Skip to content

A Study of Retreatment With MabThera (Rituximab) in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Effect of Various Re-treatment Regimens of MabThera in Combination With Methotrexate on Treatment Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00422383
Enrollment
378
Registered
2007-01-17
Start date
2006-02-28
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2015-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of various treatment and retreatment regimens of MabThera. All patients will receive concomitant methotrexate, 10-25mg once weekly either orally or parenterally. The anticipated time on study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGrituximab [MabThera/Rituxan]

500mg iv in days 1 and 15, and 500mg iv on days 168 and 182

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients \>=18 years of age; * RA for \>=6 months; * receiving outpatient treatment; * inadequate response to methotrexate, having received and tolerated it for \>=12 weeks, with a stable dose for \>=4 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA; * inflammatory joint disease other than RA, or other systemic autoimmune disorder; * diagnosis of juvenile arthritis, or RA before the age of 16; * previous treatment with \>1 biologic agent, any cell-depleting therapies, or concurrent treatment with any biologic agent or DMARD other than methotrexate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Response as Determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20)Week 48ACR20 defined as overall score of ≥20 in ACR number (ACRn) calculation. Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from baseline (BL) of following 3 measures: tender joint count (TJC; 68 joints), swollen joint count (SJC: 66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (visual analog assessment \[VAS\]), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). If CRP missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR20 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR): Adjusted Mean Change From BL at Week 48BL, Week 48DAS28 was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 equals (=) \[0.56 multiplied by (\*) the square root (√) of TJC\] plus (+) \[0.28 \* √ of SJC\] + (0.70 \* the natural logarithm (ln) ESR in millimeters per hour (mm/h)\] + \[0.014 \* participant's global assessment of disease activity (GH)\]. DAS28-ESR ≥ 5.1 = high disease activity, DAS28-ESR less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28-ESR less than (\<) 2.6 = remission.
Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 48Week 48ACR50 was defined as an overall score of 50 in the ACRn calculation. Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from BL of following 3 measures: TJC (68 joints), SJC (66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (VAS), HAQ, and CRP. If CRP missing, ESR was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. LOCF for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR50 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing.
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70% Improvement Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 48Week 48ACR70 was defined as an overall score of 70 in the ACRn calculation. The Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from BL of following 3 measures: TJC (68 joints), SJC (66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (VAS), HAQ, and CRP. If CRP missing, ESR was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. LOCF for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR70 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing.
Peripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD19 in the absence of CD27 expression was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of naive B lymphocyte count.
Percentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryWeek 48EULAR responses were categorized according to DAS28-ESR score. DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = good response, DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 or greater than (\>) 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -0.6 and ≥ -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR \> 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 or \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 ≥ -0.6 = no response, DAS28-ESR \> 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -0.6 and ≥ -1.2 or ≥ -0.6 = no response.
Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 48BL, Week 48FACIT-F scores were obtained from a 13 question self-administered participant questionnaire designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days. Participants responded to the questions using a value between 0 and 4, where 0 indicated not at all and 4 indicated very much. 11 of the 13 questions were negatively stated; indicating the higher the score of the participant's response, the greater their fatigue. These questions were calculated as 4 minus the participants' response, so that a higher score indicated an improvement in health. The scores for the 2 positively stated questions were not changed. The participants' responses were summed to result in an overall score, which are scored 0 to 52 (52 = highest level of functioning). A positive change from BL indicated improvement.
Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBL, Week (Wk) 24 and 48SF-36 scores were obtained by scoring participants' responses to a 36 item questionnaire. SF-36 evaluated 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health from a range of 1 (better) to 5 (worst). The score for each section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). These 8 aspects were summarized as physical and mental component scores.
Change in SF-36 Score From BLBL, Weeks 24 and 48SF-36 scores were obtained by scoring participants' responses to a 36 item questionnaire. SF-36 evaluated 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health from a range of 1 (better) to 5 (worst). The score for each section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). These 8 aspects were summarized as physical and mental component scores.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)Days 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).Cfirst values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLDays 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).Csecond values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.
Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysDays 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).t1/2 values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.
Peripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)BLSurface expression of CD19 was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis as a marker of absolute B lymphocyte count.
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)BL, Days 1 and 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD19 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute B lymphocyte count. The LLN was defined as \< 80 cells/µL.
Peripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD20 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of mature and memory B lymphocyte count.
Peripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD22 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of mature lymphocyte count.
Peripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Simultaneous surface expression of CD19 and CD27 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of memory B lymphocyte count.
Change From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD3 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD3+ T cells was defined as 723-2737 cells/µL.
Peripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD4 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of T helper cell count. The normal range of CD4+ T cells was defined as 404-1612 cells/µL.
Peripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD3 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD3+ T cells was defined as 723-2737 cells/µL.
Peripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD8 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of cytotoxic T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD8+ T cells was defined as 220-1129 cells/µL.
Change From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD8 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of cytotoxic T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD8+ T cells was defined as 220-1129 cells/µL.
Peripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Simultaneous surface expression of CD16 and CD56 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of NK cell count.
Change From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Simultaneous surface expression of CD16 and CD56 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of NK cell count.
Percentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, Weeks 24 and 48The LLNs for total Ig, IgA, IgG, and IgM were defined as 6.75 grams per liter (g/L), 0.70 g/L, 65 g/L, and 0.40 g/L, respectively.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeBL, Weeks 8, 24, and 48Percentage of participants who were RF seropositive at BL who became RF seronegative over the course of the study. RF seropositive status was defined as RF ≥ 20 international units (IU) per mL. RF seronegative status was defined as RF \< 20 IU/mL.
Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)BL
Change From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWeeks 8, 24, and 48
Percentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48The LLN for C3 protein was defined as \<0.9 grams per liter (g/L).
Change From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48The LLN of C3 protein was defined as \<0.9 g/L.
Change From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48
Percentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48The LLN of C4 protein was defined as \< 0.1 g/L.
Change From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48
Change From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48
Percentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL, Weeks 24 and 48A participant was defined as being HACA positive if the HACA serum level was ≥ 5 relative units (RU) per mL and the physician comment read that participant was immunodepletable with rituximab.
Percentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersBL, Weeks 24 and 48ANA titers were obtained by the following serum dilution schema: negative = negative, borderline = 1 diluted to (:) 40 or 1:80, and positive ≥ 1:160. The change categories were defined for the change from BL to Weeks 24 and 48 according to this schema. Negative to borderline was defined as any change from negative to borderline as no dilution is given for negative results. Negative to positive was defined as at least a two-fold positive change in dilution from BL. Borderline to negative was defined as any change from borderline to negative as no dilution is given for negative results. Borderline to positive was defined as at least a two-fold positive change in dilution from BL. Positive to borderline was defined as at least a two-fold negative change in dilution from BL. Positive to negative was defined as at least a two-fold negative change in dilution from BL. Unchanged was defined as any difference in dilution less than two-fold.
Percentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersBL, Weeks 24 and 48A positive titer result to recall antigens was defined as a serum antibody level equal to or above the following protective levels: tetanus toxoid ≥ 0.1 IU/mL, influenza A \> 12 U/mL, influenza B \> 12 U/mL, and streptococcus (S.) pneumococcus ≥ 1.0 mg/L.
Change From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountBL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48Surface expression of CD4 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of T helper cell count. The normal range of CD4+ T cells was defined as 404-1612 cells/µL.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rituximab Low Dose + Methotrexate
Participants received rituximab, 0.5 g, IV, on Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg, IV, by slow infusion, which was completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methotrexate 10-25 mg/mL, PO or parenterally, as prescribed by the treating physician and in accordance with the local label. Participants also received a stable dose of folate ≥ 5 mg/week given either as a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
134
Rituximab Escalated Dose + Methotrexate
Participants received rituximab, 0.5 g, IV, on Days 1 and 15 and 1.0 g, IV, on Days 168 and 182. Participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg, IV, by slow infusion, which was completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methotrexate 10-25 mg/mL, PO or parenterally, as prescribed by the treating physician and in accordance with the local label. Participants also received a stable dose of folate ≥ 5 mg/week given either as a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
119
Rituximab High Dose + Methotrexate
Participants received rituximab, 1.0 g, IV, on Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg, IV, by slow infusion, which was completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methotrexate 10-25 mg/mL, PO or parenterally, as prescribed by the treating physician and in accordance with the local label. Participants also received a stable dose of folate ≥ 5 mg/week given either as a single dose or as a divided weekly dose.
93
Rituximab/Placebo + Methotrexate
Participants received rituximab, 1.0 g, IV, on Days 1 and 15, and a placebo, IV, on Days 168 and 182. Participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg, IV, by slow infusion, which was completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methotrexate 10-25 mg/mL, PO or parenterally, as prescribed by the treating physician and in accordance with the local label. Participants also received a stable dose of folate ≥ 5 mg/week given either as a single dose or as a divided weekly dose. This treatment group was not part of the planned analysis and was not analyzed for all outcomes measures since they did not receive the planned treatment.
6
Rituximab Decreased Dose + Methotrexate
Participants received rituximab, 1.0 g, IV, on Days 1 and 15 and 0.5 g, IV, on Days 168 and 182. Participants also received methylprednisolone 100 mg, IV, by slow infusion, which was completed at least 30 minutes prior to each infusion of rituximab Days 1, 15, 168, and 182. Participants also received methotrexate 10-25 mg/mL, PO or parenterally, as prescribed by the treating physician and in accordance with the local label. Participants also received a stable dose of folate ≥ 5 mg/week given either as a single dose or as a divided weekly dose. This treatment group was not part of the planned analysis and was not analyzed for all outcomes measures since they did not receive the planned treatment.
25
Total377

