Skip to content

Temporary Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Drug Refractory Gastroparesis

Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Design With Wash-Out for Temporary Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Drug Refractory Gastroparesis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00432835
Enrollment
58
Registered
2007-02-08
Start date
2005-08-31
Completion date
2007-11-30
Last updated
2012-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroparesis

Keywords

Nausea, Vomiting, Delayed gastric emptying, Diabetes Mellitus, Post-Surgical, Idiopathic

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to determine if temporary gastric electrical stimulation will help improve symptoms of gastroparesis (abnormal stomach emptying). We hypothesize that when the device is ON, Gastrointestinal symptoms will decrease by at least 50% from baseline.

Detailed description

Gastric Electrical Stimulation is an established treatment for drug-refractory patients who have the symptoms of gastroparesis/gastropathy. The symptoms of GP are nausea, vomiting, anorexia/early satiety, bloating/distention and abdominal pain and are classically associated with delayed gastric emptying of solids. The technique of GES was first used, in a patient seen at University of Tennesse-Memphis in 1993 and has undergone several clinical trials, particularly the GEMS trial, a feasibility trial starting in 1995 and the WAVESS trial, a double-blind trial begun in 1997. Both were international trials, showing promising results, and both have been published in the last 2 years. However, a number of issues related to who would benefit the most from Gastric Electrical Stimulation therapy have emerged. Among these issues are whether patients with etiologies other than diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis, such as post-surgical gastropathy, which is often related to rapid, not delayed gastric emptying could be helped. Most recently a technique for the temporary placement of a Gastric Electrical Stimulation electrode in the stomach with an upper endoscope, combined with an external Gastric Electrical Stimulation device, has been tried and validated, first at UAMS in Little Rock, AR, beginning in 2001 and more recently here at UMMC, beginning later in 2001 and up until the present time. Using the technique of temporary gastric electrical stimulation, we have been able to demonstrate that TempStim can quickly demonstrate (in a manner of days) that a patient will respond to temporary GES, as quantified by a decrease in GI total symptoms and an improvement and normalization in solid gastric emptying.

Interventions

DEVICEGastric Electrical Stimulator, Enterra, Medtronics, Inc.

All patients received a GES electrode, endoscopically placed and connected to an external device at baseline. The device was turned ON to provide 72 continuous hours of active stimulation and OFF to deactivate stimulation

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Mississippi Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sex: Male of Female * Age Range: 18 to 70 inclusive * Patients with GP of diabetic, surgically related or idiopathic etiology. * Symptoms of GP for \>/= 1 year. * Refractory or intolerant to antiemetic drug classes (antihistamines and phenothiazines, serotonin receptor antagonists, dopamine receptor antagonists) * Chronic vomiting and/or nausea with 7 or more episodes per week for either symptom irrespective of GET values. * The patient is willing and able to provide informed consent. * The patient is willing and able to return for required follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients \< 18 or \>70 years in age. * Patients with an active infection of any kind. * Patients who the investigator determines are not candidates for endoscopic procedures. * Women who are pregnant * Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent * Unwilling or unable to return for required follow-up visits and examinations. * Patients who are currently enrolled in another investigation of a medical device or drug.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisStudy Day 0 (Baseline), Day 3, Day 7Likert Scale 0-4 (low-high) using a patient reported outcomes tool
Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisStudy Day 0 (Baseline), Day 3, Day 7Likert Scale 0-4 (low-high) using a patient reported outcomes tool
Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisStudy Day 0 (Baseline), Day 4, Day 8Transit time of a radio-labeled meal through the stomach, measured by scintigraphy for %contents remaining in the stomach at 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours. GET measures were obtained at baseline, during the period allowed for 'washout', and on the final study day.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients seeking temporary gastric electric stimulator devices for drug-refractory gastroparesis between August 2005 and October 2006 who met the inclusion criteria and did not have any of the exclusion criteria were offered access to the research protocol.

Pre-assignment details

No significant events or approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment were performed prior to group assignment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8
The sequence followed for patients in Group 1 was: enrollment and acquisition of baseline data, then placement of electrode, then determination of mucosal Electrogastrogram, then randomization to Group 1, then active stimulation for 72 consecutive hours, then a 1 day wash out, then the cross over, which entailed the device remaining inactive for the final 3 study days
28
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8
The sequence followed for patients in Group 2 was: enrollment and acquisition of baseline data, then placement of electrode, then determination of mucosal EGG, then randomization to Group 2, then no stimulation whatsoever until Day 5, then the cross over,then active stimulation with the Gastric Electrical Stimulator for 72 consecutive hours.
30
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse event: lead dislodgement.67

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants26 Participants53 Participants
Age Continuous47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants28 participants58 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants21 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 517 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 510 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With Gastroparesis

Transit time of a radio-labeled meal through the stomach, measured by scintigraphy for %contents remaining in the stomach at 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours. GET measures were obtained at baseline, during the period allowed for 'washout', and on the final study day.

Time frame: Study Day 0 (Baseline), Day 4, Day 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 2nd hour69.96 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 23.79
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 4th hour24.11 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 23.76
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 1st hour69.96 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 23.79
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 1st hour64.71 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 21.1
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 4th hour64.71 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 21.1
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 2nd hour42.19 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 24.37
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 2nd hour46.85 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 25.3
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 4th hour24.71 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 27.94
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 1st hour67.07 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 20.23
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 4th hour20.25 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 25.26
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 1st hour66.13 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 25.37
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 2nd hour37.41 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 28.06
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 0, at 4th hour16.43 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 23
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 1st hour62.35 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 24.75
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 2nd hour38.00 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 24.64
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 4, at 4th hour21.85 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 28.51
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 1st hour68.67 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 19.92
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Gastric Emptying Time (GET) Associated With GastroparesisGET Day 8, at 2nd hour40.92 percentage of radiolabeled meal in stomaStandard Error 26.5
Primary

Symptom of Nausea Associated With Gastroparesis

Likert Scale 0-4 (low-high) using a patient reported outcomes tool

Time frame: Study Day 0 (Baseline), Day 3, Day 7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNause Score Day 03.27 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.92
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNausea Score Day 31.46 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.29
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNausea Score Day 72.26 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.18
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNause Score Day 03.33 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.03
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNausea Score Day 31.67 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.49
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Nausea Associated With GastroparesisNausea Score Day 71.4 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.38
Primary

Symptom of Vomiting Associated With Gastroparesis

Likert Scale 0-4 (low-high) using a patient reported outcomes tool

Time frame: Study Day 0 (Baseline), Day 3, Day 7

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 01.82 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.55
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 30.17 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 0.67
Gastric Stimactivated Days1-4/Not Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 70.91 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.44
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 02.68 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.61
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 31.20 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.47
Gastric StimulationNotActivated Days1-4/Activated Days5-8Symptom of Vomiting Associated With GastroparesisVomiting Score Day 70.72 Patient Self-reported Symptom ScoreStandard Error 1.17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026