Skip to content

Optimize RV Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial

Optimize RV Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00422669
Enrollment
205
Registered
2007-01-17
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2013-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Pacemaker, Artificial, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial

Keywords

Pacemaker, Implantable Pulse Generator (IPG), AV Conduction Disturbance, Select Site Pacing

Brief summary

The purpose of the Optimize RV study is to determine the long-term effect of selective site pacing. Selective site pacing refers to which area of the right ventricle the lead is placed. The goal of select site pacing is to improve how the heart contracts when paced in the ventricle. By pacing in select sites, it is possible to better copy the natural pattern of contraction of the heart.

Interventions

DEVICEMedtronic Dual-Chamber Pacemaker

A Medtronic market-approved dual-chamber implantable pulse generator (IPG)

Medtronic market-approved SelectSecure Model 3830 bipolar pacing lead

Sponsors

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects that are expected to be paced in the right ventricle (RV) greater than 90 percent of the time * Subjects with an ejection fraction of greater than 40 percent within 3 months prior to enrollment * Subjects greater than 18 yrs of age * Subjects that are indicated for a dual chamber pacemaker * Subjects that will be implanted with a market released dual chamber Medtronic pacemaker and 3830 SelectSecure Lead in the ventricle

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device (based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines) * Subjects indicated for an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) * Subjects with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) * Subjects with expected managed ventricular pacing turned on * Subjects with a previously implanted pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device * Subjects with an myocardial infarction (MI) within 3 months prior to enrollment * Subjects that received bypass surgery within 3 months prior to enrollment * Subjects that had valve replacement within 3 months prior to enrollment * Subjects where a RV lead cannot be placed, (i.e., complex congenital heart disease * Subjects with a mechanical right heart valve * Women who are pregnant or nursing * Significant co-morbidity preventing study completion * Terminal conditions with a life expectancy of less than two years * Participation in another study that would confound the results of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change in Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction From Baseline to Two Year Follow-upBaseline and 24 monthsLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) will be measured at baseline and two year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LVEF from baseline to two year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LVEF.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Change in LVEF From Two Week Visit to Two Year Follow-upBaseline and 24 monthsLeft ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) will be measured at two week visit and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LVEF from two week visit to 2 year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LVEF.
The Change in Six-minute Hall Walk DistanceBaseline and 24 monthsThe change in six-minute hall walk distance will be measured at two week visit and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in six-minute hall walk distance will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in six-minute hall walk distance.
The Change in Left Ventricular (LV) End Systolic Volume (Diastolic Volume) After Two Years Follow-upBaseline and 24 monthsLV end systolic volume (diastolic volume)will be measured at baseline and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LV end systolic volume (diastolic volume)from two week visit to 2 year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LV end systolic volume (diastolic volume).
Clinical Event (AT/AF Pnly or Composite of Worsening of Heart Failure, Stroke or Death) Rate From Baseline to Two Year Follow-upBaseline and 24 monthsClinical event (AT/AF pnly or composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death) rate from baseline to two year follow-up will be estimated and compared between the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on clinical event rate.
Clinical Event (Composite of Worsening of Heart Failure, Stroke or Death) Rate From Baseline to 2 Year Follow-upBaseline and 24 monthsClinical event (composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death) rate from baseline to 2 year follow-up will be estimated and compared between the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on clinical event(composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death)rate.

Countries

Canada, China, Israel, Italy, Qatar, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollments in the Optimize RV trial began in March of 2007. The study was terminated early on March 26, 2009 after 205 subjects had been enrolled.

Pre-assignment details

Seven subjects did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RV Mid-Septal Pacing
Pacing lead is placed in the right ventricle at the middle of the muscle separating the right and left sides of the heart
98
RV Apical Pacing
Pacing lead is placed at the bottom of the right ventricle of the heart, in the right ventricular apex
100
Not Randomized
7 of the 205 subjects did not meet in/exclusion criteria so they were not randomized.
7
Total205

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyThe study was terminated early.981007

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRV Mid-Septal PacingRV Apical PacingNot RandomizedTotal
Age Continuous77.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
77.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
NA years77.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Gender
Female
37 participants39 participantsNA participants76 participants
Gender
Male
61 participants61 participantsNA participants122 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants6 participants0 participants11 participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
5 participants4 participants0 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
13 participants12 participants0 participants25 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
75 participants78 participants7 participants160 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 198
serious
Total, serious adverse events
50 / 198

Outcome results

Primary

The Change in Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction From Baseline to Two Year Follow-up

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) will be measured at baseline and two year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LVEF from baseline to two year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LVEF.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Secondary

Clinical Event (AT/AF Pnly or Composite of Worsening of Heart Failure, Stroke or Death) Rate From Baseline to Two Year Follow-up

Clinical event (AT/AF pnly or composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death) rate from baseline to two year follow-up will be estimated and compared between the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on clinical event rate.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Secondary

Clinical Event (Composite of Worsening of Heart Failure, Stroke or Death) Rate From Baseline to 2 Year Follow-up

Clinical event (composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death) rate from baseline to 2 year follow-up will be estimated and compared between the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on clinical event(composite of worsening of heart failure, stroke or death)rate.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Secondary

The Change in Left Ventricular (LV) End Systolic Volume (Diastolic Volume) After Two Years Follow-up

LV end systolic volume (diastolic volume)will be measured at baseline and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LV end systolic volume (diastolic volume)from two week visit to 2 year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LV end systolic volume (diastolic volume).

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Secondary

The Change in LVEF From Two Week Visit to Two Year Follow-up

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) will be measured at two week visit and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in LVEF from two week visit to 2 year follow-up will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in LVEF.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Secondary

The Change in Six-minute Hall Walk Distance

The change in six-minute hall walk distance will be measured at two week visit and 2 year follow-up for the group of pacing at RV Mid-Septum and the group of pacing at Apex. The change in six-minute hall walk distance will be compared between two groups to identify if pacing at selective RV sites (Mid-Septum or Apex) will have a different long term impact on the change in six-minute hall walk distance.

Time frame: Baseline and 24 months

Population: Data required for the analysis were not collected due to early study termination. Analysis will not be done.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026