Endometriosis
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is designed to assess the effects of elagolix versus subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC; also known as depo-provera) on bone mineral density (BMD) during treatment for 24 weeks with a subsequent 24-week post-treatment period.
Interventions
Provided as tablets for oral administration
Provided for subcutaneous injection in a prefilled syringe, 104 mg/0.65 mL per syringe.
Matching placebo tablets for oral administration
Matching placebo for subcutaneous injection in a pre-filled syringe
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Be female, aged 18 to 49 years, inclusive * Have a total CPSSS of ≥ 6 at screening and baseline (Day 1) in the following categories: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness and induration. The total score must include a total of at least 2 in each of the categories of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. * Have had a diagnosis of endometriosis made following laparoscopic visualization of the disease within 8 years of the start of screening with recurrent or persistent symptoms. * Have documented negative mammogram results within 12 months of screening if over the age of 40 years. * Have menstrual cycles (28 days ±5 days). Assessment of cycle duration should be based on observations in the absence of drugs or conditions that are known to affect the cycle (e.g., oral contraceptives, leuprolide, pregnancy). * Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 36 kg/m², inclusive. * Agree to use two forms of nonhormonal contraception (e.g. condom with spermicide) during the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Are currently receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, GnRH antagonist, danazol, or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening. * Are currently receiving subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) or have received any of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening. * Have been nonresponsive to GnRH agonist or antagonist therapy for the management of endometriosis. * Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within 1 month of the start of screening. * Have had surgical treatment for endometriosis (laparoscopy) within 1 month of the start of screening. * Have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy. * Have had prior treatment with NBI-56418. * Have uterine fibroids or other pelvic lesions ≥ 5 cm in diameter * Have any of the following abnormal cervical smear results at screening (based on the 2001 Bethesda System): * Benign endometrial cells (BEC) present, provided subject has irregular uterine bleeding or is over 40 years old * Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) present, and human papilloma virus (HPV) reflex testing is positive for high risk types or the testing outcome is unknown * Atypical squamous cells present, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) cannot be excluded * Atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance (AGUS/AGC): not otherwise specified (NOS), favor neoplasia (FN), favor endocervical, or favor endometrial origin types * Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) present * High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) present * Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) / malignant cells present * Have BMD with either lumbar spine or femur T-scores below -1.5 at screening as determined by the central DXA facility or have history of pathologic or compression fractures. * Have been pregnant within 6 months of screening or currently breast feeding * Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months * Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease * Have chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | Baseline and week 24 | Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | Baseline and week 24 | Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Change from baseline in N-telopeptide was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA model. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24 | Baseline and week 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), dyspareunia (painful intercourse), non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration (hardening). Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24 | Baseline and week 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia has a maximum possible value of 12 (total score range: 0 to 12, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dyspareunia score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful intercourse during the last 28 days? Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic tenderness was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic induration was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Baseline and weeks 12 and 48 | Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. |
| Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain defined as the average of all VAS pain scores reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | 24 weeks | Analgesic use was collected as part of concomitant medications on a case report form that was administered at each scheduled visit. |
| Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly peak VAS for pelvic pain was defined as the maximum VAS pain score reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Baseline and weeks 12 and 48 | Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. |
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants were randomized at 58 centers in the United States.