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event53110
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy44211
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject55001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateRituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateRituximab High Dose + MethotrexateRituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateRituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateTotal
Age, Continuous53.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.805
52.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.115
51.26 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.179
51.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.274
52.32 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.882
52.48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
110 Participants90 Participants77 Participants4 Participants16 Participants297 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants29 Participants16 Participants2 Participants9 Participants80 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
120 / 134103 / 11988 / 936 / 622 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 13421 / 11916 / 931 / 63 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Response as Determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20)

ACR20 defined as overall score of ≥20 in ACR number (ACRn) calculation. Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from baseline (BL) of following 3 measures: tender joint count (TJC; 68 joints), swollen joint count (SJC: 66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (visual analog assessment \[VAS\]), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). If CRP missing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR20 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response as Determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20)64.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response as Determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20)63.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response as Determined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20)72.0 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.815695% CI: [-0.13, 0.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.241995% CI: [-0.05, 0.19]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)

Time frame: BL

Population: SAP. 3, 3, and 2 participants were not analyzed for this outcome measure from the Low Dose, Escalated Dose, and High Dose, groups, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateAnti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)205.39 U/mLStandard Deviation 374.203
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateAnti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)179.01 U/mLStandard Deviation 255.251
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateAnti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)263.61 U/mLStandard Deviation 477.554
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateAnti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)184.77 U/mLStandard Deviation 304.169
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateAnti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP) Antibody Titers at BL in Units Per mL (U/mL)310.94 U/mLStandard Deviation 334.849
Secondary

Change From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/L

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=27,21,22)-326.9 g/LStandard Deviation 3990.88
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)-1176.8 g/LStandard Deviation 4494.98
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-1117.7 g/LStandard Deviation 4347.64
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,9,11)103.9 g/LStandard Deviation 749.79
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,9,11)-124.2 g/LStandard Deviation 921.23
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=27,21,22)-92.8 g/LStandard Deviation 836.55
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-285.4 g/LStandard Deviation 403.44
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)-17.1 g/LStandard Deviation 389.94
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,9,11)-142.4 g/LStandard Deviation 504.95
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)1054.1 g/LStandard Deviation 5409.76
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-164.9 g/LStandard Deviation 740.91
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 3a (C3a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=27,21,22)1319.9 g/LStandard Deviation 5104.05
Secondary

Change From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/L

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=26,21,22)-1424.3 g/LStandard Deviation 3801.86
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)-971.3 g/LStandard Deviation 3149.08
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-1885.3 g/LStandard Deviation 2458.08
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,8,10)629.8 g/LStandard Deviation 5993.96
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,8,10)260.4 g/LStandard Deviation 1450.4
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=26,21,22)-480.1 g/LStandard Deviation 3137.12
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-333.0 g/LStandard Deviation 706.11
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)3004.9 g/LStandard Deviation 10300.68
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=14,8,10)109.8 g/LStandard Deviation 1566.68
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=18,10,14)3.5 g/LStandard Deviation 1832.62
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=18,10,14)-1011.1 g/LStandard Deviation 1574.01
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Activated Complement Component 4a (C4a) Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=26,21,22)-3749.1 g/LStandard Deviation 13498.79
Secondary

