Rectal Neoplasms
Conditions
Keywords
Rectal cancer surgery, Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, Randomized clinical trial, Multicenter study
Brief summary
Patients with T2T3 low rectal cancer (size =\< 4 cm) received neoadjuvant treatment (50Gy in 5 weeks with concomitant chemotherapy. Good responders (residual tumour =\< 2 cm) are randomised in local vs rectal excision, 6-8 weeks after treatment. The composite end point evaluates the rate of patients with death, recurrence, major morbidity or severe after effects at two years.
Detailed description
Rectal excision is the standard surgical treatment of rectal cancer. The risk of mortality and major short and long term morbidity induced by rectal excision justifies new treatments. Local excision is a conservative alternative approach associated with low mortality and morbidity. The purpose of this prospective randomised multicenter study is to compare local vs rectal excision in good responders after radiochemotherapy for low rectal cancer. Patients with T2T3 low rectal cancer, less than 8 cm from the anal verge, size =\< 4 cm, received neoadjuvant treatment, included radiotherapy between 45-55Gy in 5 weeks with concomitant chemotherapy consist of at least, one fluoropyrimidine. Good clinical responders (residual tumour =\< 2 cm) are randomised in local vs rectal excision, 6-8 weeks after treatment. In case of not confirmed pathological response following local excision, complementary rectal excision is required. Bad responders (residual tumour \> 2cm) are treated by primary rectal excision. Follow-up includes digital rectal examination, CT-scan and endorectal ultrasound (if local excision) every 4 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years.
Interventions
New surgical option in good responders after neoadjuvant treatment for low rectal cancer
standard surgery
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* T2T3 low adenocarcinoma of the rectum * Tumour size =\< 4cm * Less than 8 cm from the anal verge * No metastatic disease * Patient is at least 18 years of age * ECOG performance status score =\< 2 * Patient and doctor have signed informed consent * inclusion criteria : Residual clinical tumour size =\< 2cm after radiochemotherapy
Exclusion criteria
* T1, T4 tumour or anal sphincter invasion * Metastatic disease (M1) * Contra indication for radiotherapy and/or fluoropyrimidine use in chemotherapy * History of cancer * Symptomatic cardiac or coronary insufficiency * Severe renal insufficiency * Peripheral neuropathy * Patient included in a trial
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare the proportion of patients presenting at least 1 component of the composite outcome (4 components: death, recurrence, major morbidity and severe after effects) at 2 years after | 24 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare the incidence at 2 years of each component separately: death, recurrence, major morbidity and severe after effect | 24 months |
| 5-year survival. | 5 years |
| Quality of life (QLQ C30 - CR38) | at 0, 4, 8 and 12 months |
Countries
France