Pre-assignment details
This study consisted of a 24-week treatment period and a 24-week post-treatment period. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD Participants received elagolix 150 mg orally once a day (QD) for 24 weeks and placebo to DMPA-SC by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12. | 84 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID Participants received elagolix 75 mg orally twice a day (BID) for 24 weeks and placebo to DMPA-SC by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12. | 84 |
| DMPA-SC Participants received placebo to elagolix orally once a day for 24 weeks and DMPA-SC 104 mg by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12. | 84 |
| Total | 252 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Adverse Event | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Non-compliance | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Sponsor/Investigator Decision | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 12 | 6 | 8 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Adverse Event | 4 | 7 | 14 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Lack of Efficacy | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Non-compliance | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Sponsor/Investigator Decision | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Period (24 Weeks) | Withdrawal by Subject | 9 | 7 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Elagolix 150 mg QD | Elagolix 75 mg BID | DMPA-SC | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 32.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 31.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 | 30.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 | 31.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native, Caucasian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black | 6 Participants | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black, Caucasian | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian, Hispanic | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Hispanic | 8 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 68 Participants | 70 Participants | 65 Participants | 203 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 84 Participants | 84 Participants | 84 Participants | 252 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 84 | 0 / 84 | 0 / 84 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 63 / 84 | 59 / 84 | 63 / 84 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 84 | 3 / 84 | 6 / 84 |
Outcome results
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at both time points
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -0.47 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -1.02 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24 | -1.29 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at both time points
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -0.11 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -1.29 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24 | -0.99 percent change |
Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dyspareunia score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful intercourse during the last 28 days? Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.13 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.12 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.15 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.14 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 12 | -30.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 24 | -37.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 16 | -34.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 8 | -27.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 4 | -19.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 20 | -32.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 4 | -24.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 8 | -33.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 12 | -31.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 16 | -33.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 20 | -33.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 24 | -33.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 8 | -31.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 24 | -35.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 20 | -34.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 12 | -26.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 4 | -22.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension | Week 16 | -31.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 4 | -12.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 8 | -20.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 12 | -18.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 16 | -21.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 20 | -20.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 24 | -24.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 24 | -23.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 4 | -10.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.7 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 16 | -20.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 20 | -22.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 8 | -16.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 12 | -21.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 8 | -13.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 12 | -14.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 24 | -25.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 16 | -14.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 4 | -5.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension | Week 20 | -18.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 8 | -25.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 24 | -35.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 4 | -17.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 12 | -29.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 16 | -31.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 20 | -30.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 12 | -29.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 20 | -31.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 8 | -27.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 16 | -29.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 24 | -33.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 4 | -18.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 24 | -29.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 4 | -17.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 8 | -20.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 12 | -20.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 16 | -23.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension | Week 20 | -25.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 8 | -15.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 24 | -18.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 4 | -13.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 12 | -16.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 16 | -18.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 20 | -18.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 16 | -14.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 20 | -14.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 8 | -14.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 12 | -14.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 24 | -14.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 4 | -9.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 24 | -16.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 8 | -13.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 12 | -15.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 16 | -17.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 20 | -15.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension | Week 4 | -12.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 4 | -16.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 8 | -19.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 12 | -23.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 16 | -24.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 20 | -27.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 24 | -29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 24 | -23.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 4 | -18.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 16 | -26.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 20 | -25.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 8 | -20.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 12 | -20.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 8 | -24.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 12 | -28.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 24 | -31.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 16 | -25.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 4 | -16.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension | Week 20 | -28.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 20 | -20.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 12 | -21.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 24 | -23.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 4 | -11.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 16 | -20.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 8 | -19.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 16 | -25.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 20 | -26.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 24 | -26.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 8 | -22.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 4 | -20.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 12 | -22.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 24 | -24.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 4 | -11.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 8 | -17.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 12 | -18.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 16 | -18.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension | Week 20 | -19.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 4 | -25.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 8 | -31.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 12 | -36.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 16 | -42.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 20 | -42.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 24 | -43.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 24 | -40.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 4 | -26.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 16 | -37.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 20 | -39.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 8 | -33.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 12 | -34.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 8 | -29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 12 | -28.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 24 | -32.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 16 | -32.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 4 | -19.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.9 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension | Week 20 | -34.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 4 | -27.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 8 | -32.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 12 | -35.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 16 | -36.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 20 | -35.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.6 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 24 | -35.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 24 | -39.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 4 | -30.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 16 | -38.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 20 | -34.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 8 | -37.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 12 | -37.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 8 | -29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.8 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 12 | -28.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 24 | -28.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 16 | -28.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 4 | -26.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension | Week 20 | -35.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 20 | -24.1 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 12 | -21.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 24 | -24.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 4 | -20.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 16 | -24.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.9 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 8 | -21.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 16 | -26.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 8 | -25.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 24 | -26.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 20 | -27.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 4 | -20.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 12 | -24.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 24 | -27.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 4 | -21.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 8 | -25.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 12 | -25.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 16 | -26.6 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension | Week 20 | -29.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 4 | -20.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 8 | -22.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 12 | -23.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 16 | -30.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 20 | -26.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 24 | -28.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 24 | -28.5 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 4 | -22.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 16 | -31.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 20 | -29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.8 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 8 | -30.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 12 | -28.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 8 | -24.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 12 | -25.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.4 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 24 | -30.9 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 16 | -29.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 4 | -18.7 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension | Week 20 | -28.3 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain
