Skip to content

Initial Graft Tension and ACL Surgery

Effects of Initial Graft Tension on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00434837
Enrollment
168
Registered
2007-02-13
Start date
2004-02-01
Completion date
2024-02-29
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Keywords

Knee, Ligament, ACL, Reconstruction, Cartilage, Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of four strong ligaments connecting the bones of the knee joint. If overstretched, the ACL can tear. Reconstruction of a torn ACL is now a common surgical procedure. The amount of tension applied to the ACL during reconstruction may indirectly affect the possible onset of arthritis over time. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of initial graft tension set during ACL reconstruction surgery on the progression of knee arthritis over at least a 15-year period.

Detailed description

Damage to the ACL is a common injury that usually requires surgical reconstruction to restore function and prevent progression of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. However, the reconstruction procedure frequently causes degenerative changes to the knee joint over time. The amount of tension applied to the ACL during reconstruction may indirectly affect the possible onset of arthritis over time. High tension would result in less joint motion during the initial healing stages, which may make the onset of arthritis less likely. On the other hand, high tension would result in increased compressive forces between the joint surfaces, which could lead to arthritis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of initial graft tension set during ACL reconstruction surgery on joint cartilage and the development of knee arthritis over at least a 15-year period. Participants will include candidates for ACL reconstruction surgery using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: * Low tension (Group 1) participants will receive low-tension treatment with initial graft tension set so that the anterior-posterior (A-P) displacement of the reconstructed knee is equal to that of the uninjured knee. * High-tension (Group 2) participants will receive high-tension treatment with initial graft tension set to reduce A-P displacement by 2 millimeters relative to that of the uninjured knee. Participants will enroll in this 15-year study 1 to 6 weeks prior to ACL surgery. There will be two preoperative study visits: one will include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the other will include a knee evaluation, dynamic function testing, and questionnaires. Postoperative visits occurred immediately following surgery and at 6, 12, 36, 60, 84, 120, 144 and 180 months following surgery. Strength testing, functional testing, x-rays, questionnaires, and a knee exam will occur at most postoperative visits. MRIs will occur at some postoperative visits. An additional group of participants with no evidence of knee injury will serve as a control. The control group will attend all study visits except for the 12-month visit. All participants may be followed for up to 15 years.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInitial graft tension during ACL reconstruction surgery

The amount of tension that is applied to the graft at the time of fixation is being performed with the knee in two different positions. When the knee is at 30 degrees of flexion, the resulting laxity is approximately 2 mm less than the contralateral leg (the "High Tension" treatment). When the tension is performed with the knee in extension (0 degrees of flexion), the the laxity is equal to that of the contralateral leg (the "Low Tension" treatment). Both methods are commonly used in clinical practice. The effect it may have on articular cartilage remains unknown.

Sponsors

Rhode Island Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for Groups 1 and 2: * ACL injury of only one knee (minor meniscal tears involving less than 1/3 of the meniscus are allowed) * Candidate for ACL reconstruction surgery using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft or a four-stranded hamstring tendon graft (looped semitendinosus and gracilis muscles) * Tegner activity score of 5 or greater, indicating participant is at least moderately active

Exclusion criteria

for Groups 1 and 2: * ACL tear that has occurred more than 12 months prior to surgery * Moderate-sized fissures or lesions in knee articular cartilage * Meniscal tears requiring partial removal of meniscus (tears larger than 1/3 of the meniscus) Inclusion Criteria for the Control Group: * Tegner activity score of 5 or greater, indicating participant is at least moderately active

