Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of HEPLISAV™ Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine Compared With Engerix-B® Vaccine

A Phase III Safety and Efficacy Study to Compare Immune Responses Following Injection With Either Two Doses of HEPLISAV™ or Three Doses of Engerix-B®

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00435812
Enrollment
2428
Registered
2007-02-15
Start date
2006-12-31
Completion date
2008-03-31
Last updated
2019-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis B

Keywords

HBV vaccine, Hepatitis B vaccine, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis, HBV, Immunostimulatory sequence (ISS)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if a new investigational hepatitis B virus vaccine, HEPLISAV™, is safe and effective compared with Engerix-B® vaccine in subjects 11-55 years old. The primary hypothesis is that the seroprotective immune response of HEPLISAV™ is at least as good as that of Engerix-B®.

Detailed description

This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of two injections of HEPLISAV™, compared with three injections of a commercially available hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine, Engerix-B®, in subjects 11 to 55 years old. About 2,400 subjects will be included in the study. Once subjects are consented, screened, and randomized to treatment, all subjects will receive a total of three injections over a 24-week period, with a follow-up visit at 28 weeks. Subjects randomized to Engerix-B® will receive 3 injections of active vaccine, while subjects randomized to HEPLISAV™ will receive 2 injections of active vaccine plus 1 injection of placebo. Safety and tolerability will be evaluated by occurrence of adverse events, periodic laboratory tests, vital signs, and local/systemic reactogenicity. Comparison: Subjects will receive treatment with either HEPLISAV™ or the comparator vaccine, Engerix-B®.

Interventions

Intramuscular (IM) injections on Week 0, Week 4; placebo (saline) injection at Week 24

BIOLOGICALEngerix-B

Intramuscular (IM) injections on Week 0, Week 4, and Week 24

Sponsors

Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Willing and able to give written informed consent * Is serum negative for HBV antibodies

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Any previous HBV infection * Previous vaccination with any HBV vaccine (1 or more doses) * Any autoimmune disease * Received any blood products or antibodies within 3 months prior to study entry * Ever received an injection with DNA plasmids or oligonucleotides * Received any vaccines within 4 weeks prior to study entry * Received any other investigational medicinal agent within 4 weeks prior to study entry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune ResponseWeek 12 for HEPLISAV and Week 28 for Engerix-BPercentage of subjects who have a seroprotective immune response (anti-HBsAg ≥ 10 milli-international unit (mIU)/mL) after the final active injection in each treatment group (Week 12 for HEPLISAV™ and Week 28 for Engerix-B®)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsWithin 7 days post-injection for Post Injection Reactions

Countries

Canada, Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HEPLISAV and/or Placebo
0.5 mL HEPLISAV (20 mcg HBsAg and 3000 mcg 1018) HEPLISAV and/or Placebo: Intramuscular (IM) injections at Week 0, Week 4, plus a placebo (saline) injection at Week 24
1,821
Engerix-B
1.0 mL Engerix-B Engerix-B: Intramuscular (IM) injections on Week 0, Week 4, and Week 24
607
Total2,428

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHEPLISAV and/or PlaceboEngerix-BTotal
Age, Customized
11 to 17 years
11 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Age, Customized
≥18 and ≤ 55 years
1810 Participants605 Participants2415 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1123 Participants366 Participants1489 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
698 Participants241 Participants939 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
959 Participants346 Participants1305 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
862 Participants261 Participants1123 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
602 / 1,821191 / 607
serious
Total, serious adverse events
28 / 1,82113 / 607

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune Response

Percentage of subjects who have a seroprotective immune response (anti-HBsAg ≥ 10 milli-international unit (mIU)/mL) after the final active injection in each treatment group (Week 12 for HEPLISAV™ and Week 28 for Engerix-B®)

Time frame: Week 12 for HEPLISAV and Week 28 for Engerix-B

Population: Per Protocol Population: Subjects who met eligibility criteria, did not violate the protocol in a substantial manner, received all protocol-specified study injections, had their primary serology and all injections within the specified day ranges, and had serology at their primary endpoint (Week 12 for HEPLISAV group and Week 28 for Engerix-B group)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune Response95.1 Percentage of Participants
Engerix-BPercentage of Subjects With Seroprotective Immune Response81.3 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to Injections

Time frame: Within 7 days post-injection for Post Injection Reactions

Population: Safety Analysis Population: All participants who received at least 1 study injection and had any post-baseline data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 140.4 Percentage of subjects
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 235.8 Percentage of subjects
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 36.5 Percentage of subjects
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 127.1 Percentage of subjects
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 221.2 Percentage of subjects
HEPLISAV and/or PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 312.8 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 218.5 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 134.1 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 129.2 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 224.8 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsSystemic Reaction : Injection 314.7 Percentage of subjects
Engerix-BPercentage of Participants With Local and Systemic Reactions to InjectionsLocal Reaction : Injection 320.5 Percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026