Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of etanercept with usual disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 16 weeks in the Asia Pacific region.
Interventions
* Etanercept: 25 mg twice weekly over 16 weeks, SC * Methotrexate: \> 7.5 mg/week and no more than 25 mg/week, PO
* Methotrexate: at least 7.5 mg/wk and not more than 25 mg/wk.;PO * Sulfasalazine: Start treatment w/500 mg daily for 1 wk, thereafter increase dose by 1 tab each wk to a max of 3 g/day;PO * Hydroxychloroquine:400 mg daily in divided dose, may be reduced to 200 mg. Max: 6.5 mg/kg/day * Leflunomide: Initially, loading dose 100 mg daily for 3 days. Maintenance: 20 mg daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of RA * Currently receiving an adequate dose of methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of RA * Active RA at time of screening and baseline
Exclusion criteria
* Previous or current treatment with etanercept (ETN), other tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, or other biologic agents * Concurrent treatment with a DMARD, other than MTX, at screening * Receipt of any DMARD, other than MTX, within 3 months before screening
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks | 16 weeks | ACR-N = the lowest of 3 values (percent change in the number of swollen joints, percent change in the number of tender joints, and median of the other 5 measures in the ACR core data set). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The ACR-N AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the ACR-N multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was presented as %-weeks. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission) | Week 16 | Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm). |
| Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16 | Week 16 | Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response | Week 16 | EULAR Response Criteria DAS28) improvement at week 16. Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders were participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of \>0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of \>3.7. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response. |
| Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2 | Week 16 | Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | Week 16 | Response includes improvement in tender or swollen joints as well as 20 percent improvement in three of the other five criteria. Required: ≥ 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in tender joint count ≥ 20% , 50% or 70% improvement in swollen joint count and at least 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5:Patient pain assessment , Patient global assessment ,Physician global assessment, Patient self-assessed disability. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 | The Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant's disease activity is estimated over the last two - three days by the physician; A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity. The Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant assesses overall arthritis activity. A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 | The duration of morning stiffness on the day of examination should be determined by asking the following two questions: When did you awaken this morning? When were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Duration of morning stiffness is equal to the time elapsed between the above two times in minutes; If none is present enter 0, If morning stiffness is still continuing, please indicate average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days. If stiffness persists the entire day 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) should be recorded. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 | VAS, participant indicates by marking a vertical line at an appropriate position through a horizontal line. The length of the line measures from left (in mm) and the value (in mm) is recorded. General Health VAS, in general how would you rate your heath over the last 2-3 weeks, 0mm equals very well and 100mm equals extremely bad. Pain VAS: indicate the amount of pain experienced during the last 2-3 days, 0 mm equals no pain and 100 mm equals pain as bad as it can be. Fatigue VAS: how fatigued or tired have you been over the last week, range =No Fatigue - Extremely Fatigued. |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 | Participant's assessment of pain - A horizontal pain visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) is used to assess the participants current level of pain; 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain. Swollen joint count - ACR swollen joint count, an assessment of 28 joints. Joints are classified as either swollen or not swollen. |
Countries
Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited in the Asia-Pacific Region from June 2007 to October 2008.
Pre-assignment details
Screening of subjects occurred up to 2 weeks before randomization followed by a treatment phase of 16 weeks and a 2-week safety follow up.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| ETN/MTX Etanercept (ETN) was administered subcutaneous (SC) bi-weekly (BIW) (eg, on Monday and Thursday, Tuesday and Friday, or Wednesday and Saturday). Each dose of ETN was administered as 1 SC injection. | 197 |
| DMARD/MTX Methotrexate (MTX) was taken orally once weekly on the same day of the week (as a single dose or 2 divided doses on the same day) at the same dose subjects were taking at the time of screening. The dose and administration of usual disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy followed the approved local label or recommendations. Subjects took commercially available MTX and usual DMARD therapy. | 103 |
| Total | 300 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 3 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | ETN/MTX | DMARD/MTX | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | 48.38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.98 | 48.52 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.25 | 48.43 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 180 Participants | 91 Participants | 271 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 17 Participants | 12 Participants | 29 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 66 / 197 | 71 / 103 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 6 / 197 | 3 / 103 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks
ACR-N = the lowest of 3 values (percent change in the number of swollen joints, percent change in the number of tender joints, and median of the other 5 measures in the ACR core data set). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The ACR-N AUC was calculated using the trapezoidal rule as the ACR-N multiplied by the duration of the assessment period (in weeks) and was presented as %-weeks.
Time frame: 16 weeks
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks | 434.83 Units on a scale | Standard Error 29.18 |
| DMARD/MTX | Change From Baseline in Adjusted Mean of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-N) Area Under Curve (AUC) Over 16 Weeks | 289.54 Units on a scale | Standard Error 36.11 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses
Response includes improvement in tender or swollen joints as well as 20 percent improvement in three of the other five criteria. Required: ≥ 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in tender joint count ≥ 20% , 50% or 70% improvement in swollen joint count and at least 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5:Patient pain assessment , Patient global assessment ,Physician global assessment, Patient self-assessed disability.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 20 | 78.87 Percentage of Participants |
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 50 | 56.70 Percentage of Participants |
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 70 | 19.07 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 20 | 58.16 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 50 | 34.69 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 20, 50, and 70 Responses | ACR 70 | 7.14 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission)
Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission) | Low Disease (DAS28 <3.2) | 39.09 Percentage of Participants |
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission) | Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | 15.74 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission) | Low Disease (DAS28 <3.2) | 18.45 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 <3.2 (Low Disease Activity) and <2.6 (Remission) | Remission (DAS28 <2.6) | 7.77 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response
EULAR Response Criteria DAS28) improvement at week 16. Good response was defined as \>1.2 improvement in DAS from Baseline and DAS attained during follow-up of ≤2.4. Non-responders were participants with improvement of ≤0.6 or participants with improvement of \>0.6 but ≤1.2 and DAS attained during follow-up of \>3.7. Remaining participants were classified as moderate. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.
