Neoplasms, Breast
Conditions
Keywords
neo-adjuvant trastuzumab early breast cancer lapatinib
Brief summary
Evaluate the activity of Trastuzumab, Lapatinib, and a combination of both agents with chemotherapy in the preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment of early breast cancer.
Interventions
Arm B 1250mg/d PO Arm C 750mg/d PO
First dose 4mg/kg in 60mins, then weekly 2mg/kg in 30 mins
80mg/sqm 1 hour infusion for 12 weeks
600mg/sqm iv day 1 q21 days for four coursess
75mg/sqm iv day 1 q21 days for four courses
600mg/sqm day 1 q21 days for four courses
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed infiltrating primary breast cancer of \> 2.0 cm in largest clinical diameter HER2 positive tumor (either IHC 3+ or FISH+) * Availability of tumor tissue suitable for biological and molecular examination before starting primary treatment * Age \>18, \< 65 years * ECOG PS 0-1 * Normal organ and marrow function as defined below: leukocytes ³ 3000/microL absolute neutrophil count ³ 1,500/microL platelets ³ 100,000/microL total bilirubin \<= 1.5x ULN. In case of Gilbert's syndrome, \<2 x ULN is allowed AST (SGOT)/ALT(SGPT)\<= 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal Alkaline phosphatase \<= 2.5 x ULN Creatinine within normal institutional limits * Cardiac ejection fraction within the institutional range of normal as measured by echocardiogram or MUGA scan * Eligibility of patients receiving medications or substances known to affect, or with the potential to affect the activity or pharmacokinetics of lapatinib will be determined following review of their use by the Principal Investigator. A list of medications and substances known or with the potential to interact with CYP450 isoenzymes is provided * The effects of lapatinib on the developing human fetus at the recommended therapeutic dose are unknown; women of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control or abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus and potential risk for loss of the pregnancy * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Ability to swallow and retain oral medication
Exclusion criteria
* Stage IIIB, IIIC, and inflammatory breast cancer * Stage IV breast cancer * Contraindication to the treatment with anthracycline, paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab * Prior treatment with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or radiotherapy. Prior treatment with EGFR targeting therapies * Treatment with any other investigational agents, or with all herbal (alternative) medicines * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to lapatinib * Uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Pregnancy or breastfeeding; (breast feeding should be discontinued to be enrolled in the study) * Women of childbearing potential that refusal to adopt adequate contraceptive measures * HIV-positive patients receiving combination anti-retroviral therapy * GI tract disease resulting in an inability to take oral medication, malabsorption syndrome, a requirement for IV alimentation, prior surgical procedures affecting absorption, uncontrolled inflammatory GI disease (e.g., Crohn's, ulcerative colitis) * Concomitant requirement for medication classified as CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes | At Baseline and surgery (within 5 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration) (assessed up to Study Week 29) | Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined by the complete absence of infiltrating tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes. The pathological response in the breast was evaluated according to the criteria of Miller and Payne as follows: Grade 1, no change or some alteration to individual malignant cells, but no reduction in overall cellularity; Grade 2, a minor loss in tumor cells (up to 30%); Grade 3, between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cells; Grade 4, marked disappearance of tumor cells, with only a small cluster or a dispersed cell remaining (more than 90% loss); Grade 5, no identifiable malignant cells. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be present. Grades were interpreted as follows: Grade 1-2=no response; Grade 3-4=partial response; Grade 5=complete response. pCR was defined by comparing specimens obtained at Baseline (biopsy) to those obtained upon surgery. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | At Baseline and at surgery (up to Study Week 29) | The percentage of participants who had BCS and mastectomy and who were initiallycandidates for mastectomy and who actually had BCS was measured. At Baseline, the surgeon stated, within 4 weeks before starting the primary treatment, which type of surgical treatment he would perform in the absence of primary therapy and in the case of primary therapy (if the tumor size was reduced by the primary treatment to less than 3 centimeters), and the reasons for these choices. The rules for choosing the type of surgical treatment are reported in the Consensus Conference on Primary Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. The surgeon was to have re-evaluated the participant after primary treatment. In cases in which the type of surgical procedure was different from that originally programmed, the reason for this chance was to have been reported. |
| Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy | From randomization up to Study Week 307 | Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression, premature treatment discontinuation and death due to any cause. The overall disease progression date is the earlier of the two disease progression dates from ultrasonography and mammography assessments. For ultrasonography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the longest diameter of the primary lesion at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For mammography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the larger nodule dimension at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For participants who has neither progressed, pre-maturely withdrawn or died, time to treatment failure will be censored at the latest date of ultrasonography and mammography tumor assessments. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Failure | From randomization up to 29 weeks | Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of local tumor progression (including ipsilateral and controlateral breast), distant tumor progression, permanent treatment discontinuation (either for the experimental or conventional arm), or death due to any cause. |
| Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | At Baseline and after primary treatment (within 2 weeks before surgery; up to Study Week 27) | The clinical response was evaluated by comparing the tumor size (largest tumor diameter) before (at Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (before surgery), as assessed by ultrasonography examination. The clinical response was scored by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as follows: complete clinical response: the nodule is not detectable and all the ultrasound abnormality detected at diagnosis disappeared (margins circumscribed, round oval shape, parallel orientation, isoechoic echo pattern, no posterior acoustic features, echogenic lesion boundary, and tumor vascularity not present); partial clinical response: the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \>50%, and the ultrasound characteristics of the tumor persist; no response (stable disease): the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \<50% or has increased by no more than 20% from the starting value; progressive disease: tumor longest diameter has increased \>20% from the starting value. |