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)15 yearsJoint space width measurements in the medial compartment were calculated from weightbearing radiographs using the semi-flexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were manually segmented to outline articular surfaces of femur and tibia using Mimics. A custom program in MATLAB developed by Dr. Ata Kiapour was used to calculate joint space width as the perpendicular distance between the femoral condyle and tibial plateau boundaries at 25% of total bicondylar width. Measured JSW values were then scaled using image distances between beads of a calibration standard taped to the fibular head. This method was used for the baseline, 10-12, and 15-year follow-up as a comparable in-house method to the surface-fit method. Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30 mm over the study period.
Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)3 yearsMedial joint space width measurements were obtained from radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively using the semiflexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were taken of each knee, and the medial compartment joint space width was measured by calculating the distance between the femoral and tibial intersections with the bisecting midpoint line. Analysis was conducted using a MATLAB program. (Mehta N, Duryea J, Badger GJ, et al. Comparison of 2 Radiographic Techniques for Measurement of Tibiofemoral Joint Space Width. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(9):2325967117728675. Published 2017 Sep 26. doi:10.1177/2325967117728675) Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30 mm over the study period. This was the first method used for the study. It was used for baseline and 3-year follow-up prior to switching to the 'surface-fit' method at the 7-year follow-up.
Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)7 yearsMedial joint space width measurements were obtained from radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively using the semiflexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were taken of each knee, and the medial compartment joint space width was measured at the midline of the compartment in the coronal plane using a validated computer algorithm. (Duryea et al., Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee, Medical Physics 27, 580 (2000); doi: 10.1118/1.598897). Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30mm over the study period. The surface-fit method was used for the 7-year follow-up and baseline radiographs instead of the Midpoint Method, after confirming less variability across knees within a participant. (Mehta et al. 2017)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life15 yearsThe five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport15 yearsThe five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life15 yearsThe five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.
Knee Joint Laxity15 yearsDifference in Anterior-Posterior (A-P) knee laxity value; A-P laxity is defined as the amount of A-P directed translation of the tibia (relative to the femur) between the shear load limits of -90 N (posterior) and 133 N (anterior).
Limb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15 yearsClinical outcome was assessed using the 2000 IKDC Knee Examination Score (http://www.sportsmed.org). The IKDC scores evaluate 4 categories: function, symptoms, range of knee motion, and clinical examination.The IKDC score rates knees as normal (A), nearly normal (B), abnormal (C), and severely abnormal (D), with the final IKDC rating based on the score of the worst category.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health15 yearsThe SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.
Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)15 yearsThe OA status of the knee was assessed using the semiquantitative Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS).The score uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to grade 14 independent features: cartilage signal and morphological characteristics, subarticular bone marrow abnormality, subarticular cysts, subarticular bone attrition, and marginal osteophytes evaluated in 15 regions. The condition of the menisci, cruciate and collateral ligaments, synovitis, loose bodies, and periarticular cysts was also included for a total possible score of 332 points. 0-indicates no damage in anatomical landmarks assessed. 332-severe damage to the anatomical landmarks assessed.
One-legged Hop Test15 yearsRatio of hop distance on the injured knee to the hop distance on the contralateral uninjured knee.
Modified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score15 yearsOARSI-The overall condition of the knee joints of both surgical and contralateral limbs were graded on radiographs by a radiologist. (0-83). 83-severe damage.0- no damage. The difference of the score between surgical and contralateral limbs is also presented.
Isokinetic Strength7 yearsStrength of quadriceps muscles was quantified by averaging the peak torques of 3 repetitions and normalizing these values with respect to body weight.Percent torque of surgical compared to contralateral is presented. If the quadriceps muscle of the surgical limb had the same peak torque as the contralateral, it would be 100%.
Muscle Atrophy15 yearsThigh circumference 6 cm above the joint line for injured and contralateral knees. Muscle atrophy difference calculated as index-contralateral circumference.
Tegner Activity Scale15-yearsThe Tegner activity scale graded activity level based on work and sports activity on a scale of 1-10 with 1 representing physical disability due to knee problems and 10 indicating national or international level soccer participation.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms15 yearsThe five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain15 yearsThe five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBraden C. Fleming, PhD

Rhode Island Hospital/Brown Medical School

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment took place between February 2004 and February 2007 in clinics of participating doctors: Dr. Paul D. Fadale, Dr. Michael J. Hulstyn, and Dr. Robert M. Shalvoy.

