Skip to content

A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing IM Nails and Plate Fixation in Proximal Tibial Fractures

Intramedullary Nail Versus Plate Fixation Re-Evaluation Study in Proximal Tibial Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing IM Nails and Plate Fixation (IMPRESS)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00429585
Enrollment
108
Registered
2007-02-01
Start date
2007-02-28
Completion date
2020-12-16
Last updated
2021-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tibial Fractures

Keywords

tibia fracture, proximal tibia, interlocking intramedullary nail, locking periarticular plate, open reduction, internal fixation

Brief summary

This study looks at two types of surgical treatments and hopes to answer the question: which is the best way to surgically treat a proximal tibia fracture? Both procedures being studied are standard of care (used routinely) and use FDA approved devices. All medical and surgical treatment will be the same for participants as non-participants.

Detailed description

The study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which individuals sustaining a fracture of the proximal metaphysis of the tibia will be operatively managed by one of two strategies. The first strategy involves fixation of the fracture with a reamed, interlocking intramedullary nail (Nail Group). The second treatment strategy involves open reduction and internal fixation of the fracture with a locking periarticular plate (Plate Group). The null hypothesis of the study is that there will be no difference in the two groups with respect to the primary and secondary outcome measures. To the degree possible, patients in the two groups will receive post-operative care according to the same standards and protocols.

Interventions

Standard of care device for tibia fracture repair; Randomized Treatment - Nail

Standard of care device for tibia fracture repair; Randomized Treatment - Plate

Sponsors

Orthopaedic Trauma Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletally mature, * Extra-articular fracture of the proximal tibia extending into the metaphyseal with or without intra-articular extension not requiring open reduction with complete anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, * Major fracture line not closer than 4cm from the proximal tibial articular surface * Fracture requiring operative treatment amenable to either IM nail or plate * Surgeon agreed to randomize patient * Informed consent obtained * Patient is English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Tibial shaft fractures not amenable to intramedullary nailing (i.e.fracture is less than 4 cm from joint surface), * Fracture of the proximal tibia with intraarticular extension requiring open reduction, * Known metabolic bone disease * Separate displaced tibial tubercle fragment, * Soft tissue injuries compromising treatment method with nail,plate or both. * Fractures with vascular injury (Gustillo Type IIIC injury) requiring repair, * Compartment syndrome of the leg diagnosed preoperatively, * Pathological fractures, * Retained hardware or existing deformity in the affected limb that would complicate IM nailing,plating or both, * Symptomatic knee arthritis. * Surgical delay greater than 3 weeks for closed fractures or 24 hours for open fractures, * Immunocompromised, * Unable to comply with postoperative rehabilitation protocols or instructions (i.e. head injured or mentally impaired), * Current or impending incarceration, * Unlikely to follow-up in surgeon's estimation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 12 Months12 month follow-upParticipant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less difficulty and bother.
Participants' Quality of Life at 3 Months3 monthsThe European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The lower the score the less quality of life problems.
Participants' Quality of Life at 6 Months6 monthsThe European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The lower the score the less quality of life problems.
Participants' Quality of Life at 12 Months12 monthsThe European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The higher the score the less quality of life problems.
Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 3 Months3 monthsParticipant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less injury related limitations and bother.
Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 6 Months6 monthsParticipant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less injury related limitations and bother.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Superficial Infections6 monthsA superficial infection is an infection that occurs at the wound only. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.
Number of Participants With Deep Infections6 monthsA deep infection is an infection occurring at the site of the nail or plate. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.
Number of Participants With Compartment Syndrome6 monthsCompartment syndrome is a painful condition that occurs when pressure within the muscles builds to dangerous levels. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.
Number of Participants With Malunion (>5 Degrees Varus/Valgus)12 monthsMalunion is when a broken bone heals in an abnormal position. In this case, more than a 5 degree angle varus (curving into) or valgus (curving away). This is determined by a review of the participants' medical records and x-rays.
Number of Participants With Fracture Nonunions12 monthsA nonunion is when a broken bone fails to heal. This is determined by a review of the participants' medical records and x-rays.

