Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Conditions
Keywords
relapsing, oral, remitting, multiple sclerosis
Brief summary
To determine if treatment with BG00012 can decrease the number of MS relapses during a certain time period. To determine if, over time, BG00012 treatment can decrease the number of certain types of brain lesions commonly seen in MS patients and slow down the time it takes for the disease to get worse. The purpose of this study is also to determine the safety of BG00012 and how well it is tolerated. Another goal is to see what effect BG00012 may have on tests and evaluations used to assess MS.
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: * Unless otherwise specified, to be eligible to participate in this study, candidates must meet the following eligibility criteria at the time of the randomization: * Must have a confirmed diagnosis of RRMS according to McDonald criteria #1-4. * Must have a baseline EDSS between 0.0 and 5.0, inclusive. * Must have relapsing-remitting disease course. Key
Exclusion criteria
* Unless otherwise specified, candidates will be excluded from study entry if any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Subjects Relapsed | 2 years | A protocol-defined relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection that lasted at least 24 hours, and were separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. All protocol-defined relapses were evaluated by an independent neurolgic evaluation committee. The proportion of subjects with a relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was based on the time-to-first-relapse survival distribution. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions | 2 years | The number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at 2 years that developed in each subject compared to baseline assessed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The estimates of mean T2 lesion count were calculated from a negative binomial regression model adjusted for region and baselineT2 lesion volume |
| Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted Lesions | 2 years | The number of Gd-enhancing lesions was assessed using brain MRI scans following administration of gadolinium, a contrast agent. The mean number of Gd-enhancing lesions at 2 years was the average of the number of lesions at 2 years in a treatment group. |
| Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 2 years | Note: This outcome measure represents the categorical analysis for the previously listed secondary outcome measure Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions |
| Annualized Relapse Rate | 2 years | A protocol-defined relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection that lasted at least 24 hours, and were separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. All protocol-defined relapses were evaluated by an independent neurologic evaluation committee. The adjusted annualized relapse rate was calculated from a negative binomial regression model, adjusted for baseline EDSS (≤ 2.0 vs. \>2.0), age (\<40 versus ≥40 years), region, and the number of relapses in the 1 year prior to enrollment. |
| Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Progression of Disability Assessed Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) | 2 years | The EDSS is based on a standardized neurological examination and focuses on symptoms that commonly occur in MS. EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (death due to MS). Disability progression was defined as ≥ 1.0 point increase in subjects with a baseline EDSS of ≥1.0, or a ≥1.5 point increase in subjects with a baseline EDSS = 0, and required that the increase from baseline was confirmed ≥12 weeks later. The proportion of subjects with confirmed (12-week) disability progression was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was based on the time-to-first-progression survival distribution. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Croatia, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, India, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Virgin Islands
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were screened and enrolled at 198 investigational sites in 28 countries.
Pre-assignment details
From screening, 1237 eligible subjects were equally randomized. Of these, 1234 subjects received at least one dose of study treatment and comprised the intent-to-treat (ITT) and safety populations.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received two placebo capsules orally three times daily (TID) | 408 |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) Participants received two 120 mg BG00012 capsules orally twice daily (BID) and two placebo capsules orally once daily (QD) | 410 |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) Participants received two 120 mg BG00012 capsules orally three times daily (TID) | 416 |
| Total | 1,234 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 22 | 40 | 36 |
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 9 | 11 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Other-Unspecified | 21 | 14 | 18 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 31 | 22 | 19 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 38.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.14 | 38.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.11 | 38.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.85 | 38.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.03 |
| Mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score | 2.48 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.241 | 2.40 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.29 | 2.36 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.188 | 2.42 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.24 |
| Mean number of gadolinium (Gd) enhancing lesions | 1.6 Number of Gd enhancing lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.45 | 1.2 Number of Gd enhancing lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 | 1.2 Number of Gd enhancing lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 | 1.4 Number of Gd enhancing lesions STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.64 |
| Mean number of relapses within the past 12 months | 1.3 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67 | 1.3 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67 | 1.3 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 | 1.3 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65 |
| Mean number of relapses within the previous 3 years | 2.5 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.56 | 2.5 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.44 | 2.4 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27 | 2.5 Number of relapses STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.43 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 306 Participants | 296 Participants | 306 Participants | 908 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 102 Participants | 114 Participants | 110 Participants | 326 Participants |
| Time since first multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis | 5.8 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.78 | 5.6 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.39 | 5.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.29 | 5.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.49 |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 384 / 408 | 394 / 410 | 393 / 416 | 787 / 826 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 86 / 408 | 74 / 410 | 65 / 416 | 139 / 826 |
Outcome results
Proportion of Subjects Relapsed
