Skip to content

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Compared to Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

A Phase 3, Open-Label, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Human Insulin Inhalation Powder (HIIP) Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Insulin-Naive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Oral Agents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00437112
Enrollment
142
Registered
2007-02-19
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2018-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Brief summary

A study to compare Human Inhalation Powder (also known as AIR® Inhaled Insulin) (AIR® is a registered trademark of Alkermes, Inc.)with insulin glargine injections in patients with Type 2 diabetes who are currently taking oral medications and have not previously taken insulin. Change in HbA1c levels will be reviewed to determine superiority or inferiority of the AIR Inhaled Insulin regimen.

Interventions

patient specific dose, inhaled, before meals, 24 weeks

DRUGInsulin Glargine

patient specific dose, injectable, before meals, 24 weeks

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Alkermes, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus * Insulin naive * One or more oral antihyperglycemic medications * HbA1c greater than or equal to 8.0% and less than or equal to 10.5% * Non-smoker

Exclusion criteria

* Taking a TZD dose greater than what is indicated * Have not taken insulin within 6 months of entry into study * Have had more than 2 episodes of sever hypoglycemia during the 6 months prior to study entry * Have had more than 1 hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control during the 6 months prior to study entry * Have had pneumonia in the 3 months prior to study entry * Systemic glucocorticoid therapy * Clinical signs or symptoms of liver disease, acute or chronic hepatitis * History of renal transplantation * Have an active or untreated malignancy * Have a current diagnosis or past history of clinically relevant pulmonary disease * Taking or have taken exenatide during the 6 weeks prior to study entry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare, in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes on one or more oral antihyperglycemic medications, a regimen adding mealtime HIIP versus a regimen adding insulin glargine with respect to change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint.56 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient Reported outcomes of DSC-Rscreening,baseline, week 12,24, and 48
Patient reported outcomes of DTSQSscreening,baseline, week 12, 24 and 48
Patient reported outcome of IDSQweek 12, 24, and 48
Patient reported outcome of preference questionnaireweek 48
Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to various timepoints56 weeks
Insulin dose requirements56 weeks
Assess inhaler reliability.throughout the study
Hypoglycemia ratethroughout the study
Changes in body weightevery visit
Adverse eventsthroughout the study
Safety as assessed by total pulmonary function testing and fasting lipid profilethroughout the study
Patient reported outcome of Expectations About Insulin Therapy Questionnairescreening,baseline
Patient reported outcome of Experience with Insulin Therapy Questionnaireweek 12, 24 and 48
Patient-reported outcomes of W-BQ12screening,baseline, week 12,24, and 48

Countries

Brazil, India, Puerto Rico, Spain, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026