Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Study With Chemotherapy, Lapatinib And Trastuzumab In Breast Cancer

Chemotherapy Plus Lapatinib or Trastuzumab or Both in Her2+ Primary Breast Cancer. A Randomized Phase IIb Study With Biomarker Evaluation.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00429299
Acronym
CHERLOB
Enrollment
121
Registered
2007-01-31
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2016-03-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms, Breast

Keywords

neo-adjuvant trastuzumab early breast cancer lapatinib

Brief summary

Evaluate the activity of Trastuzumab, Lapatinib, and a combination of both agents with chemotherapy in the preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment of early breast cancer.

Interventions

DRUGlapatinib

Arm B 1250mg/d PO Arm C 750mg/d PO

BIOLOGICALtrastuzumab

First dose 4mg/kg in 60mins, then weekly 2mg/kg in 30 mins

DRUGpaclitaxel

80mg/sqm 1 hour infusion for 12 weeks

DRUGfluorouracil

600mg/sqm iv day 1 q21 days for four coursess

75mg/sqm iv day 1 q21 days for four courses

DRUGcyclophosphamide

600mg/sqm day 1 q21 days for four courses

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed infiltrating primary breast cancer of \> 2.0 cm in largest clinical diameter HER2 positive tumor (either IHC 3+ or FISH+) * Availability of tumor tissue suitable for biological and molecular examination before starting primary treatment * Age \>18, \< 65 years * ECOG PS 0-1 * Normal organ and marrow function as defined below: leukocytes ³ 3000/microL absolute neutrophil count ³ 1,500/microL platelets ³ 100,000/microL total bilirubin \<= 1.5x ULN. In case of Gilbert's syndrome, \<2 x ULN is allowed AST (SGOT)/ALT(SGPT)\<= 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal Alkaline phosphatase \<= 2.5 x ULN Creatinine within normal institutional limits * Cardiac ejection fraction within the institutional range of normal as measured by echocardiogram or MUGA scan * Eligibility of patients receiving medications or substances known to affect, or with the potential to affect the activity or pharmacokinetics of lapatinib will be determined following review of their use by the Principal Investigator. A list of medications and substances known or with the potential to interact with CYP450 isoenzymes is provided * The effects of lapatinib on the developing human fetus at the recommended therapeutic dose are unknown; women of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control or abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus and potential risk for loss of the pregnancy * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document * Ability to swallow and retain oral medication

