 0.02094
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 24 (n=55) (n=62)0.4060 ng/mLStandard Error 0.0264
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsBaseline (n-64) (n=66)0.3933 ng/mLStandard Error 0.02955
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 3 (n=63) (n=65)0.3647 ng/mLStandard Error 0.02989
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 6 (n=62) (n=64)0.3540 ng/mLStandard Error 0.02576
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 12 (n=63) (n=64)0.4042 ng/mLStandard Error 0.03056
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 15 (n=55) (n=58)0.3576 ng/mLStandard Error 0.02519
PlaceboSerum Beta C-terminal Telopeptides of Type I Collagen(b-CTx) by VisitsMonth 18 (n=55) (n=60)0.3954 ng/mLStandard Error 0.03001

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026