Pre-assignment details

Patients between the age of 15-50 with isolated unilateral ACL injuries were considered for eligibility. Patients were excluded from the study if they required meniscectomy greater than 1/3 of meniscus, showed increased laxity of knee ligaments, or had a history of previous knee injuries and/or developing osteoarthritis. Of 108 subjects initially recruited to tension groups, 18 were excluded pre- or during surgery.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low-tension
Patients recruited to study the initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction surgery who were randomized to the Low-tension group will receive the low-tension treatment with initial graft tension set so that the anterior-posterior (A-P) displacement of the reconstructed knee is equal to that of the uninjured knee. Initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction surgery: The amount of tension that is applied to the graft at the time of fixation is being performed with the knee in two different positions. When the knee is at 30 degrees of flexion, the resulting laxity is approximately 2 mm less than the contralateral leg (the High Tension treatment). When the tension is performed with the knee in extension (0 degrees of flexion), the the laxity is equal to that of the contralateral leg (the Low Tension treatment). Both methods are commonly used in clinical practice. The effect it may have on articular cartilage remains unknown.
46
High-tension
Patients recruited to study the initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction surgery who were randomized to the High-tension group will receive the high-tension treatment with the initial graft tension set to reduce A-P displacement by 2 millimeters relative to that of the uninjured knee. Initial graft tension during ACL reconstruction surgery: The amount of tension that is applied to the graft at the time of fixation is being performed with the knee in two different positions. When the knee is at 30 degrees of flexion, the resulting laxity is approximately 2 mm less than the contralateral leg (the High Tension treatment). When the tension is performed with the knee in extension (0 degrees of flexion), the the laxity is equal to that of the contralateral leg (the Low Tension treatment). Both methods are commonly used in clinical practice. The effect it may have on articular cartilage remains unknown.
44
Uninjured Control Group
Uninjured age, sex, and race matched control group
60
Total150

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow-tensionTotalUninjured Control GroupHigh-tension
Age, Continuous23.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.26
24.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.53
25.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.15
23.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.19
BMI24.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
24.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.28
23.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.14
24.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.56
Graft type
Autologous Hamstring Tendon
15 Participants32 Participants17 Participants
Graft type
Autologous Patellar Tendon
31 Participants58 Participants27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants5 participants3 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
0 participants3 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 participants8 participants3 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown/Not Reported
1 participants2 participants1 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
43 participants131 participants52 participants36 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants150 participants60 participants44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants74 Participants26 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants76 Participants34 Participants18 Participants
Time from injury to surgery112 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 86.5
114 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 102
116 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 119

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 460 / 440 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 4620 / 446 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 440 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)

Joint space width measurements in the medial compartment were calculated from weightbearing radiographs using the semi-flexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were manually segmented to outline articular surfaces of femur and tibia using Mimics. A custom program in MATLAB developed by Dr. Ata Kiapour was used to calculate joint space width as the perpendicular distance between the femoral condyle and tibial plateau boundaries at 25% of total bicondylar width. Measured JSW values were then scaled using image distances between beads of a calibration standard taped to the fibular head. This method was used for the baseline, 10-12, and 15-year follow-up as a comparable in-house method to the surface-fit method. Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30 mm over the study period.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Insufficient time for imaging; loss to follow-up. Method was used retroactively for existing baseline images.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)10-12-year-0.1038 mm
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)Baseline-0.1076 mm
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)15-year0.1136 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)10-12-year0.3238 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)Baseline0.0653 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)15-year0.5509 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)Baseline-0.0876 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)15-year-0.1553 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Kiapour Method)10-12-year0.3269 mm
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.22ANOVA
Primary

Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)

Medial joint space width measurements were obtained from radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively using the semiflexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were taken of each knee, and the medial compartment joint space width was measured by calculating the distance between the femoral and tibial intersections with the bisecting midpoint line. Analysis was conducted using a MATLAB program. (Mehta N, Duryea J, Badger GJ, et al. Comparison of 2 Radiographic Techniques for Measurement of Tibiofemoral Joint Space Width. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(9):2325967117728675. Published 2017 Sep 26. doi:10.1177/2325967117728675) Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30 mm over the study period. This was the first method used for the study. It was used for baseline and 3-year follow-up prior to switching to the 'surface-fit' method at the 7-year follow-up.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Insufficient time for imaging; loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)1-year0.1374 mm
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)Baseline0.0613 mm
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)3-years0.0705 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)1-year0.1941 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)Baseline0.0634 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)3-years0.0192 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)Baseline-0.0321 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)3-years-0.1321 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Midpoint Method)1-year-0.2413 mm
Comparison: These results are from the 3-year analysis.p-value: 0.27ANOVA
Primary

Radiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)

Medial joint space width measurements were obtained from radiographs preoperatively and postoperatively using the semiflexed metatarsophalangeal view. Radiographs were taken of each knee, and the medial compartment joint space width was measured at the midline of the compartment in the coronal plane using a validated computer algorithm. (Duryea et al., Trainable rule-based algorithm for the measurement of joint space width in digital radiographic images of the knee, Medical Physics 27, 580 (2000); doi: 10.1118/1.598897). Subjects are identified as having radiographic signs of OA if they exhibit a change in the medial or lateral compartments greater than 0.30mm over the study period. The surface-fit method was used for the 7-year follow-up and baseline radiographs instead of the Midpoint Method, after confirming less variability across knees within a participant. (Mehta et al. 2017)

Time frame: 7 years

Population: Insufficient time for imaging; loss to follow-up. Baseline images of subjects presented at 7-year follow-up were analyzed again retroactively with this method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)Baseline0.1483 mm
Low-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)7-years0.1858 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)Baseline0.0029 mm
High-tensionRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)7-years0.1969 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)Baseline-0.0492 mm
Uninjured Control GroupRadiographic Joint Space Narrowing (Surface-Fit Method)7-years-0.2314 mm
Comparison: These results are from the 7-year analysis.p-value: 0.08ANOVA
Secondary

Isokinetic Strength

Strength of quadriceps muscles was quantified by averaging the peak torques of 3 repetitions and normalizing these values with respect to body weight.Percent torque of surgical compared to contralateral is presented. If the quadriceps muscle of the surgical limb had the same peak torque as the contralateral, it would be 100%.

Time frame: 7 years

Population: At baseline, machine measuring isokinetic strength was unavailable for many surgical subjects. Population discrepancies at later time-points include loss to follow-up and machine unavailability. Isokinetic strength was no longer measured after the 7-year follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionIsokinetic StrengthBaseline80.0994 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Low-tensionIsokinetic Strength1-year86.6887 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Low-tensionIsokinetic Strength3-years94.4971 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Low-tensionIsokinetic Strength7-years99.6495 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
High-tensionIsokinetic Strength7-years103.1218 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
High-tensionIsokinetic StrengthBaseline74.6156 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
High-tensionIsokinetic Strength3-years94.4971 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
High-tensionIsokinetic Strength1-year82.6245 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Uninjured Control GroupIsokinetic Strength7-years99.9448 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Uninjured Control GroupIsokinetic Strength1-year105.7979 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Uninjured Control GroupIsokinetic Strength3-years102.3595 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Uninjured Control GroupIsokinetic StrengthBaseline101.8830 percentage of index/contralateral limbs
Comparison: These results were from the 7-year analysis.p-value: 0.54ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life

The five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the ADL score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life1-year94.5440 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life3-years94.5151 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily LifeBaseline85.7680 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life6 months94.8097 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life7-years94.8938 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life15-years94.4005 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life10-12-years95.7313 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life6 months90.5462 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life10-12-years94.2263 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life15-years97.6190 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life1-year95.0415 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily LifeBaseline84.3365 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life3-years95.8478 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life7-years96.5686 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life15-years99.0686 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily LifeBaseline99.9755 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life1-year99.5037 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life3-years98.6779 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life7-years98.6592 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Activities of Daily Life10-12-years99.4094 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.015ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain

The five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the pain score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain1-year90.2317 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain3-years90.6907 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - PainBaseline75.3549 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain6 months86.6422 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain7-years90.5671 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain15-years90.7051 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain10-12-years90.8606 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain6 months86.2302 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain10-12-years91.0493 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain15-years93.5185 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain1-year88.9245 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - PainBaseline77.0187 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain3-years91.0948 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain7-years92.8241 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain15-years98.1481 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - PainBaseline98.8889 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain1-year98.1679 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain3-years96.2963 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain7-years96.3848 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Pain10-12-years97.3806 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.0018ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life

The five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the QOL score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life1-year74.0612 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life3-years78.8851 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of LifeBaseline35.6944 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life6 months61.2132 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life7-years75.6944 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life15-years81.9712 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life10-12-years85.2823 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life6 months58.1250 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life10-12-years77.7778 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life15-years75.5952 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life1-year67.6282 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of LifeBaseline37.9360 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life3-years77.7674 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life7-years81.2500 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life15-years94.7917 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of LifeBaseline97.3517 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life1-year95.4122 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life3-years93.2692 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life7-years92.4632 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Quality of Life10-12-years94.2857 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.0006ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport

The five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the sport score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport1-year79.5708 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport3-years81.6216 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SportBaseline54.7866 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport6 months75.7059 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport7-years80.0000 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport15-years80.5769 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport10-12-years85.0000 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport6 months73.9286 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport10-12-years85.7407 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport15-years87.3810 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport1-year80.3846 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SportBaseline54.8882 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport3-years83.2353 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport7-years87.7778 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport15-years95.0000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SportBaseline98.0720 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport1-year95.9575 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport3-years92.6923 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport7-years93.6765 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Sport10-12-years94.0000 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.003ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms

The five dimensions of Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were scored separately: pain , symptoms ,activities of daily life function, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life . Each sub score has a 0-100 scale. 0- extreme knee problems and 100- no knee problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the symptoms score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms1-year84.1270 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms3-years85.9073 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SymptomsBaseline70.3704 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms6 months79.5168 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms7-years82.2421 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms15-years84.2033 score on a scale
Low-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms10-12-years83.4110 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms6 months78.4184 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms10-12-years85.0257 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms15-years83.1633 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms1-year80.0824 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SymptomsBaseline70.4319 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms3-years82.1429 score on a scale
High-tensionKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms7-years85.8135 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms15-years92.6190 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - SymptomsBaseline96.7292 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms1-year95.8207 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms3-years93.2234 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms7-years92.3319 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - Symptoms10-12-years91.7351 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.0078ANOVA
Secondary

Knee Joint Laxity

Difference in Anterior-Posterior (A-P) knee laxity value; A-P laxity is defined as the amount of A-P directed translation of the tibia (relative to the femur) between the shear load limits of -90 N (posterior) and 133 N (anterior).

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Loss to follow-up or questionnaire-only participant

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity10-12-years1.0763 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity1-year2.3026 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity15-years.9907 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity3-years1.7727 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint LaxityBaseline4.5107 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity7-years1.3436 Millimeters
Low-tensionKnee Joint Laxity6-months1.6605 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint LaxityBaseline4.1532 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity10-12-years1.7086 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity7-years1.3890 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity3-years2.4545 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity15-years1.5967 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity6-months0.8389 Millimeters
High-tensionKnee Joint Laxity1-year2.1378 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint Laxity15-years1.1002 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint LaxityBaseline0.4383 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint Laxity1-year0.1417 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint Laxity3-years-0.8919 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint Laxity7-years-0.3301 Millimeters
Uninjured Control GroupKnee Joint Laxity10-12-years-0.0328 Millimeters
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.15ANOVA
Secondary

Limb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score

Clinical outcome was assessed using the 2000 IKDC Knee Examination Score (http://www.sportsmed.org). The IKDC scores evaluate 4 categories: function, symptoms, range of knee motion, and clinical examination.The IKDC score rates knees as normal (A), nearly normal (B), abnormal (C), and severely abnormal (D), with the final IKDC rating based on the score of the worst category.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Loss to follow-up or questionnaire-only subject