Change From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mL

Time frame: Weeks 8, 24, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 8 (n=127,112,85,6,24)-42.97 U/mLStandard Deviation 94.873
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 48 (n=116,102,87,4,22)-72.99 U/mLStandard Deviation 151.086
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 24 (n=117,107,82,4,24)-68.23 U/mLStandard Deviation 158.951
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 24 (n=117,107,82,4,24)-56.76 U/mLStandard Deviation 144.256
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 8 (n=127,112,85,6,24)-46.84 U/mLStandard Deviation 140.589
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 48 (n=116,102,87,4,22)-82.51 U/mLStandard Deviation 223.577
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 24 (n=117,107,82,4,24)-72.96 U/mLStandard Deviation 219.466
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 8 (n=127,112,85,6,24)-70.39 U/mLStandard Deviation 265.694
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 48 (n=116,102,87,4,22)-127.21 U/mLStandard Deviation 307.981
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 8 (n=127,112,85,6,24)-33.80 U/mLStandard Deviation 58.443
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 48 (n=116,102,87,4,22)-28.98 U/mLStandard Deviation 42.881
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 24 (n=117,107,82,4,24)-70.33 U/mLStandard Deviation 149.881
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 24 (n=117,107,82,4,24)-64.32 U/mLStandard Deviation 89.763
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 8 (n=127,112,85,6,24)-18.67 U/mLStandard Deviation 54.228
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Anti-CCP Antibody Titers in U/mLWk 48 (n=116,102,87,4,22)-81.57 U/mLStandard Deviation 167.012
Secondary

Change From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/L

The LLN of C3 protein was defined as \<0.9 g/L.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0469 g/LStandard Deviation 0.17761
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0423 g/LStandard Deviation 0.20915
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=118,104,79)-0.0413 g/LStandard Deviation 0.18365
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,105,78)-0.0137 g/LStandard Deviation 0.22743
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)-0.0621 g/LStandard Deviation 0.21365
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,78)-0.0889 g/LStandard Deviation 0.21974
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)-0.0953 g/LStandard Deviation 0.20329
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.1048 g/LStandard Deviation 0.20255
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=118,104,79)-0.0235 g/LStandard Deviation 0.19255
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)-0.0580 g/LStandard Deviation 0.26221
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,105,78)0.0279 g/LStandard Deviation 0.20724
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)-0.0225 g/LStandard Deviation 0.20578
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,78)-0.0673 g/LStandard Deviation 0.2115
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0563 g/LStandard Deviation 0.16277
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0143 g/LStandard Deviation 0.17514
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.0979 g/LStandard Deviation 0.23505
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=118,104,79)-0.1094 g/LStandard Deviation 0.2186
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0773 g/LStandard Deviation 0.17876
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0802 g/LStandard Deviation 0.12774
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,105,78)-0.0596 g/LStandard Deviation 0.18186
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)-0.1374 g/LStandard Deviation 0.19296
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,78)-0.1395 g/LStandard Deviation 0.21823
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)-0.0864 g/LStandard Deviation 0.19814
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C3 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.1533 g/LStandard Deviation 0.21412
Secondary

Change From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/L

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0187 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0495
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0139 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06109
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=117,104,79)-0.0126 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0533
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,104,78)0.0020 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06441
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)0.0046 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06671
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,77)-0.0017 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05998
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)-0.0049 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0612
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.0079 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06431
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=117,104,79)-0.0071 g/LStandard Deviation 0.04819
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)0.0138 g/LStandard Deviation 0.12093
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,104,78)0.0069 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05476
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)0.0214 g/LStandard Deviation 0.06848
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,77)0.0064 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05432
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0170 g/LStandard Deviation 0.04048
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0089 g/LStandard Deviation 0.04479
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.0014 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05706
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Postdose (n=117,104,79)-0.0320 g/LStandard Deviation 0.04947
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Predose (n=120,105,80)-0.0230 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0433
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Postdose (n=119,102,84)-0.0220 g/LStandard Deviation 0.0271
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LWk 4 (n=118,104,78)-0.0020 g/LStandard Deviation 0.08212
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=115,97,81)-0.0142 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05015
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Post Retreatment (n=113,97,77)-0.0068 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05746
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LBL Pre Retreatment (n=115,98,83)0.0128 g/LStandard Deviation 0.12884
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Complement C4 Protein Level in g/LDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=113,99,82)-0.0168 g/LStandard Deviation 0.05079
Secondary

Change From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell Count

Simultaneous surface expression of CD16 and CD56 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of NK cell count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)30.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 103.95
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)25.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 88.56
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)53.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 125.06
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)13.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 89.73
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)29.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 96.16
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-72.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 92.33
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 91.95
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)4.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 72.79
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)41.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 109.6
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)8.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 81.85
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)34.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 94.33
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)17.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 73.16
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-60.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 93.63
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)4.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 74.48
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)8.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 104.11
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)15.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 80.56
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)15.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 82.02
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)28.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 86.61
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)29.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 95.65
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)39.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 90.37
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)38.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 101.55
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)39.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 87.49
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)40.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 90.44
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)24.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 81.95
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-2.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 84.49
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-83.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 84.98
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)19.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 82.51
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)-1.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 64.87
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)12.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 80.04
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)4.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 61.94
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)38.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 85.59
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)8.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 76.78
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD16+56+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)3.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 79.93
Secondary

Change From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell Count

Surface expression of CD3 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD3+ T cells was defined as 723-2737 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)41.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 599.47
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)3.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 548.8
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)33.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 517.7
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)78.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 511.99
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-24.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 517.71
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-1000.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 576.77
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-952.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 572.95
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)25.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 478.94
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)47.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 557.67
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-31.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 427.92
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-9.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 538.12
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)81.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 436.08
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-968.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 539.8
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)40.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 435.72
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-897.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 535.33
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-19.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 450.67
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)98.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 496.83
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)47.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 448.72
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)20.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 379.99
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)51.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 412.36
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)65.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 511.46
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)20.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 431.58
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)-12.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 421.39
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)-0.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 488.79
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-965.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 500.78
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-1065.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 513.18
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)-18.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 439.47
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)34.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 463.99
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-47.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 506.89
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)-23.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 429.32
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-12.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 502.2
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)-0.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 444.81
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD3+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-53.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 476.03
Secondary

Change From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell Count

Surface expression of CD4 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of T helper cell count. The normal range of CD4+ T cells was defined as 404-1612 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)42.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 446.65
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)7.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 418.85
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)14.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 375.97
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)72.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 395.29
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-24.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 377.76
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-744.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 454.55
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-732.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 449.99
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)24.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 355.22
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)38.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 419.78
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-16.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 330.2
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-8.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 399.48
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)64.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 349.16
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-738.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 393.02
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)38.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 306.89
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-696.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 392.37
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-4.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 345.57
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)84.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 370.64
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)37.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 312.15
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)13.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 276.55
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)39.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 305.18
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)39.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 356.89
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)15.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 320.98
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)-6.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 331.87
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)7.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 377.73
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-749.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 401.01
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-801.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 416.45
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)-8.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 337.42
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)36.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 359.92
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-33.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 407.52
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)-4.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 343.31
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 366.44
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)-0.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 336.19
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD4+ T Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-36.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 368.83
Secondary