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

9 participants were enrolled but were not randomized. Of those 9, 6 were found ineligible after consent and 3 withdrew consent prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Randomized Treatment - Nail
Randomized Treatment - Nail reamed, interlocking intramedullary nail: Standard of care device for tibia fracture repair; Randomized Treatment - Nail
52
Randomized Treatment - Plate
Randomized Treatment - Plate locking periarticular plate: Standard of care device for tibia fracture repair; Randomized Treatment - Plate
47
Total99

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2720
Overall StudyPhysician Decision20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRandomized Treatment - PlateTotalRandomized Treatment - Nail
Age, Continuous48 years46 years43 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants99 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants23 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants76 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 520 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 5213 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 522 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 12 Months

Participant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less difficulty and bother.

Time frame: 12 month follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 12 Months34.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.93
Randomized Treatment - PlateInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 12 Months23.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.35
Primary

Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 3 Months

Participant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less injury related limitations and bother.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 3 Months40.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.74
Randomized Treatment - PlateInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 3 Months40.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.28
Primary

Injury Related Limitations and Concerns at 6 Months

Participant limitations and bother from the injury will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA).This survey asks the subject 46 questions, they are broken up into 2 parts. Part 1 relates to the difficulty/limitations the subject has related to their injury. Part 2 is how much the subject is bothered by this injury. Subjects provide score on a scale of 1 (no difficulty/bother) to 5 (highly difficult/bothered). The scoring range is between 0-100. The lower the score the less injury related limitations and bother.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 6 Months32.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.7
Randomized Treatment - PlateInjury Related Limitations and Concerns at 6 Months27.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.58
Primary

Participants' Quality of Life at 12 Months

The European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The higher the score the less quality of life problems.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailParticipants' Quality of Life at 12 Months0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Randomized Treatment - PlateParticipants' Quality of Life at 12 Months0.775 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Primary

Participants' Quality of Life at 3 Months

The European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The lower the score the less quality of life problems.

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailParticipants' Quality of Life at 3 Months0.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Randomized Treatment - PlateParticipants' Quality of Life at 3 Months0.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Primary

Participants' Quality of Life at 6 Months

The European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) Survey will be used to measure the participants' quality of life. The EQ-5D measures the subjects' overall state, including 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The score is determined by a scale and grading systems that can range from 0.01 to 1.00. The lower the score the less quality of life problems.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Treatment - NailParticipants' Quality of Life at 6 Months0.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.19
Randomized Treatment - PlateParticipants' Quality of Life at 6 Months0.72 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Secondary

Number of Participants With Compartment Syndrome

Compartment syndrome is a painful condition that occurs when pressure within the muscles builds to dangerous levels. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Treatment - NailNumber of Participants With Compartment Syndrome1 Participants
Randomized Treatment - PlateNumber of Participants With Compartment Syndrome0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Deep Infections

A deep infection is an infection occurring at the site of the nail or plate. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Treatment - NailNumber of Participants With Deep Infections3 Participants
Randomized Treatment - PlateNumber of Participants With Deep Infections1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Fracture Nonunions

A nonunion is when a broken bone fails to heal. This is determined by a review of the participants' medical records and x-rays.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Treatment - NailNumber of Participants With Fracture Nonunions4 Participants
Randomized Treatment - PlateNumber of Participants With Fracture Nonunions5 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Malunion (>5 Degrees Varus/Valgus)

Malunion is when a broken bone heals in an abnormal position. In this case, more than a 5 degree angle varus (curving into) or valgus (curving away). This is determined by a review of the participants' medical records and x-rays.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Treatment - NailNumber of Participants With Malunion (>5 Degrees Varus/Valgus)3 Participants
Randomized Treatment - PlateNumber of Participants With Malunion (>5 Degrees Varus/Valgus)3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Superficial Infections

A superficial infection is an infection that occurs at the wound only. Participants are monitored during clinical exams throughout the 12 month follow up appointments and medical records are reviewed.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Treatment - NailNumber of Participants With Superficial Infections0 Participants
Randomized Treatment - PlateNumber of Participants With Superficial Infections2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026