Skip to content

Beta-Cell Function and Sitagliptin Trial (BEST)

A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Assessing the Effect of Sitagliptin on the Preservation of Beta-Cell Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00420511
Acronym
BEST
Enrollment
21
Registered
2007-01-11
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2009-09-30
Last updated
2012-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes, beta-cell function, sitagliptin, intensive insulin therapy

Brief summary

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by progressive deterioration in the function of the pancreatic beta-cells, which are the cells that produce and secrete insulin (the hormone primarily responsible for the handling of glucose in the body). The investigators propose a double-blind, randomized controlled pilot study comparing the effect of sitagliptin (a novel anti-diabetic drug with beta-cell protective potential) versus placebo, on the preservation of beta-cell function over one year in patients with T2DM on metformin, the first-line agent for the treatment of T2DM (ie. the study groups will be (i) sitagliptin and metformin versus (ii) placebo and metformin). This study may demonstrate an important beta-cell protective capacity of sitagliptin. Hypothesis: In patients with T2DM on metformin, treatment with the DPP-IV inhibitor sitagliptin will preserve pancreatic beta-cell function.

Detailed description

Medications currently used in the treatment of T2DM have not been shown to modify the progressive decline in beta-cell function that occurs over time. Recent evidence, however, suggests that a new class of anti-diabetic medications, called dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, may be able to protect beta cells and hence alter the natural history of T2DM. We thus wish to study the effect of sitagliptin (a DPP-IV inhibitor) on the preservation of beta-cell function in patients with T2DM randomized to either (i) sitagliptin and metformin or (ii) placebo and metformin.

Interventions

DRUGSitagliptin

sitagliptin 100 mg once a day

DRUGPlacebo

placebo once a day

DRUGmetformin

metformin 1000 mg twice a day (bid) by mouth (po)

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women between the ages of 30 and 75 inclusive 2. Physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes on 0-2 oral hypoglycemic agents 3. Negative for anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase (anti-GAD\_ antibodies (to rule out Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adults (LADA) 4. A1c at screening between 6.5% and 9% inclusive if on no oral hypoglycemic agents or 6.0% and 9.0% inclusive if on 1-2 oral hypoglycemic agents

Exclusion criteria

1. Current insulin therapy 2. Type 1 diabetes or secondary forms of diabetes 3. Any major illness with a life expectancy of \< 5 years or that may interfere with the patient's participation in the study 4. Involvement in any other study requiring drug therapy 5. Renal dysfunction as evidenced by serum creatinine \>/= 136 umol/L for males or \>/= 124 umol/L for females or abnormal creatinine clearance (\< 60 ml/min by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula) 6. Hepatic disease considered to be clinically significant (includes jaundice, chronic hepatitis, or previous liver transplant) or transaminases \> 2.5 times the upper limit of normal 7. Excessive alcohol consumption, defined as \> 14 alcoholic drinks per week for males and \> 9 alcoholic drinks per week for females 8. Pregnancy or unwillingness to use reliable contraception. Women should not be planning pregnancy for the duration of the study. Reliable contraception includes: birth control pill, intra-uterine device, abstinence, tubal ligation, partner vasectomy, or condoms with spermicide. Any women who miss a menstrual period or think that they may be pregnant must have a pregnancy test as soon as possible 9. History of serious arrhythmia or atrioventricular block on baseline electrocardiogram 10. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 180 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mm Hg) 11. Unwillingness to undergo multiple daily insulin injection therapy for 4 weeks 12. Unwillingness to perform capillary blood glucose monitoring at least 4 times per day during intensive insulin therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Preservation of Beta-cell Function Measured by Area-under-the-curve (C-peptide/Glucose)/HOMA-IR48 weeksArea-under-the-C-peptide-curve (AUCCpep) and area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUCgluc) from 0 to 240 minutes during meal tests were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Insulin resistance was assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Beta-cell function was assessed using the ratio of total AUCCpep to AUCgluc divided by HOMA-IR (AUCCpep/gluc/HOMA-IR), a measure of insulin secretion in the context of ambient insulin sensitivity, analogous to the disposition index and adaptation index. Higher AUCCpep/gluc/HOMA-IR is indicative of better beta-cell function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insulinogenic Index Divided by HOMA-IR at 48 Weeks48 weeksInsulinogenic index was calculated as the incremental change in insulin from 0 to 30 minutes divided by the incremental change in glucose over the same period of time. Insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IR provides an additional measure of beta-cell function. A higher value indicates better beta-cell function
Fasting Blood Glucose at 48 Weeks48 weeks
Area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUCglucose) on Meal Test at 1 Year1 year
Time to Loss of Glycemic Control1 year
Proportion of Patients Achieving Sustained Normoglycemia Off Medication at 1-week Post-insulin Therapy1 year

