Skip to content

Comparison of Early and Late Therapy for Adults With Non-Operatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures

Early vs Delayed Physical Therapy (Exercises) for Non-Operatively-Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00438633
Enrollment
63
Registered
2007-02-22
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2019-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proximal Humeral Fractures

Keywords

proximal humerus fracture, rehabilitation, non-operative treatment, DASH and Constant instruments

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare two common ways of rehabilitating after proximal humerus fractures treated non-operatively.

Detailed description

Proximal humerus fractures with limited displacement and fractures that occur in older, less active or infirm patients are treated non-operatively. There is a general impression, supported by some data, that better function is obtained with immediate initiation of shoulder exercises. However, there is some concern that this may contribute to nonunion of the fracture and may be unnecessary. Some researchers have demonstrated better outcomes with immediate rehabilitation with pendulum movements. Others have shown similar functional outcomes when rehabilitation begins approximately a month after injury, or when radiographs show signs of bone healing, and this delay is associated with lower rates of non-union and malunion occurrence.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and Female patients. * Any race * Older than 18y * Diagnosed with proximal humeral fracture clinically and confirmed by imaging studies: X rays and/or CT Scans. * Any type of proximal humeral fracture according to the Neer or AO classification system. * Patient should have received non-operative treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 18 y. * Patients with multiple other fractures. * Patients that have received surgical treatment including closed reduction and percutaneous fixation, open reduction and internal fixation (plates, screws, pins, tension wire bands, cerclage wiring and/or intramedullary nailing) and/or articular shoulder prosthesis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Flexion6 monthsWe measured active forward flexion of the shoulder

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Pain Likert Scores3 months, 6 monthsRated on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain.
External Rotation3 months, 6 months
Abduction3 months, 6 months
Disability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm Score3 months, 6 monthsDisability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm Score (DASH) is a measure of upper extremity physical function, with scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more physical impairment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Early Therapy
Subjects who begin therapy immediately after diagnosis of injury.
26
Late Therapy
Subjects who delay therapy for 3 weeks after diagnosis of injury.
24
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1517
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEarly TherapyLate TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous63 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
62 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
63 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Injured Hand
Dominant
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Injured Hand
Non-dominant
17 Participants12 Participants29 Participants
Non- or minimally displaced
No
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Non- or minimally displaced
Yes
22 Participants19 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants9 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants15 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 260 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 260 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Shoulder Flexion

We measured active forward flexion of the shoulder

Time frame: 6 months

Population: All analysis conducted with those who completed 3-month follow-up. We used mean imputation for the 6-month evaluation for patients who did not attend a 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early TherapyShoulder Flexion150 DegreesStandard Deviation 26
Late TherapyShoulder Flexion146 DegreesStandard Deviation 22
Secondary

Abduction

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: All analysis conducted with those who completed 3-month follow-up. We used mean imputation for the 6-month evaluation for patients who did not attend a 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early TherapyAbductionAbduction, 3 months115 DegreesStandard Deviation 43
Early TherapyAbductionAbduction, 6 months147 DegreesStandard Deviation 27
Late TherapyAbductionAbduction, 3 months101 DegreesStandard Deviation 41
Late TherapyAbductionAbduction, 6 months136 DegreesStandard Deviation 33
Secondary

Disability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm Score

Disability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm Score (DASH) is a measure of upper extremity physical function, with scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more physical impairment.

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: All analysis conducted with those who completed 3-month follow-up. We used mean imputation for the 6-month evaluation for patients who did not attend a 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early TherapyDisability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm ScoreDASH, 3 months33 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25
Early TherapyDisability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm ScoreDASH, 6 months18 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Late TherapyDisability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm ScoreDASH, 3 months24 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Late TherapyDisability of the Hand, Shoulder, and Arm ScoreDASH, 6 months14 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7
Secondary

External Rotation

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: All analysis conducted with those who completed 3-month follow-up. We used mean imputation for the 6-month evaluation for patients who did not attend a 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early TherapyExternal RotationExternal Rotation, 3 months53 DegreesStandard Deviation 30
Early TherapyExternal RotationExternal Rotation, 6 months70 DegreesStandard Deviation 17
Late TherapyExternal RotationExternal Rotation, 3 months51 DegreesStandard Deviation 21
Late TherapyExternal RotationExternal Rotation, 6 months66 DegreesStandard Deviation 26
Secondary

Shoulder Pain Likert Scores

Rated on a scale of 0-10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is severe pain.

Time frame: 3 months, 6 months

Population: All analysis conducted with those who completed 3-month follow-up. We used mean imputation for the 6-month evaluation for patients who did not attend a 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early TherapyShoulder Pain Likert ScoresNRS Pain, 3 months3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Early TherapyShoulder Pain Likert ScoresNRS Pain, 6 months2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Late TherapyShoulder Pain Likert ScoresNRS Pain, 3 months3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Late TherapyShoulder Pain Likert ScoresNRS Pain, 6 months2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026