Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOX-4 Plus Cetuximab Versus UFOX Plus Cetuximab.

A Randomized, Open-label Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of FOLFOX-4 Plus Cetuximab Versus UFOX Plus Cetuximab as First-line Therapy in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00439517
Acronym
FUTURE
Enrollment
302
Registered
2007-02-23
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2014-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

Cancer, Colorectal, Metastatic, Untreated

Brief summary

This is an exploratory study to compare activity and safety in 400 patients with previously untreated metastatic carcinoma of the colon treated with UFOX (a combination regimen of UFT® (Tegafur plus Uracil), Oxaliplatin, Folinic Acid) plus Cetuximab or FOLFOX-4 (a combination regimen of 5 Fluorouracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Folinic Acid) plus Cetuximab)

Interventions

DRUGUFOX + Cetuximab

* Cetuximab infusion (400 mg/m\^2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m\^2 at each subsequent day 1, as well as on days 8, 15 and 22) * Oxaliplatin infusion (85mg/m\^2) on days 1 and 15 (every 2 weeks) * Oral UFT® (250mg/m\^2 tegafur + 560 mg/m\^2 uracil in 3 daily doses rounded to the nearest number of whole capsules) on days 1-21 * Oral Folinic Acid (90 mg in 3 daily divided doses) on days 1-21

DRUGFOLFOX4 + Cetuximab

* Cetuximab infusion (400 mg/m\^2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m\^2 at each subsequent day 1, as well as on days 8, 15 and 22) * Oxaliplatin infusion (85 mg/m\^2) on days 1 and 15 (every 2 weeks) * 5-FU bolus + infusions (400 mg/m\^2) on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 * Folinic Acid infusions (200 mg/m\^2) on days 1, 2, 15 and 16

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed written informed consent * Inpatient or outpatient ≥ 18 years of age * Diagnosis of histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum * First occurrence of metastatic disease (not curatively resectable) * Presence of at least one lesion measurable uni dimensionally by computerised tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (Target lesion(s) must not lie within an irradiated area) * Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months * Karnofsky performance status of ≥ 60, at study entry * White blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 3 x 10\^9/L, with neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L, platelets ≥ 100 x 10\^9/L, and hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL * Aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase ≤ 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) (≤ 5 x ULN if liver metastasis are present) * Normal serum creatinine (in case of elevated creatinine, labelled ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance ≥ 65 mL/min is acceptable) * Effective contraception for both male and female subjects if the risk of conception exists * Tumor biopsy or archived sample available

Exclusion criteria

* Brain metastasis and/or leptomeningeal disease (known or suspected) * Previous chemotherapy for colorectal cancer except adjuvant treatment with progression of disease documented \> 6 months after end of adjuvant treatment. * Previous oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy * Surgery (excluding diagnostic biopsy) or irradiation within 4 weeks prior to randomization * Concurrent or previous chronic systemic immune therapy, targeted therapy, anti-vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway targeting therapy not indicated in the study protocol * Concurrent hormonal therapy not indicated in the study protocol except for physiologic replacement or contraception * Clinically relevant coronary artery disease, history of myocardial infarction in the last 12 months, or high risk of uncontrolled arrhythmia * Peripheral neuropathy \>grade 1 * Known hypersensitivity reaction to any of the components of the treatment. * Any concurrent malignancy other than basal cell cancer of the skin, or pre-invasive cancer of the cervix. (Subjects with a previous malignancy but without evidence of disease for ≥ 5 years will be allowed to enter the study) * Pregnancy (absence to be confirmed by ß-human chorionic gonadotrophin test) or lactation period * Known drug abuse/alcohol abuse * Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity * Medical or psychological condition which in the opinion of the investigator would not permit the subject to complete the study or sign meaningful informed consent * Participation in another clinical study within the 30 days before randomization * Significant disease which, in the investigator's opinion, would exclude the subject from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Time from randomization to disease progression, death, or last tumor assessment reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009Duration from randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Only deaths within 12 weeks of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Response and progression were assessed by the Investigators using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Time from randomization to death or last known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.
Quality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)At baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. Cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delaysAll of the single-item measures of the FACT-C are assessed on ordinal response categories ranging from 0=Not at all to 4=Very much. For scoring purposes the response scores are reversed on negatively phrased questions. The principle for scoring the sub-scales is the same in all cases: subscale score = (Sum of items × Number of items in the subscale) / numbers of items answered. The lowest possible total score is 0 and the highest is 136. A high scale score represents a high QOL.
QOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome Questionnaireat baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. All cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delaysThe EQ-5D questionnaire is a measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The optional part of the questionnaire was not applied. The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5 items are combined to generate health profiles. These profiles were converted to a continuous single index score using a one to one matching. The lowest possible score is -0.59 and the highest is 1.00, higher scores on the EQ-5D represent a better QOL.
Best Overall Response (BOR)Evaluations were performed every 8 weeks until disease progression, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009BOR defined as percentage of subjects, whose BOR was either (confirmed) complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), relative to the number of subjects belonging to the study population of interest. CR defined as Disappearance of all target lesions plus disappearance of all non-target lesions & without appearance of any new lesions; confirmed minimum 4 weeks later. PR defined as At least 30% reduction in the SOLD of target lesions plus no significant change in non-target lesions to qualify for either CR or PD without appearance of new lesions; confirmed minimum 4 weeks later
Treatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationFrom randomisation until final visit, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009Non-protocol medical care visits and consultations
Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse EventTime from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009Please refer to Adverse Events section for details of individual serious adverse events and other adverse events
QOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)at baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. All cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delaysTPQ was used to investigate which features of chemotherapy treatment are the most relevant in ensuring patient satisfaction. The most essential characteristics of a cancer medication are shown at baseline and at cycle 3, along with percentage of subjects selecting that characteristic.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First subject randomised 12 February 2007, last subject randomised 30 June 2008. Cut off date was 30th June 2009

