Skip to content

Controlled Randomized Stimulation Versus Resection (CoRaStiR)

Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Neurostimulation in the Medial Temporal Lobe for Patients With Medically Refractory Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy; Controlled Randomized Stimulation Versus Resection (CoRaStiR)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00431457
Enrollment
12
Registered
2007-02-05
Start date
2007-06-01
Completion date
2009-12-01
Last updated
2023-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Brief summary

Patients will be prospectively randomized to 3 different treatment arms: * Treatment group 1: patients who undergo medial temporal lobe resection * Treatment group 2: patients who receive immediate hippocampal neurostimulation * Treatment group 3: patients who are implanted with an intracranial electrode but in whom hippocampal neurostimulation is delayed for 6 months. Twelve months after inclusion unblinding will occur. Patients in group 2 and 3 will have the option to choose between continuing neurostimulation treatment or resective surgery. Study visits will occur every 3 months.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation of an intracranial electrode

Implantation of an intracranial electrode will be followed.

PROCEDUREamygddohyppocampertomy

Resective surgery

Sponsors

Medtronic
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presurgical candidates with pharmacoresistant partial seizures despite optimal medical treatment and history of temporal lobe epilepsy * Age above 18 years * TIQ \> 80 * Able to give informed consent * Average of 2 partial seizures per month during a baseline of 3 months. Recording of seizures must have been done in a prospective manner using standard seizure diaries. * Able to adequately report seizure frequencies using standard seizure diaries * Video-EEG characteristics showing temporal lobe seizure onset (left-sided or right-sided seizure onset) in at least one recorded habitual seizure * Presence of a structural abnormality in the medial temporal lobe, suggestive of hippocampal sclerosis as evidenced by optimum MRI * Women of child-bearing age will be required to use a reliable method of contraception during the study duration

Exclusion criteria

* Extratemporal epilepsy; multifocal epilepsy; evidence of bilateral medial temporal lobe epilepsy * MR evidence of potentially epileptogenic lesions outside the medial temporal lobe such as dysplasias, tumours or cavernomas * Prior resective intracranial surgery * Patients who are candidates for invasive video-EEG recording or have previously been investigated with invasive video-EEG recording * Patients who previously underwent any other type of neurostimulation for treating epilepsy * Patients who are unable to fill in questionnaires and comply with protocol requirements * Progressive neurological or medical conditions * Medical or psychiatric conditions precluding surgery or compliance * Patients taking antidepressant medication * Pregnancy at study onset * Previous (within the last 3 months), ongoing or planned participation in other treatment study protocols for epilepsy * Contraindication for intracranial surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess whether stimulation and/or resection produces a reduction in mean monthly seizure frequency that is greater than in the control group over 6 months of follow-up.6 months
To assess whether stimulation produces a reduction in mean monthly seizure frequency that is comparable to resection at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.at 6 and 12 months of follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
mean seizure free interval during 3 month intervals3 month intervals
seizure severity and seizure type during 3-month intervals3-month intervals
quality of life: changes in QOLIE 89 score at 6 and 12 monthsat 6 and 12 months
To assess whether stimulation yields better neuropsychological outcome compared to resection at 12 months of follow-up.at 12 months of follow-up
Safety Objectives:during twelve months after inclusion
Operative and postoperative complications and long-term side effectsduring twelve months after inclusion
mood assessment: changes in Beck depression scale scores at 6 and 12 monthat 6 and 12 month
responder rates during 3 month intervals3 months intervals

Countries

Belgium, Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026