The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain defined as the average of all VAS pain scores reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -10.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.59 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -14.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -17.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.24 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -17.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.51 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -16.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.53 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -18.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.57 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -23.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.47 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -11.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.58 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -23.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.45 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -24.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.43 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -17.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.06 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -23.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.19 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -15.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -15.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.27 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -17.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.64 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -17.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.57 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -10.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.59 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -17.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.59 |
Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain
The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly peak VAS for pelvic pain was defined as the maximum VAS pain score reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -29.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.4 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -32.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.51 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -31.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.14 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -18.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.97 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -32.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.24 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -26.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.06 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -14.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.96 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -37.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.23 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -28.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.02 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -32.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -32.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.31 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -37.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.19 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 24 | -35.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.65 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 4 | -15.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 2.98 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 8 | -27.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 12 | -24.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.2 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 16 | -30.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.38 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain | Week 20 | -31.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.51 |
Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.11 |
Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48
Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Change from baseline in N-telopeptide was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA model.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48
Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 48 | -1.28 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.61 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 24 | 0.23 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 12 | 0.94 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 24 | -0.30 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.48 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 12 | 0.57 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.43 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 48 | -1.53 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.48 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 12 | 0.74 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.45 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 48 | -1.39 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.58 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Week 24 | -0.24 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE) | Standard Error 0.54 |
Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic induration was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic tenderness was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -1.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -0.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.09 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -0.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -0.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.1 |
Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -4.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -4.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -5.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -5.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -5.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -5.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.32 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -5.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -5.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -4.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -5.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -4.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -4.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -5.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -4.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.33 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -4.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.34 |
Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia has a maximum possible value of 12 (total score range: 0 to 12, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -4.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -3.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -4.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -4.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -4.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -4.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -4.4 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 8 | -3.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 12 | -3.7 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.27 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 24 | -4.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 16 | -3.9 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 4 | -3.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.25 |
| DMPA-SC | Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period | Week 20 | -4.1 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.3 |
Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase
Analgesic use was collected as part of concomitant medications on a case report form that was administered at each scheduled visit.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Other Analgesics and Antipyretics | 45.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Antiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids | 65.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Opioids | 23.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Opioids | 25.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Other Analgesics and Antipyretics | 46.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Antiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids | 64.3 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Antiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids | 68.7 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Other Analgesics and Antipyretics | 34.9 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase | Opioids | 33.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), dyspareunia (painful intercourse), non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration (hardening). Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary visual analog scale (VAS) values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24 | 73.8 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24 | 86.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 75.3 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 84.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 73.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 87.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 81.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 70.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 52.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 63.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 57.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 80.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 44.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 73.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 84.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 82.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 58.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 82.2 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 91.2 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 80.5 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 83.3 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 86.3 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 74.7 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 79.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary visual analog scale (VAS) values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24 | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48
Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 82.8 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 82.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 86.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 81.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 74.1 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 67.5 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 74.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 66.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 56.4 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 56.6 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 76.0 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 82.2 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 78.3 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 80.9 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 76.9 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 60.7 percentage of participants |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 60.7 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 24 | 76.5 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 12 | 71.6 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 4 | 68.7 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 28 | 73.3 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 8 | 82.2 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 48 | 71.8 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 20 | 75.9 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 16 | 70.2 percentage of participants |
| DMPA-SC | Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time | Week 36 | 68.3 percentage of participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48
Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -0.63 percent change |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | -0.38 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -0.54 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | -0.86 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -0.77 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | -0.76 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48
Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -0.39 percent change |
| Elagolix 150 mg QD | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | 0.20 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -1.05 percent change |
| Elagolix 75 mg BID | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | -0.49 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 12 | -0.57 percent change |
| DMPA-SC | Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48 | Week 48 | -0.56 percent change |