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsB19 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearD0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineB27 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsA6 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsA17 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsA8 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsD0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsB12 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsA21 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsC7 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsC4 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineA0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsB16 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsD0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsB16 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsA9 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsC3 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsC2 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineC17 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsD0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsD1 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearA21 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsB6 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsD0 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearB11 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineD1 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsC1 Participants
Low-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearC5 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsA5 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineA0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineB28 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineC13 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineD2 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsA21 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsB15 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsC1 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score6-monthsD0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearA16 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearB16 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearD0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsA17 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsB11 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsC5 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsD0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsA7 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsB22 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsC0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsD0 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsA8 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsB9 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsC3 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsD2 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearC5 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsB6 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsC2 Participants
High-tensionLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsD0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearD0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineA58 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsA22 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearC0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsB5 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsB4 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearB2 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineB2 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsC0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score1-yearA46 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsD1 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score10-12-yearsD1 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsD0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineD0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsA24 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsC2 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsC0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsB8 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsB5 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score15-yearsA14 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsC0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score3-yearsA30 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ScoreBaselineC0 Participants
Uninjured Control GroupLimb Strength International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score7-yearsD0 Participants
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.34Chi-squared
Secondary

Modified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score

OARSI-The overall condition of the knee joints of both surgical and contralateral limbs were graded on radiographs by a radiologist. (0-83). 83-severe damage.0- no damage. The difference of the score between surgical and contralateral limbs is also presented.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Insufficient time for imaging; loss to follow-up

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) ScoreBaseline-0.0541 score on a scale
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score1-year0 score on a scale
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score3-year0.7679 score on a scale
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score7-year1.0667 score on a scale
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score10-12-year2.2222 score on a scale
Low-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score15-year2.2813 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score15-year0.5833 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) ScoreBaseline-0.1081 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score7-year0.6724 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score10-12-year0.7857 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score1-year0.3400 score on a scale
High-tensionModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score3-year0.5000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score1-year-0.3125 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score3-year-0.0185 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score15-year0.0278 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score7-year-0.1667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) ScoreBaseline-0.2604 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupModified OsteoArthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Score10-12-year-0.0385 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.067ANOVA
Secondary

Muscle Atrophy

Thigh circumference 6 cm above the joint line for injured and contralateral knees. Muscle atrophy difference calculated as index-contralateral circumference.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Participant population declined due to loss to follow-up or insufficient time to test at the appointment. Control subjects were not tested at the 6-month follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy1-year0.6579 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy10-12-years-0.3600 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle AtrophyBaseline-0.0267 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy6-months0.9324 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy3-years-0.3359 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy7-years-0.2625 centimeters
Low-tensionMuscle Atrophy15-years-0.2941 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy6-months0.7071 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy1-year0.7896 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy3-years-0.3030 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy15-years-0.7308 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy7-years-0.4783 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle Atrophy10-12-years-0.4318 centimeters
High-tensionMuscle AtrophyBaseline-0.2093 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle Atrophy10-12-years0.1000 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle Atrophy1-year0.3520 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle Atrophy15-years0 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle AtrophyBaseline0.0293 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle Atrophy3-years0.2105 centimeters
Uninjured Control GroupMuscle Atrophy7-years0.0323 centimeters
Secondary