Pre-assignment details

A total of 329 participants were screened and 302 participants were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. One patient included in the ITT population received no study medication and was not included in the Safety Population which comprised 301 participants (151 received UFOX plus cetuximab and 150 FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
UFOX + Cetuximab
UFOX is a combination regimen of UFT® (Tegafur plus Uracil), Oxaliplatin and Folinic Acid. * Cetuximab infusion (400 mg/m\^2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m\^2 at each subsequent day 1, as well as on days 8, 15 and 22) * Oxaliplatin infusion (85mg/m\^2) on days 1 and 15 (every 2 weeks) * Oral UFT® (250mg/m\^2 tegafur + 560 mg/m\^2 uracil in 3 daily doses rounded to the nearest number of whole capsules) on days 1-21 * Oral Folinic Acid (90 mg in 3 daily divided doses) on days 1-21
152
FOLFOX4 + Cetuximab
FOLFOX4 is a combination regimen of 5 Fluorouracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Folinic Acid. * Cetuximab infusion (400 mg/m\^2 on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m\^2 at each subsequent day 1, as well as on days 8, 15 and 22) * Oxaliplatin infusion (85 mg/m\^2) on days 1 and 15 (every 2 weeks) * 5-FU bolus + infusions (400 mg/m\^2) on days 1, 2, 15 and 16 * Folinic Acid infusions (200 mg/m\^2) on days 1, 2, 15 and 16
150
Total302

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudySubject in survival follow-up10
Overall StudySubject on treatment10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUFOX + CetuximabFOLFOX4 + CetuximabTotal
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.01
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.04
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.53
Age, Customized
<65 years
93 participants84 participants177 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
57 participants66 participants123 participants
Age, Customized
Missing
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
6 participants5 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
13 participants9 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
5 participants7 participants12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
5 participants9 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
6 participants8 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
27 participants28 participants55 participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
9 participants5 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
7 participants4 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
28 participants33 participants61 participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
30 participants27 participants57 participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
7 participants9 participants16 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants55 Participants112 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
95 Participants95 Participants190 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
151 / 151146 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
52 / 15148 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Duration from randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Only deaths within 12 weeks of last tumor assessment are considered. Patients without event are censored on the date of last tumor assessment. Response and progression were assessed by the Investigators using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria

Time frame: Time from randomization to disease progression, death, or last tumor assessment reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009

Population: Intention-to-treat (ITT) population i.e. all randomized subjects .

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
UFOX + CetuximabProgression-free Survival (PFS)6.6 months
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabProgression-free Survival (PFS)8.2 months
p-value: 0.004895% CI: [0.515, 0.889]Stratified log rank
Secondary

Best Overall Response (BOR)

BOR defined as percentage of subjects, whose BOR was either (confirmed) complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), relative to the number of subjects belonging to the study population of interest. CR defined as Disappearance of all target lesions plus disappearance of all non-target lesions & without appearance of any new lesions; confirmed minimum 4 weeks later. PR defined as At least 30% reduction in the SOLD of target lesions plus no significant change in non-target lesions to qualify for either CR or PD without appearance of new lesions; confirmed minimum 4 weeks later

Time frame: Evaluations were performed every 8 weeks until disease progression, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009

Population: ITT population i.e. all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UFOX + CetuximabBest Overall Response (BOR)37.5 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabBest Overall Response (BOR)51.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01695% CI: [1.11, 2.777]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death or last known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009

Population: ITT population i.e. all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
UFOX + CetuximabOverall Survival (OS)12.9 months
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabOverall Survival (OS)15.5 months
p-value: 0.379795% CI: [0.603, 1.213]Stratified log rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Time from randomization to death. Patients without event are censored at the last date known to be alive or at the clinical cut-off date, whatever is earlier.

