Skip to content

Elagolix Versus Subcutaneous Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate for the Treatment of Endometriosis

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00437658
Acronym
PETAL
Enrollment
252
Registered
2007-02-21
Start date
2006-12-11
Completion date
2008-11-24
Last updated
2018-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Brief summary

This study is designed to assess the effects of elagolix versus subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC; also known as depo-provera) on bone mineral density (BMD) during treatment for 24 weeks with a subsequent 24-week post-treatment period.

Interventions

DRUGElagolix

Provided as tablets for oral administration

DRUGSubcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC)

Provided for subcutaneous injection in a prefilled syringe, 104 mg/0.65 mL per syringe.

Matching placebo tablets for oral administration

DRUGPlacebo to DMPA-SC

Matching placebo for subcutaneous injection in a pre-filled syringe

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be female, aged 18 to 49 years, inclusive * Have a total CPSSS of ≥ 6 at screening and baseline (Day 1) in the following categories: dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, nonmenstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness and induration. The total score must include a total of at least 2 in each of the categories of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain. * Have had a diagnosis of endometriosis made following laparoscopic visualization of the disease within 8 years of the start of screening with recurrent or persistent symptoms. * Have documented negative mammogram results within 12 months of screening if over the age of 40 years. * Have menstrual cycles (28 days ±5 days). Assessment of cycle duration should be based on observations in the absence of drugs or conditions that are known to affect the cycle (e.g., oral contraceptives, leuprolide, pregnancy). * Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 36 kg/m², inclusive. * Agree to use two forms of nonhormonal contraception (e.g. condom with spermicide) during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Are currently receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, GnRH antagonist, danazol, or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening. * Are currently receiving subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) or have received any of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening. * Have been nonresponsive to GnRH agonist or antagonist therapy for the management of endometriosis. * Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within 1 month of the start of screening. * Have had surgical treatment for endometriosis (laparoscopy) within 1 month of the start of screening. * Have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy. * Have had prior treatment with NBI-56418. * Have uterine fibroids or other pelvic lesions ≥ 5 cm in diameter * Have any of the following abnormal cervical smear results at screening (based on the 2001 Bethesda System): * Benign endometrial cells (BEC) present, provided subject has irregular uterine bleeding or is over 40 years old * Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) present, and human papilloma virus (HPV) reflex testing is positive for high risk types or the testing outcome is unknown * Atypical squamous cells present, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H) cannot be excluded * Atypical glandular cells of uncertain significance (AGUS/AGC): not otherwise specified (NOS), favor neoplasia (FN), favor endocervical, or favor endometrial origin types * Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) present * High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) present * Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) / malignant cells present * Have BMD with either lumbar spine or femur T-scores below -1.5 at screening as determined by the central DXA facility or have history of pathologic or compression fractures. * Have been pregnant within 6 months of screening or currently breast feeding * Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months * Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease * Have chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24Baseline and week 24Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24Baseline and week 24Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Change from baseline in N-telopeptide was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA model.
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24Baseline and week 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), dyspareunia (painful intercourse), non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration (hardening). Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24Baseline and week 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia has a maximum possible value of 12 (total score range: 0 to 12, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dyspareunia score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful intercourse during the last 28 days? Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic tenderness was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic induration was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Baseline and weeks 12 and 48Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain defined as the average of all VAS pain scores reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase24 weeksAnalgesic use was collected as part of concomitant medications on a case report form that was administered at each scheduled visit.
Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainBaseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly peak VAS for pelvic pain was defined as the maximum VAS pain score reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Baseline and weeks 12 and 48Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were randomized at 58 centers in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

This study consisted of a 24-week treatment period and a 24-week post-treatment period. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elagolix 150 mg QD
Participants received elagolix 150 mg orally once a day (QD) for 24 weeks and placebo to DMPA-SC by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12.
84
Elagolix 75 mg BID
Participants received elagolix 75 mg orally twice a day (BID) for 24 weeks and placebo to DMPA-SC by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12.
84
DMPA-SC
Participants received placebo to elagolix orally once a day for 24 weeks and DMPA-SC 104 mg by subcutaneous injection at weeks 1 and 12.
84
Total252

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Adverse Event101
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy022
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up501
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Non-compliance301
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Sponsor/Investigator Decision301
Post-treatment Period (24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject1268
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Adverse Event4714
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Lack of Efficacy423
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up545
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Non-compliance114
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Sponsor/Investigator Decision510
Treatment Period (24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject977