Time frame: Week 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response | 87.82 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants Achieving European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Moderate or Good Response | 73.79 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2
Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2 | ≥0.6 | 91.37 Percentage of Participants |
| ETN/MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2 | ≥1.2 | 82.74 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2 | ≥0.6 | 78.64 Percentage of Participants |
| DMARD/MTX | Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Improvement of ≥0.6 and ≥1.2 | ≥1.2 | 66.02 Percentage of Participants |
Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16
Disease Activity Score 28 based on 28 Joints (DAS28) is the calculation of DAS28: DAS28 = 0.56 sqrt (28 painful joint count) + 0.28 sqrt (28 swollen joint count) + 0.70 (ln erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) + 0.014 (General Health) (GH). GH = Subject general health visual analog scale (0-10 mm).
Time frame: Week 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16 | 38.32 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Week 16 | 27.46 Percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness
The duration of morning stiffness on the day of examination should be determined by asking the following two questions: When did you awaken this morning? When were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Duration of morning stiffness is equal to the time elapsed between the above two times in minutes; If none is present enter 0, If morning stiffness is still continuing, please indicate average of duration of stiffness over the past 3 days. If stiffness persists the entire day 1440 minutes (24h x 60 minutes) should be recorded.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 4 | 63.85 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 12 | 79.76 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 8 | 73.41 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 16 | 80.55 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 2 | 54.92 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 16 | 46.77 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 2 | 16.43 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 4 | 33.22 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 8 | 37.35 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Duration (Minutes) of Morning Stiffness | Week 12 | 52.76 Percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales
VAS, participant indicates by marking a vertical line at an appropriate position through a horizontal line. The length of the line measures from left (in mm) and the value (in mm) is recorded. General Health VAS, in general how would you rate your heath over the last 2-3 weeks, 0mm equals very well and 100mm equals extremely bad. Pain VAS: indicate the amount of pain experienced during the last 2-3 days, 0 mm equals no pain and 100 mm equals pain as bad as it can be. Fatigue VAS: how fatigued or tired have you been over the last week, range =No Fatigue - Extremely Fatigued.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 16 | 50.49 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 12 | 48.46 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 4 | 30.61 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 16 | 54.42 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 2 | 27.59 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 2 | 20.90 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 12 | 42.10 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 4 | 30.87 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 4 | 34.73 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 8 | 35.92 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 8 | 38.57 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 12 | 39.65 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 8 | 42.97 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 16 | 46.92 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 2 | 21.14 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 16 | 30.04 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 2 | 8.88 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 4 | 22.78 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 8 | 27.86 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 12 | 30.26 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | General Health - Week 16 | 33.89 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 2 | 9.99 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 4 | 22.98 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 8 | 29.14 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 12 | 33.97 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Pain - Week 16 | 36.45 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 2 | 6.63 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 4 | 19.00 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 8 | 21.82 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in General Health, Pain, and Fatigue, Visual Analog Scales | Fatigue - Week 12 | 28.65 Percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts
Participant's assessment of pain - A horizontal pain visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) is used to assess the participants current level of pain; 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain. Swollen joint count - ACR swollen joint count, an assessment of 28 joints. Joints are classified as either swollen or not swollen.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 2 | 34.17 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 4 | 46.11 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 8 | 55.48 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 12 | 65.65 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 16 | 68.99 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 2 | 38.59 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 4 | 49.33 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 8 | 59.91 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 12 | 67.97 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 16 | 73.83 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 8 | 44.19 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 2 | 27.68 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 2 | 21.32 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 4 | 36.71 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 16 | 56.32 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 8 | 49.71 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 4 | 27.72 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 12 | 55.55 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Swollen Joints - Week 12 | 50.48 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Painful and Swollen Joint Counts | Painful Joints - Week 16 | 57.31 Percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments
The Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant's disease activity is estimated over the last two - three days by the physician; A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity. The Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity: The participant assesses overall arthritis activity. A zero (0) means no disease activity and a ten (10) means extreme disease activity.
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Population: The mITT population, defined as all randomly assigned subjects who received at least 1 dose of ETN or MTX in the ETN group or 1 dose of usual DMARD therapy medication or MTX in the usual DMARD therapy group and had at least 1 postbaseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 12 | 55.00 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 2 | 30.40 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 4 | 39.58 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 8 | 45.86 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 16 | 62.05 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 2 | 21.84 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 4 | 28.94 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 8 | 34.92 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 12 | 43.18 Percent change |
| ETN/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 16 | 50.76 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 8 | 26.08 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 12 | 38.67 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 2 | 7.24 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 2 | 11.83 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 16 | 30.55 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 4 | 22.81 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 4 | 19.22 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 8 | 35.41 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Subject Global Assessment - Week 12 | 30.10 Percent change |
| DMARD/MTX | Percent Change From Baseline in Physician And Subject Global Assessments | Physician Global Assessment - Week 16 | 45.04 Percent change |