Change From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell Count

Surface expression of CD8 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of cytotoxic T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD8+ T cells was defined as 220-1129 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)-3.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 183.31
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)-6.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 157.14
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)11.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 174.03
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)2.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 150.31
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-1.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 176.58
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-256.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 190.92
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-222.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 180.5
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)-1.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 140.66
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)3.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 163.2
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-17.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 127.14
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-6.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 168.67
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)18.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 117.74
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-229.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 183.97
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)2.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 167.12
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-201.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 176.3
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-18.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 128.02
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)16.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 148.14
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)14.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 160.58
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)7.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 139.69
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)11.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 144.92
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)22.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 197.32
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)2.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 143.87
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 40 (n=113,96,81)-8.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 112.07
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 28 (n=115,94,84)-7.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 130.24
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Postdose (n=116,102,86)-215.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 140.77
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountBL Postdose (n=115,106,82)-262.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 148.57
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 32 (n=116,99,85)-8.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 129.83
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountDay 15 Predose (n=122,107,84)-5.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 122.68
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 16 (n=117,105,88)-16.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 114.9
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 8 (n=121,105,87)-21.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 101.94
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 48 (n=110,96,80)-10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 150.14
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 24 (n=109,100,82)0.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 130.37
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange From BL in Peripheral CD8+ Cell CountWk 4 (n=122,105,84)-17.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 124.74
Secondary

Change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 48

FACIT-F scores were obtained from a 13 question self-administered participant questionnaire designed to measure the degree of fatigue experienced by participants in the previous 7 days. Participants responded to the questions using a value between 0 and 4, where 0 indicated not at all and 4 indicated very much. 11 of the 13 questions were negatively stated; indicating the higher the score of the participant's response, the greater their fatigue. These questions were calculated as 4 minus the participants' response, so that a higher score indicated an improvement in health. The scores for the 2 positively stated questions were not changed. The participants' responses were summed to result in an overall score, which are scored 0 to 52 (52 = highest level of functioning). A positive change from BL indicated improvement.

Time frame: BL, Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population. 9, 4, 2, and 1 participants were not evaluated for this outcome measure from the Low Dose, Escalated Dose, High Dose, and Decreased Dose groups, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 486.605 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1529
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 488.109 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2876
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 488.364 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8368
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexateChange in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 482.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.025
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexateChange in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score From BL at Week 486.192 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.0081
Secondary

Change in SF-36 Score From BL

SF-36 scores were obtained by scoring participants' responses to a 36 item questionnaire. SF-36 evaluated 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health from a range of 1 (better) to 5 (worst). The score for each section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). These 8 aspects were summarized as physical and mental component scores.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants analyzed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=115,107,85)5.173 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.516
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,87)9.815 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4616
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=112,108,85)4.941 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8122
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=115,100,87)6.470 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9736
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=115,106,85)8.180 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7621
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,86)6.607 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6356
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=111,108,85)5.517 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6418
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=114,102,88)6.529 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6382
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,85)5.951 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9256
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=114,101,86)6.445 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.0187
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,84)6.473 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1079
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=115,101,87)7.347 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.0663
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,865.786 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8861
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,88)7.382 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9376
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,86)6.796 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7057
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,86)9.088 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6821
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,86)4.979 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3225
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=111,108,85)6.261 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2243
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=114,102,88)6.318 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8785
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,88)7.807 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.188
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,85)4.571 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5182
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=114,101,86)6.350 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4357
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,86)7.479 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.235
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,84)5.994 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7472
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=115,106,85)7.914 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7302
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,86)6.495 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2488
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,87)9.323 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3335
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=115,101,87)7.493 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8317
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=112,108,85)4.996 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7345
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=115,100,87)6.340 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9124
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=115,107,85)4.138 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5165
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,867.070 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1663
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,84)6.385 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6101
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,86)4.939 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.0695
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,866.722 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8518
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=112,108,85)4.812 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1955
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=111,108,85)7.081 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4105
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,86)7.200 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3652
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=115,106,85)11.948 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2846
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=114,102,88)8.577 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9439
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLPhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=115,101,87)7.873 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6133
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=115,107,85)5.312 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1965
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=113,108,85)7.180 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.0934
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=116,102,88)7.713 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3046
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=116,101,87)12.712 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3962
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=114,101,86)7.142 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4771
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=115,100,87)6.241 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.4496
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateChange in SF-36 Score From BLVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=115,108,86)6.534 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8644
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR): Adjusted Mean Change From BL at Week 48

DAS28 was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 equals (=) \[0.56 multiplied by (\*) the square root (√) of TJC\] plus (+) \[0.28 \* √ of SJC\] + (0.70 \* the natural logarithm (ln) ESR in millimeters per hour (mm/h)\] + \[0.014 \* participant's global assessment of disease activity (GH)\]. DAS28-ESR ≥ 5.1 = high disease activity, DAS28-ESR less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28-ESR less than (\<) 2.6 = remission.

Time frame: BL, Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population. Two participants from the Low Dose group and 1 participant from the Escalated Dose group were not evaluated for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR): Adjusted Mean Change From BL at Week 48-2.13 score on a scale
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR): Adjusted Mean Change From BL at Week 48-2.19 score on a scale
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR): Adjusted Mean Change From BL at Week 48-2.42 score on a scale
p-value: 0.7127ANOVA
p-value: 0.1018ANOVA
Secondary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)

Cfirst values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.

Time frame: Days 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).

Population: ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants analyzed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)First Course (n=121,112,91)165 µg/mLStandard Deviation 42
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)Second Course (n=120,105,84)177 µg/mLStandard Deviation 41
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)First Course (n=121,112,91)163 µg/mLStandard Deviation 39
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)Second Course (n=120,105,84)345 µg/mLStandard Deviation 92
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)First Course (n=121,112,91)317 µg/mLStandard Deviation 94
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 1st Infusion of Rituximab (Cfirst) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Micrograms Per mL (µg/mL)Second Course (n=120,105,84)350 µg/mLStandard Deviation 86
Secondary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mL

Csecond values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.

Time frame: Days 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).