A protocol-defined relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection that lasted at least 24 hours, and were separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. All protocol-defined relapses were evaluated by an independent neurolgic evaluation committee. The proportion of subjects with a relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was based on the time-to-first-relapse survival distribution.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: The analysis was based on the ITT population, defined as all subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Among subjects who switched to an alternative therapy for multiple sclerosis, all the data before the switch were used for the analysis. In all other subjects, all relapses were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Proportion of Subjects Relapsed | 0.461 Proportion of subjects,confirmed relapse |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Proportion of Subjects Relapsed | 0.270 Proportion of subjects,confirmed relapse |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Proportion of Subjects Relapsed | 0.260 Proportion of subjects,confirmed relapse |
Annualized Relapse Rate
A protocol-defined relapse was defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection that lasted at least 24 hours, and were separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding relapse. All protocol-defined relapses were evaluated by an independent neurologic evaluation committee. The adjusted annualized relapse rate was calculated from a negative binomial regression model, adjusted for baseline EDSS (≤ 2.0 vs. \>2.0), age (\<40 versus ≥40 years), region, and the number of relapses in the 1 year prior to enrollment.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: The ITT population was defined as all subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication. Among subjects who switched to an alternative therapy for multiple sclerosis, all the data before the switch were used for the analysis. In all other subjects, all relapses were included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Annualized Relapse Rate | 0.364 Relapses per year |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Annualized Relapse Rate | 0.172 Relapses per year |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Annualized Relapse Rate | 0.189 Relapses per year |
Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted Lesions
The number of Gd-enhancing lesions was assessed using brain MRI scans following administration of gadolinium, a contrast agent. The mean number of Gd-enhancing lesions at 2 years was the average of the number of lesions at 2 years in a treatment group.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Of the 540 subjects included in the MRI cohort, 469 (165 placebo,152 BG00012 BID,152 BG00012 TID) had post-baseline Gd-enhancing lesion data \& were included in the analysis. Missing data before the use of alternative MS medications \& visits after patients switched to alternative MS medications were imputed with the use of a constant rate assumption
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted Lesions | 1.8 Number of lesions | Standard Deviation 4.15 |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted Lesions | 0.1 Number of lesions | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted Lesions | 0.5 Number of lesions | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions
The number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at 2 years that developed in each subject compared to baseline assessed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The estimates of mean T2 lesion count were calculated from a negative binomial regression model adjusted for region and baselineT2 lesion volume
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Of the 540 subjects included in the MRI cohort, 469 subjects (165 placebo, 152 BG00012 BID, 152 BG00012 TID) had post-baseline T2 data and were included in the analysis. Missing data before the use of alternative MS medications and visits after patients switched to alternative MS medications were imputed with the use of a constant rate assumption.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions | 17.0 Number of lesions |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions | 2.6 Number of lesions |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions | 4.4 Number of lesions |
Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions
Note: This outcome measure represents the categorical analysis for the previously listed secondary outcome measure Number of Gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Of the 540 subjects included in the MRI cohort, 469 (165 placebo,152 BG00012 BID,152 BG00012 TID) had post-baseline Gd-enhancing lesion data \& were included in the analysis. Missing data before the use of alternative MS medications \& visits after patients switched to alternative MS medications were imputed with the use of a constant rate assumption
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 3-4 lesions | 15 Number of subjects |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 2 lesions | 13 Number of subjects |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | >=5 lesions | 18 Number of subjects |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 1 lesion | 16 Number of subjects |
| Placebo | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 0 lesions | 103 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 0 lesions | 142 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 1 lesion | 8 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 2 lesions | 1 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 3-4 lesions | 0 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | >=5 lesions | 1 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | >=5 lesions | 7 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 3-4 lesions | 3 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 0 lesions | 130 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 2 lesions | 2 Number of subjects |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Number of Subjects With Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhancing Lesions | 1 lesion | 10 Number of subjects |
Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Progression of Disability Assessed Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
The EDSS is based on a standardized neurological examination and focuses on symptoms that commonly occur in MS. EDSS scores range from 0.0 (normal) to 10.0 (death due to MS). Disability progression was defined as ≥ 1.0 point increase in subjects with a baseline EDSS of ≥1.0, or a ≥1.5 point increase in subjects with a baseline EDSS = 0, and required that the increase from baseline was confirmed ≥12 weeks later. The proportion of subjects with confirmed (12-week) disability progression was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was based on the time-to-first-progression survival distribution.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: The analysis population consisted of the ITT population (all subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study medication) who had a baseline EDSS assessment. Analysis were based on all observed data. Onset of disability progression must begin before a subject switched to alternative MS medication.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Progression of Disability Assessed Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) | 0.271 Proportion of participants |
| BG00012 240 mg Twice Daily (BID) | Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Progression of Disability Assessed Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) | 0.164 Proportion of participants |
| BG00012 240 mg 3 Times Daily (TID) | Proportion of Subjects Experiencing Progression of Disability Assessed Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) | 0.177 Proportion of participants |