One-legged Hop Test

Ratio of hop distance on the injured knee to the hop distance on the contralateral uninjured knee.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some surgical subjects declined to perform due to knee instability. Other subjects had insufficient time to test. There was loss to follow-up at later timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop Test3-years94.3962 percentage of contralateral knee
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop TestBaseline76.8510 percentage of contralateral knee
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop Test1-year91.2106 percentage of contralateral knee
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop Test7-years93.0311 percentage of contralateral knee
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop Test10-12-years94.9735 percentage of contralateral knee
Low-tensionOne-legged Hop Test15-years93.2949 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop Test1-year93.0460 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop Test3-years95.2889 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop Test7-years94.8787 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop Test15-years85.1336 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop Test10-12-years92.2336 percentage of contralateral knee
High-tensionOne-legged Hop TestBaseline76.9565 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop TestBaseline101.0724 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop Test10-12-years100.0648 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop Test3-years100.7867 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop Test15-years101.0900 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop Test1-year100.6628 percentage of contralateral knee
Uninjured Control GroupOne-legged Hop Test7-years101.3066 percentage of contralateral knee
Comparison: These results were from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.14ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the bodily pain score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain1-year82.4167 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain3-years84.6216 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily PainBaseline62.3778 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain6 months80.2727 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain7-years79.2778 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain15-years78.4231 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain10-12-years83.1613 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain6 months77.5571 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain10-12-years88.1786 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain15-years89.1743 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain1-year85.1750 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily PainBaseline61.0000 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain3-years86.8824 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain7-years86.8611 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain15-years81.6667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily PainBaseline86.6500 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain1-year87.0000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain3-years84.7895 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain7-years86.0000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Bodily Pain10-12-years82.4857 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.15ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the emotional role score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role1-year92.1278 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role3-years94.1441 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional RoleBaseline85.3704 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role6 months89.3930 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role7-years95.1289 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role15-years91.0256 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role10-12-years97.3123 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role6 months91.9188 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role10-12-years97.3218 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role15-years96.8254 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role1-year92.771 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional RoleBaseline85.3175 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role3-years97.5500 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role7-years95.6019 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role15-years97.5000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional RoleBaseline96.6667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role1-year98.2277 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role3-years96.3667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role7-years97.0588 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Emotional Role10-12-years97.8571 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.03ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the general health score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health1-year84.9722 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health3-years82.4865 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General HealthBaseline81.9111 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health6 months83.4412 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health7-years80.1111 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health15-years80.8462 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health10-12-years81.9355 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health6 months82.2286 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health10-12-years82.3214 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health15-years84.7143 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health1-year85.6750 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General HealthBaseline84.9767 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health3-years85.2941 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health7-years84.8611 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health15-years82.4655 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General HealthBaseline86.1667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health1-year86.6170 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health3-years85.1795 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health7-years86.6765 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey General Health10-12-years84.2000 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.61ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the mental health score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health1-year78.4722 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health3-years82.2973 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental HealthBaseline74.1111 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health6 months80.0000 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health7-years79.8611 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health15-years78.4135 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health10-12-years80.9677 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health6 months83.5714 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health10-12-years81.9643 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health15-years81.9048 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health1-year82.6250 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental HealthBaseline74.8837 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health3-years86.0294 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health7-years85.0000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health15-years80.6667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental HealthBaseline84.1667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health1-year82.4468 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health3-years85.5128 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health7-years84.8529 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Mental Health10-12-years80.7143 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.67ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the physical functioning score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning1-year89.1667 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning3-years89.9865 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical FunctioningBaseline70.0000 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning6 months83.8971 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning7-years91.9444 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning15-years91.1538 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning10-12-years90.0000 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning6 months83.1429 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning10-12-years95.1786 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning15-years91.9048 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning1-year90.7500 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical FunctioningBaseline70.1163 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning3-years93.9706 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning7-years95.1389 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning15-years97.1667 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical FunctioningBaseline98.3333 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning1-year99.0426 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning3-years95.8974 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning7-years97.6471 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning10-12-years96.4286 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.17ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the physical role score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role1-year91.8403 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role3-years91.7230 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical RoleBaseline59.5833 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role6 months86.3971 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role7-years94.2708 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role15-years90.1442 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role10-12-years96.5276 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role6 months82.5840 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role10-12-years96.2054 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role15-years96.1310 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role1-year92.0313 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical RoleBaseline54.0698 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role3-years96.6912 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role7-years97.5694 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role15-years95.2083 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical RoleBaseline97.6389 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role1-year96.4096 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role3-years95.6731 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role7-years96.5074 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Role10-12-years95.7143 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.25ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the social function score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function1-year92.7083 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function3-years94.5946 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social FunctionBaseline81.1111 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function6 months88.6364 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function7-years89.9306 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function15-years90.3846 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function10-12-years95.9677 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function6 months90.0000 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function10-12-years96.4286 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function15-years92.8571 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function1-year92.6563 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social FunctionBaseline75.5814 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function3-years97.4265 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function7-years96.5278 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function15-years90.0000 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social FunctionBaseline96.4583 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function1-year97.2826 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function3-years96.7949 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function7-years97.0588 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Social Function10-12-years93.9286 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.82ANOVA
Secondary