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants | From the first dose of randomized therapy to 30 days after the last dose of randomized therapy (assessed up to Study Week 29) | An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment had been exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. |
| Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | Baseline | Analysis of mutations in the PI3KCA gene was performed from RNA extracted from frozen tumor tissue samples (sections). A gene is either a wild-type (no mutation) or mutated (presence of a mutation). Exons 9 and 20 of the PI3KCA gene were accessed (high frequency mutation at these two spots). |
| Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | At Baseline and Withdrawal (assessed up to Study Week 29) | The percentage of inhibition of intermediate (EGFR, HER2, pMAPK, pAKT, PTEN, and PI3KCA) and final (TUNEL and Ki67) biomarkers of the proliferation and apoptosis pathways was calculated as the difference between the staining scores before (Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (withdrawal). |
Countries
Germany, Italy, Poland
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants underwent core biopsy of the primary tumor, for the histological diagnosis and the biological characterization of the tumor. Radiological investigations were performed to rule out the metastatic disease. After diagnostic confirmation of the infiltrating carcinoma, participants were randomized to one of the three treatment arms.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab Participants received chemotherapy (CT), which included paclitaxel 80 milligrams per meters squared (mg/m\^2) weekly for 12 weeks, followed by intravenous (IV) fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Trastuzumab was administered throughout the course of the CT and for two weeks after the last CT administration. The first dose of trastuzumab was administered at 4 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV for 60 minutes on the day of the first paclitaxel course. Subsequent administrations were given weekly at 2 mg/kg IV for 30 minutes. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery. | 36 |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg Participants received CT, which included paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 weekly for 12 weeks, followed by IV fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Participants received lapatinib 1500 mg/day orally on an empty stomach throughout the course of the CT and for three weeks after the last CT administration. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery. Following Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) recommendations, lapatinib doses were reduced to 1250 mg/day orally on an empty stomach. | 39 |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg Participants received CT, which included paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 weekly for 12 weeks, followed by IV fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Trastuzumab was administered throughout the course of the CT and for two weeks after the last CT administration. The first dose of trastuzumab was administered at 4 mg/kg IV for 60 minutes on the day of the first paclitaxel course. Subsequent administrations were given weekly at 2 mg/kg IV for 30 minutes. Participants received lapatinib 1000 mg/day orally on an empty stomach throughout the course of the CT and for three weeks after the last CT administration. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery. Following IDMC recommendations, lapatinib doses were reduced to 750 mg/day orally on an empty stomach. | 46 |
| Total | 121 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Disease Progression | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | CT Plus Trastuzumab | CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 50 Years | 49 Years | 49 Years | 49.3 Years |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 34 Participants | 37 Participants | 44 Participants | 115 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Unknown | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 36 Participants | 39 Participants | 46 Participants | 121 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 35 / 36 | 38 / 39 | 46 / 46 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 14 / 36 | 13 / 39 | 21 / 46 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes
Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined by the complete absence of infiltrating tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes. The pathological response in the breast was evaluated according to the criteria of Miller and Payne as follows: Grade 1, no change or some alteration to individual malignant cells, but no reduction in overall cellularity; Grade 2, a minor loss in tumor cells (up to 30%); Grade 3, between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cells; Grade 4, marked disappearance of tumor cells, with only a small cluster or a dispersed cell remaining (more than 90% loss); Grade 5, no identifiable malignant cells. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be present. Grades were interpreted as follows: Grade 1-2=no response; Grade 3-4=partial response; Grade 5=complete response. pCR was defined by comparing specimens obtained at Baseline (biopsy) to those obtained upon surgery.
Time frame: At Baseline and surgery (within 5 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration) (assessed up to Study Week 29)
Population: Efficacy Analysis Population: all participants in the Intent-to-Treat Population (all participants who were randomized), except for the 2 participants who were excluded because of withdraw of consent and major protocol deviation
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes | 25 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes | 26.3 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes | 46.7 Percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment had been exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations.
Time frame: From the first dose of randomized therapy to 30 days after the last dose of randomized therapy (assessed up to Study Week 29)
Population: Safety Population: all randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants | 35 Participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants | 38 Participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants | 46 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure
Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of local tumor progression (including ipsilateral and controlateral breast), distant tumor progression, permanent treatment discontinuation (either for the experimental or conventional arm), or death due to any cause.