Exclusion criteria

* Stage IIIB, IIIC, and inflammatory breast cancer * Stage IV breast cancer * Contraindication to the treatment with anthracycline, paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab * Prior treatment with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or radiotherapy. Prior treatment with EGFR targeting therapies * Treatment with any other investigational agents, or with all herbal (alternative) medicines * History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to lapatinib * Uncontrolled inter-current illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Pregnancy or breastfeeding; (breast feeding should be discontinued to be enrolled in the study) * Women of childbearing potential that refusal to adopt adequate contraceptive measures * HIV-positive patients receiving combination anti-retroviral therapy * GI tract disease resulting in an inability to take oral medication, malabsorption syndrome, a requirement for IV alimentation, prior surgical procedures affecting absorption, uncontrolled inflammatory GI disease (e.g., Crohn's, ulcerative colitis) * Concomitant requirement for medication classified as CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph NodesAt Baseline and surgery (within 5 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration) (assessed up to Study Week 29)Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined by the complete absence of infiltrating tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes. The pathological response in the breast was evaluated according to the criteria of Miller and Payne as follows: Grade 1, no change or some alteration to individual malignant cells, but no reduction in overall cellularity; Grade 2, a minor loss in tumor cells (up to 30%); Grade 3, between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cells; Grade 4, marked disappearance of tumor cells, with only a small cluster or a dispersed cell remaining (more than 90% loss); Grade 5, no identifiable malignant cells. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be present. Grades were interpreted as follows: Grade 1-2=no response; Grade 3-4=partial response; Grade 5=complete response. pCR was defined by comparing specimens obtained at Baseline (biopsy) to those obtained upon surgery.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSAt Baseline and at surgery (up to Study Week 29)The percentage of participants who had BCS and mastectomy and who were initiallycandidates for mastectomy and who actually had BCS was measured. At Baseline, the surgeon stated, within 4 weeks before starting the primary treatment, which type of surgical treatment he would perform in the absence of primary therapy and in the case of primary therapy (if the tumor size was reduced by the primary treatment to less than 3 centimeters), and the reasons for these choices. The rules for choosing the type of surgical treatment are reported in the Consensus Conference on Primary Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. The surgeon was to have re-evaluated the participant after primary treatment. In cases in which the type of surgical procedure was different from that originally programmed, the reason for this chance was to have been reported.
Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary TherapyFrom randomization up to Study Week 307Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression, premature treatment discontinuation and death due to any cause. The overall disease progression date is the earlier of the two disease progression dates from ultrasonography and mammography assessments. For ultrasonography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the longest diameter of the primary lesion at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For mammography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the larger nodule dimension at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For participants who has neither progressed, pre-maturely withdrawn or died, time to treatment failure will be censored at the latest date of ultrasonography and mammography tumor assessments.
Number of Participants With Treatment FailureFrom randomization up to 29 weeksTreatment failure is defined as the occurrence of local tumor progression (including ipsilateral and controlateral breast), distant tumor progression, permanent treatment discontinuation (either for the experimental or conventional arm), or death due to any cause.
Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyAt Baseline and after primary treatment (within 2 weeks before surgery; up to Study Week 27)The clinical response was evaluated by comparing the tumor size (largest tumor diameter) before (at Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (before surgery), as assessed by ultrasonography examination. The clinical response was scored by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as follows: complete clinical response: the nodule is not detectable and all the ultrasound abnormality detected at diagnosis disappeared (margins circumscribed, round oval shape, parallel orientation, isoechoic echo pattern, no posterior acoustic features, echogenic lesion boundary, and tumor vascularity not present); partial clinical response: the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \>50%, and the ultrasound characteristics of the tumor persist; no response (stable disease): the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \<50% or has increased by no more than 20% from the starting value; progressive disease: tumor longest diameter has increased \>20% from the starting value.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of ParticipantsFrom the first dose of randomized therapy to 30 days after the last dose of randomized therapy (assessed up to Study Week 29)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment had been exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations.
Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselineBaselineAnalysis of mutations in the PI3KCA gene was performed from RNA extracted from frozen tumor tissue samples (sections). A gene is either a wild-type (no mutation) or mutated (presence of a mutation). Exons 9 and 20 of the PI3KCA gene were accessed (high frequency mutation at these two spots).
Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentAt Baseline and Withdrawal (assessed up to Study Week 29)The percentage of inhibition of intermediate (EGFR, HER2, pMAPK, pAKT, PTEN, and PI3KCA) and final (TUNEL and Ki67) biomarkers of the proliferation and apoptosis pathways was calculated as the difference between the staining scores before (Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (withdrawal).

Countries

Germany, Italy, Poland

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants underwent core biopsy of the primary tumor, for the histological diagnosis and the biological characterization of the tumor. Radiological investigations were performed to rule out the metastatic disease. After diagnostic confirmation of the infiltrating carcinoma, participants were randomized to one of the three treatment arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CT Plus Trastuzumab
Participants received chemotherapy (CT), which included paclitaxel 80 milligrams per meters squared (mg/m\^2) weekly for 12 weeks, followed by intravenous (IV) fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Trastuzumab was administered throughout the course of the CT and for two weeks after the last CT administration. The first dose of trastuzumab was administered at 4 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) IV for 60 minutes on the day of the first paclitaxel course. Subsequent administrations were given weekly at 2 mg/kg IV for 30 minutes. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery.
36
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mg
Participants received CT, which included paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 weekly for 12 weeks, followed by IV fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Participants received lapatinib 1500 mg/day orally on an empty stomach throughout the course of the CT and for three weeks after the last CT administration. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery. Following Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) recommendations, lapatinib doses were reduced to 1250 mg/day orally on an empty stomach.
39
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mg
Participants received CT, which included paclitaxel 80 mg/m\^2 weekly for 12 weeks, followed by IV fluorouracil 600 mg/m\^2, IV epidoxorubicin 75 mg/m\^2, and IV cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2, once every 21 days for four treatment courses. Trastuzumab was administered throughout the course of the CT and for two weeks after the last CT administration. The first dose of trastuzumab was administered at 4 mg/kg IV for 60 minutes on the day of the first paclitaxel course. Subsequent administrations were given weekly at 2 mg/kg IV for 30 minutes. Participants received lapatinib 1000 mg/day orally on an empty stomach throughout the course of the CT and for three weeks after the last CT administration. Treatments were administered for 26 weeks prior to surgery. Following IDMC recommendations, lapatinib doses were reduced to 750 mg/day orally on an empty stomach.
46
Total121

