Skip to content

Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN™) in Metastatic or Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma

A Phase II, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Cediranib 45mg Versus Placebo Following 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Had no Previous Anti-VEGF Therapy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00423332
Enrollment
105
Registered
2007-01-18
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2017-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

cancer, tumour, advanced cancer, Metastatic renal cell carcinoma, kidney cancer, RECENTIN

Brief summary

Cediranib is being tested to assess its effectiveness on the growth of kidney cancer tumours and also how well it is tolerated.

Interventions

DRUGCediranib

45 mg oral tablet

oral tablet

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmation of metastatic or recurrent renal cell carcinoma

Exclusion criteria

* Certain types of previous anti-cancer therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma * Patients with type I insulin-dependent diabetes or poorly-controlled type II insulin-independent diabetes * Patients with a history of poorly controlled high blood pressure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at 12 WeeksBaseline to Week 12Sum of longest diameters of the target lesions, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria ((Week 12 - baseline)/baseline)\*100

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size During the StudyTreatment period up to Week 12 visit date for last patient in (LPI)Maximum reduction or minimum increase in tumour size where size is the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions
Duration of ResponseTreatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009Based on RECIST measurements taken throughout the study and best objective tumour response at the defined analysis cut-off point. Measured from the time the criteria for complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) are first met (whichever is recorded first) until the patient progresses or dies.
Progression Free SurvivalTreatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009.Number of months from randomisation until progressive disease based on RECIST (progression of target lesions, clear progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions) or death in the absence of progression.
Objective Tumour Response at 12 WeeksResponse rate at 12 weeks was based on RECIST measurements taken at baseline and at Week 12, or upon progression if this was before Week 12.Number of patients with complete (CR) /partial response (PR) (based on RECIST). CR is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. At 12 weeks, tumour responses would be unconfirmed, as this was the first post-baseline RECIST assessment, unless a patient had a RECIST assessment before Week 12 to confirm a suspected progression.
Best Objective Tumour ResponseBaseline, Week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter or until progression.Best Objective Tumour response as defined by RECIST. Patients were assigned to 1 of the following best objective tumour response categories: complete response (CR) defined as a Disappearance of all target lesions, partial response (PR), defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, stable disease (SD) defined as Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, or progressive disease (PD) defined as At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began). Patients who were evaluable for RECIST assessments, but who did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, SD, or PD, were assigned to the response category of not evaluable (NE).

Countries

Netherlands, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Seventy-one patients were randomised to study treatment: 53 to cediranib 45 mg and 18 to placebo. Following unblinding for the primary analysis, all patients, except those who had progressed on cediranib, then had the option of receiving open-label treatment with cediranib. Randomised=ITT=Safety set: Cediranib 45mg 53, Placebo 18.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AZD2171 45 mg
AZD2171 45mg/Day
53
Placebo
Placebo/Day
18
Total71

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event62
Overall StudyCondition under investigation worsened11
Overall StudyProgressive at Week 601
Overall StudyUnblinded before 12 weeks13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAZD2171 45 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous60.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
62.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
61.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
Gender
Female
13 Participants3 Participants16 Participants
Gender
Male
40 Participants15 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
53 / 5316 / 1857 / 58
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 533 / 1815 / 58

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at 12 Weeks

Sum of longest diameters of the target lesions, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria ((Week 12 - baseline)/baseline)\*100

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

Population: For patients to be included in the analysis they had to have been evaluable for RECIST with week 12 or progression tumour size data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AZD2171 45 mgPercentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at 12 Weeks-19.47 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 17.093
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size at 12 Weeks19.65 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 22.902
Secondary

Best Objective Tumour Response

Best Objective Tumour response as defined by RECIST. Patients were assigned to 1 of the following best objective tumour response categories: complete response (CR) defined as a Disappearance of all target lesions, partial response (PR), defined as At least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD, stable disease (SD) defined as Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum LD since the treatment started, or progressive disease (PD) defined as At least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded (either at baseline or at previous assessment since treatment began). Patients who were evaluable for RECIST assessments, but who did not meet the criteria for CR, PR, SD, or PD, were assigned to the response category of not evaluable (NE).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 and every 8 weeks thereafter or until progression.

Population: For the patients who switched from placebo to cediranib after unblinding, the baseline RECIST assessment was not reset to their last scan placebo, owing to the methods of data collection; therefore, it was not possible to determine their subsequent response to cediranib treatment using a 'best response' summary.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AZD2171 45 mgBest Objective Tumour Response18 Participants
PlaceboBest Objective Tumour Response1 Participants
Secondary

Best Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size During the Study

Maximum reduction or minimum increase in tumour size where size is the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions

Time frame: Treatment period up to Week 12 visit date for last patient in (LPI)

Population: For patients to be included in the analysis they had to have been evaluable for RECIST with week 12 or progression tumour size data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AZD2171 45 mgBest Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size During the Study-26.90 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 23.153
PlaceboBest Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Size During the Study1.09 Percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 26.783
Secondary

Duration of Response

Based on RECIST measurements taken throughout the study and best objective tumour response at the defined analysis cut-off point. Measured from the time the criteria for complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) are first met (whichever is recorded first) until the patient progresses or dies.

Time frame: Treatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009

Population: For patients to be included in the analysis they had to have been evaluable for RECIST and have been a responder (Complete response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)).~13 of the 19 responders had not progressed by the data cut off so their responses are ongoing and are censored at the date of the last evaluable visit before the data cut-off.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AZD2171 45 mgDuration of Response18.595 Months
PlaceboDuration of Response11.1 Months
Secondary

Objective Tumour Response at 12 Weeks

Number of patients with complete (CR) /partial response (PR) (based on RECIST). CR is defined as Disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of Longest Diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD. At 12 weeks, tumour responses would be unconfirmed, as this was the first post-baseline RECIST assessment, unless a patient had a RECIST assessment before Week 12 to confirm a suspected progression.

Time frame: Response rate at 12 weeks was based on RECIST measurements taken at baseline and at Week 12, or upon progression if this was before Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AZD2171 45 mgObjective Tumour Response at 12 Weeks11 Participants
PlaceboObjective Tumour Response at 12 Weeks0 Participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Number of months from randomisation until progressive disease based on RECIST (progression of target lesions, clear progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of one or more new lesions) or death in the absence of progression.

Time frame: Treatment period up to 2nd data cut-off of 8th March 2009.

Population: Comparison of PFS between patients randomised to cediranib 45 mg versus those randomised to placebo. All patients irrespective of whether they had a 12 week scan are included in this analysis. At week 12 placebo patients were able to switch to cediranib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AZD2171 45 mgProgression Free Survival12.1 Months
PlaceboProgression Free Survival2.76 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026