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElagolix 150 mg QDElagolix 75 mg BIDDMPA-SCTotal
Age, Continuous32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
31.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
30.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
31.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native, Caucasian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
6 Participants10 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black, Caucasian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian, Hispanic
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
8 Participants4 Participants6 Participants18 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
68 Participants70 Participants65 Participants203 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants84 Participants84 Participants252 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 840 / 840 / 84
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 8459 / 8463 / 84
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 843 / 846 / 84

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at both time points

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-0.47 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-1.02 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Week 24-1.29 percent change
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at both time points

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-0.11 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-1.29 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Week 24-0.99 percent change
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dysmenorrhea at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.7, -1.2]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dysmenorrhea at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.6, -1.2]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dysmenorrhea at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.9, -1.4]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dyspareunia score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful intercourse during the last 28 days? Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dyspareunia at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -0.9]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dyspareunia at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.00012% CI: [-1.2, -0.7]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in dyspareunia at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.5]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 12-30.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 24-37.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 16-34.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 8-27.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 4-19.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 20-32.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 4-24.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 8-33.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 12-31.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 16-33.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 20-33.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 24-33.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 8-31.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 24-35.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 20-34.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 12-26.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 4-22.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Control and Powerlessness DimensionWeek 16-31.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 4-12.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 8-20.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 12-18.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 16-21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 20-20.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 24-24.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 24-23.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 4-10.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 16-20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 20-22.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 8-16.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 12-21.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 8-13.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 12-14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 24-25.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 16-14.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 4-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Emotional Well-being DimensionWeek 20-18.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 8-25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 24-35.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 4-17.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 12-29.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 16-31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 20-30.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 12-29.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 20-31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 8-27.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 16-29.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 24-33.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 4-18.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 24-29.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 4-17.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 8-20.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 12-20.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 16-23.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Intercourse DimensionWeek 20-25.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 8-15.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 24-18.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 4-13.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 12-16.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 16-18.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 20-18.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 16-14.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 20-14.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 8-14.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 12-14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 24-14.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 4-9.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 24-16.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 8-13.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 12-15.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 16-17.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 20-15.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Medical Profession DimensionWeek 4-12.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 4-16.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 8-19.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 12-23.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 16-24.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 20-27.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 24-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 24-23.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 4-18.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 16-26.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 20-25.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 8-20.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 12-20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 8-24.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 12-28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 24-31.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 16-25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 4-16.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Relationship With Children DimensionWeek 20-28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 20-20.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 12-21.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 24-23.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 4-11.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 16-20.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 8-19.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 16-25.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 20-26.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 24-26.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 8-22.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 4-20.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 12-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 24-24.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 4-11.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 8-17.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 12-18.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 16-18.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Self Image DimensionWeek 20-19.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 4-25.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 8-31.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 12-36.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 16-42.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 20-42.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 24-43.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 24-40.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 4-26.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 16-37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 20-39.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 8-33.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 12-34.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 8-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 12-28.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 24-32.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 16-32.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 4-19.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Social Support DimensionWeek 20-34.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 4-27.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 8-32.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 12-35.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 16-36.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 20-35.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 24-35.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 24-39.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 4-30.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 16-38.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 20-34.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 8-37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 12-37.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 8-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 12-28.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 24-28.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 16-28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 4-26.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Treatment DimensionWeek 20-35.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in EHP-5 Work Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 20-24.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 12-21.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 24-24.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 4-20.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 16-24.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.9
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 8-21.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 16-26.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 8-25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 24-26.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 20-27.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 4-20.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 12-24.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 24-27.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 4-21.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 8-25.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 12-25.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 16-26.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in EHP-5 Work DimensionWeek 20-29.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain Dimension

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions, five of which were recorded in this study: work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession and treatment. Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 4-20.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 8-22.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 12-23.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 16-30.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 20-26.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 24-28.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 24-28.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 4-22.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 16-31.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 20-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 8-30.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 12-28.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 8-24.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 12-25.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 24-30.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 16-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.7
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 4-18.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) Pain DimensionWeek 20-28.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain

The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain defined as the average of all VAS pain scores reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-10.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.59
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-14.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-17.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.24
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-17.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.51
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-16.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.53
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-18.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.57
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-23.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.47
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-11.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.58
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-23.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.45
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-24.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.43
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-17.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.06
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-23.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.19
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-15.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-15.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.27
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-17.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.64
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-17.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.57
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-10.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.59
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-17.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.59
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-23.3, -13.1]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-28.3, -18.5]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in peak VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-23.1, -12.7]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic Pain