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event251
Overall StudyDisease Progression110
Overall StudyProtocol Violation100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject013

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCT Plus TrastuzumabCT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgCT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgTotal
Age, Continuous50 Years49 Years49 Years49.3 Years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
34 Participants37 Participants44 Participants115 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
36 Participants39 Participants46 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 3638 / 3946 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 3613 / 3921 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes

Pathological Complete Response (pCR) is defined by the complete absence of infiltrating tumor cells in the breast and in the lymph nodes. The pathological response in the breast was evaluated according to the criteria of Miller and Payne as follows: Grade 1, no change or some alteration to individual malignant cells, but no reduction in overall cellularity; Grade 2, a minor loss in tumor cells (up to 30%); Grade 3, between an estimated 30% and 90% reduction in tumor cells; Grade 4, marked disappearance of tumor cells, with only a small cluster or a dispersed cell remaining (more than 90% loss); Grade 5, no identifiable malignant cells. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) may be present. Grades were interpreted as follows: Grade 1-2=no response; Grade 3-4=partial response; Grade 5=complete response. pCR was defined by comparing specimens obtained at Baseline (biopsy) to those obtained upon surgery.

Time frame: At Baseline and surgery (within 5 weeks after the last chemotherapy administration) (assessed up to Study Week 29)

Population: Efficacy Analysis Population: all participants in the Intent-to-Treat Population (all participants who were randomized), except for the 2 participants who were excluded because of withdraw of consent and major protocol deviation

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes25 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes26.3 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) in the Breast and in the Lymph Nodes46.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.01990% CI: [13.1, 36.9]Chi-squared
90% CI: [14.5, 38.1]
90% CI: [34.4, 58.9]
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment had been exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations.

Time frame: From the first dose of randomized therapy to 30 days after the last dose of randomized therapy (assessed up to Study Week 29)

Population: Safety Population: all randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants35 Participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants38 Participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE), Including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Occurring in >=5% of Participants46 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as the occurrence of local tumor progression (including ipsilateral and controlateral breast), distant tumor progression, permanent treatment discontinuation (either for the experimental or conventional arm), or death due to any cause.

Time frame: From randomization up to 29 weeks

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure7 Participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure9 Participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Failure7 Participants
Secondary

Number of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at Baseline

Analysis of mutations in the PI3KCA gene was performed from RNA extracted from frozen tumor tissue samples (sections). A gene is either a wild-type (no mutation) or mutated (presence of a mutation). Exons 9 and 20 of the PI3KCA gene were accessed (high frequency mutation at these two spots).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants for which high-quality tumor tissue samples were available were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type29 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation1 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type25 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus TrastuzumabNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation5 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation6 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type35 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type31 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation2 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Mutation5 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Mutation3 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 20 Wild-type37 Variations/Somatic mutations
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgNumber of Variations/Somatic Mutation in PI3KCA at BaselinePIK3CA Exon 9 Wild-Type39 Variations/Somatic mutations
Secondary

Percentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After Treatment

The percentage of inhibition of intermediate (EGFR, HER2, pMAPK, pAKT, PTEN, and PI3KCA) and final (TUNEL and Ki67) biomarkers of the proliferation and apoptosis pathways was calculated as the difference between the staining scores before (Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (withdrawal).

