Skip to content

Advance Supply of Emergency Contraception Compared to Routine Postpartum Care in Teens

A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of Advanced Supply of Levonorgestrel Emergency Contraception vs. Routine Postpartum Contraceptive Care in the Teenage Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00433004
Enrollment
50
Registered
2007-02-09
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2017-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Partum

Keywords

Teen, Plan B, Post Partum, Emergency Contraception

Brief summary

This is a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of advanced supply of emergency contraception versus routine care in a teen postpartum population. The goals are to assess feasibility of recruiting and retaining postpartum teens; to obtain estimates of the prevalence of (use of Plan B, primary contraceptive continuation, unprotected intercourse exposure, and pregnancy rates), in postpartum teens given advanced supply of Plan B; to assess whether or not (lack of use of Plan B, contraceptive method non-continuation, and unprotected intercourse exposure), are surrogate markers for risk of unintended pregnancy.

Interventions

PP TEENS ARE RANDOMIZED TO PLAN B + ROUTINE CONTRACETIVE CARE VS. ROUTINE CARE ALONE. QUESTIONNAIRES ON HEALTH STATUS, SEXUAL HISTORY, AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE ARE COMPLETED AT STATED INTERVALS.

Sponsors

University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
14 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Female 2. English speaking 3. Aged 14-19 at enrollment 4. Immediately postpartum of a live infant 5. Planning to parent the baby 6. Desiring to delay another pregnancy for at least one year 7. General good health 8. Willing and able to follow the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to levonorgestrel 2. Current substance abuse 3. Plans for relocation outside of Philadelphia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR.1 year
PREGNANCY RATES1 year
PLAN B USE1 year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
No Advance EC
No advance supply of emergency contraception
27
Advance EC Given
Advance supply of emergency contraception is given Plan B (Levonorgestrel): Postpartum TEENS ARE RANDOMIZED TO PLAN B + ROUTINE CONTRAPCETIVE CARE VS. ROUTINE CARE ALONE. QUESTIONNAIRES ON HEALTH STATUS, SEXUAL HISTORY, AND CONTRACEPTIVE USE ARE COMPLETED AT STATED INTERVALS.
23
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo Advance ECAdvance EC GivenTotal
Age, Continuous17.6 years17.6 years17.6 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants23 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 270 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 270 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 270 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

ABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Advance ECABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR.22 Participants
Advance EC GivenABILITY TO FOLLOW POSTPARTUM TEENS FOR 1 YEAR.16 Participants
Primary

PLAN B USE

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Advance ECPLAN B USE8 Participants
Advance EC GivenPLAN B USE12 Participants
Primary

PREGNANCY RATES

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
No Advance ECPREGNANCY RATES8 Participants
Advance EC GivenPREGNANCY RATES3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026