Population: ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLFirst course (n=130,116,90)194 µg/mLStandard Deviation 65
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLSecond course (n=121,107,88)209 µg/mLStandard Deviation 70
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLFirst course (n=130,116,90)190 µg/mLStandard Deviation 57
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLSecond course (n=121,107,88)380 µg/mLStandard Deviation 139
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLFirst course (n=130,116,90)373 µg/mLStandard Deviation 116
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateMaximum Observed Serum Concentrations Following the 2nd Infusion of Rituximab (Csecond) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in µg/mLSecond course (n=121,107,88)392 µg/mLStandard Deviation 123
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - Seronegative

Percentage of participants who were RF seropositive at BL who became RF seronegative over the course of the study. RF seropositive status was defined as RF ≥ 20 international units (IU) per mL. RF seronegative status was defined as RF \< 20 IU/mL.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 8, 24, and 48

Population: RF seropositive participants from the ITT-M2 population, n=number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 24 (n=83,79,56)22.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 8 (n=93,84,60)9.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 48 (n=85,78,60)30.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 24 (n=83,79,56)21.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 8 (n=93,84,60)9.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 48 (n=85,78,60)30.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 8 (n=93,84,60)5.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 48 (n=85,78,60)23.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Were Rheumatoid Factor (RF) - SeronegativeWk 24 (n=83,79,56)16.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70% Improvement Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 48

ACR70 was defined as an overall score of 70 in the ACRn calculation. The Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from BL of following 3 measures: TJC (68 joints), SJC (66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (VAS), HAQ, and CRP. If CRP missing, ESR was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. LOCF for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR70 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a ACR 70% Improvement Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 4820 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a ACR 70% Improvement Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 4819 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a ACR 70% Improvement Criteria (ACR70) Response at Week 4823 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) Titers

ANA titers were obtained by the following serum dilution schema: negative = negative, borderline = 1 diluted to (:) 40 or 1:80, and positive ≥ 1:160. The change categories were defined for the change from BL to Weeks 24 and 48 according to this schema. Negative to borderline was defined as any change from negative to borderline as no dilution is given for negative results. Negative to positive was defined as at least a two-fold positive change in dilution from BL. Borderline to negative was defined as any change from borderline to negative as no dilution is given for negative results. Borderline to positive was defined as at least a two-fold positive change in dilution from BL. Positive to borderline was defined as at least a two-fold negative change in dilution from BL. Positive to negative was defined as at least a two-fold negative change in dilution from BL. Unchanged was defined as any difference in dilution less than two-fold.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: SAP, n=number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)23.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)4.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Negative to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)7.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Unchanged (n=113,107,80,4,24)77.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Unchanged (n=112,102,86,4,22)64.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)5.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Positive (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Negative to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)2.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)14.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Positive (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Unchanged (n=112,102,86,4,22)66.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Unchanged (n=113,107,80,4,24)79.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)16.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Negative to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)2.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Negative to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)1.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)2.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Positive (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)24.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)3.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Positive (n=112,102,86,4,22)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)3.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Negative to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)7.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)11.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Positive (n=113,107,80,4,24)1.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)6.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)1.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Unchanged (n=113,107,80,4,24)72.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Negative to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)16.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Positive (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)7.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Unchanged (n=112,102,86,4,22)70.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Unchanged (n=113,107,80,4,24)75.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Negative to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)50.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Positive (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Unchanged (n=112,102,86,4,22)50.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Positive (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)25.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Negative to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Unchanged (n=113,107,80,4,24)95.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)4.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Negative to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)4.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)9.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Borderline (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Unchanged (n=112,102,86,4,22)86.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Positive to Negative (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Borderline to Positive (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Negative to Borderline (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 24, Borderline to Positive (n=113,107,80,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Change From BL by Category in Anti-Nuclear Antibodies (ANA) TitersWk 48, Positive to Negative (n=112,102,86,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 48

ACR50 was defined as an overall score of 50 in the ACRn calculation. Overall score defined as lowest percent improvement from BL of following 3 measures: TJC (68 joints), SJC (66 joints), and the 3rd lowest improvement achieved by at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core parameters: physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's global assessment of disease activity, participant's assessment of pain (VAS), HAQ, and CRP. If CRP missing, ESR was used. In order for improvements in the ACRn score to be expressed as a positive result, rather than the negative changes that improvements represent, the final ACRn results were multiplied by negative 1. LOCF for TJC/SJC, HAQ, CRP/ESR, VAS. If change in CRP incalculable, change in ESR used. ACR50 set to Non-Responder if ACRn missing.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 4839 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 4839 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With ACR 50% Improvement Criteria (ACR50) Response at Week 4848 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category

EULAR responses were categorized according to DAS28-ESR score. DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = good response, DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 or greater than (\>) 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -0.6 and ≥ -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR \> 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -1.2 = moderate response, DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 or \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 ≥ -0.6 = no response, DAS28-ESR \> 5.1 at Week 48 and a change from BL to Week 48 \< -0.6 and ≥ -1.2 or ≥ -0.6 = no response.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: ITT-M2 population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryModerate50.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryNone26.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryGood22.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryModerate55.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryNone27.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryGood16.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryNone10.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryGood26.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With a Response at Week 48 by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CategoryModerate62.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.5029Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.0495Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLN

The LLN for C3 protein was defined as \<0.9 grams per liter (g/L).

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=122,113,82)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)5.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)6.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNWeek 4 (n=121,113,83)3.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)3.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)6.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,84)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)3.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,82)4.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNWeek 4 (n=121,113,83)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)2.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,84)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=122,113,82)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)1.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,82)2.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)1.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)4.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,84)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,82)7.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)5.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)8.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNWeek 4 (n=121,113,83)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=122,113,82)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)7.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 3 (C3) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)3.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLN

The LLN of C4 protein was defined as \< 0.1 g/L.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=121,113,81)2.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)2.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNWk 4 (n=121,111,81)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,83)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)4.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,81)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNWk 4 (n=121,111,81)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,83)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=121,113,81)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,81)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Predose (n=124,115,83)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Predose (n=127,108,86)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Post Retreatment (n=118,103,81)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Postdose (n=122,109,87)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Post Retreatment (n=119,107,88)1.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNWk 4 (n=121,111,81)2.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Postdose (n=121,113,81)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNDay 15 Pre Retreatment (n=120,105,86)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Complement Component 4 (C4) Protein Level ≤ LLNBL Pre Retreatment (n=121,105,88)1.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)

Surface expression of CD19 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute B lymphocyte count. The LLN was defined as \< 80 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Days 1 and 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 16 (n=122,112,91,6,23)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 24 (n=114,107,87,4,24)7.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 1 Postdose (n=118,109,85,5,23)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 32 (n=122,107,88,5,24)2.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 4 (n=127,111,87,6,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 40 (n=118,103,84,4,23)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)5.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 28 (n=121,103,86,6,25)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 8 (n=126,111,90,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Predose (n=127,114,87,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 8 (n=126,111,90,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 24 (n=114,107,87,4,24)6.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 16 (n=122,112,91,6,23)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Predose (n=127,114,87,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 1 Postdose (n=118,109,85,5,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 40 (n=118,103,84,4,23)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)1.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 32 (n=122,107,88,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 4 (n=127,111,87,6,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 28 (n=121,103,86,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 16 (n=122,112,91,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 1 Postdose (n=118,109,85,5,23)2.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Predose (n=127,114,87,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 4 (n=127,111,87,6,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 8 (n=126,111,90,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 24 (n=114,107,87,4,24)4.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 28 (n=121,103,86,6,25)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 32 (n=122,107,88,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 40 (n=118,103,84,4,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)5.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 4 (n=127,111,87,6,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 1 Postdose (n=118,109,85,5,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Predose (n=127,114,87,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)50.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 40 (n=118,103,84,4,23)50.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 16 (n=122,112,91,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 28 (n=121,103,86,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 32 (n=122,107,88,5,24)20.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 8 (n=126,111,90,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 24 (n=114,107,87,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 1 Postdose (n=118,109,85,5,23)8.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 24 (n=114,107,87,4,24)12.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 4 (n=127,111,87,6,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 28 (n=121,103,86,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)13.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 32 (n=122,107,88,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Day 15 Predose (n=127,114,87,5,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 40 (n=118,103,84,4,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 16 (n=122,112,91,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Peripheral CD19+ B Cell Counts Above BL or the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN)Wk 8 (n=126,111,90,6,23)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) Titers