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics at the Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes between February 2007 and October 2008.

Pre-assignment details

Participants underwent prerandomization phase of 4-8 weeks of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) consisting of basal detemir and premeal insulin aspart. Only participants who achieved fasting glucose \<7.0 mmol/L 1 day after completing IIT were randomized to either sitagliptin 100 mg once daily or matching placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily and metformin 1000 mg twice a day (bid) by mouth po
10
Placebo
Matching placebo once daily and metformin 1000 mg twice a day (bid) by mouth (po)
11
Total21

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSitagliptinPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous61.3 years60.8 years60.9 years
Area-Under-The-Curve (C-peptide/glucose) / HOMA-IR114.8 index of beta-cell function126.0 index of beta-cell function120.0 index of beta-cell function
Body Mass Index34.3 kg/m^232.7 kg/m^232.7 kg/m^2
Duration of diabetes2.8 years3.5 years3.0 years
HbA1c6.2 percent glycosylated hemoglobin6.1 percent glycosylated hemoglobin6.1 percent glycosylated hemoglobin
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants2 participants8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
4 participants9 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 101 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Preservation of Beta-cell Function Measured by Area-under-the-curve (C-peptide/Glucose)/HOMA-IR

Area-under-the-C-peptide-curve (AUCCpep) and area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUCgluc) from 0 to 240 minutes during meal tests were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. Insulin resistance was assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). Beta-cell function was assessed using the ratio of total AUCCpep to AUCgluc divided by HOMA-IR (AUCCpep/gluc/HOMA-IR), a measure of insulin secretion in the context of ambient insulin sensitivity, analogous to the disposition index and adaptation index. Higher AUCCpep/gluc/HOMA-IR is indicative of better beta-cell function.

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SitagliptinPreservation of Beta-cell Function Measured by Area-under-the-curve (C-peptide/Glucose)/HOMA-IR80.4 index of beta-cell function
PlaceboPreservation of Beta-cell Function Measured by Area-under-the-curve (C-peptide/Glucose)/HOMA-IR71.2 index of beta-cell function
Secondary

Area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUCglucose) on Meal Test at 1 Year

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Fasting Blood Glucose at 48 Weeks

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SitagliptinFasting Blood Glucose at 48 Weeks6.9 mmol/l
PlaceboFasting Blood Glucose at 48 Weeks6.7 mmol/l
Secondary

Insulinogenic Index Divided by HOMA-IR at 48 Weeks

Insulinogenic index was calculated as the incremental change in insulin from 0 to 30 minutes divided by the incremental change in glucose over the same period of time. Insulinogenic index divided by HOMA-IR provides an additional measure of beta-cell function. A higher value indicates better beta-cell function

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
SitagliptinInsulinogenic Index Divided by HOMA-IR at 48 Weeks3.9 index of beta-cell function
PlaceboInsulinogenic Index Divided by HOMA-IR at 48 Weeks1.8 index of beta-cell function
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Achieving Sustained Normoglycemia Off Medication at 1-week Post-insulin Therapy

Time frame: 1 year

Secondary

Time to Loss of Glycemic Control

Time frame: 1 year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026