Time frame: Time from randomization to death or last known to be alive, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 31 Aug 2011

Population: ITT population i.e. all randomized subjects.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
UFOX + CetuximabOverall Survival (OS)16.8 months
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabOverall Survival (OS)18.4 months
p-value: 0.857595% CI: [0.755, 1.263]Stratified log rank
Secondary

QOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome Questionnaire

The EQ-5D questionnaire is a measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value. The optional part of the questionnaire was not applied. The EQ-5D defines health in terms of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The 5 items are combined to generate health profiles. These profiles were converted to a continuous single index score using a one to one matching. The lowest possible score is -0.59 and the highest is 1.00, higher scores on the EQ-5D represent a better QOL.

Time frame: at baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. All cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delays

Population: Patients were considered evaluable for EQ-5D provided they had at least one evaluable EQ-5D questionnaire and provided that they were also included in the ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
UFOX + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireBaseline0.747 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.021
UFOX + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireCycle 30.782 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.021
UFOX + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireCycle 60.758 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.026
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireBaseline0.734 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.021
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireCycle 30.758 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.022
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D) Health Outcome QuestionnaireCycle 60.771 scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.026
Secondary

QOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)

TPQ was used to investigate which features of chemotherapy treatment are the most relevant in ensuring patient satisfaction. The most essential characteristics of a cancer medication are shown at baseline and at cycle 3, along with percentage of subjects selecting that characteristic.

Time frame: at baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. All cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delays

Population: Patients were considered evaluable for TPQ provided they had at least one evaluable TPQ questionnaire and they were also included in the ITT TPQ subset population.~The most essential characteristics of a cancer medication score are shown at baseline and cycle 3, no further cycles are available due to the low number of patients in later cycles

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not increase your risk of infection18 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not interfere with daily activities17 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not make you vomit4 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not give you diarrhea9 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not increase your risk of infection15 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not interfere with daily activities10 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not make you vomit4 percentage of participants
UFOX + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not give you diarrhea15 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not give you diarrhea4 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not increase your risk of infection16 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not increase your risk of infection15 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not interfere with daily activities15 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not make you vomit10 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not make you vomit14 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Cycle 3: Does not interfere with daily activities11 percentage of participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQOL Therapy Preference Questionnaire (TPQ)Baseline: Does not give you diarrhea5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Quality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)

All of the single-item measures of the FACT-C are assessed on ordinal response categories ranging from 0=Not at all to 4=Very much. For scoring purposes the response scores are reversed on negatively phrased questions. The principle for scoring the sub-scales is the same in all cases: subscale score = (Sum of items × Number of items in the subscale) / numbers of items answered. The lowest possible total score is 0 and the highest is 136. A high scale score represents a high QOL.

Time frame: At baseline, at every first day of every third cycle during active - treatment, and at final tumor assessment , reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009. Cycles were 4 weeks long unless dosing delays

Population: Patients were considered evaluable for FACT-C provided they had at least one evaluable FACT-C questionnaire and provided that they were also included in the ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
UFOX + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Baseline98.22 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.725
UFOX + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Cycle 395.41 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.735
UFOX + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Cycle 694.75 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Baseline96.45 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.749
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Cycle 395.89 scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.806
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabQuality of Life (QOL) Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C)Cycle 694.70 scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.126
Secondary

Safety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event

Please refer to Adverse Events section for details of individual serious adverse events and other adverse events

Time frame: Time from first dose up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut off date, 30 Jun 2009

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
UFOX + CetuximabSafety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event151 participants
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabSafety - Number of Patients Experiencing Any Adverse Event149 participants
Secondary

Treatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource Utilization

Non-protocol medical care visits and consultations

Time frame: From randomisation until final visit, reported between day of first patient randomised, Feb 2007, until cut-off date, 30 Jun 2009

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationGeneral Practitioner consultation65 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationEmergency room visit34 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationSpecialist consultation62 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationPractice visit71 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationNurse consultation15 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationHospital oupatient clinic visit40 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationOther consultation19 visits or consultations
UFOX + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationHome visit15 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationOther consultation18 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationEmergency room visit26 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationHospital oupatient clinic visit35 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationPractice visit159 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationGeneral Practitioner consultation124 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationSpecialist consultation84 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationNurse consultation123 visits or consultations
FOLFOX4 + CetuximabTreatment Impact on Social Daily Living and Health Care Resource UtilizationHome visit130 visits or consultations

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026