A participant was defined as being HACA positive if the HACA serum level was ≥ 5 relative units (RU) per mL and the physician comment read that participant was immunodepletable with rituximab.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: SAP, n=number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL (n=131,115,91,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 48 (n=115,104,87,4,22)4.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 24 (n=118,109,86,4,24)5.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 24 (n=118,109,86,4,24)7.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL (n=131,115,91,6,25)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 48 (n=115,104,87,4,22)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 24 (n=118,109,86,4,24)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL (n=131,115,91,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 48 (n=115,104,87,4,22)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL (n=131,115,91,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 48 (n=115,104,87,4,22)25.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 24 (n=118,109,86,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 24 (n=118,109,86,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersBL (n=131,115,91,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Human Anti-Chimeric Antibody (HACA) TitersWk 48 (n=115,104,87,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody Titers

A positive titer result to recall antigens was defined as a serum antibody level equal to or above the following protective levels: tetanus toxoid ≥ 0.1 IU/mL, influenza A \> 12 U/mL, influenza B \> 12 U/mL, and streptococcus (S.) pneumococcus ≥ 1.0 mg/L.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: SAP, n=number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 24 (n=118,107,83,4,24)72.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 24 (n=114,105,79,4,23)94.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Day 1 Predose (n=125,110,88,6,25)94.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Day 1 Predose (n=130,114,91,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 48 (n=116,105,89,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 48 (n=114,101,87,4,22)94.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Day 1 Predose (n=129,114,88,6,25)94.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 48 (n=112,100,88,4,21)94.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 24 (n=118,108,83,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Day 1 Predose (n=131,115,91,6,25)77.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 24 (n=114,107,82,4,24)93.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)71.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 48 (n=114,101,87,4,22)94.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 48 (n=116,105,89,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 24 (n=114,107,82,4,24)97.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Day 1 Predose (n=131,115,91,6,25)70.4 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Day 1 Predose (n=125,110,88,6,25)98.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 24 (n=114,105,79,4,23)94.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 48 (n=112,100,88,4,21)97.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 24 (n=118,107,83,4,24)69.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Day 1 Predose (n=129,114,88,6,25)94.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Day 1 Predose (n=130,114,91,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)66.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 24 (n=118,108,83,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 24 (n=114,105,79,4,23)96.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Day 1 Predose (n=125,110,88,6,25)89.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 24 (n=114,107,82,4,24)90.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 48 (n=112,100,88,4,21)89.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Day 1 Predose (n=130,114,91,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 24 (n=118,108,83,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 48 (n=116,105,89,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Day 1 Predose (n=131,115,91,6,25)75.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 24 (n=118,107,83,4,24)73.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)73.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Day 1 Predose (n=129,114,88,6,25)97.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 48 (n=114,101,87,4,22)96.6 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 48 (n=116,105,89,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Day 1 Predose (n=125,110,88,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 24 (n=118,107,83,4,24)75.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 24 (n=118,108,83,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)75.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Day 1 Predose (n=130,114,91,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 48 (n=114,101,87,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Day 1 Predose (n=129,114,88,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 48 (n=112,100,88,4,21)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 24 (n=114,107,82,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 24 (n=114,105,79,4,23)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Day 1 Predose (n=131,115,91,6,25)66.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 48 (n=116,105,89,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Day 1 Predose (n=129,114,88,6,25)96.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Day 1 Predose (n=125,110,88,6,25)92.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 24 (n=118,107,83,4,24)62.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 24 (n=114,107,82,4,24)91.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Day 1 Predose (n=130,114,91,6,25)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 48 (n=114,101,87,4,22)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersS. Pneumococcus, Wk 24 (n=118,108,83,4,24)100.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Wk 48 (n=118,105,89,4,22)54.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersTetanus Toxoid, Day 1 Predose (n=131,115,91,6,25)84.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersRubella, Wk 48 (n=112,100,88,4,21)95.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Positive Recall Antigen Antibody TitersVaricella, Wk 24 (n=114,105,79,4,23)95.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLN

The LLNs for total Ig, IgA, IgG, and IgM were defined as 6.75 grams per liter (g/L), 0.70 g/L, 65 g/L, and 0.40 g/L, respectively.

Time frame: BL, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT-M2 population, n=number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgM <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)7.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total Ig <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgG <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgA <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgM <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.8 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgA <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgG <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgA <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)1.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total Ig <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total Ig <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgG <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)2.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgM <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)13.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgG <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgA <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgG <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgA <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total Ig <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total Ig <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgG <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgM <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)7.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgA <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)1.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgM <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgM <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)13.3 percentage of participants
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total Ig <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.9 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgG <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total Ig <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)1.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgA <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)2.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgG <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)2.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgM <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)1.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total Ig <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgA <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)1.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgG <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgM <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)6.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total Ig <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgA <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)2.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgM <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)10.1 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgA <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgM <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgG <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total Ig <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgA <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgG <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total Ig <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgM <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgA <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total Ig <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgG <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgM <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgG <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgM <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)16.7 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgM <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)4.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgM <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)18.2 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total Ig <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)4.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgG <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgA <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total IgA <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 48, total IgG <LLN (n=117,105,89,4,22)4.5 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total IgA <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNBL, total Ig <LLN (n=131,113,93,6,25)0.0 percentage of participants
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Total Immunoglobin (Ig), IgA, IgG, and IgM Results Below the LLNWk 24, total Ig <LLN (n=117,109,83,4,24)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Peripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µL

Simultaneous surface expression of CD16 and CD56 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of NK cell count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)172.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 102.58
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)99.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 51.46
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)175.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 95.76
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)170.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 100.96
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)180.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 103.51
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)197.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 107.89
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)201.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 115.66
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)188.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 93.43
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)203.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 120.7
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)212.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 127.77
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)222.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 145.8
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)208.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 117.23
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)216.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 128.45
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)173.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 100.55
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)193.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 120.85
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)200.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 119.07
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)111.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 56.35
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)189.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 105.93
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)213.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 127.08
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)180.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 114.27
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)201.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 120.24
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)182.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 110.95
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)181.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 103.36
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)219.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 130.92
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)173.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 96.23
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)173.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 94.15
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)193.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 93.87
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)177.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 92.23
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)184.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 87.33
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)182.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 99.76
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)214.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 122.52
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)174.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 99.82
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)92.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 52.96
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)200.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 114.49
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)168.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 84.38
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD16+56+ Natural Killer (NK) Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)212.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 111.62
Secondary

Peripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µL

Simultaneous surface expression of CD19 and CD27 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of memory B lymphocyte count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)41.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 41.79
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)4.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.85
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)5.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.65
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)3.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.2
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)4.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.56
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)4.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.98
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)5.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.2
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)6.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.67
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)5.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.97
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)5.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.35
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)5.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.24
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)5.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.04
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)5.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.11
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)42.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 40.74
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)5.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.39
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)4.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.54
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)5.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.2
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)4.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.51
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)4.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.41
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)4.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.4
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)6.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.95
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)4.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.7
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)3.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.24
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)4.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.38
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)3.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.27
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)4.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.57
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)5.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.14
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)4.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.73
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)4.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.33
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)7.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.8
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)4.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.28
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)42.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 33.71
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)4.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.4
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)4.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.51
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)4.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.83
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)6.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 11.94
Secondary

Peripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD19 in the absence of CD27 expression was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of naive B lymphocyte count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)141.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 108.9
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)16.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 13.1
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)10.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.39
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)10.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.9
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.49
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)11.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.65
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)23.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 25.11
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)11.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 9.15
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)13.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 27.58
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)10.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.33
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)18.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 22.13
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)13.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 11.67
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)126.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 75
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)11.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.55
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)10.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.3
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)15.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 9.5
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.44
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)11.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.7
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)10.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.94
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)21.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 23.5
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)10.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.56
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)10.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)10.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.07
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=103,89,70)10.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,92,74)10.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.68
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=105,88,73)10.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.86
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=110,92,75)10.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.77
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=104,93,75)10.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 2.04
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=97,91,67)20.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 20.89
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=99,84,67)11.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 7.59
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,98,75)179.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 169.38
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,72)19.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 21.92
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,86,72)13.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 19.34
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,99,75)10.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.07
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD19+CD27 Negative (-) B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=96,87,70)15.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 18.69
Secondary

Peripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD20 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of mature and memory B lymphocyte count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: The safety analysis population (SAP) = ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)184.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 135.29
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.58
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)0.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.76
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)1.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 7.35
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)0.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.21
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)0.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.64
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)2.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.02
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)20.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 53.56
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)1.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 12.14
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)5.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 33.42
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)1.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.44
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)12.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 26.89
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)4.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 10.7
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)173.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 99.18
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)3.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.67
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)1.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.82
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.49
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)4.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 42.09
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)1.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 7.94
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)0.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.74
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)15.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 25.98
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.5
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.63
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)1.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 4.93
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)0.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.39
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)0.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.74
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)1.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.88
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)0.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.86
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)0.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.15
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)13.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 23.96
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)1.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 9.11
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)218.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 158.16
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)0.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.65
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)4.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 20.59
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)0.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 0.57
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD20+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)8.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 22.12
Secondary

Peripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD22 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of mature lymphocyte count.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)188.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 135.54
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)24.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 20.59
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)5.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.33
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)1.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.92
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)4.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.61
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)3.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.14
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)5.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.6
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)20.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 32.29
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)4.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 13.16
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)8.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 33.71
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)3.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.92
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)14.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 26.88
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)6.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 10.77
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)177.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 98.69
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)6.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 9.83
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)4.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.07
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)23.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 17.39
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)8.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 41.87
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)3.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.05
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)5.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.03
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)17.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 25.81
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)3.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.44
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)1.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 1.77
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)3.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.58
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=104,91,70)2.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 3.23
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=110,95,72)4.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 7.73
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=107,88,74)3.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 8.51
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=111,92,73)3.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.03
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=105,93,75)3.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 5.94
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=99,92,67)16.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 25.7
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=100,86,68)4.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 10.01
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=113,97,75)221.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 158.82
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=105,94,71)29.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 31.51
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=101,85,72)8.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 21.96
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=112,101,75)5.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 6.3
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD22+ B Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=100,89,73)9.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 22.24
Secondary

Peripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD3 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of absolute T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD3+ T cells was defined as 723-2737 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)237.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 133.09
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)1231.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 585.6
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)302.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 149.8
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)1283.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 620.88
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)1262.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 643.6
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)1262.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 651.88
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)1318.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 650.01
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)1256.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 580.95
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)1280.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 622.21
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)1282.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 587.75
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)1332.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 658.82
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)1300.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 670.68
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)1297.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 602.07
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)1223.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 505.72
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)1286.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 522.82
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)1293.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 559.38
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)350.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 220.23
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)1251.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 511.15
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)1193.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 505.68
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)263.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 167.58
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)1317.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 629.87
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)1229.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 565.79
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)1317.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 605.57
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)1292.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 589.57
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)1315.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 598.66
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)1319.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 569.57
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)226.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 122.02
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)1356.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 604.98
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)343.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 184.44
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)1264.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 508.87
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)1296.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 534.19
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)1260.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 562.16
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)1314.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 511.18
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)1327.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 590.38
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)1312.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 509.52
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD3+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)1306.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 508.49
Secondary

Peripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD4 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of T helper cell count. The normal range of CD4+ T cells was defined as 404-1612 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)900.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 500.42
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)130.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 81.65
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)920.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 468.01
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)165.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 92.96
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)880.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 456.63
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)903.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 514.94
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)889.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 436.84
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)969.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 553.17
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)936.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 539.94
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)939.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 515.71
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)908.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 478.4
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)908.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 477.46
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)889.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 378.08
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)876.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 398.85
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)937.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 450.52
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)870.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 373.17
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)145.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 86.22
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)949.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 462.71
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)901.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 383.73
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)930.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 424.72
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)918.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 434.08
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)859.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 373.69
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)196.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 124.38
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)911.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 404.4
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)196.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 132.65
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)917.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 431.93
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)950.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 439.04
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)950.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 458.27
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)910.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 472.95
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)948.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 418.09
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)942.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 422.23
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)953.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 462.18
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)129.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 75.17
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)967.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 496.62
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)991.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 504.25
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD4+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)952.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 487.98
Secondary

Peripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µL

Surface expression of CD8 was assessed by FACS analysis as a marker of cytotoxic T lymphocyte count. The normal range of CD8+ T cells was defined as 220-1129 cells/µL.

