Skip to content

Treatment of Hypovitaminosis D in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatment of Hypovitaminosis D in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00423358
Enrollment
22
Registered
2007-01-18
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2015-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypovitaminosis D, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis, hypovitaminosis D, bone turnover, ergocalciferol

Brief summary

This study recruits individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and low vitamin D concentrations. Subjects are dosed with vitamin D or placebo for one year. Primary outcome is change in bone turnover markers, additionally, bone mineral density and parameters of RA status are evaluated throughout the study.

Detailed description

Osteoporosis is twice as common in people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared to age and gender-matched controls \[1, 2\]. Hypovitaminosis D can contribute to osteoporosis pathogenesis by decreasing calcium absorption, leading to a decline in serum ionized calcium, a rise in parathyroid hormone levels and upregulation of osteoclast activity, leading to loss of calcium from the skeleton. Hypovitaminosis D is also common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis \[3-5\], making it an appealing target to potentially improve health in both RA and osteoporosis. Vitamin D has theoretic potential to modulate RA disease activity, based on the presence of vitamin D receptors in lymphocytes, macrophages, chondrocytes, and synovial cells \[6\]. Vitamin D, given as the bioactive metabolite 1,25(OH)2D, ameliorates disease activity in murine models of RA \[7, 8\]. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of vitamin D on RA disease activity in humans. Two three month open-label studies reported that vitamin D reduced RA disease activity \[9\] and pain levels \[10\]. By contrast, an eight-week open-label study \[11\] reported no reduction in swollen joint counts, inflammatory markers or cytokine levels after vitamin D therapy. The only double-blind, placebo-controlled trial published thus far \[12\] found no significant effect of vitamin D on RA disease activity, but was limited by the lack of hypovitaminosis D as a criterion for study entry. Indeed, at baseline subjects' mean 25(OH)D levels indicated vitamin D repletion, potentially explaining the null effect of vitamin D on RA disease activity. Three studies have evaluated the effect of vitamin D on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with RA \[13-15\]. Researchers \[14\] randomized 96 subjects with RA to vitamin D (500 IU/day) and calcium (1000 mg/day) or placebo for two years; vitamin D and calcium therapy modestly increased BMD in the spine and hip. In another study \[15\], 20 subjects randomized to daily calcium and 1 α-hydroxyvitamin D for up to 24 months experienced similar declines in radius and spine BMD compared to 15 controls \[15\]. Likewise, vitamin D and calcium did not prevent bone loss in a prospective cohort study of patients with RA \[13\]. However, none of the studies required hypovitaminosis D as an entry criterion, vitamin D repletion to 25(OH)D levels \> 32 ng/ml were not evaluated \[13, 14\] or achieved \[15\], and low doses of vitamin D were administered, potentially limiting skeletal benefits of this therapy. We hypothesized that correction of hypovitaminosis D in subjects with RA would decrease parathyroid hormone (PTH), increase BMD, improve functional capacity and down-regulate inflammatory cytokine production, thereby diminishing disease activity. Vitamin D is inexpensive and widely available. If proven beneficial, vitamin D might become a mainstay of therapy for subjects with RA.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTVitamin D

Ergocalciferol 50,000 IU loading dose then twice monthly for one year

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTplacebo

matching placebo

Sponsors

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Rheumatology

Exclusion criteria

* Bisphosphonate therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parathyroid Hormone Level1 YearSerum parathyroid hormone level

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Mineral Density1 Yearone year change in mean total hip BMD
Short Form 36 Survey1 Year12 month score for physical function domain of SF36 survey; scale 0 to 100 with 0 indicating worst disability and 100 indicating best physical function

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vitamin D
ergocalciferol 50,000 IU Twice monthly Vitamin D: Ergocalciferol 50,000 IU loading dose then twice monthly for one year
11
Placebo
matching placebo tablet placebo: matching placebo
11
Total22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalVitamin DPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants11 participants11 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants7 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 110 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 110 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Parathyroid Hormone Level

Serum parathyroid hormone level

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: Subject data were analyzed using the intent to treat approach.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vitamin D, n=11Parathyroid Hormone Level19 pg/mLStandard Deviation 11
Placebo, n=11Parathyroid Hormone Level20 pg/mLStandard Deviation 11
Secondary

Bone Mineral Density

one year change in mean total hip BMD

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vitamin D, n=11Bone Mineral Density0.970 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.14
Placebo, n=11Bone Mineral Density1.151 g/cm2Standard Deviation 0.168
Secondary

Short Form 36 Survey

12 month score for physical function domain of SF36 survey; scale 0 to 100 with 0 indicating worst disability and 100 indicating best physical function

Time frame: 1 Year

Population: Intent to treat analysis

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Vitamin D, n=11Short Form 36 Survey39.1 units from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Placebo, n=11Short Form 36 Survey47.7 units from 0 (worst) to 100 (best)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026