Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin or Teicoplanin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

A Multicenter, Randomized, Assessor-Blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin or Teicoplanin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (cSSTI)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00430937
Enrollment
194
Registered
2007-02-02
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Diseases, Infectious, Soft Tissue Infections

Keywords

Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Daptomycin, Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, Complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Brief summary

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daptomycin compared to vancomycin or teicoplanin for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Interventions

DRUGDaptomycin

4 mg/kg intravenous once daily

DRUGVancomycin

1 g intravenous twice daily

DRUGTeicoplanin

400 mg intravenous once daily following a loading dose of 400 mg administered at 0, 12, 24 hours on day one.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with a diagnosis of cSSTI * Infection known or suspected (based on Gram's stain) to be due, at least partially, to Gram-positive bacteria. * Hospitalised subjects with clinical evidence of at least one of the following:I infected ulcers , major abscess. deep or extensive cellulitis, post-surgical / post-traumatic wound infection * Presence of at least two of the following: drainage and/or discharge from the infection site, redness, swelling and/or hardened skin, heat and/or localised warmth, pain and/or tenderness to touch, presence of pus.

Exclusion criteria

* cSSTIs of the following categories: * Infected burns, * Severely impaired arterial blood supply (such that the likelihood of amputation of the infected anatomical site is likely), * Decubitus ulcers, * Infected diabetic foot ulcers associated with osteomyelitis, * Infected human or animal bites, superficial infections or abscesses in an anatomic site, such as the rectal area, where the risk of anaerobic or Gram-negative pathogen involvement is high (e.g. perirectal abscess), * Necrotising fasciitis or gangrene, * cSSTI expected to require more than 14 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy, * Skin and/or skin structure infection that can be treated by surgery alone, * Infections associated with a permanent prosthetic device that will not be removed within 2 days of study randomisation * Subjects with documented bacteraemia at Baseline or those with shock or hypotension * Concomitant clinically suspected or confirmed other site of infection or disorder at study entry that may interfere with the evaluations in this protocol * Treatment with vancomycin or teicoplanin within the past 48 hours, unless administered for less than 24 hours. * Subjects admitted to the hospital for conditions associated with rhabdomyolysis or those with an infection due to an organism known prior to study entry to be resistant to daptomycin, vancomycin or teicoplanin. * Previously diagnosed disease of immune function. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infected subjects without Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) may be enrolled. * Subjects receiving oral steroids or receiving immunosuppressant drugs after organ transplant. * Absence of purulent material for initial culture and Gram's stain. Subjects with cellulitis may be enrolled in the absence of purulent material, provided that infection with a Gram-positive organism is suspected. * Subjects who have received more than 48 hours of any systemic antibiotic or topical antibiotic at the infection site with activity against Gram-positive pathogens, unless there is clinical evidence of treatment failure OR documented resistance in the identified Gram-positive pathogen to the previous antibiotic therapy. * cSSTI suspected or documented as being due exclusively to Gram-negative or anaerobic organisms based on epidemiology or on direct examination of a Gram-stained specimen. * Subjects diagnosed with pneumonia or those with severe renal impairment or hepatic disease * Previous history of hearing loss. Other protocol defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.Baseline to TOC Visit (7-14 days after end of treatment) up to 4 weeksSuccess: Total resolution of clinically significant signs and symptoms of the infection site (cure) or improvement to such a level that no further antibacterial therapy was required (improvement). Failure: Persistence or progression of signs and symptoms after at least 3 days of study therapy, or development of new signs and symptoms at the infection site, or concomitant or additional antibacterial therapy with documented activity against isolated organisms, or a treatment duration greater than 14 days, or requirement of a major surgical procedure as adjunct or follow-up therapy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Microbiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.Baseline to TOC Visit (7-14 days after end of treatment) up to 4 weeksMicrobiological Success: All infecting Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline were eradicated at the TOC evaluation and a superinfecting pathogen was not isolated either prior to or at the TOC evaluation. Microbiological Failure: Persistence of one or more infecting Gram-positive pathogens or isolation of a superinfecting pathogen prior to or at the TOC evaluation.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

194 participants were randomized; 5 participants were not exposed to study drug by mistake; therefore, only 189 participants received study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Daptomycin
Daptomycin 4 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.) once daily
97
Pooled Comparator
Vancomycin 1 g intravenous (i.v.) twice daily or Teicoplanin 400 mg i.v. once daily following a loading dose of 400 mg administered at 0, 12 and 24 hours on day one.
92
Total189

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative reasons10
Overall StudyAdverse Event38
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyInappropriate enrollment21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy65
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up66
Overall StudyProtocol discontinuation criteria met12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation32
Overall StudyUnable to classify01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDaptomycinPooled ComparatorTotal
Age, Customized
< 65 years
62 Participants61 Participants123 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
35 Participants31 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants41 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants51 Participants112 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 9725 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
17 / 9716 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.

Success: Total resolution of clinically significant signs and symptoms of the infection site (cure) or improvement to such a level that no further antibacterial therapy was required (improvement). Failure: Persistence or progression of signs and symptoms after at least 3 days of study therapy, or development of new signs and symptoms at the infection site, or concomitant or additional antibacterial therapy with documented activity against isolated organisms, or a treatment duration greater than 14 days, or requirement of a major surgical procedure as adjunct or follow-up therapy.

Time frame: Baseline to TOC Visit (7-14 days after end of treatment) up to 4 weeks

Population: The clinically evaluable population was used for the efficacy analysis. It included all patients who met the criteria for cSSTI as listed in the Protocol, had no substantive protocol deviation, had a sponsor clinical response assessment of success or failure at the assessment visit, and had a specified baseline primary site of infection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DaptomycinClinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.Clinical Success53 Participants
DaptomycinClinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.Clinical Failure5 Participants
Pooled ComparatorClinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.Clinical Success41 Participants
Pooled ComparatorClinical Success as Measured by Comparing the Participants Signs and Symptoms at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit to Those Recorded at Study Baseline in the Clinically Evaluable Population.Clinical Failure6 Participants
Secondary

Microbiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.

Microbiological Success: All infecting Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline were eradicated at the TOC evaluation and a superinfecting pathogen was not isolated either prior to or at the TOC evaluation. Microbiological Failure: Persistence of one or more infecting Gram-positive pathogens or isolation of a superinfecting pathogen prior to or at the TOC evaluation.

Time frame: Baseline to TOC Visit (7-14 days after end of treatment) up to 4 weeks

Population: Population analyzed consisted of patients from the clinically evaluable population who had microbiological assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DaptomycinMicrobiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.Microbiological Success56 Participants
DaptomycinMicrobiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.Microbiological Failure1 Participants
Pooled ComparatorMicrobiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.Microbiological Success39 Participants
Pooled ComparatorMicrobiological Efficacy Measured by the Number of Participants Achieving Bacteriological Eradication of Gram-positive Baseline Pathogens at the TOC Visit.Microbiological Failure4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026