Time frame: BL, Day 15, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 28, 32, 40, and 48

Population: SAP, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)361.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 231.86
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)106.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 70.64
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)358.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 196.37
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)134.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 79.79
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)348.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 202.67
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)357.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 199.77
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)365.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 220.35
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)359.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 189.24
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)359.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 208.91
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)372.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 213.84
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)367.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 215.21
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)365.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 218.78
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)357.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 210.51
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)352.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 228.43
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)377.8 cells/µLStandard Deviation 227.32
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)353.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 221.13
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)118.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 104.11
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)367.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 239.39
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)386.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 260.49
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)360.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 232.26
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)382.0 cells/µLStandard Deviation 241.73
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)330.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 197.94
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)152.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 130.11
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)372.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 211.86
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Postdose (n=121,108,89)145.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 95.64
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 4 (n=127,111,87)341.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 164.61
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 32 (n=122,107,88)359.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 169.32
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 8 (n=126,111,90)342.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 159.31
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 16 (n=122,112,91)344.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 169.67
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 24 (n=113,107,85)363.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 184.04
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 40 (n=118,103,84)356.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 166.19
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Predose (n=127,110,90)364.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 181.22
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLBL Postdose (n=118,109,85)98.1 cells/µLStandard Deviation 70.68
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 28 (n=120,101,86)357.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 182.9
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLDay 15 Predose (n=127,114,87)359.7 cells/µLStandard Deviation 174.12
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral CD8+ T Cell Count in Cells/µLWk 48 (n=114,103,83)355.5 cells/µLStandard Deviation 178.67
Secondary

Peripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)

Surface expression of CD19 was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis as a marker of absolute B lymphocyte count.

Time frame: BL

Population: ITT-M2 population. 7, 8, 3, 1, and 2 participants were not analyzed for this outcome measure from the Low Dose, Escalated Dose, High Dose, Placebo, and Decreased Dose groups, respectively.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)183.6 cells/µLStandard Deviation 142.31
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)168.9 cells/µLStandard Deviation 94.98
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)205.3 cells/µLStandard Deviation 171.91
Rituximab/Placebo + MethotrexatePeripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)318.2 cells/µLStandard Deviation 174.62
Rituximab Decreased Dose + MethotrexatePeripheral Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 19 Positive (+) B Cell Count at BL in Cells Per Microliter (Cells/µL)235.4 cells/µLStandard Deviation 112.56
Secondary

Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Score

SF-36 scores were obtained by scoring participants' responses to a 36 item questionnaire. SF-36 evaluated 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health from a range of 1 (better) to 5 (worst). The score for each section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). These 8 aspects were summarized as physical and mental component scores.

Time frame: BL, Week (Wk) 24 and 48

Population: ITT-M2 population, n (number) = number of participants analyzed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)40.765 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5247
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)43.506 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5661
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: BL (n=127,116,90)31.013 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5785
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,87)46.905 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5538
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,88)44.529 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7796
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)39.709 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2218
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)41.318 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.2879
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: BL (n=127,116,91)28.826 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5523
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)42.366 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1916
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=118,101,89)41.138 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3191
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,86)34.286 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1702
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: BL (n=128,116,90)38.443 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4207
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: BL (n=128,115,90)31.657 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.5764
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=118,103,89)35.291 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.7203
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: BL (n=128,116,91)38.253 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2709
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: BL (n=127,116,90)34.850 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5814
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: BL (n=127,115,90)33.719 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9238
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: BL (n=128,116,91)34.948 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6147
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,86)37.694 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8439
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,87)39.665 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.1752
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)45.000 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7039
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,89)38.599 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9559
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=118,102,88)40.429 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7266
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,87)39.644 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8338
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=118,102,88)39.644 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7514
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: BL (n=127,116,90)30.864 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7546
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,87)39.805 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2346
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,86)36.977 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6325
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,87)46.251 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8299
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,89)39.086 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.623
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: BL (n=128,116,91)33.341 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3817
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=118,101,89)41.555 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9892
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)40.737 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4537
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)42.235 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.0464
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: BL (n=128,116,91)38.096 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5184
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: BL (n=128,116,90)38.307 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9908
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)44.577 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1008
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)38.875 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.3432
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)43.209 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7315
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,88)44.447 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9128
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: BL (n=127,116,91)28.223 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.873
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)40.836 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6176
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,86)33.929 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3543
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=118,103,89)35.318 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.668
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: BL (n=127,115,90)32.217 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.9819
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: BL (n=127,116,90)34.692 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3289
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,87)37.406 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.279
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: BL (n=128,115,90)30.815 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5633
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,87)39.928 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4008
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,87)47.462 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3098
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: BL (n=128,115,90)30.319 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2328
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)42.736 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7885
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreBodily Pain Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)43.105 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4713
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: BL (n=127,116,90)34.025 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8533
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,87)39.050 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4236
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreGeneral Health Score: Wk 48 (n=118,101,89)40.427 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5756
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: BL (n=128,116,90)38.405 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1899
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 24 (n=118,108,87)43.955 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6107
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreMental Health Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,88)43.640 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5868
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: BL (n=127,116,91)29.896 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.7899
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=116,109,86)37.323 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5428
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=118,103,89)38.547 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6649
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: BL (n=127,115,90)32.167 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6914
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)46.206 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.0519
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreEmotional Role Score: Wk 48 (n=118,102,88)39.800 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.0611
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: BL (n=127,116,90)32.309 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.4529
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 24 (n=117,109,86)39.027 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.905
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScorePhysical Role Score: Wk 48 (n=119,102,89)40.362 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1419
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: BL (n=128,116,91)35.812 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2109
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 24 (n=118,109,87)42.869 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8028
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreSocial Functioning Score: Wk 48 (n=119,103,89)43.613 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3599
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateShort-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) ScoreVitality Score: BL (n=128,116,91)39.832 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2209
Secondary

Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in Days

t1/2 values were estimated from rituximab serum concentrations by non-compartmental methods using the software WinNonlin Enterprise Version 5.2.

Time frame: Days 1 and 15 (before infusion and 30 minutes following infusion) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 26, 28, 32, 40, and 48 or early withdrawal and at Weeks 24 and 48 of safety follow-up (1 year period following the completion of study treatment).

Population: ITT-M2 population, n = number of participants assessed for the given parameter at the specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysFirst Course (n=120,109,85)16.04 daysStandard Deviation 5.52
Rituximab Low Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysSecond Course (n=116,99,85)19.62 daysStandard Deviation 6.05
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysFirst Course (n=120,109,85)16.75 daysStandard Deviation 6.64
Rituximab Escalated Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysSecond Course (n=116,99,85)22.13 daysStandard Deviation 6.48
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysFirst Course (n=120,109,85)17.67 daysStandard Deviation 6
Rituximab High Dose + MethotrexateTerminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2) in the 1st and 2nd Courses of Treatment in DaysSecond Course (n=116,99,85)21.42 daysStandard Deviation 6.32

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026