Skip to content

Finding of Optimal Dose for NT 201 in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Trial to Determine the Optimal Dose of NT 201, Free of Complexing Proteins, in the Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00430586
Enrollment
191
Registered
2007-02-02
Start date
2006-11-30
Completion date
2007-08-31
Last updated
2011-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glabellar Frown Lines

Brief summary

NT 201 is a botulinum toxin type A preparation free of complexing proteins, i.e. free of proteins other than the active toxin. Injected into the muscle, NT 201 causes local weakening to full paralysis depending on the administered dose. Botulinum toxin type A is widely used for aesthetic treatment of facial lines. This study will determine the optimal dose of NT 201 in the treatment of glabellar frown lines.

Interventions

Single treatment with 10, 20 or 30 Units of NT 201 given as intramuscular treatment injections of equal amount to 5 sites on Day 0. The same volume of reconstituted study medication (0.6 mL per subject) was administered irrespective of the treatment group. The total dose volume was administered in equal aliquots to the 5 injection sites. Thus, each of the 5 injection sites was injected with 0.12 mL study medication per injection site.

DRUGPlacebo

Single treatment with Placebo given as intramuscular treatment injections of equal amount to 5 sites on Day 0. A volume of reconstituted 0.6 mL per subject was administered. The total dose volume was administered in equal aliquots to the 5 injection sites. Thus, each of the 5 injection sites was injected with 0.12 mL Placebo per injection site.

Sponsors

Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Moderate to severe glabellar frown lines

Exclusion criteria

* Previous insertion of permanent material in the glabellar area * Neuromuscular function disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of responders at maximum frown at Day 30 as assessed by the investigator according to Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS)Baseline (Day 0) to Day 30Responders on the FWS are defined as subjects with glabellar line severity of none (0) or mild (1). The Primary Analysis Set (PAS) will be used for all confirmatory tests for the primary efficacy variables of the co-primary endpoint. The PAS will consist of all subjects in the Full Analysis Set who have available assessments by the investigator for severity of glabellar frown lines at maximum frown on Day 30, as well as patient's assessment at Day 0 and Day 30. All analyses for this population will therefore use the same sample for both primary endpoints.
Percentage of responders at maximum frown at Day 30 as assessed by patient's assessment according to 4-point scaleBaseline (Day 0) to Day 30Responders will be subjects with at least a 1-point improvement compared to Day 0. The Primary Analysis Set (PAS) will be used for all confirmatory tests for the primary efficacy variables of the co-primary endpoint. The PAS will consist of all subjects in the Full Analysis Set who have available assessments by the investigator for severity of glabellar frown lines at maximum frown on Day 30, as well as patient's assessment at Day 0 and Day 30. All analyses for this population will therefore use the same sample for both primary endpoints.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of responders at maximum frown at Day 90 as assessed by the investigator according to FWSBaseline (Day 0) to Day 90Responders on the FWS are defined as subjects with glabellar line severity of none (0) or mild (1). Secondary efficacy endpoints will be analyzed analogously to the analysis of primary efficacy endpoint.
Percentage of responders at maximum frown at Day 90 as assessed by patient's assessmentBaseline (Day 0) to Day 90Responders will be subjects with at least a 1-point improvement compared to Day 0. Secondary efficacy endpoints will be analyzed analogously to the analysis of primary efficacy endpoint.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026