Skip to content

Imatinib in Patients With Mucosal or Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma

A Phase II Study of Imatinib in Patients With Mucosal or Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma and Melanomas That Arise on Chronically Sun Damaged Skin.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00424515
Acronym
BUS255
Enrollment
24
Registered
2007-01-19
Start date
2006-07-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2016-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma, Chronically Sun Damaged Melanomas, Mucosal Melanoma

Keywords

Imatinib, Gleevec

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective imatinib (Gleevec) is in treating acral/lentiginous and mucosal melanoma which has spread to other parts of the body in patients who's disease carries a c-kit mutation. Imatinib is a protein-kinase inhibitor. It is believed that imatinib may be effective in blocking signals on certain cancer cells which allow the malignant cells to multiply and spread.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine the response rate of patients with metastatic mucosal, acral/lentiginous, or chronically sun damaged melanomas to treatment with of imatinib. * To determine the time to progression. Secondary * To correlate c-kit mutational status with response to therapy. * To evaluate the use of FDG-PET scanning in determining early biologic response to therapy. * Tolerability of imatinib. * To assess amplification of c-kit status through quantitative PCR and/or FISH and other related molecular pathway targets. * To correlate c-kit amplification status with response to therapy.

Interventions

DRUGImatinib

Imatinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (4 100mg pills). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Dosage may have been increased to twice daily if disease worsened and patient was in otherwise good clinical condition.

Sponsors

Novartis
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Melanomas that arise on chronically sun damaged skin and have pathologic evidence of solar elastosis * History of primary mucosal or acral/lentiginous melanoma * Histologically documented stage IV metastatic melanoma * ECOG performance status 0,1, or 2 * Estimated life expectancy of 6 months or greater * Age 18 years or older * Creatinine \< 1.5 x ULN * ANC \> 1500 ul * Platelets \> 100,000 ul * Total bilirubin, AST, and ALT \< 2 x ULN * Amylase and lipase \< 1.5 x ULN * C-kit mutation documented from either primary or metastatic tumor site * \> 4 weeks from prior chemotherapy or investigational drug * At least one measurable site of disease as defined by at least 1 cm in greatest dimension

Exclusion criteria

* Severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease * Pregnant or nursing mothers * Any other significant medical, surgical, or psychiatric condition that my interfere with compliance * Patient is \< 5 years free of another primary malignancy except: basal cell skin cancer or a cervical carcinoma in situ * Concurrent treatment with Warfarin * Prior treatment with c-kit inhibitor * Patient with Grade III/IV cardiac problems as defined by NYHA criteria * No H2 blockers or proton pump inhibitors * Known brain metastasis * Known chronic liver disease * Known diagnosis of HIV infection * Previous radiotherapy to \> 25% of the bone marrow * Major surgery within 2 weeks prior to study entry * Patient has received any other investigational agent within 28 days of first study drug dosing * Chemotherapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Overall ResponseDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).Best overall response (BOR) on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. For target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation required within 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. CR is disappearance of all non-target lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to ProgressionDisease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment and every 3 months long-term. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).Time to progression (TTP) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Overall SurvivalPatients were followed long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Median survival follow-up was 10.6 months (range 3.7-27.1).Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was activated on July 6, 2006 and closed March 1, 2011. Patients enrolled from 9 medical centers beginning April 2007 through December 2010.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Amplified KIT
Imatinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (4 100 mg pills). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Dosage may have been increased to twice daily if disease worsened and patient was in otherwise good clinical condition. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon KIT molecular status.
11
Mutated KIT
Imatinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (4 100 mg pills). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Dosage may have been increased to twice daily if disease worsened and patient was in otherwise good clinical condition. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon KIT molecular status.
13
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyIntercurrent Illness01
Overall StudyProgressive Disease1011
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMutated KITTotalAmplified KIT
Age, Continuous64 years65 years69 years
Melanoma Type
Acral
2 participants6 participants4 participants
Melanoma Type
Chronically Sun-Damaged
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Melanoma Type
Mucosal
11 participants17 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants24 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants18 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 1113 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 113 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Best Overall Response

Best overall response (BOR) on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria. For target lesions, complete response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions and partial response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. CR or PR confirmation required within 4 weeks. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum LD of target lesions from smallest sum LD as reference or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Stable disease (SD) is neither meeting PR or PD. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. CR is disappearance of all non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Amplified KITBest Overall ResponseComplete Response0 participants
Amplified KITBest Overall ResponsePartial Response0 participants
Amplified KITBest Overall ResponseStable Disease2 participants
Amplified KITBest Overall ResponseProgressive Disease9 participants
Mutated KITBest Overall ResponseProgressive Disease3 participants
Mutated KITBest Overall ResponseComplete Response0 participants
Mutated KITBest Overall ResponseStable Disease3 participants
Mutated KITBest Overall ResponsePartial Response7 participants
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive.

Time frame: Patients were followed long-term every 3 months until first progression, death or lost to follow-up. Median survival follow-up was 10.6 months (range 3.7-27.1).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amplified KITOverall Survival11.9 months
Mutated KITOverall Survival12.9 months
Secondary

Time to Progression

Time to progression (TTP) based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.

Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline, after 6-weeks, and at 2-month intervals on treatment and every 3 months long-term. Mean treatment duration was 4 months (range 1-11; amplified/mutated 3m/ 6m).

Population: The analysis dataset is comprised of treated patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amplified KITTime to Progression3.4 months
Mutated KITTime to Progression3.9 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026