Time frame: From randomization up to 29 weeks
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Participants With Treatment Failure | 7 Participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Failure | 9 Participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Failure | 7 Participants |
Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline
Analysis of mutations in the PI3KCA gene was performed from RNA extracted from frozen tumor tissue samples (sections). A gene is either a wild-type (no mutation) or mutated (presence of a mutation). Exons 9 and 20 of the PI3KCA gene were accessed (high frequency mutation at these two spots).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants for which high-quality tumor tissue samples were available were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type | 29 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation | 1 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type | 25 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation | 5 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation | 6 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type | 35 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type | 31 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation | 2 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation | 5 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation | 3 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type | 37 Variations/Somatic mutations |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline | PIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type | 39 Variations/Somatic mutations |
Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment
The percentage of inhibition of intermediate (EGFR, HER2, pMAPK, pAKT, PTEN, and PI3KCA) and final (TUNEL and Ki67) biomarkers of the proliferation and apoptosis pathways was calculated as the difference between the staining scores before (Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (withdrawal).
Time frame: At Baseline and Withdrawal (assessed up to Study Week 29)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants contributing data to the indicated time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 25 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 18 | 19 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 2.5 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 17 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 7 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 2 | NA Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 31 | 0.4 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 11 | 0.1 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 37 | 80 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 15 | 100 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 28 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 11 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 11 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 25 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 31 | 0.58 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 37 | 80 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 18 | 15 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 2 | 70 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 28 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 10 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 11 | 0.1 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 7 | 10 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 17 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 15 | 80 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 17 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 7 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 15 | 80 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 2 | 5 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 31 | 0.8 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Tunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 11 | 0.05 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 28 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 30 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | Ki67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 18 | 10 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | PTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 37 | 90 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 42 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment | pEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 11 | 0 Percentage of inhibition |
Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS
The percentage of participants who had BCS and mastectomy and who were initiallycandidates for mastectomy and who actually had BCS was measured. At Baseline, the surgeon stated, within 4 weeks before starting the primary treatment, which type of surgical treatment he would perform in the absence of primary therapy and in the case of primary therapy (if the tumor size was reduced by the primary treatment to less than 3 centimeters), and the reasons for these choices. The rules for choosing the type of surgical treatment are reported in the Consensus Conference on Primary Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. The surgeon was to have re-evaluated the participant after primary treatment. In cases in which the type of surgical procedure was different from that originally programmed, the reason for this chance was to have been reported.
Time frame: At Baseline and at surgery (up to Study Week 29)
Population: Efficacy Analysis Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Mastectomy | 33.3 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | BCS | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Conversion from mastectomy to BCS | 61.9 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Mastectomy | 39.5 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | BCS | 57.9 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Conversion from mastectomy to BCS | 42.8 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | BCS | 68.9 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Conversion from mastectomy to BCS | 60 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS | Mastectomy | 31.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography
The clinical response was evaluated by comparing the tumor size (largest tumor diameter) before (at Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (before surgery), as assessed by ultrasonography examination. The clinical response was scored by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as follows: complete clinical response: the nodule is not detectable and all the ultrasound abnormality detected at diagnosis disappeared (margins circumscribed, round oval shape, parallel orientation, isoechoic echo pattern, no posterior acoustic features, echogenic lesion boundary, and tumor vascularity not present); partial clinical response: the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \>50%, and the ultrasound characteristics of the tumor persist; no response (stable disease): the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \<50% or has increased by no more than 20% from the starting value; progressive disease: tumor longest diameter has increased \>20% from the starting value.
Time frame: At Baseline and after primary treatment (within 2 weeks before surgery; up to Study Week 27)
Population: Efficacy Analysis Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Progressive Disease | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Stable Disease | 5.5 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Complete Response (CR) | 30.5 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Partial Response (PR) | 41.7 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Not Evaluable | 19.4 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Stable Disease | 13.1 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Complete Response (CR) | 15.8 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Partial Response (PR) | 44.7 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Progressive Disease | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Not Evaluable | 23.7 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Not Evaluable | 28.9 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Progressive Disease | 0 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Complete Response (CR) | 42.2 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Stable Disease | 0 Percentage of participants |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography | Partial Response (PR) | 28.9 Percentage of participants |
Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy
Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression, premature treatment discontinuation and death due to any cause. The overall disease progression date is the earlier of the two disease progression dates from ultrasonography and mammography assessments. For ultrasonography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the longest diameter of the primary lesion at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For mammography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the larger nodule dimension at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For participants who has neither progressed, pre-maturely withdrawn or died, time to treatment failure will be censored at the latest date of ultrasonography and mammography tumor assessments.
Time frame: From randomization up to Study Week 307
Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| CT Plus Trastuzumab | Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy | 28.2 Months |
| CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg | Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy | 39.6 Months |
| CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg | Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy | 39.6 Months |