The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled no pain and the right extreme was labeled worst pain ever felt scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly peak VAS for pelvic pain was defined as the maximum VAS pain score reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-29.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-32.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.51
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-31.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.14
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-18.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.97
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-32.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.24
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-26.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.06
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-14.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.96
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-37.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.23
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-28.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.02
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-32.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-32.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.31
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-37.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.19
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 24-35.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.65
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 4-15.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.98
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 8-27.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 12-24.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 16-30.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.38
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in in Monthly Peak Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pelvic PainWeek 20-31.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.51
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in peak VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-39.2, -25.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in peak VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-39.4, -26.4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in peak VAS for pelvic pain at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-43, -28.6]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -1]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.4, -1]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.3, -0.8]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48

Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Change from baseline in N-telopeptide was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA model.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 48-1.28 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.61
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 240.23 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.5
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 120.94 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.43
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 24-0.30 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.48
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 120.57 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.43
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 48-1.53 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.48
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 120.74 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.45
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 48-1.39 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.58
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in N-telopeptide at Weeks 12, 24 and 48Week 24-0.24 nM bone collagen equivalents (BCE)Standard Error 0.54
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic induration was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Induration Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic induration at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1, -0.7]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic induration at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.7]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic induration at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-0.9, -0.6]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Pelvic tenderness was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Pelvic Tenderness Component of the CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-0.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic tenderness at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.2, -0.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic tenderness at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in pelvic tenderness at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.1, -0.7]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-4.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.34
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.2, -4.8]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS at week 24. Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.8, -4.5]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6, -4.6]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment Period

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia has a maximum possible value of 12 (total score range: 0 to 12, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Elagolix 150 mg QDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-4.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Elagolix 75 mg BIDChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 8-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 12-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 24-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 16-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 4-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
DMPA-SCChange From Baseline in Total CPSSS Excluding Dyspareunia During the Treatment PeriodWeek 20-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.1, -4]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5, -3.9]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Within-group analysis of change from baseline in total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia at week 24.~Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5.1, -3.9]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment Phase

Analgesic use was collected as part of concomitant medications on a case report form that was administered at each scheduled visit.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOther Analgesics and Antipyretics45.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseAntiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids65.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOpioids23.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOpioids25.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOther Analgesics and Antipyretics46.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseAntiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids64.3 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseAntiinflammatory/Antirheumatics, Non-Steroids68.7 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOther Analgesics and Antipyretics34.9 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants Using Analgesics During the Treatment PhaseOpioids33.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 24

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), dyspareunia (painful intercourse), non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration (hardening). Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary visual analog scale (VAS) values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 2486.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 2473.8 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) at Week 2486.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.96395% CI: [-13.4, 12.7]Pearson chi-squared
p-value: 0.10195% CI: [-26.7, 1.8]Pearson chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over Time

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?. Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2486.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 475.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 884.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1273.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1687.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2081.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2870.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3652.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4863.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2076.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2857.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 480.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3644.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2473.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 884.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1682.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4858.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1282.2 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4866.7 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1691.2 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3680.5 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2083.3 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2486.3 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1282.1 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 474.7 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2893.3 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Dysmenorrhea Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 879.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 24

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary visual analog scale (VAS) values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 2486.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 2476.9 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS at Week 2476.5 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.204895% CI: [-5.2, 24.2]Pearson chi-squared
p-value: 0.954495% CI: [-15.1, 16]Pearson chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over Time

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days? Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48

Population: All randomized participants who received at least one oral dose of study drug, an initial subcutaneous injection, and either reported at least 7 e-diary VAS values or provided an assessment of either dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at week 4 or later during the treatment phase (intent-to-treat) with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2866.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1682.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 882.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2486.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2081.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 474.1 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3667.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1274.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4866.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4856.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 456.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 876.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1282.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1678.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2080.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2476.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2860.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3660.7 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2476.5 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1271.6 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 468.7 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2873.3 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 882.2 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 4871.8 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 2075.9 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 1670.2 percentage of participants
DMPA-SCPercentage of Participants With a Response in the Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component of the CPSSS Over TimeWeek 3668.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-0.63 percent change
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 48-0.38 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-0.54 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 48-0.86 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-0.77 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femur at Weeks 12 and 48Week 48-0.76 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48

Population: Participants who received at least one dose (i.e., one tablet or injection) of study drug (safety analysis set) with available BMD data at each time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-0.39 percent change
Elagolix 150 mg QDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 480.20 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-1.05 percent change
Elagolix 75 mg BIDPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 48-0.49 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 12-0.57 percent change
DMPA-SCPercent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Spine at Weeks 12 and 48Week 48-0.56 percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026