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality

The SF-36 evaluates general health related to physical function, role limitations, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and health transition. Each sub score is on a 0-100 scale. 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates severe problems.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Some subjects omitted responses from questions pertaining to the vitality score. These subjects were omitted from the overall N for score calculations.~Loss to follow-up between time-points accounts for the remaining population differences. Control subjects were not assessed at 6 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality1-year69.7917 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality3-years69.2568 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey VitalityBaseline62.6733 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality6 months65.3409 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality7-years68.4028 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality15-years64.9038 score on a scale
Low-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality10-12-years67.4058 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality6 months73.3929 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality10-12-years72.3214 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality15-years70.5357 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality1-year71.4063 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey VitalityBaseline64.0988 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality3-years73.1618 score on a scale
High-tensionShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality7-years72.9456 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality15-years67.9167 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey VitalityBaseline73.2292 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality1-year70.3457 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality3-years73.5577 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality7-years70.9559 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Vitality10-12-years70.0000 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.53ANOVA
Secondary

Tegner Activity Scale

The Tegner activity scale graded activity level based on work and sports activity on a scale of 1-10 with 1 representing physical disability due to knee problems and 10 indicating national or international level soccer participation.

Time frame: 15-years

Population: Subjects were lost to follow-up throughout the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionTegner Activity Scale1-year6.1282 score on a scale
Low-tensionTegner Activity ScaleBaseline7.6087 score on a scale
Low-tensionTegner Activity Scale3-years5.5556 score on a scale
Low-tensionTegner Activity Scale7-years4.8056 score on a scale
Low-tensionTegner Activity Scale10-12-years4.6452 score on a scale
Low-tensionTegner Activity Scale15-years4.1538 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity Scale15-years4.8571 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity Scale1-year6.6000 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity Scale10-12-years5.2143 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity ScaleBaseline7.6363 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity Scale7-years5.6111 score on a scale
High-tensionTegner Activity Scale3-years6.0286 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity Scale1-year6.3111 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity Scale3-years5.6154 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity Scale15-years5.0333 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity Scale7-years5.4412 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity ScaleBaseline6.5333 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupTegner Activity Scale10-12-years5.1143 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.08ANOVA
Secondary

Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)

The OA status of the knee was assessed using the semiquantitative Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS).The score uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences to grade 14 independent features: cartilage signal and morphological characteristics, subarticular bone marrow abnormality, subarticular cysts, subarticular bone attrition, and marginal osteophytes evaluated in 15 regions. The condition of the menisci, cruciate and collateral ligaments, synovitis, loose bodies, and periarticular cysts was also included for a total possible score of 332 points. 0-indicates no damage in anatomical landmarks assessed. 332-severe damage to the anatomical landmarks assessed.

Time frame: 15 years

Population: Insufficient time for imaging; loss to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)Baseline3.7941 score on a scale
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)1-year3.5278 score on a scale
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)3-year3.1852 score on a scale
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)7-year8.1667 score on a scale
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)10-12-year11.6731 score on a scale
Low-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)15-year11.2333 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)15-year10.0000 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)Baseline6.1875 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)7-year2.8929 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)10-12-year7.3095 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)1-year6.9286 score on a scale
High-tensionWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)3-year3.2917 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)1-year-0.9583 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)3-year-0.3333 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)15-year-1.2500 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)7-year-1.3548 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)Baseline0.9167 score on a scale
Uninjured Control GroupWhole Organ Magnetic Resonance Image Score (WORMS)10-12-year-3.8400 score on a scale
Comparison: These results are from the 15-year analysis.p-value: 0.051ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026