Skip to content

Study Comparing Etanercept With Usual DMARD Therapy in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Asia Pacific Region

A Randomized, Open-Label Study in the Asia-Pacific Region Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept With Usual DMARD Therapy in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00422227
Enrollment
300
Registered
2007-01-15
Start date
2007-06-30
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2010-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of etanercept with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 16 weeks in the Asia Pacific region.

Interventions

DRUGEtanercept , Methotrexate

* Etanercept: 25 mg twice weekly over 16 weeks, SC * Methotrexate: \> 7.5 mg/week and no more than 25 mg/week, PO

DRUGMethotrexate; sulfasalazine; hydroxychloroquine;leflunomide

* Methotrexate: at least 7.5 mg/wk and not more than 25 mg/wk.;PO * Sulfasalazine: Start treatment w/500 mg daily for 1 wk, thereafter increase dose by 1 tab each wk to a max of 3 g/day;PO * Hydroxychloroquine:400 mg daily in divided dose, may be reduced to 200 mg. Max: 6.5 mg/kg/day * Leflunomide: Initially, loading dose 100 mg daily for 3 days. Maintenance: 20 mg daily

Sponsors

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of RA * Currently receiving an adequate dose of methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of RA * Active RA at time of screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

* Previous or current treatment with etanercept (ETN), other tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, or other biologic agents * Concurrent treatment with a DMARD, other than MTX, at screening * Receipt of any DMARD, other than MTX, within 3 months before screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks16 weeksACR-N = the lowest of 3 values (percent change in the number of swollen joints, percent change in the number of tender joints, and median of the other 5 measures in the ACR core data set). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The ACR-N AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the ACR-N multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was presented as %-weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)Week 16Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16Week 16Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good ResponseWeek 16EULAR Response Criteria DAS28) improvement at week 16. Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders were participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of \>0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of \>3.7. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2Week 16Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesWeek 16Response includes improvement in tender or swollen joints as well as 20 percent improvement in three of the other five criteria. Required: ≥ 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in tender joint count ≥ 20% , 50% or 70% improvement in swollen joint count and at least 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5:Patient pain assessment , Patient global assessment ,Physician global assessment, Patient self-assessed disability.
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16The Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant's disease activity is estimated over the last two - three days by the physician; A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity. The Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant assesses overall arthritis activity. A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity.
Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16The duration of morning stiffness on the day of examination should be determined by asking the following two questions: When did you awaken this morning? When were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Duration of morning stiffness is equal to the time elapsed between the above two times in minutes; If none is present enter 0, If morning stiffness is still continuing, please indicate average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days. If stiffness persists the entire day 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) should be recorded.
Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16VAS, participant indicates by marking a vertical line at an appropriate position through a horizontal line. The length of the line measures from left (in mm) and the value (in mm) is recorded. General Health VAS, in general how would you rate your heath over the last 2-3 weeks, 0mm equals very well and 100mm equals extremely bad. Pain VAS: indicate the amount of pain experienced during the last 2-3 days, 0 mm equals no pain and 100 mm equals pain as bad as it can be. Fatigue VAS: how fatigued or tired have you been over the last week, range =No Fatigue - Extremely Fatigued.
Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 16Participant's assessment of pain - A horizontal pain visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) is used to assess the participants current level of pain; 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain. Swollen joint count - ACR swollen joint count, an assessment of 28 joints. Joints are classified as either swollen or not swollen.

Countries

Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited in the Asia-Pacific Region from June 2007 to October 2008.

Pre-assignment details

Screening of subjects occurred up to 2 weeks before randomization followed by a treatment phase of 16 weeks and a 2-week safety follow up.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ETN/MTX
Etanercept (ETN) was administered subcutaneous (SC) bi-weekly (BIW) (eg, on Monday and Thursday, Tuesday and Friday, or Wednesday and Saturday). Each dose of ETN was administered as 1 SC injection.
197
DMARD/MTX
Methotrexate (MTX) was taken orally once weekly on the same day of the week (as a single dose or 2 divided doses on the same day) at the same dose subjects were taking at the time of screening. The dose and administration of usual disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy followed the approved local label or recommendations. Subjects took commercially available MTX and usual DMARD therapy.
103
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event38
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up13
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject04

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicETN/MTXDMARD/MTXTotal
Age Continuous48.38 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98
48.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25
48.43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72
Sex: Female, Male
Female
180 Participants91 Participants271 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants12 Participants29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 19771 / 103
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 1973 / 103

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks

ACR-N = the lowest of 3 values (percent change in the number of swollen joints, percent change in the number of tender joints, and median of the other 5 measures in the ACR core data set). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The ACR-N AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the ACR-N multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was presented as %-weeks.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ETN/MTXChange From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks434.83 Units on a scaleStandard Error 29.18
DMARD/MTXChange From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks289.54 Units on a scaleStandard Error 36.11
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses

Response includes improvement in tender or swollen joints as well as 20 percent improvement in three of the other five criteria. Required: ≥ 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in tender joint count ≥ 20% , 50% or 70% improvement in swollen joint count and at least 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5:Patient pain assessment , Patient global assessment ,Physician global assessment, Patient self-assessed disability.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 2078.87 Percentage of Participants
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 5056.70 Percentage of Participants
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 7019.07 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 2058.16 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 5034.69 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 ResponsesACR 707.14 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: ACR 20p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: ACR 50p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: ACR 70p-value: 0.009Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)

Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)Low Disease (DAS28 <3.2)39.09 Percentage of Participants
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)Remission (DAS28 <2.6)15.74 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)Low Disease (DAS28 <3.2)18.45 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)Remission (DAS28 <2.6)7.77 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: Low Disease (DAS28 \<3.2)p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Comparison: Remission (DAS28 \<2.6)p-value: 0.069Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response

EULAR Response Criteria DAS28) improvement at week 16. Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders were participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of \>0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of \>3.7. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response87.82 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response73.79 Percentage of Participants
p-value: 0.003Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2

Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2≥0.691.37 Percentage of Participants
ETN/MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2≥1.282.74 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2≥0.678.64 Percentage of Participants
DMARD/MTXPercentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2≥1.266.02 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: ≥0.6p-value: 0.003Fisher Exact
Comparison: ≥1.2p-value: 0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16

Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).

Time frame: Week 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 1638.32 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 1627.46 Percent change
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness

The duration of morning stiffness on the day of examination should be determined by asking the following two questions: When did you awaken this morning? When were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Duration of morning stiffness is equal to the time elapsed between the above two times in minutes; If none is present enter 0, If morning stiffness is still continuing, please indicate average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days. If stiffness persists the entire day 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) should be recorded.

Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 463.85 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 1279.76 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 873.41 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 1680.55 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 254.92 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 1646.77 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 216.43 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 433.22 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 837.35 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning StiffnessWeek 1252.76 Percent change
Comparison: Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales

VAS, participant indicates by marking a vertical line at an appropriate position through a horizontal line. The length of the line measures from left (in mm) and the value (in mm) is recorded. General Health VAS, in general how would you rate your heath over the last 2-3 weeks, 0mm equals very well and 100mm equals extremely bad. Pain VAS: indicate the amount of pain experienced during the last 2-3 days, 0 mm equals no pain and 100 mm equals pain as bad as it can be. Fatigue VAS: how fatigued or tired have you been over the last week, range =No Fatigue - Extremely Fatigued.

Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 1650.49 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 1248.46 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 430.61 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 1654.42 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 227.59 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 220.90 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 1242.10 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 430.87 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 434.73 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 835.92 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 838.57 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 1239.65 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 842.97 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 1646.92 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 221.14 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 1630.04 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 28.88 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 422.78 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 827.86 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 1230.26 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesGeneral Health - Week 1633.89 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 29.99 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 422.98 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 829.14 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 1233.97 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesPain - Week 1636.45 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 26.63 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 419.00 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 821.82 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog ScalesFatigue - Week 1228.65 Percent change
Comparison: General Health Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Pain Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Fatigue Week 16p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts

Participant's assessment of pain - A horizontal pain visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) is used to assess the participants current level of pain; 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain. Swollen joint count - ACR swollen joint count, an assessment of 28 joints. Joints are classified as either swollen or not swollen.

Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 234.17 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 446.11 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 855.48 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 1265.65 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 1668.99 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 238.59 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 449.33 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 859.91 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 1267.97 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 1673.83 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 844.19 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 227.68 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 221.32 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 436.71 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 1656.32 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 849.71 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 427.72 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 1255.55 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsSwollen Joints - Week 1250.48 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint CountsPainful Joints - Week 1657.31 Percent change
Comparison: Painful Joints at Week 16p-value: 0.014ANCOVA
Comparison: Swollen Joints at Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments

The Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant's disease activity is estimated over the last two - three days by the physician; A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity. The Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant assesses overall arthritis activity. A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity.

Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 1255.00 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 230.40 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 439.58 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 845.86 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 1662.05 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 221.84 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 428.94 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 834.92 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 1243.18 Percent change
ETN/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 1650.76 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 826.08 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 1238.67 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 27.24 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 211.83 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 1630.55 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 422.81 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 419.22 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 835.41 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsSubject Global Assessment - Week 1230.10 Percent change
DMARD/MTXPercent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global AssessmentsPhysician Global Assessment - Week 1645.04 Percent change
Comparison: Physician Global Assessment Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Subject Global Assessment Week 16p-value: <0.001ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 24, 2026