Time frame: At Baseline and Withdrawal (assessed up to Study Week 29)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants contributing data to the indicated time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 4225 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 1819 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 422.5 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 170 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 70 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 2NA Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 310.4 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 110.1 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 3780 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 15100 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 280 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 110 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 110 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 4225 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 310.58 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 3780 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 1815 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 270 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 280 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 4210 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 110.1 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 710 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 170 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 1580 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Post-treatment, 18, 20, 170 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Baseline, n=9, 5, 70 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Post-treatment, n=14, 17, 1580 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpMAPK, Post-treatment, n=0, 1, 25 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Baseline, n=25, 27, 310.8 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentTunel test, Post-treatment, n=7, 12, 110.05 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Baseline, n=21, 24, 280 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Baseline, n=34, 37, 4230 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentKi67, Post-treatment, n=22, 21, 1810 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentPTEN, Baseline, n=27, 35, 3790 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpAKT, Baseline, n=34, 37, 420 Percentage of inhibition
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Inhibition of Biomarkers Ki67, pAKT, pMAPK, Tunel Test, PTEN, and pEGFR After TreatmentpEGFR, Post-treatment, n=5, 10, 110 Percentage of inhibition
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCS

The percentage of participants who had BCS and mastectomy and who were initiallycandidates for mastectomy and who actually had BCS was measured. At Baseline, the surgeon stated, within 4 weeks before starting the primary treatment, which type of surgical treatment he would perform in the absence of primary therapy and in the case of primary therapy (if the tumor size was reduced by the primary treatment to less than 3 centimeters), and the reasons for these choices. The rules for choosing the type of surgical treatment are reported in the Consensus Conference on Primary Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. The surgeon was to have re-evaluated the participant after primary treatment. In cases in which the type of surgical procedure was different from that originally programmed, the reason for this chance was to have been reported.

Time frame: At Baseline and at surgery (up to Study Week 29)

Population: Efficacy Analysis Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSMastectomy33.3 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSBCS66.7 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSConversion from mastectomy to BCS61.9 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSMastectomy39.5 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSBCS57.9 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSConversion from mastectomy to BCS42.8 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSBCS68.9 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSConversion from mastectomy to BCS60 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants Who Had Breast-conserving Surgery (BCS), Mastectomy, and Conversion From Mastectomy to BCSMastectomy31.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by Ultrasonography

The clinical response was evaluated by comparing the tumor size (largest tumor diameter) before (at Baseline \[biopsy\]) and after treatment (before surgery), as assessed by ultrasonography examination. The clinical response was scored by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) as follows: complete clinical response: the nodule is not detectable and all the ultrasound abnormality detected at diagnosis disappeared (margins circumscribed, round oval shape, parallel orientation, isoechoic echo pattern, no posterior acoustic features, echogenic lesion boundary, and tumor vascularity not present); partial clinical response: the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \>50%, and the ultrasound characteristics of the tumor persist; no response (stable disease): the longest diameter of the tumor has been reduced by \<50% or has increased by no more than 20% from the starting value; progressive disease: tumor longest diameter has increased \>20% from the starting value.

Time frame: At Baseline and after primary treatment (within 2 weeks before surgery; up to Study Week 27)

Population: Efficacy Analysis Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyProgressive Disease2.8 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyStable Disease5.5 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyComplete Response (CR)30.5 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyPartial Response (PR)41.7 Percentage of participants
CT Plus TrastuzumabPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyNot Evaluable19.4 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyStable Disease13.1 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyComplete Response (CR)15.8 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyPartial Response (PR)44.7 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyProgressive Disease2.6 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyNot Evaluable23.7 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyNot Evaluable28.9 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyProgressive Disease0 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyComplete Response (CR)42.2 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyStable Disease0 Percentage of participants
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgPercentage of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Objective Response (Complete Response and Partial Response), Stable Disease, and Progressive Disease, as Assessed by UltrasonographyPartial Response (PR)28.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy

Time to treatment failure (TTF) is defined as the interval of time between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression, premature treatment discontinuation and death due to any cause. The overall disease progression date is the earlier of the two disease progression dates from ultrasonography and mammography assessments. For ultrasonography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the longest diameter of the primary lesion at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For mammography, disease progression is defined as at least 20% increase in the larger nodule dimension at pre-surgery comparing to Baseline. For participants who has neither progressed, pre-maturely withdrawn or died, time to treatment failure will be censored at the latest date of ultrasonography and mammography tumor assessments.

Time frame: From randomization up to Study Week 307

Population: ITT Population: all participants who were randomized

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
CT Plus TrastuzumabTime to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy28.2 Months
CT Plus Lapatinib 1500 mgTime to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy39.6 Months
CT Plus Trastuzumab and Lapatinib 1000 mgTime to Treatment Failure From the Start of Primary Therapy39.6 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026